Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Urban Planning
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-01-2010, 03:19 PM
 
34 posts, read 156,130 times
Reputation: 78

Advertisements

Arlington Texas comes to mind. I lived there for about 4 months, and was shocked to find out that although the city has a population of 380,000, public transportation is non-existent. Whenever I would mention this fact to residents they didn’t see the point of public transportation, thought everyone should just by a car. City officials could care less about mass transit either, and were much happier to use the city’s tax dollars for building stadiums and other attractions, then becoming a member of DART (Dallas Area Rapid Transit) or TRE (Trinity Railway Express).

Any other cities out there with anti-mass transit mentalities
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-01-2010, 11:41 PM
 
Location: On the Rails in Northern NJ
12,380 posts, read 26,844,597 times
Reputation: 4581
Arlington,Texas is the Largest us city without Public Transit which is retarded thinking these days. Majority of the anti-Transit cities are in the south , some Great plain cities. Collage towns and cities are exempt for that type of thinking mostly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-02-2010, 02:09 AM
 
Location: The Lakes
2,368 posts, read 5,103,722 times
Reputation: 1141
Lexington, KY has nothing but a very sorry excuse for a bus system
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-02-2010, 07:12 AM
 
22,768 posts, read 30,722,558 times
Reputation: 14745
everywhere i've ever lived, it was just common local knowledge that mass transit was for poor people only. it was seen as akin to welfare.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-02-2010, 07:30 AM
 
Location: The City
22,378 posts, read 38,892,470 times
Reputation: 7976
Quote:
Originally Posted by le roi View Post
everywhere i've ever lived, it was just common local knowledge that mass transit was for poor people only. it was seen as akin to welfare.

I think that is only in cities with bad systems...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-02-2010, 08:19 AM
 
Location: Cincinnati
860 posts, read 1,356,882 times
Reputation: 1130
Cincinnati has had trouble getting its mass transit in gear for the last decade, but we're finally building the first line of our light rail . Honestly, I've seen the craziest, most ignorant reasons on why we shouldn't have mass transit here. Although Cincy was built around streetcars, the city now is completely car dependent and so many people are unaware of how mass transit works, and the effects it's had on most cities. Funny that the removal of Cincy's mass transit coincided with its population loss.

In 2002, there was a movement to have lightrail/subway throughout most of Hamilton County. This was proposed during the same time the Minneapolis system was proposed. They went trhough with theirs; However in Cincy, it was voted down because of a .5 cent tax increase. That's right, half a cent. At the time, the head of our transit authority (SORTA) was against mass transit and did alot to steer people away from embracing the proposed routes.

It was implied that the federal government rated the proposed plan as one of the worst in the nation, come to find out the goverment doesn't even rate transit systems. SORTA also promised alternatives to curb excessive traffic (such as adding diamond and hov lanes on our highways) Too bad none of our highways are equipt to be able to handle HOV lanes, and in the 8 years since there's not been any mention of it at all.

Lately there has been massive investment in our city core, and mass transit has to be incorporated to give us an edge on raising property values and decreasing surface lots downtown. People here are so backwards they don't want it because "it will travel through an undesirable area that will only serve degenerates" . But if they could only see the bigger picture and the long-run, the once blighted neighborhoods will be fully restored within the next decade.

For any city to be truely succesful and reach its peak, mass tarnsit must be incorporated. It's a basic amenity of an urban environment and helps create a vision for what a city can potentially be.

For more info on the Cincy streetcars visit here:
www.cincystreetcar.com

City-data forum:
https://www.city-data.com/forum/cinci...streetcar.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-02-2010, 08:37 AM
k_s
 
Location: Texas
405 posts, read 896,351 times
Reputation: 205
Quote:
Originally Posted by itwhite View Post
Arlington Texas comes to mind. I lived there for about 4 months, and was shocked to find out that although the city has a population of 380,000, public transportation is non-existent. Whenever I would mention this fact to residents they didn’t see the point of public transportation, thought everyone should just by a car. City officials could care less about mass transit either, and were much happier to use the city’s tax dollars for building stadiums and other attractions, then becoming a member of DART (Dallas Area Rapid Transit) or TRE (Trinity Railway Express).

Any other cities out there with anti-mass transit mentalities
I knew Arlington would be in here before I even opened the thread. I went to college in Arlington and still live in DFW. From what I understand, the mentality came about when Vandergriff was mayor.

Thankfully, the city has been taking baby steps toward a solution. The TRE has a stop near 360 and Trinity (which is technically Fort Worth, but is still close enough to Arlington). There are also shuttles going around the Entertainment District during events.

I really think the Metroplex would be MUCH more connected if Arlington would get on the ball with mass transit.

Quote:
Originally Posted by le roi View Post
everywhere i've ever lived, it was just common local knowledge that mass transit was for poor people only. it was seen as akin to welfare.
Quote:
Originally Posted by kidphilly View Post
I think that is only in cities with bad systems...
That was a common theme that I heard living in Arlington. Many people thought that the "riff raff" would be the only ones riding, as that group can't afford cars. As if the lack of public transportation has made Arlington into an affluent suburb
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-02-2010, 09:57 AM
 
22,768 posts, read 30,722,558 times
Reputation: 14745
Quote:
Originally Posted by k_s View Post
That was a common theme that I heard living in Arlington. Many people thought that the "riff raff" would be the only ones riding, as that group can't afford cars. As if the lack of public transportation has made Arlington into an affluent suburb

the thing is, when you have a poorly designed transportation system, this becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.

if people have to walk across 110 degree blacktop parking lots, and cross 6-lane roads of 45 MPH, for example, then they're going to choose to drive instead.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-02-2010, 10:04 AM
 
Location: from houstoner to bostoner to new yorker to new jerseyite ;)
4,084 posts, read 12,680,004 times
Reputation: 1974
When you say Arlington is without mass transit, do you mean they don't even operate city buses?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-02-2010, 10:14 AM
k_s
 
Location: Texas
405 posts, read 896,351 times
Reputation: 205
Quote:
Originally Posted by le roi View Post
the thing is, when you have a poorly designed transportation system, this becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.

if people have to walk across 110 degree blacktop parking lots, and cross 6-lane roads of 45 MPH, for example, then they're going to choose to drive instead.
The city was built the way it was because of that mentality. I'm sure that if mass transit had been implemented, the city would have made improvements to the existing infrastructure.

Quote:
Originally Posted by neotextist View Post
When you say Arlington is without mass transit, do you mean they don't even operate city buses?
That's correct.

There are a few "specialty" shuttles, though (for elderly/handicapped citizens, for students at UTA [not sure if this shuttle still operates], and for visitors in the Entertainment District [but I've only seen them on game days]).

Other than that, you get around by car.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Urban Planning
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top