Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Urban Planning
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-31-2012, 07:16 PM
 
10,224 posts, read 19,223,538 times
Reputation: 10895

Advertisements

There's "low income" and there's "income from illegal activities and government handouts only". Enormous difference between the way neighborhoods inhabited by those two look.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-31-2012, 07:43 PM
 
4,019 posts, read 3,955,543 times
Reputation: 2938
what impresses me about european cities is how they are able to keep their buildings looking so new. most of which are hundreds of years old. these old buildings look like they could have been built last year. despite being very old, don't look run down by any means. compared to a typical modern single-family home in california, after just 30 or 40 years starts to resemble a crackhouse in appearance and is ready for demolition.









Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2012, 09:15 PM
 
10,224 posts, read 19,223,538 times
Reputation: 10895
Don't kid yourself, those pristine-looking buildings require continuous maintenance to keep looking like that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2012, 10:08 PM
 
4,019 posts, read 3,955,543 times
Reputation: 2938
I'm sure there's some maintenance involved to keep them looking pristine, applying a fresh coat of paint from time to time, etc. But the mere fact they're still standing after all this time is a testament to how solidly constructed and well-crafted they are. Not just a few random buildings but entire medieval cities and towns were built like that, with this incredible attention to detail, not only to quality control but also to the aesthetics. The artistry and form of the buildings is valued just as highly as the function.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-01-2012, 11:58 AM
 
Location: Bellingham, WA
9,726 posts, read 16,749,721 times
Reputation: 14888
The whole thing about trashy houses that need maintenance and/or repairs while a car with $2000 chrome wheels sits in the driveway...ever consider that maybe those people are renting that house and their landlord is the one who doesn't take care of the place?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-01-2012, 02:38 PM
 
Location: Vallejo
21,868 posts, read 25,173,926 times
Reputation: 19093
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lamplight View Post
The whole thing about trashy houses that need maintenance and/or repairs while a car with $2000 chrome wheels sits in the driveway...ever consider that maybe those people are renting that house and their landlord is the one who doesn't take care of the place?
Ever consider that they're still renting it because it's a $100 less a month because the chrome rims are how they'd rather spend their money than living in non-slumlord housing? I mean, it's one thing if that's all you can afford... but that's clearly not the case since they leave $2000 sitting out on the street every night.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-01-2012, 06:35 PM
 
10,224 posts, read 19,223,538 times
Reputation: 10895
[quote=cisco kid;24551344]I'm sure there's some maintenance involved to keep them looking pristine, applying a fresh coat of paint from time to time, etc.[quote]
Not just that, but masonry work, structural reinforcement, etc. And the particular town you posted, Rothenburg, is a showpiece. With the kind of work they put into keeping it up, you could make a clapboard shack survive a few hundred years. Or more. For instance, there's Dresden:


That's the Frauenkirch, finished in 1743.... but wait, it was bombed flat by the Allies in 1945. And left to rot by the Communists until the 1990s. When I saw it, it basically looked like this

They rebuilt it from the rubble. Literally.

Rothenburg was also bombed in WWII, though not to nearly the same extent. So while it's certainly true that masonry will last longer than wood, it's also true that heroic efforts are made to preserve and restore many of those old buildings.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-01-2012, 07:37 PM
 
Location: Bellingham, WA
9,726 posts, read 16,749,721 times
Reputation: 14888
Quote:
Originally Posted by Malloric View Post
Ever consider that they're still renting it because it's a $100 less a month because the chrome rims are how they'd rather spend their money than living in non-slumlord housing? I mean, it's one thing if that's all you can afford... but that's clearly not the case since they leave $2000 sitting out on the street every night.
Sure, but that has nothing to with whether or not their landlord takes care of the place properly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-01-2012, 08:31 PM
 
10,224 posts, read 19,223,538 times
Reputation: 10895
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lamplight View Post
Sure, but that has nothing to with whether or not their landlord takes care of the place properly.
For the landlord, it's a business proposition. It only makes sense to take care of the property above the bare minimum if that will pay off in the form of increased rent. In some neighborhoods, it doesn't matter how much you maintain or improve the property, you won't make any more in rent... so it's foolish to bother.

Also the kinds of landlords willing to own rental properties in such places tend to fit the stereotype of a sl*mlord... but that's largely because a more conscientious landlord can't make it financially there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-01-2012, 09:30 PM
 
Location: Planet Earth
3,921 posts, read 9,133,578 times
Reputation: 1673
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chango View Post
At first this might seem to be a no-brainer, but it is a huge issue when it comes to planning and creating a pleasant urban environment. Lots of cash makes for attractive developments, but why do less exclusive areas have to be so damned ugly?

This is where the US has really messed up. Why is it a poor or average income area in Europe can still look like a classic painting:

But in the US we get garbage like this:

Why does "poor" equal "ugly" in this country? It seems to me it doesn't have to be that way...
The first and second one don't look too great. In the second one, I thought all those windows were boarded up. The third one looks good, though.

For the Oklahoma one, the second and third don't look bad at all.

Quote:
Originally Posted by goldenchild08 View Post
This is not exactly true for all low-income areas in America. Many places that are or were very dangerous look very deceivingly middle class. Many California ghettos look very pleasant, suburban and middle class. This is because upper middle class White folks used to live in these places before a few Black people moved in and they said "There goes the neighborhood!" and up and left and took all the jobs with them. There aren't even any stereotypical signs of blight in many dangerous California ghettos. Can you believe this place used to be the epicenter of a city officially dubbed as the murder capital of the United States in 1992?! There are many neighborhoods in the richest counties in America that look similar to this:
Yeah. I heard about Compton and some parts of Long Beach, and I checked them out on Google Maps and they didn't look bad at all. The same thing for some areas in Florida.

Quote:
Originally Posted by GlobalistPotato View Post
The mobile homes aren't a good comparison, because they aren't part of a town, but they do house poorer people.
Camden, NJ. Most exaggerated example of a poor=ugly kind of city
Damn. I remember seeing an area in Baltimore where all the homes were boarded up like that, but at least they were all intact.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Urban Planning

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top