Quote:
Originally Posted by ccdscott
Realistically, from an urban planner's perspective, what can be done? I mean, you can't keep building freeways and obviously, if you propose major transit upgrades one way or another some part of the political spectrum will hate it and not vote for it.
So what's the alternative? Sit back while quality of life and traffic just completely suck the life out of doing anything? Or is it at that point already?
If I'm Atlanta, I'm looking at all that growth (transit wise) in those similarly sized Texas cities (Houston and Dallas) and wondering where exactly are we headed...
|
A zillion things can be done.
1. When find yourself in a hole -stop digging. No more belt ways, complete moratorium on annexations into
Rational policy is put in place.
2. Zoning has to change everywhere, immediately. Introduce mixed-use neighborhoods; upzone upzone upzone. Replace Euclidean zoning with form-based code. Build densisty from the core out.
4. If Atlanta is like most US cities it has developed a ton of regs over the years that make development in the core a huge obstacle. Strip these away. The great cities in the world developed without the. They do more harm than good.
3. Reconfigure streets to be complex, multi-modal and friendly to uses other than cars.
4. Rediscover the grid. Look at every available opportunity to re-stitch the grid together.
6. Turn the one-way streets into two-way streets.
5. Atlanta likely has a master plan, but it's likely decades out of date. Put together a new one, base it on cities that are doing the right things.
6. Fire the transportation department. Every last person. They will be the biggest impediment to change going forward.
7. Reinvest transportation dollars away from big roads projects. Do little road diets, bike lanes, cycle tracks, all over the central core.
8. After they've done the above - consider making large investments into high capacity transit.
9. Tell every developer of very new greenfield site that not one acre of their land will ever be annexed, nor city services extended to their residents unless: the site is built to a grid and well connected to surrounding communities, and access points provided for connections to future communities, and that developer must develop densely enough that he can demonstrate to the satisfaction of a neutral third party that the tax revenue generated will be sufficient to cover all future infrastructure maintenance costs past the first life cycle.
That's just a brief start