Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Ventura County
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which area has the best Price/Value ratio ?
Ventura 2 22.22%
Oxnard 4 44.44%
Thousand Oaks 1 11.11%
Camarillow 2 22.22%
Voters: 9. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-06-2010, 08:46 PM
 
28 posts, read 111,020 times
Reputation: 13

Advertisements

Good point....but you also said the prices are still too high. Another thing thats happening is banks are hoarding up the houses and are not putting the foreclosure properties in market. People are getting to live in their houses for free for months and in some places more than a year after they stop paying their monthly mortgage payments. I guess banks are waiting for the real estate market to settle before they let their inventory on the market otherwise they are shooting themselves in the foot.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-12-2010, 06:18 PM
 
Location: SoCal
5 posts, read 8,441 times
Reputation: 10
All the people I know who accurately predicted the bubble, are in agreement that we are NOT at the bottom in most places. Those that are at the bottom will likely stall for a bit. There have been blips that indicate we are recovering but it doesn't make sense to buy one in the Camarillo/Ventura area right now. As mentioned above, there are still a lot of foreclosures that will come in the next couple years and you don't want to buy next to one of them. Then the bank sells the house for pennies on the dollar and they are the comp to yours and just cut your value by 30%...oh and an investor bougth it and they can rent it for less than you so you have to lower your rate. It's too risky for someone who plans to move in 3 years anyway.

Good luck!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-14-2010, 11:11 PM
 
Location: Living on the Coast in Oxnard CA
16,289 posts, read 32,350,015 times
Reputation: 21891
My only opinion now is with the interest rates. They are low now. Not that this is a guarentee that myself or anyone else will get the best rate. What will happen to the rates? Traditionally when rates are low prices are high. Right now it appears that prices are low and rates are low. Maybe the people that set the rates are in agreement that prices are still too high and they are keeping rates down to get people to buy. That could be another indicator that prices are still up there. One factor is if you have to finance a place you will need to determine the best time to buy based on the cost of money. A $250,000 home at 4.89% is cheaper per month than a $200,000 home with a 8.25% interest rate. It all goes toward what will happen in the future. One thing we know for now is the cost of the money. We don't know what that will be in the future. Then again we don't even know if we can get the best rate in town anyway.

For me I am talking long term and not someone that is looking to sell within the short term. I think you can do better with your money somewhere else than in housing if the plan is to sell in a 3 year period.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-26-2010, 02:50 PM
 
191 posts, read 586,558 times
Reputation: 79
Quote:
Originally Posted by hilgi View Post
Wait two years to buy, housing in CA is still overvalued. All bubbles go back to the prices where they started. This bubble most likly started in 2000, some say 1996. 2000 prices would be ok.
A lot has changed since 1996 or 2000. Supply, demand and interest rates have completely changed. Pointing back to a year and saying it will retrace to that level is just plain ignorant.

We all have to live somewhere. If you can buy for the same or less than renting, buy.

This was not true in the bubble years. Renting was almost always cheaper.

As far as affordability goes, I look at median incomes for a given area vs. median prices. In many zip codes, these are tracking nicely. In others, they remain out of whack. Of course, the mix of homes available for sale (along with the # of rental units) will skew the number both directions - when paired with equivalent rent, you get a pretty good barometer of value.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Ventura County

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:57 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top