Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > District of Columbia > Washington, DC
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-07-2015, 07:48 AM
 
Location: DC
6,848 posts, read 7,988,579 times
Reputation: 3572

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by paytonc View Post
The housing code was rewritten last year, and that section was struck because it duplicates the construction code. However, I think this building was built (right behind DCRA's offices) before last May, in which case the code says:

"Each habitable room shall have a glass area transmitting natural light equivalent to that which would be transmitted by a clear glass area at least equal to one tenth (1/10) of the floor area served"

The bedrooms in question have a clear glass area within the walls to the other rooms, which seems like it'd cover 10% of the floor area.
It's probably been the subject of litigation but I'd question where a window into another room meets the requirement for "natural light." Note that 14-502 contains no notice that it is superseded.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-07-2015, 11:33 AM
 
Location: Beautiful and sanitary DC
2,503 posts, read 3,539,428 times
Reputation: 3280
Ah, final rulemaking is still underway, so you're correct in that it hasn't been superseded yet.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2015, 07:41 AM
 
2,814 posts, read 2,280,800 times
Reputation: 3717
Seems like the alternatives are either: build the bedrooms by the windows and then have windowless living rooms or just build less new units in the city.

I though these windowless bedrooms were ok if they: 1) were "Jr. 1-bed rooms" or 2) had interior glass windows. Is it possible these new buildings could technically soon be "illegal" going forward in the District? I hope not.

I don't care for the interior windows, but lots of people seem fine with them. (Why not let people decide, since this isn't really a true health and safety issue anyway)?

In the past year, DC has rejected any plans to increase the height limit, downzoned vast areas of the city to prevent rowhouse to apartment conversions, so I really hope this doesn't get added to the list.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > District of Columbia > Washington, DC
Similar Threads
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top