Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Weather
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Norilsk or Wrangel Island
Norilsk 16 69.57%
Wrangel Island 7 30.43%
Voters: 23. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-10-2012, 02:19 PM
 
Location: Singapore
3,341 posts, read 5,559,719 times
Reputation: 2018

Advertisements

Norilsk - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wrangel Island - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Assuming the data for Norilsk is correct of course. I have looked for climate data for Norilsk on meteo.ru or pogoda.ru and didn't find it.

I've seen some videos of winter in Norilsk and it looks like it receives significant snowfall and a lot of wind with bitter temperatures. Norilsk also has very poor air quality.

Anyway, I'd choose Wrangel Island and its colder summers over Norilsk.

Wrangel Island is a D- or F+ and Norilsk is an F--->.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-10-2012, 02:30 PM
 
Location: North West Northern Ireland.
20,633 posts, read 23,877,481 times
Reputation: 3107
Oh my God Norilsk has got the perfect climate!! The most contrasting climate between winter and summer i've seen yet.

I'd love Wrangel islands summer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2012, 02:56 PM
 
Location: South Jersey
14,497 posts, read 9,433,651 times
Reputation: 5251
Wrangel Island for me. Less brutal winters. I like cold, but -3F average high temperature in January is cold enough for me. I'd pass on the average high of -24F for Norilsk in January. Both have enough snow for my liking. While Norilsk does have warmer summers, neither summer is really warm enough to enjoy typical outdoor summer activities. So they're tied in that regard, and Wrangel Island poses little to no risk of temperatures too hot for my liking, unlike Norilsk. I also favor Wrangel Island's slightly more northerly latitude. Plus Wrangel Island averages three snowy days in July. And I am not opposed to summer snowfall at all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2012, 03:01 PM
 
Location: New Jersey
15,318 posts, read 17,224,288 times
Reputation: 6959
I prefer Norilsk's summers, but the winters are too cold. So Wrangel Island it is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2012, 03:39 PM
 
Location: Buxton, England
6,990 posts, read 11,418,823 times
Reputation: 3672
Both F standard garbage!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2012, 04:02 PM
 
Location: Laurentia
5,576 posts, read 8,000,929 times
Reputation: 2446
Nor'ilsk gets hardcore winter weather, usually with crushing amounts of snow. The bitter cold enhances the entire winter experience. The temperature is a bit much for me, so I'd choose Wrangel Island's winter temperatures. However, Wrangell Island, from the looks of it, is too dry in wintertime. Wrangel has virtually no summer weather at all - it remains in the 40's through the warmest part of the year. Nor'ilsk at least has a decent warmup in summer (up to 61F).

So, although it's decidedly too cold in the winter, all the factors besides that make Nor'ilsk the better option overall. The grades for both climates are B- or thereabouts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2012, 05:03 PM
 
Location: Paris
8,159 posts, read 8,733,717 times
Reputation: 3552
Norilsk hands down. I remember being surprised by photos of its snowy streets, but now that I've seen the climate stats I understand. That's a very wet winter for such bitter temperatures.
I prefer Wrangel Island's winter temps, but Norilsk's summers are much better. Better have two months of mild weather than none, regardless of the rest of the year.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2012, 05:14 PM
 
Location: Leeds, UK
22,112 posts, read 29,589,687 times
Reputation: 8819
I pick Norilsk.

Although Norlisk, the place itself, is just a putrid smelly polluted hole.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2012, 05:42 PM
 
Location: Melbourne AUS
1,155 posts, read 1,953,708 times
Reputation: 843
both are horrendous .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2012, 06:53 PM
 
Location: London, UK
2,688 posts, read 6,564,065 times
Reputation: 1757
I'm about to throw up.

I'll pick Norilsk, at least it doesn't suck for about 2% of the time (above average July early afternoons )
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Weather

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:33 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top