Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Weather
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-07-2014, 06:14 PM
 
Location: Vernon, British Columbia
3,026 posts, read 3,644,049 times
Reputation: 2191

Advertisements

^This is one reason why no longer measure sunshine hours in Canada (outside a select sites).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-08-2015, 11:40 AM
 
50 posts, read 37,726 times
Reputation: 35
to make statements as the original poster did without providing solid evidence as far as im concenred is spreading false information.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2016, 03:21 PM
 
Location: Orcutt, CA (Santa Maria Valley)
3,314 posts, read 2,214,542 times
Reputation: 960
About 300 hour diffrences between Sault Ste Marie Ontario/Michigan

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sault_...ntario#Climate


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sault_...chigan#Climate
Attached Thumbnails
Sunshine hours education thread-stmonsunhrs.png   Sunshine hours education thread-stmmisunhrs.png  
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2016, 03:51 PM
 
Location: Wellington and North of South
5,069 posts, read 8,594,884 times
Reputation: 2675
The effect of Kipp-Zonen measurement with a fixed cutoff level (used in other measurement systems as well of course) in this country is to boost summer numbers too unrealistically high levels. The old Campbell-Stokes system had a variety of problems but at least tried to compensate for seasonality in temperate latitudes. As far as I'm concerned "bright sunshine" or "unobstructed sunshine" should have a compensation factor involved. When one looks at the NZ results in the two systems, the C-S data looks much more coherent as a whole when mapped against other known climatological factors, than does the K-Z data.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2016, 11:04 AM
 
Location: Castlederp
9,264 posts, read 7,405,066 times
Reputation: 2974
[url]https://icdc.zmaw.de/fileadmin/user_upload/icdc_Dokumente/matuszko_AComparisonofSunshineDurationRecordsfromt heCampbellStokesSunshineRecorderandCSD3SunshineDur ationSensor_JApplClimatol_119_401-406_2015.pdf[/url]

Interesting read, particularly page 4 onwards
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2016, 11:11 AM
 
29,505 posts, read 19,602,720 times
Reputation: 4527
Quote:
Originally Posted by irlinit View Post
https://icdc.zmaw.de/fileadmin/user_...1-406_2015.pdf

Interesting read, particularly page 4 onwards
So those authors feel that the new e-sensors over state sunshine hours?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2016, 11:13 AM
B87
 
Location: Surrey/London
11,769 posts, read 10,589,947 times
Reputation: 3099
Quote:
Originally Posted by irlinit View Post
https://icdc.zmaw.de/fileadmin/user_...1-406_2015.pdf

Interesting read, particularly page 4 onwards
Assuming a similar trend here, Heathrow would see about 1802 hrs with the electronic sensor, Kew 1825 hrs.

Electronic sensors seem to have trouble when there are sunny but hazy skies, or cirrus clouds, which are a fairly common occurrence here in summer.



https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3892/1...ce64cdd2_b.jpg
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2016, 11:19 AM
 
Location: Castlederp
9,264 posts, read 7,405,066 times
Reputation: 2974
It would appear so, I don't know though, they still say that the CS appears to be the best method for measuring sunshine but I just don't agree
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2016, 11:21 AM
B87
 
Location: Surrey/London
11,769 posts, read 10,589,947 times
Reputation: 3099
Quote:
Originally Posted by irlinit View Post
It would appear so, I don't know though, they still say that the CS appears to be the best method for measuring sunshine but I just don't agree
CS is the best method for measuring bright sunshine, as in blue dome skies. It is poor when it comes to skies like in the above pictures, which electroic sensors would record.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2016, 12:05 PM
 
Location: Castlederp
9,264 posts, read 7,405,066 times
Reputation: 2974
Quote:
Originally Posted by B87 View Post
CS is the best method for measuring bright sunshine, as in blue dome skies. It is poor when it comes to skies like in the above pictures, which electroic sensors would record.
Yeah, I've read that too, and our skies are normally partly cloudy/mostly sunny for a lot of the year..

I'm reading up on it at the moment, I wonder if there are sunshine readings in the UK anywhere with a foster recorder?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Weather

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top