Choose your torture device: Eureka, Nunavut vs. Wyndham, AUS (climate, hot, freezing)

[Ethereal]

A (mostly) freezing polar climate versus a pervasively hot & mostly humid climate. If you had to be banished to one of these extreme places, which would it be?

Eureka: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eureka,_Nunavut#Climate

Wyndham: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wyndha...tralia#Climate

[deneb78]

Wyndham and it wouldn't be torture if I had AC and a swimming pool...it would be heavenly

[RWood]

Wyndham by miles.

[ABrandNewWorld]

Wyndham will win by a landslide except for with the hardcore coldies.
Should have used Dallol or Mecca instead.

[EverBlack]

I'm far from a hardcore coldy, but 9.3 °C is far more comfortable to me than 31.2 °C, so I choose Eureka. I'm not a fan of -33 °C highs, though.

[Warszawa]

Wyndham wouldn't be bad for a couple of weeks, highs in the upper 30s aren't that bad especially with such a low humidity. Living there year after year would be annoying tho. Eureka is unlivable, not for a year not for a week

[Pedrinho]

Wyndham is nice.

[forgotten username]

Wyndham is the land of eternal summer. I find it actually pretty enjoyable considering the low humidity, and the rain amount is reasonable.

Eureka is just far too cold. I like cold, but that's just way too much for too long.

[B87]

Wyndham of course.

[43north87west]

Wyndham sounds pretty nice! I'd take pretty much anything over Eureka.