Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The implication seems to be that if they had home and contents insurance (ignoring the fact that people in social housing are not eligible for home insurance), they wouldn't be in this situation - i.e homeless and with nowhere to go.
I see no other reason why he would mention that in relation to what I posted - and, of course, most normal people wouldn't immediately jump to that ridiculous conclusion.
It just seemed like a random, out of place comment. Wouldn't have given it a second thought.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dunno what to put here
God knows why you're so eager to defend him. He certainly doesn't deserve it.
I am defending him, because I think the reaction to his comments were overblown. They were completely twisted by everyone who started bashing him, unnecessarily IMO.
We clearly disagree and interpreted them differently, so perhaps we should just leave it at that.
It's all about my perceived background. He's seething because he's went through some sort of trama in a past time period/lived a poor childhood, so he thinks I should suffer.
Remember he votes Labour, many Labour politicans are Socialist (want equality for everyone/equal pay) so in his mind there should be no wealth; everyone should have an equal income, house size, healthcare, money etc.
It's all about my perceived background. He's seething because he's went through some sort of trama in a past time period/lived a poor childhood, so he thinks I should suffer.
Remember he votes Labour, many Labour politicans are Socialist (want equality for everyone/equal pay) so in his mind there should be no wealth; everyone should have an equal income, house size, healthcare, money etc.
His reason is just a smokescreen.
Just when you were winning back fans you come back and reveal yourself to be the pretentious dick you really are.
I think people give him too much attention in all honesty (I've been guilty of this too). I think it's honestly better to just ignore his inflammatory posts and respond to the legitimate ones.
It's all about my perceived background. He's seething because he's went through some sort of trama in a past time period/lived a poor childhood, so he thinks I should suffer.
Remember he votes Labour, many Labour politicans are Socialist (want equality for everyone/equal pay) so in his mind there should be no wealth; everyone should have an equal income, house size, healthcare, money etc.
His reason is just a smokescreen.
The most stuck up piece of text I've ever read. You've got worse.
Just when you were winning back fans you come back and reveal yourself to be the pretentious dick you really are.
If anything it's you who has the smokescreen.
So you agree? Everyone have £30,000 salary, 1,500 square foot house etc?
No chance to develop?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
