Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Last bit sounds fun, though I would prefer decoys. Where is your fact other than anecdotal? I looked at other threads and some guy named saxonwold doesn't agree with you... according to him and a study he found 54 percent of brits are type i. Type Iv is pretty dark and from the Italians I have seen they only get there from extreme tanning.
Prototype IV actually just mean that you can get tan really easy, but if they don's stay under the sun they don't necessary look tanned. For example, me and my sister look pale the same in this period of the year, but we notice the difference during the summer, when my sister gets tanned from the really first day at the seaside while I start with a sunburn and I start to get tanned from the 3rd day (I'm prototype III, while my sister is a little closer to IV).
Now I can't find any decent statistic, I've only found that the most of Italians are somewhere between prototype III and IV.
He did have olive undertones, white yes definetely, but with olive undertones. When I think of Australians I think of sunburned people.
What are these "olive" undertones? Pale olive?
Australia has high skin cancer rates, but I'm not sure everybody looks like lobsters. Type III skin is still highy prone to skin cancer, so that doesn't invalidate anything.
How is that map useful? I've seen dark skinned native Bostonians that were of Italian ancestry that were far darker than some Scots Irish native of Atlanta GA. And trust me I've seen them with their clothes off .
I am sure you have you cheeky son of a gun lol. How is any map regarding skin tones useful?
Australia has high skin cancer rates, but I'm not sure everybody looks like lobsters. Type III skin is still highy prone to skin cancer, so that doesn't invalidate anything.
Yes it is, put a picture of a pale redhead next to one of Cristiano ronaldo and I think you will see the difference.
Prototype IV actually just mean that you can get tan really easy, but if they don's stay under the sun they don't necessary look tanned. For example, me and my sister look pale the same in this period of the year, but we notice the difference during the summer, when my sister gets tanned from the really first day at the seaside while I start with a sunburn and I start to get tanned from the 3rd day (I'm prototype III, while my sister is a little closer to IV).
Now I can't find any decent statistic, I've only found that the most of Italians are somewhere between prototype III and IV.
OK then, so what about actual skin tones now? I'm sure if I tanned enough I'll hit type v.
I'm pretty sure this debate is about the skin type of typical Brits. The typical Brit isn't a ghostly redhead.
Am I talking to Saxonwold here?
Where on earth did you get that I was implying Brits are ghostly redheads?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
