Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > West Virginia
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-09-2014, 09:21 PM
 
6,347 posts, read 9,875,345 times
Reputation: 1794

Advertisements

I know I am reposting this, but I know there are several posters in this region and I want to get this out. The water is not safe. It cannot be used for anything other than using the toilet.

Quote:
CHARLESTON, W.Va. (Heath Harrison, Kallie Cart, Rick Lord) – Gov. Earl Ray Tomblin declared a state of emergency Thursday and residents in eight West Virginia counties were told not to use their water due to a chemical leak.

West Virginia American Water has issued a public notice for their customers to not use their water, and the notice has now expanded to eight counties.

Kanawha, Boone, Putnam, Lincoln, Logan, Clay, Roane and Jackson counties were affected. The Culloden area of Cabell County was also also affected.

"West Virginians in the affected service areas are urged NOT to use tap water for drinking, cooking, washing or bathing," Tomblin said in a news release. "Right now, our priorities are our hospitals, nursing homes, and schools. I've been working with our National Guard and Office of Emergency Services in an effort to provide water and supplies through the county emergency services offices as quickly as possible."
Authorities are advising not to rush to get water. I would recommend you do rush. Water supplies go fast in disasters like this. If you do not have water try contacting a hospital.

Eyewitness News
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-09-2014, 10:10 PM
 
Location: West Virginia
515 posts, read 778,272 times
Reputation: 1238
I'm a WVAW customer in Putnam County and this sucks big time for us. There's no definite answer on how long this will last and I just received a call that said do not use the water for any purpose! Lawyers are going to have a heyday with this one when all's said and done. I'm going to hook back up to my well water if this isn't resolved by morning.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-10-2014, 06:10 AM
 
6,347 posts, read 9,875,345 times
Reputation: 1794
Quote:
Originally Posted by HomersBoy View Post
I'm a WVAW customer in Putnam County and this sucks big time for us. There's no definite answer on how long this will last and I just received a call that said do not use the water for any purpose! Lawyers are going to have a heyday with this one when all's said and done. I'm going to hook back up to my well water if this isn't resolved by morning.
I have no clue what caused this but heads should roll.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-10-2014, 07:19 AM
 
Location: Hiding from Antifa!
7,783 posts, read 6,084,949 times
Reputation: 7099
Wasn't there a chemical spill back in the 60s or 70s in the Kanawha River, with carbon tetrachloride? I haven't been through the area for decades now, but I remember a chemical smell for a long time afterward. Maybe that was just the industry that was still there.

How would this spill relate to that one?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-10-2014, 07:22 AM
 
6,347 posts, read 9,875,345 times
Reputation: 1794
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cruzincat View Post
Wasn't there a chemical spill back in the 60s or 70s in the Kanawha River, with carbon tetrachloride? I haven't been through the area for decades now, but I remember a chemical smell for a long time afterward. Maybe that was just the industry that was still there.

How would this spill relate to that one?
In both cases corrupt Charleston politicians are to blame but god help these companies if the politicboros don't have water. If all of wv didn't have water and they did no big deal but when their stupidity and inconpotence goes back to haunt them too they get upset for the inconvenience.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-10-2014, 07:24 AM
 
Location: Hiding from Antifa!
7,783 posts, read 6,084,949 times
Reputation: 7099
I found this:Daily News - Google News Archive Search

It would be interesting if FMC is somehow related to the company responsible for this spill.

edit: After reading closer, I see that the one in 1977 was not a spill so much as the company was permitted to dump 800 lbs of Carbon Tetrachloride per day. The EPA in cahoots with the local politicians allowed that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-10-2014, 07:57 AM
 
1,889 posts, read 2,150,035 times
Reputation: 655
The Legislative Session started Wednesday in Charleston but the officials did not meet today due to the water problems. That may or may not be a good thing for this company. I wouldn't think it would be in their best interest to have that many elected officials in Charleston at this time.

W.Va. Gov. Issues State of Emergency for 9 Counties, Water Ban for 100,000+ The link here mentions that the chemical may still be leaking or leeching into the Elk River at this time and that the leak may have been ongoing for some time before the leak was discovered. A press conference is scheduled for 10:30am Friday for an update to the situation.

FEMA is delivering over 50 tractor trailer loads of water to be picked up by a WV Air National Guard C-130 that flew to Martinsburg to load the water. Thousands of residents warned to not use water* - News - The Charleston Gazette - West Virginia News and Sports -

At least at this time, where I live in Putnam county, we receive our water from Hurricane City Water and we have been told that our water is fine because the water is pulled from the Hurricane Reservoir.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-10-2014, 08:02 AM
 
Location: Hiding from Antifa!
7,783 posts, read 6,084,949 times
Reputation: 7099
Kind of makes you wonder if the chemical plants were located next to rivers for the water supply or as a means to get rid of unwanted chemicals. Maybe both.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-10-2014, 08:07 AM
 
Location: NW Penna.
1,758 posts, read 3,834,660 times
Reputation: 1880
Quote:
Originally Posted by cry_havoc View Post
I have no clue what caused this but heads should roll.
After reading the Charleston Gazette article today, I concur. Maybe the extreme cold weather was a factor. But, the company should have noticed a leak of that magnitude long before the neighborhood did. Some employee should have been walking the tank farm at regular intervals, some alarm should have gone off when the liquid level dropped, or something. Apparently a large amount leaked before anyone caught it. Has someone seen a volume estimate anywhere?

The water company was probably correct that their charcoal filters would handle it, if it hadn't been such a large amount. Most likely when the initial announcement was made, the water was deemed safe. But later, the chemical started breaking through, or else the officials got a better handle on the amount that was continuing to leak into the river and they knew that breakthrough was inevitable and they changed their minds.

I would not worry too much about longterm damage, loss of property value, dead fish, and half a dozen other things online comments have been wailing about. They will stop the leak, river flow will continuously dilute the contaminate, the water lines will get flushed out. The fact that they said "do not use the water" does not mean that the water is actually toxic. It means that it may or may not be safe to drink or use. They know there is a contaminant in it, and prudent and most correct thing to do is tell people "Don't use it." Once they know there is some unwanted chemical in the water supply, there are only 2 choices for announcements:
1. Don't use it or Don't use it except for certain specific and limited uses.
2. There's something in there but it's harmless so go ahead and use the water as you normally would.

Obviously, they can't guarantee Choice #2, that it's perfectly safe, so they have to go with the Choice #1 because that is the only correct action.

Major hassle, inconvenience, and expense: Yes. Huge environmental disaster: Seems unlikely. People will just have to do whatever it takes to ride it out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-10-2014, 08:09 AM
 
152 posts, read 386,659 times
Reputation: 140
I saw this on Good morning america and all i could think is why would there be a chemical plant allowed to be upstream from the biggest water supply in the east coast?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:



Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > West Virginia
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top