Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-19-2015, 09:45 AM
 
1,188 posts, read 959,213 times
Reputation: 1598

Advertisements

For example, if you're a graduating college senior who is 21 years old and whose experience consists of a 1-semester internship, you're more competitive in the job market than someone who is 30 years old with 2 years of professional experience. Agreed?

I've seen many examples of people who aren't necessarily old but aren't very experienced for their age, and they are practically cut out of the loop of good jobs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-19-2015, 12:26 PM
 
Location: Eureka CA
9,519 posts, read 14,748,538 times
Reputation: 15068
What planet do you live on??
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2015, 12:32 PM
 
1,511 posts, read 1,973,761 times
Reputation: 3442
Quote:
Originally Posted by KonaldDuth View Post
For example, if you're a graduating college senior who is 21 years old and whose experience consists of a 1-semester internship, you're more competitive in the job market than someone who is 30 years old with 2 years of professional experience. Agreed? .
Um, no.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2015, 01:15 PM
 
Location: Free From The Oppressive State
30,253 posts, read 23,742,275 times
Reputation: 38639
Quote:
Originally Posted by KonaldDuth View Post
For example, if you're a graduating college senior who is 21 years old and whose experience consists of a 1-semester internship, you're more competitive in the job market than someone who is 30 years old with 2 years of professional experience. Agreed?

I've seen many examples of people who aren't necessarily old but aren't very experienced for their age, and they are practically cut out of the loop of good jobs.
Is this what you're telling yourself? You are absolutely incorrect. Age discrimination happens. Pretending it doesn't happen, by actually trying to convince yourself that a 1 semester internship is better than 2 actual years of experience, is ridiculous.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2015, 01:38 PM
 
174 posts, read 217,839 times
Reputation: 230
The OP has a point. It depends on the job of course, if you want someone to do a technical job now with the potential to be a manager later, then I would compare career progression over the time of the career between candidates. Age doesn't directly matter, but of course, older people have longer careers to look at and a long career doing the exact same thing with no promotions tells me what I can expect from that employee.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2015, 07:57 PM
 
Location: East of Seattle since 1992, 615' Elevation, Zone 8b - originally from SF Bay Area
44,585 posts, read 81,206,701 times
Reputation: 57821
There are not many jobs where I work that have less than 4 years experience required. That is not age discrimination, we would be happy to hire a 19 year old engineer or IT developer if he/she has the experience required. Many positions will require 10-12 years experience and typically those applicants will be 30-50.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2015, 08:02 AM
 
Location: San Antonio
7,629 posts, read 16,456,953 times
Reputation: 18770
My husband has a PhD. Part of his curriculum was a business law class that was very interesting. With Age Discrimination suits, the age where the "burden of proof" shifts from the employee to the employer was 40 yrs old. Meaning, IF you have a complaint about age discrimination BEFORE the age of 40, YOU must prove the discrimination was against you because of "age". After that age, the burden of proof shifted to the employer to prove they were NOT discriminating against you because of your age. Interesting for sure.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-21-2015, 09:55 PM
 
748 posts, read 820,569 times
Reputation: 697
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paka View Post
My husband has a PhD. Part of his curriculum was a business law class that was very interesting. With Age Discrimination suits, the age where the "burden of proof" shifts from the employee to the employer was 40 yrs old. Meaning, IF you have a complaint about age discrimination BEFORE the age of 40, YOU must prove the discrimination was against you because of "age". After that age, the burden of proof shifted to the employer to prove they were NOT discriminating against you because of your age. Interesting for sure.
Sounds like the age to sue is 40 and up, if that's true.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-21-2015, 10:13 PM
 
Location: Seattle
3,573 posts, read 2,883,162 times
Reputation: 7265
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paka View Post
My husband has a PhD. Part of his curriculum was a business law class that was very interesting. With Age Discrimination suits, the age where the "burden of proof" shifts from the employee to the employer was 40 yrs old. Meaning, IF you have a complaint about age discrimination BEFORE the age of 40, YOU must prove the discrimination was against you because of "age". After that age, the burden of proof shifted to the employer to prove they were NOT discriminating against you because of your age. Interesting for sure.
Under federal law workers under 40 have no age discrimination protection. There may be some state protection but it is not common.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2015, 12:00 AM
 
Location: Las Vegas, NV
553 posts, read 1,208,961 times
Reputation: 807
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paka View Post
My husband has a PhD. Part of his curriculum was a business law class that was very interesting. With Age Discrimination suits, the age where the "burden of proof" shifts from the employee to the employer was 40 yrs old. Meaning, IF you have a complaint about age discrimination BEFORE the age of 40, YOU must prove the discrimination was against you because of "age". After that age, the burden of proof shifted to the employer to prove they were NOT discriminating against you because of your age. Interesting for sure.
The professor needs some employment law education before teaching a business law class on age discrimination. As Sockeye points out in post #9, Federal law protects workers at age 40 and above. Younger workers are not protected under federal law. Also, as Sockeye points out, states (and local governments) could have their own laws that extend the protection to an age younger than 40, but those would be rare if they exist.

All of that said, the discussion about age discrimination brings to light an important issue in employment law and employment related decisions. Nearly all employment decisions involve "discrimination". A good employer should discriminate between better and worse candidates. The key, however, is that the discrimination cannot be on an unlawful basis. So choosing between a promotion for the worker who volunteered for all of the overtime and demonstrated an exceptionally good attitude over the worker who constantly was tardy, left at the minute his shift ended, and was a general P.I.T.A. to deal with, is certainly discriminatory, AND lawful. Hiring an applicant aged 35 over an applicant aged 50, both of whom have similar qualifications for the job, and preferring the younger worker because of the worker's age is also discriminatory BUT unlawful.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top