Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 12-12-2017, 03:24 PM
 
Location: Heart of Dixie
12,441 posts, read 14,865,272 times
Reputation: 28438

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by movedintime View Post
...Why would someone think a doctor has more value than say a taxi driver taking that doctor to an emergency...
REALLY?!?!?!
BTW - taxis don't take doctors to emergencies, that's just not how it works.

Your arguments just don't hold up. In fact, what you describe is a nightmarish dystopian society where some elite echelon defines what everyone (the proletariat) should earn and how they should live.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-12-2017, 04:38 PM
 
923 posts, read 526,170 times
Reputation: 1891
Quote:
Originally Posted by movedintime View Post

Why would someone think a doctor has more value than say a taxi driver taking that doctor to an emergency.

A person who loves to teach and is good at it, might pass because of the wage being offered. That sounds like a huge opportunity lose for everyone.

People in retail would offer better service to you, because they want to be there, not just because they have to.

And so on.
Ok, so everyone is on a level playing field. Now the norm is 80 hours per week, 5 days vacation, from age 23 to 80. (must go longer due to lack of production in this "world" you believe in)

Doesn't matter if you are digging ditches or making copies on a printer while sitting at a desk in a comfortable room with people to talk to.

Both are important, both need to be done and are very important, both should be paid the same. Correct?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2017, 05:33 PM
 
1,022 posts, read 738,159 times
Reputation: 1909
Quote:
Originally Posted by Humble and Kind View Post
Ok, so everyone is on a level playing field. Now the norm is 80 hours per week, 5 days vacation, from age 23 to 80. (must go longer due to lack of production in this "world" you believe in)

Doesn't matter if you are digging ditches or making copies on a printer while sitting at a desk in a comfortable room with people to talk to.

Both are important, both need to be done and are very important, both should be paid the same. Correct?
Correct. Without the ditch digger there is no water supply or waste removal.

Without the sanitary conditions, well we all know what that would look like (or smell like). No one would even be able to enter the work place. That high level degree is suddenly worthless. I have never held the position, but am very thankful to the person willing to clean the sink before I need it.

And can an example be accepted as an example only? Like the taxi driver....(just an example).

80 hrs. a week ? No, No, No
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2017, 07:18 PM
 
Location: In the Redwoods
30,311 posts, read 51,917,889 times
Reputation: 23701
Quote:
Originally Posted by movedintime View Post
Why would someone think a doctor has more value than say a taxi driver taking that doctor to an emergency.
Value might be too strong of a word, but you have to consider the time, money, and specific skill-set/intelligence required for these two jobs. Anyone with working eyes can get their driver's license (judging by the incompetent driving I witness daily), and become a taxi/Uber/Lyft driver. Literally the only requirements are a valid driver's license, and relatively clean record. Now look at what's required to become a doctor, and the consequences for not being a competent one... 4 years of college, 7+ years of post-graduate work, internships, residencies, etc; and both financial and emotional devastation when something goes wrong. Still think they should be paid equally? I sure don't.

Also, I would assume most doctors aren't relying on taxis to get to the hospital in an emergency. They either have reliable transportation themselves, or are already sleeping at the hospital while on call.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2017, 07:37 PM
 
Location: In the Redwoods
30,311 posts, read 51,917,889 times
Reputation: 23701
Quote:
Originally Posted by movedintime View Post
Correct. Without the ditch digger there is no water supply or waste removal.

Without the sanitary conditions, well we all know what that would look like (or smell like). No one would even be able to enter the work place. That high level degree is suddenly worthless. I have never held the position, but am very thankful to the person willing to clean the sink before I need it.
Yeah, but who's going to even apply to ditch-digging or sewage jobs, if they can earn the same money flipping burgers or driving a cab? And conversely, who's going to waste the time and stress becoming a doctor, if they can earn that same salary at a cushy office job? Sure, you'll get folks who do it for the love of the profession - but money is always a driving force, too, and anyone who says otherwise is lying.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2017, 07:51 PM
 
16,376 posts, read 22,476,176 times
Reputation: 14398
Quote:
Originally Posted by movedintime View Post
Correct. Without the ditch digger there is no water supply or waste removal.
Most ditches are dug using heavy equipment. A lot of these heavy equipment operators that deal with sewers work for city or county government. Although it's private sector for septic. But septic workers use heavy equipment mostly too.

Gone are the days of digging ditches with shovels.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2017, 07:48 AM
 
Location: Washington state
7,027 posts, read 4,889,008 times
Reputation: 21892
Quote:
Originally Posted by Humble and Kind View Post
Some want to, some don't, and some should. I never said it'd be for the rest of your life.

I except that from myself and my kids, bust your ***** when your young and your body can work harder than your mind. Later in life your mind will work harder than your body will/can.

As far as health, as for me and the people who have worked for me, the harder you work the healthier you are. I use my body much harder than my mind when I was younger. Yes, I'm slower now but can still do as much as I did before because I'm much more efficient.

We also don't complain about work cause we aren't over worked these days. Want to know what hard work is? Go back 50-75 years. Did they ****** and moan? Nope. We've become wimps, me included.
You can't equate not having enough employees to cover a busy store to cutting pay for those employees when it's not busy.

If you're in business, you have to look ahead to more than just the next month. Yeah, if you want to stock your store with only two employees saving money on employees when it's slow but losing present and potential customers when it's busy, feel free. That's how your business never picks up and eventually closes. Meantime, if you have enough employees to take care of the busy times and it does get slow, there's always something else they can be doing besides standing around.


I know you never said working 80 hour a week jobs would or should be for the rest of a person's life. But that's where we're headed if someone just wants to keep a roof over his head.

And as for your comment about hard work...back in the 80s, I knew someone who had worked during the Depression. His comment then (about people in the 70s and 80s) was that they didn't work as hard as people in the 30s did. And you're saying that people now don't work as hard as people in the 50s and 60s did. Each generation thinks younger people don't do anything difficult.

As for myself, for one semester I worked a full time job, went to high school full time, took two extra classes, and worked an additional 12 hours a week at another job, just so I could graduate. What did that teach me about hard work? Two things. One, that I could do it if I really wanted to and two, that I never wanted to for anything that bad again. I spent 6 month trying not to fall asleep everywhere I went and it's a sucky way to live. I'd rather be poor than live like that again. Likewise when I had a 30 hour commute on top of a 40 hour a week job, it totally sucked. I did that for a year before I packed it in for a worse job closer to home.

So if anyone tells me they don't want to work 80 hour a week jobs for the rest of their life, I can surely sympathize with that and I wouldn't expect anyone to have to do so unless it was temporary and they needed to get themselves out of a hole. Otherwise, I don't think anyone should have to wrok hours like that and I don't care how wimpy others think they may be.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2017, 10:27 AM
 
Location: U.S.A., Earth
5,511 posts, read 4,472,997 times
Reputation: 5770
Quote:
Originally Posted by rodentraiser View Post
You can't equate not having enough employees to cover a busy store to cutting pay for those employees when it's not busy.

If you're in business, you have to look ahead to more than just the next month. Yeah, if you want to stock your store with only two employees saving money on employees when it's slow but losing present and potential customers when it's busy, feel free. That's how your business never picks up and eventually closes. Meantime, if you have enough employees to take care of the busy times and it does get slow, there's always something else they can be doing besides standing around.


I know you never said working 80 hour a week jobs would or should be for the rest of a person's life. But that's where we're headed if someone just wants to keep a roof over his head.

And as for your comment about hard work...back in the 80s, I knew someone who had worked during the Depression. His comment then (about people in the 70s and 80s) was that they didn't work as hard as people in the 30s did. And you're saying that people now don't work as hard as people in the 50s and 60s did. Each generation thinks younger people don't do anything difficult.

As for myself, for one semester I worked a full time job, went to high school full time, took two extra classes, and worked an additional 12 hours a week at another job, just so I could graduate. What did that teach me about hard work? Two things. One, that I could do it if I really wanted to and two, that I never wanted to for anything that bad again. I spent 6 month trying not to fall asleep everywhere I went and it's a sucky way to live. I'd rather be poor than live like that again. Likewise when I had a 30 hour commute on top of a 40 hour a week job, it totally sucked. I did that for a year before I packed it in for a worse job closer to home.

So if anyone tells me they don't want to work 80 hour a week jobs for the rest of their life, I can surely sympathize with that and I wouldn't expect anyone to have to do so unless it was temporary and they needed to get themselves out of a hole. Otherwise, I don't think anyone should have to wrok hours like that and I don't care how wimpy others think they may be.

It's ironic that as part of change, Henry Ford did his thing with doubling the workers' wage to $5 an hour, which would be $123 in today's money according to an inflation calculator. He also pushed for 8, NOT 9 hour workdays, feeling that was enough to get things done, but not burn them out. He also wanted his employees to be able to afford their cars they're making, so the doubling their wage let them afford one after 4 month's of work.* This jump started the middle class economy. The irony is nowadays, we're heading right back where we came from.


Why Did Henry Ford Double His Minimum Wage? | The Saturday Evening Post


* A visiting Soviet Commissar was quoted saying...
‘Ah! The capitalist bosses’ cars!’
No one could convince him that this great sea of automobiles belonged to the 60,000 Ford workers of the Rouge.”
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2017, 11:42 AM
 
4,323 posts, read 7,229,965 times
Reputation: 3488
Quote:
Originally Posted by ackmondual View Post
It's ironic that as part of change, Henry Ford did his thing with doubling the workers' wage to $5 an hour, which would be $123 in today's money according to an inflation calculator.

Incorrect.


Henry Ford doubled wages to $5 PER DAY, not hour.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-13-2017, 11:44 AM
 
923 posts, read 526,170 times
Reputation: 1891
Quote:
Originally Posted by rodentraiser View Post
You can't equate not having enough employees to cover a busy store to cutting pay for those employees when it's not busy.

If you're in business, you have to look ahead to more than just the next month. Yeah, if you want to stock your store with only two employees saving money on employees when it's slow but losing present and potential customers when it's busy, feel free. That's how your business never picks up and eventually closes. Meantime, if you have enough employees to take care of the busy times and it does get slow, there's always something else they can be doing besides standing around.


I know you never said working 80 hour a week jobs would or should be for the rest of a person's life. But that's where we're headed if someone just wants to keep a roof over his head.

And as for your comment about hard work...back in the 80s, I knew someone who had worked during the Depression. His comment then (about people in the 70s and 80s) was that they didn't work as hard as people in the 30s did. And you're saying that people now don't work as hard as people in the 50s and 60s did. Each generation thinks younger people don't do anything difficult.

As for myself, for one semester I worked a full time job, went to high school full time, took two extra classes, and worked an additional 12 hours a week at another job, just so I could graduate. What did that teach me about hard work? Two things. One, that I could do it if I really wanted to and two, that I never wanted to for anything that bad again. I spent 6 month trying not to fall asleep everywhere I went and it's a sucky way to live. I'd rather be poor than live like that again. Likewise when I had a 30 hour commute on top of a 40 hour a week job, it totally sucked. I did that for a year before I packed it in for a worse job closer to home.

So if anyone tells me they don't want to work 80 hour a week jobs for the rest of their life, I can surely sympathize with that and I wouldn't expect anyone to have to do so unless it was temporary and they needed to get themselves out of a hole. Otherwise, I don't think anyone should have to wrok hours like that and I don't care how wimpy others think they may be.
This is what I'm hearing you say, please do tell me if I'm wrong. Your saying, in a nutshell, that we shouldn't have to work that many hours to be able to afford what we want.

Just wanting to understand more. Thanks!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top