Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > World
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: London vs SF
London 96 70.59%
San Francisco 40 29.41%
Voters: 136. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 05-13-2014, 05:20 PM
 
Location: UK
47 posts, read 65,982 times
Reputation: 39

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mezter View Post
You're acting like SF is some small dusty town. lol. And where do you live?
London.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
Haha London is not more diverse than the Bay Area, what a laugh. Darling I can drive for 70 miles through a vast area home to millions of people and no racial diversity. Some day you may get there mate. In the meantime watch and learn.

Furthermore,
London's food is way overrated, its shopping is actually kinda boring and all those trashy foreign oligarchs make the place look so tacky and gauche.

The countryside is cute tho. I used to enjoy it.
London itself is more diverse than San Francisco love.

Oligarchs are here because they realize that this is the centre of the world. They wouldn't settle for SF.

 
Old 05-13-2014, 05:20 PM
 
Location: Denver/Atlanta
6,083 posts, read 10,707,996 times
Reputation: 5872
Quote:
Originally Posted by duke of windsor View Post
Have you been to London? I'm guessing no.
Me? No. I haven't been to SF either though. I just know I'd like it a lot better, because it's more my style.


Quote:
Originally Posted by marxtrivia View Post
Compared to London it is a small dusty irrelevant town LOL
In that case, I guess London is a small dusty town compared to places like NY and Tokyo. lol.
 
Old 05-13-2014, 05:21 PM
 
Location: Denver/Atlanta
6,083 posts, read 10,707,996 times
Reputation: 5872
Quote:
Originally Posted by duke of windsor View Post
London.
Oh, that explains the homerism.
 
Old 05-13-2014, 05:22 PM
 
Location: UK
47 posts, read 65,982 times
Reputation: 39
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mezter View Post
Oh, that explains the homerism.
As said by one who called London "overrated" whilst never actually setting foot in the city.
 
Old 05-13-2014, 05:24 PM
 
Location: UK
47 posts, read 65,982 times
Reputation: 39
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mezter View Post
Me? No. I haven't been to SF either though. I just know I'd like it a lot better, because it's more my style.




In that case, I guess London is a small dusty town compared to places like NY and Tokyo. lol.
Good try but London and New York have the same population. No one cares about Tokyo..not a place to live.
 
Old 05-13-2014, 05:24 PM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,660 posts, read 67,548,962 times
Reputation: 21244
Quote:
Originally Posted by duke of windsor View Post
London.



London itself is more diverse than San Francisco, love.

Oligarchs are here because they realize that this is the centre of the world. They wouldn't settle for SF.
Hahaha San Francisco doesnt need foreign oligarchs to make up for underproductive and underwhelming natives because SF doesnt have that problem. The Bay Area has a higher ratio of billionaires and ultra high net worth individuals than London so thank goodness rich foreigners such as myself spend coin there.

LOL
 
Old 05-13-2014, 05:25 PM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,660 posts, read 67,548,962 times
Reputation: 21244
Quote:
Originally Posted by duke of windsor View Post
As said by one who called London "overrated" whilst never actually setting foot in the city.
Overrated, overpriced, overcast, etc.

Take your pic.
 
Old 05-13-2014, 05:26 PM
 
Location: Denver/Atlanta
6,083 posts, read 10,707,996 times
Reputation: 5872
Quote:
Originally Posted by duke of windsor View Post
As said by one who called London "overrated" whilst never actually setting foot in the city.
Maybe overrated wasn't the right word to use. I just don't think that it's my taste and many other cities offer what London does, despite London being so high up on the global stage. Just my opinion.
 
Old 05-13-2014, 05:27 PM
 
Location: Denver/Atlanta
6,083 posts, read 10,707,996 times
Reputation: 5872
Quote:
Originally Posted by duke of windsor View Post
Good try but London and New York have the same population. No one cares about Tokyo..not a place to live.
Um, isn't London's metro only 14-15 million? Compared to NYC's 22 million? And many people love Tokyo...
 
Old 05-13-2014, 05:42 PM
 
Location: UK
47 posts, read 65,982 times
Reputation: 39
Thats true. London has more style and sophistication than SF could ever dream of.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > World

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top