Children's Haven School in Sarasota, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 23.

4405 DESOTO ROAD
Sarasota, FL 34235

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Tatum Ridge Elementary School (4.8 miles):

91
Lakeview Elementary School (8.0 miles):

76
Wilkinson Elementary School (6.5 miles):

57
Bradenton Charter School (9.7 miles):

49
Island Village North School (3.2 miles):

43
H. S. Moody Elementary School (10.7 miles):

33
Children's Haven School:

23
Blanche H. Daughtrey Elementary School (6.3 miles):

19
Children's Haven School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Sarasota County:

48
Sarasota:

43
Children's Haven School:

23

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (941) 355-8808 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 58
School number: 1322
School type: Elementary
District Name: SARASOTA
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (941) 359-8520
Principal: Peggy Connell
The main educational program offered at the school: Special Education

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

40%
State average from 33 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

67%
State average from 33 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
CHILDREN'S HAVEN:

89%
State average from 33 schools:

86%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

47%
State average from 33 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

53%
State average from 33 schools:

63%
Making Math Gains
Here:

70%
State average from 33 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

50%
State average from 33 schools:

60%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

64%
State average from 33 schools:

69%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

490
State average from 33 schools:

528
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 33 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: Pending

Grade in 2009: D

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: D

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: D

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 119999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

50%
State average from 33 schools:

64%
Minority Rate
Here:

55%
State average from 33 schools:

54%
Region: 4

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1012 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1014 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 489
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 930
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 879

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 932
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 882
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 446 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 446 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 211
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 416
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 392

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 416
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 392
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 205 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 206 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 102
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

24%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 185
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 175

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 185
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 174
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 288 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 289 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 147
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 260
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 245

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 262
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 249
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 534 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 536 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 251
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
CHILDREN'S HAVEN:

27%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 478
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 454

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 479
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 459
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 73 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 74 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 31
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 48
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 53
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 116 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 116 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 59
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
CHILDREN'S HAVEN:

13%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 105
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 94

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
CHILDREN'S HAVEN:

29%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 104
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 94
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

35%
State average from 33 schools:

63%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

67%
State average from 33 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

84%
State average from 33 schools:

90%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

38%
State average from 33 schools:

44%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

44%
State average from 33 schools:

63%
Making Math Gains
Here:

70%
State average from 33 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

42%
State average from 33 schools:

61%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
CHILDREN'S HAVEN:

56%
State average from 33 schools:

66%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

446
State average from 33 schools:

526
Percent Tested
Here:

98%
State average from 33 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: NO

Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: D

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: D

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: D

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

44%
State average from 33 schools:

61%
Minority Rate
Here:

55%
State average from 33 schools:

53%
Region: 4


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1052 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1049 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 479
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 961
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 899

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 959
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 898
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 475 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 474 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 222
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 446
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 413

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 445
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 412
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 209 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 208 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 86
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 183
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 173

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 182
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 171
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 290 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 290 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 130
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

26%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 258
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 248

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 259
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 250
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 487 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 485 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 203
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

26%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 436
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 408

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 435
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 407
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 73 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 73 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
CHILDREN'S HAVEN:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 37
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 117 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 117 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 43
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

12%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 106
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 96

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

27%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 106
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 97
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

39%
State average from 33 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

65%
State average from 33 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

81%
State average from 33 schools:

86%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

48%
State average from 33 schools:

45%
Making Reading Gains
CHILDREN'S HAVEN:

50%
State average from 33 schools:

62%
Making Math Gains
Here:

72%
State average from 33 schools:

72%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

45%
State average from 33 schools:

61%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

69%
State average from 33 schools:

73%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

479
State average from 33 schools:

535
Percent Tested
Here:

98%
State average from 33 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: D

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: D

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

39%
State average from 33 schools:

58%
Minority Rate
Here:

52%
State average from 33 schools:

54%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1001 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 996 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 412
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 928
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 858

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 921
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 851
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 454 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 452 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 196
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 436
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 410

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
CHILDREN'S HAVEN:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 433
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 407
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 204 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 203 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 80
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

20%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 178
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 161

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 175
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 159
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 269 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 267 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 103
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

24%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 245
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 221

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 243
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 217
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 407 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 406 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
CHILDREN'S HAVEN:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 158
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

26%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 368
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 332

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 365
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 329
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 111 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 109 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 38
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

10%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 100
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 87
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 98
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 85
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 94 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 95 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 30
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 85
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 76
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 85
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 76
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1925
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

312
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

23%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

35%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

26%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

11%
State average:

12%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

5%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

42%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

11
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1906
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

296
State average:

302
Percent Passing
Here:

52%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

37%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

34%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

18%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

5%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

7%
State average:

12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

30%
State average:

37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

14
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

315
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

20%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

36%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

39%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

5%
State average:

5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
CHILDREN'S HAVEN:

44%
State average:

36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
CHILDREN'S HAVEN:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1920
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

301
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

13%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

29%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

35%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

18%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

5%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

58%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1976
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

321
State average:

326
Percent Passing
Here:

78%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

15%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

20%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

34%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

27%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

65%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
CHILDREN'S HAVEN:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
CHILDREN'S HAVEN:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1873
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

303
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1892
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

294
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

308
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 37%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1923
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

302
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1968
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

319
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 77%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 509
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 81%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1879
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

304
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1945
State average:

1935
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

303
State average:

302
Percent Passing: 56%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

314
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1923
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

302
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
CHILDREN'S HAVEN:

1980
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

322
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 81%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

552
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

698
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
Here:

65
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
CHILDREN'S HAVEN:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
CHILDREN'S HAVEN:

12
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
CHILDREN'S HAVEN:

7
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

430
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
Here:

713
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
Here:

71
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
CHILDREN'S HAVEN:

9
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

11
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

8
State average:

8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 441
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

296
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 48%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 78%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Sarasota, FL
  5. Children's Haven School in Sarasota, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.