Co-Wide Exceptional Child Programs School in Fort Myers, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 17.

2855 COLONIAL BLVD
Fort Myers, FL 33966

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
New School (3.0 miles):

93
Southwest Florida Juvenile Det Center School (3.5 miles):

68
Orange River Elementary School (6.3 miles):

60
Gateway Elementary School (6.9 miles):

53
Edgewood Academy School (4.5 miles):

45
Peace River Elementary School (4.1 miles):

36
Veterans Park Academy For The Arts School (13.4 miles):

23
Co-Wide Exceptional Child Programs School:

17
Co-Wide Exceptional Child Programs School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Lee County:

49
Fort Myers:

44
This School:

17

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (239) 337-8280 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 36
School number: 9450
School type: Combination Elementary and Secondary
District Name: LEE
Grade range: PREKINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 12
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (239) 337-8653
Principal: Carl Brunick
The main educational program offered at the school: Special Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 14
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 73
Senate District: 37
School Web Address: www.leeschools.net/dept/ese

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 52 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 52 (93%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 39 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 38 (90%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 52 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 52 (93%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 42 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 41 (92%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 42 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 41 (92%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 48 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 47 (92%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (92%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (89%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 48 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 47 (92%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 44 (86%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 42 (85%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (86%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 34 (85%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 43 (85%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 41 (84%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 64 (90%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 64 (90%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 9

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 27
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 25
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 53 (91%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 53 (91%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 62 (90%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 62 (90%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 27
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 25
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1764
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

284
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

20%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

60%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

10%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
CO-WIDE EXCEPTIONAL CHILD PROGRAMS:

10%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

20%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

15
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

5
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1909
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

309
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

30%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

10%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

30%
State average:

12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

60%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

11
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1944
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

303
State average:

302
Percent Passing
Here:

64%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

27%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 2
CO-WIDE EXCEPTIONAL CHILD PROGRAMS:

18%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

45%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

9%
State average:

12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

55%
State average:

37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

15
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

286
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
CO-WIDE EXCEPTIONAL CHILD PROGRAMS:

50%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 2
CO-WIDE EXCEPTIONAL CHILD PROGRAMS:

30%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

20%
State average:

30%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

20%
State average:

36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1886
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

291
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

30%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

30%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

20%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

10%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 5
CO-WIDE EXCEPTIONAL CHILD PROGRAMS:

10%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

40%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
CO-WIDE EXCEPTIONAL CHILD PROGRAMS:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1969
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

320
State average:

326
Percent Passing
Here:

64%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

9%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
CO-WIDE EXCEPTIONAL CHILD PROGRAMS:

27%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
CO-WIDE EXCEPTIONAL CHILD PROGRAMS:

18%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

45%
State average:

33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

64%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

287
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 58%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1932
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

314
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
CO-WIDE EXCEPTIONAL CHILD PROGRAMS:

276
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 73%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 9%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1928
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

303
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

1
State average:

103

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

1
State average:

190

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 2

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 10
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

259
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 10%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
CO-WIDE EXCEPTIONAL CHILD PROGRAMS:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 50%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 30%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1904
State average from 819 schools:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

314
State average:

294
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 60%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
CO-WIDE EXCEPTIONAL CHILD PROGRAMS:

1954
State average:

1807
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1836
State average:

1738
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 118

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
CO-WIDE EXCEPTIONAL CHILD PROGRAMS:

1922
State average from 612 schools:

1849
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

312
State average:

298
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 40%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

2133
State average:

1837
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1956
State average:

1779
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 177

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
CO-WIDE EXCEPTIONAL CHILD PROGRAMS:

1833
State average from 573 schools:

1879
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

283
State average:

291
Percent Passing: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 56%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 19%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 11
Percent Matched to 2006: 44%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1887
State average:

1873
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1933
State average:

1876
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -46

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1875
State average from 815 schools:

1851
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

315
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 50%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1939
State average:

1845
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1905
State average:

1755
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 34

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
CO-WIDE EXCEPTIONAL CHILD PROGRAMS:

1940
State average from 613 schools:

1884
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

307
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 40%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

2030
State average:

1869
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

2003
State average:

1821
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 27

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1935
State average from 581 schools:

1950
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

311
State average:

315
Percent Passing: 64%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 43%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1966
State average:

1939
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1963
State average:

1901
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 1

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 1

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 1

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 1

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 3

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 2

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 1

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 1

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 1

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 1

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 1

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 3

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 2

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 1

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 1
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 8
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 10
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

243
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 70%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 10%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
CO-WIDE EXCEPTIONAL CHILD PROGRAMS:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 40%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 40%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 10%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 50%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 10%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Fort Myers, FL
  5. Co-Wide Exceptional Child Programs School in Fort Myers, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.