Eleanor H. Miller School in Palatka, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 45.

156 HORSEMAN CLUB RD
Palatka, FL 32177

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Q. I. Roberts Middle School (12.2 miles):

66
Kelley Smith Elementary School (0.6 miles):

54
Putnam County Adult Education Center School (3.1 miles):

46
Eleanor H. Miller School:

45
James A. Long Elementary School (3.1 miles):

39
C. H. Price Middle School (11.5 miles):

27
Interlachen High School (11.5 miles):

25
Palatka High School (1.8 miles):

20
Eleanor H. Miller School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Putnam County:

31
Palatka:

31
Eleanor H. Miller School:

45

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (386) 329-0595 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 54
School number: 321
School type: Combination Elementary and Secondary
District Name: PUTNAM
Grade range: PREKINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 12
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (386) 329-0601
Principal: Faye Davis
The main educational program offered at the school: Special Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 7
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 21
Senate District: 7
School Web Address: http://ehmiller.putnamschools.org/

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

85%
State average from 59 schools:

76%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

89%
State average from 59 schools:

78%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

91%
State average from 59 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

73%
State average from 59 schools:

54%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

66%
State average from 59 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
ELEANOR H. MILLER SCHOOL:

79%
State average from 59 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

64%
State average from 59 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

78%
State average from 59 schools:

69%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
ELEANOR H. MILLER SCHOOL:

625
State average from 59 schools:

560
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 59 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 119999: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
ELEANOR H. MILLER SCHOOL:

6%
State average from 59 schools:

54%
Minority Rate
ELEANOR H. MILLER SCHOOL:

4%
State average from 59 schools:

46%
Region: 2

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 975 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 975 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 327
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 956
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 905

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 957
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 905
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 843 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 843 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 286
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 831
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 786

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 832
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 786
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 52 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 52 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 34 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 34 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 36 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 36 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 62 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 62 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 115 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 115 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 37
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 115
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 108

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 115
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 107
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

85%
State average from 58 schools:

76%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

86%
State average from 58 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

94%
State average from 58 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

71%
State average from 58 schools:

50%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

66%
State average from 58 schools:

69%
Making Math Gains
Here:

77%
State average from 58 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

67%
State average from 58 schools:

66%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

71%
State average from 58 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

617
State average from 58 schools:

564
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 59 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 1999: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

4%
State average from 59 schools:

51%
Minority Rate
Here:

15%
State average from 59 schools:

46%
Region: 2


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (88%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 38 (90%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

11%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

15%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27 (90%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28 (93%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (89%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (89%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (88%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 38 (90%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

85%
State average from 59 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

86%
State average from 59 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
ELEANOR H. MILLER SCHOOL:

96%
State average from 59 schools:

83%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

69%
State average from 59 schools:

47%
Making Reading Gains
ELEANOR H. MILLER SCHOOL:

63%
State average from 59 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

77%
State average from 59 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

58%
State average from 59 schools:

60%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

69%
State average from 59 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

603
State average from 59 schools:

541
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 59 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 1999: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

4%
State average from 59 schools:

47%
Minority Rate
Here:

14%
State average from 59 schools:

46%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 47 (78%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (78%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
ELEANOR H. MILLER SCHOOL:

9%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 34 (77%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 36 (78%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 44 (79%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 46 (82%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

23%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 47 (78%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (78%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

9%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 53 (81%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 47 (77%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24 (79%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21 (74%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 43 (82%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (79%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 53 (81%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 47 (77%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 81 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 80 (97%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 37
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 68
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
ELEANOR H. MILLER SCHOOL:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 66
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 36 (97%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 16

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 33
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 33
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (91%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (91%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 23
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 68 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 67 (97%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 30

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 58
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 55
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 81 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 80 (97%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 37

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 68
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 66
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

5
State average:

103

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

4
State average:

97

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

3
State average:

101

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
ELEANOR H. MILLER SCHOOL:

7
State average:

190

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
ELEANOR H. MILLER SCHOOL:

4
State average:

201

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

2
State average:

192

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
ELEANOR H. MILLER SCHOOL:

7
State average:

273

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

4
State average:

237

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 3

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 1

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 4

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1141
State average from 808 schools:

1746
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

190
State average:

305
% in each Achievement Level 1: 70%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1193
State average:

1743
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1205
State average:

1668
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -12

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1570
State average from 612 schools:

1849
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

247
State average:

298
% in each Achievement Level 1: 80%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 6
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 80%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1519
State average:

1837
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
ELEANOR H. MILLER SCHOOL:

1534
State average:

1779
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -15

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1699
State average from 613 schools:

1884
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

236
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 80%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
ELEANOR H. MILLER SCHOOL:

1713
State average:

1869
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1603
State average:

1821
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 110

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 3

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 3

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 3

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 11
Mean Scale Score
Here:

663
State average from 597 schools:

696
Median NPR: 32
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 9
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 10): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 11
Critical Analysis (max 14): 7
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 3

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 3

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 3

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 11
Mean Scale Score
Here:

665
State average from 597 schools:

708
Median NPR: 28
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 3
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 3
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 2
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 5
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Palatka, FL
  5. Eleanor H. Miller School in Palatka, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.