City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is
82.
Other nearby schools ratings:
Expressions Learning Arts Academy School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:Florida: | 45 |
Alachua County: | 36 |
Gainesville: | 34 |
Expressions Learning Arts Academy: | 82 |
Discuss this school with others on our active
Florida forum
Phone: (352) 373-5223 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 1
School number: 956
School type: Elementary
District Name: ALACHUA
Grade range: KINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 5
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (352) 373-6327
Principal: Cheryl Valantis
Regular charter school.
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 6
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 22
Senate District: 14
School Web Address: http://www.expressionsacademy.org/
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 89% |
State average from 734 schools: | 73% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 86% |
State average from 734 schools: | 77% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 100% |
State average from 734 schools: | 85% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 61% |
State average from 733 schools: | 53% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 82% |
State average from 734 schools: | 64% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 59% |
State average from 733 schools: | 67% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 82% |
State average from 734 schools: | 58% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 59% |
State average from 734 schools: | 66% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 618 |
State average from 734 schools: | 543 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 733 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 16% |
State average from 734 schools: | 57% |
Minority RateHere: | 20% |
State average from 735 schools: | 46% |
Region: 2
Title I: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 37 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 89% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 86% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 30 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingEXPRESSIONS LEARNING ARTS ACADEMY: | 83% |
State average from 735 schools: | 74% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 80% |
State average from 734 schools: | 76% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 93% |
State average from 734 schools: | 88% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 56% |
State average from 734 schools: | 51% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 72% |
State average from 734 schools: | 67% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 61% |
State average from 735 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 72% |
State average from 735 schools: | 65% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 61% |
State average from 734 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)EXPRESSIONS LEARNING ARTS ACADEMY: | 578 |
State average from 734 schools: | 557 |
Percent TestedHere: | 99% |
State average from 734 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 13% |
State average from 734 schools: | 53% |
Minority RateHere: | 24% |
State average from 734 schools: | 45% |
Region: 2
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 84% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 81% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 36 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 36 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 82% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 92% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 86% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 39 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 39 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 91% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 85% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 37 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 93% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 15
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 81% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 36
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 72% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 36
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 23
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1661 |
State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 359 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 3EXPRESSIONS LEARNING ARTS ACADEMY: | 27% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4EXPRESSIONS LEARNING ARTS ACADEMY: | 47% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 100% |
State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1904 |
State average: | 1604 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 375 |
State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 15% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 38% |
State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 5Here: | 38% |
State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 92% |
State average: | 72% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1696 |
State average: | 1481 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 386 |
State average: | 339 |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 20% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 53% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 5Here: | 27% |
State average: | 16% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 100% |
State average: | 79% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1678 |
State average: | 1585 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500EXPRESSIONS LEARNING ARTS ACADEMY: | 351 |
State average: | 330 |
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 46% |
State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 38% |
State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 92% |
State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1585 |
State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 347 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 69%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 92%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1834 |
State average: | 1656 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 343 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 80%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 100%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 349 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 10
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1643 |
State average: | 1476 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 374 |
State average: | 338 |
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 69%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 100%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 11
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1761 |
State average: | 1675 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 353 |
State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 9
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1468 |
State average: | 1396 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 328 |
State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1728 |
State average: | 1582 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 345 |
State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 21
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1869 |
State average: | 1627 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 349 |
State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 25%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 100%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 362 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 11
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 10
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1495 |
State average: | 1461 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 342 |
State average: | 335 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 92%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1557 |
State average: | 1563 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 323 |
State average: | 325 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1751 |
State average: | 1668 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 351 |
State average: | 333 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 644 |
State average from 3241 schools: | 633 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Strategies (max 10)EXPRESSIONS LEARNING ARTS ACADEMY: | 6 |
State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 664 |
State average from 3233 schools: | 653 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Strategies (max 10)EXPRESSIONS LEARNING ARTS ACADEMY: | 8 |
State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreEXPRESSIONS LEARNING ARTS ACADEMY: | 694 |
State average from 3309 schools: | 667 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)EXPRESSIONS LEARNING ARTS ACADEMY: | 11 |
State average: | 9 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Strategies (max 10)EXPRESSIONS LEARNING ARTS ACADEMY: | 8 |
State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 11
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 334 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 82%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 9
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 14
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 55%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 82%
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1704 |
State average: | 1342 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 366 |
State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 62%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 23%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 100%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1796 |
State average from 1875 schools: | 1542 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 356 |
State average: | 313 |
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 64%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 100%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 100%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1796 |
State average: | 1546 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006EXPRESSIONS LEARNING ARTS ACADEMY: | 1632 |
State average: | 1397 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 164
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1829 |
State average from 1873 schools: | 1629 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 342 |
State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 27%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 93%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 100%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1829 |
State average: | 1632 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1583 |
State average: | 1532 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 245
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500EXPRESSIONS LEARNING ARTS ACADEMY: | 351 |
State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 10
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1587 |
State average: | 1413 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 362 |
State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 3: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 31%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 100%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000EXPRESSIONS LEARNING ARTS ACADEMY: | 1606 |
State average from 1874 schools: | 1525 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 334 |
State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 100%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1606 |
State average: | 1528 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1614 |
State average: | 1414 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: -8
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1691 |
State average from 1872 schools: | 1647 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 338 |
State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1698 |
State average: | 1649 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1520 |
State average: | 1519 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 179
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 13
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 671 |
State average from 1891 schools: | 633 |
Median NPR: 86
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 16
Functional (max 18): 15
Initial Understanding (max 12): 11
Interpretation (max 20): 17
Critical Analysis (max 12): 10
Strategies (max 10): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 12
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 672 |
State average from 1874 schools: | 642 |
Median NPR: 83
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 15
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 18
Critical Analysis (max 12): 10
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 15
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 680 |
State average from 1870 schools: | 667 |
Median NPR: 81
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 13
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 660 |
State average from 1891 schools: | 632 |
Median NPR: 85
Number Sense (max 14): 12
Operations (max 11): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 12
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 663 |
State average from 1874 schools: | 652 |
Median NPR: 83
Number Sense (max 12): 10
Operations (max 12): 10
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 7
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 15
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 670 |
State average from 1870 schools: | 663 |
Median NPR: 80
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 11
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 340 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 73%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 15
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 45%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 82%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 73%
- All Cities
- Florida forum
- Florida
- Gainesville, FL
- Expressions Learning Arts Academy School in Gainesville, Florida (FL)
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: