Jump to a detailed profile or search site with

Students & Teachers

Limited English Proficiency:

Show data for

• 2013-14

---

Students Enrolled in LEP Programs

• Hispanic52
• Asian4
• White2
• IDEA58

Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 58 (male: 33, female: 25)

• Hispanic: 52 (male: 29, female: 23)
• Asian: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
• White: 2 (all male)

• Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 58 (male: 32, female: 26)

Students with disabilities:

Show data for

• 2013-14

---

Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.

Students with disabilities served under IDEA

• Hispanic74
• Asian11
• Black7
• White23
• LEP59

Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 115 (male: 70, female: 45)

• Hispanic: 74 (male: 43, female: 31)
• Asian: 11 (male: 7, female: 4)
• Black: 7 (all male)
• White: 23 (male: 13, female: 10)

• Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 59 (male: 34, female: 25)

---

Retention:

Show data for

• 2013-14

---

A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained

Total number of students retained in 12th grade

• Hispanic7
• Asian2
• White4
• LEP4
• IDEA13

Total number of students retained in 12th grade: 13 (male: 7, female: 6)

• Hispanic: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
• Asian: 2 (all female)
• White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

• Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
• Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 13 (male: 8, female: 5)

---

Statewide Student Assessments

Paper-based CAASPP:

Show data for

• 2014

(State average from 1,311 schools)

---

California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) System includes paper-based tests:

California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA) - Students with significant cognitive disabilities who are unable to take the Smarter Balanced Field Test even with designated supports and accommodations participated in the CAASPP system by taking the CAPA. The CAPA is an individually administered performance assessment with all tasks linked to the California ELA, mathematics, and science content standards.

CAPA English-Language Arts students tested: 85
CAPA English-Language Arts students with scores: 85

Percentage At Or Above Proficient:	79%
State:	82%

---

CAPA Mathematics students tested: 85
CAPA Mathematics students with scores: 85

Percentage At Or Above Proficient:	62%
State:	68%

---

CAPA Science students tested: 42
CAPA Science students with scores: 42

Percentage At Or Above Proficient:	55%
California:	66%

The Physical Fitness Test:

Show data for

• 2014
• 2013
• 2012

---

The Physical Fitness Test (PFT) for students in California schools is the FITNESSGRAM. The main goal of the test is to help students in starting life-long habits of regular physical activity.

Aerobic Capacity:
7th grade: (Students tested: 17, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 0.0%, Needs Improvement: 88.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 11.8%)

88.2%

11.8%

---

---

Body Composition:
7th grade: (Students tested: 17, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 47.1%, Needs Improvement: 17.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 35.3%)

47.1%

17.6%

35.3%

---

---

Abdominal Strength:
7th grade: (Students tested: 17, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 5.9%, Needs Improvement: 94.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)

5.9%

94.1%

---

---

Trunk Extension Strength:
7th grade: (Students tested: 17, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 17.6%, Needs Improvement: 82.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)

17.6%

82.4%

---

---

Upper Body Strength:
7th grade: (Students tested: 17, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 0.0%, Needs Improvement: 100.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)

100.0%

---

---

Flexibility:
7th grade: (Students tested: 17, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 11.8%, Needs Improvement: 88.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)

11.8%

88.2%

---

Aerobic Capacity:
7th grade: (Students tested: 27, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 11.1%, Needs Improvement: 14.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 74.1%)

11.1%

14.8%

74.1%

---

---

Body Composition:
7th grade: (Students tested: 27, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 37.0%, Needs Improvement: 3.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 59.3%)

37.0%

3.7%

59.3%

---

---

Abdominal Strength:
7th grade: (Students tested: 27, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 3.7%, Needs Improvement: 96.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)

3.7%

96.3%

---

---

Trunk Extension Strength:
7th grade: (Students tested: 27, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 29.6%, Needs Improvement: 70.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)

29.6%

70.4%

---

---

Upper Body Strength:
7th grade: (Students tested: 27, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 3.7%, Needs Improvement: 96.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)

3.7%

96.3%

---

---

Flexibility:
7th grade: (Students tested: 27, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 33.3%, Needs Improvement: 66.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)

33.3%

66.7%

---

Aerobic Capacity:
7th grade: (Students tested: 13, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 7.7%, Needs Improvement: 23.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 69.2%)

7.7%

23.1%

69.2%

9th grade: (Students tested: 21, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 4.8%, Needs Improvement: 38.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 57.1%)

4.8%

38.1%

57.1%

---

---

Body Composition:
7th grade: (Students tested: 13, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 23.1%, Needs Improvement: 15.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 61.5%)

23.1%

15.4%

61.5%

9th grade: (Students tested: 21, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 28.6%, Needs Improvement: 28.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 42.8%)

28.6%

28.6%

42.8%

---

---

Abdominal Strength:
7th grade: (Students tested: 13, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 30.8%, Needs Improvement: 69.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)

30.8%

69.2%

9th grade: (Students tested: 21, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 19.0%, Needs Improvement: 81.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)

19.0%

81.0%

---

---

Trunk Extension Strength:
7th grade: (Students tested: 13, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 46.2%, Needs Improvement: 53.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)

46.2%

53.8%

9th grade: (Students tested: 21, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 76.2%, Needs Improvement: 23.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)

76.2%

23.8%

---

---

Upper Body Strength:
7th grade: (Students tested: 13, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 7.7%, Needs Improvement: 92.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)

7.7%

92.3%

9th grade: (Students tested: 21, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 4.8%, Needs Improvement: 95.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)

4.8%

95.2%

---

---

Flexibility:
7th grade: (Students tested: 13, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 23.1%, Needs Improvement: 76.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)

23.1%

76.9%

9th grade: (Students tested: 21, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 42.9%, Needs Improvement: 57.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)

42.9%

57.1%

---

Accountability

Adequate Yearly Progress:

Show data for

• 2015
• 2013
• 2012
• 2011
• 2010
• 2009
• 2008
• 2007
• 2006

(State average from 9,846 schools)

---

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) - Accountability system mandated by federal No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Statistics are based on test results of the Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Program, the California High School Exit Examination (CAHSEE), and the California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA).

Fred E. Lull Special Education Center School - Adequate Yearly Progress status

Met all AYP Criteria: Yes
Number of AYP criteria met: 2
Number of AYP criteria possible: 2
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)

---

Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes

ELA Participation Rate

Fred E. Lull Special Education Center School:	30.0%
State:	95.2%

ELA Participation Rate

• Hispanic15
• Black50
• White100
• SED34
• With Disabilities30

• Hispanic: 15% (tested 1 out of 7 enrolled)
• Black: 50% (tested 1 out of 2 enrolled)
• White: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)

• Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 34% (tested 2 out of 6 enrolled)
• Students with Disabilities: 30% (tested 3 out of 10 enrolled)

---

Met Math Participation Rate: Yes

Math Participation Rate

Fred E. Lull Special Education Center School:	30.0%
State:	94.9%

Math Participation Rate

• Hispanic15
• Black50
• White100
• SED34
• With Disabilities30

• Hispanic: 15% (tested 1 out of 7 enrolled)
• Black: 50% (tested 1 out of 2 enrolled)
• White: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)

• Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 34% (tested 2 out of 6 enrolled)
• Students with Disabilities: 30% (tested 3 out of 10 enrolled)

---

Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 17
Number of AYP criteria possible: 21
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)

---

ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 89.2%

ELA Participation Rate

Fred E. Lull Special Education Center School:	99.0%
California:	98.2%

ELA Participation Rate

• Hispanic100
• American Indian100
• Asian100
• Filipino100
• Black90
• White100
• SED99
• LEP100
• With Disabilities99

• Hispanic: 100% (tested 70 out of 70 enrolled)
• American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
• Asian: 100% (tested 7 out of 7 enrolled)
• Filipino: 100% (tested 5 out of 5 enrolled)
• Black: 90% (tested 9 out of 10 enrolled)
• White: 100% (tested 20 out of 20 enrolled)

• Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 99% (tested 64 out of 65 enrolled)
• English Learners: 100% (tested 63 out of 63 enrolled)
• Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 113 out of 114 enrolled)

• Hispanic: Yes

• Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
• English Learners: Yes
• Students with Disabilities: Yes

Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or Above

School:	84.8%
California:	55.7%

ELA Proficient or Above

• Hispanic81
• White100
• SED89
• LEP83
• With Disabilities85

• Hispanic: 81% (57 out of 70 valid scores)
• White: 100% (19 out of 19 valid scores)

• Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 89% (57 out of 64 valid scores)
• English Learners: 83% (52 out of 63 valid scores)
• Students with Disabilities: 85% (95 out of 112 valid scores)

---

Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: No
Math Percent Proficient Target: 89.5%

Math Participation Rate

Fred E. Lull Special Education Center School:	99.0%
California:	98.2%

Math Participation Rate

• Hispanic100
• American Indian100
• Asian100
• Filipino100
• Black90
• White100
• SED99
• LEP100
• With Disabilities99

• Hispanic: 100% (tested 70 out of 70 enrolled)
• American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
• Asian: 100% (tested 7 out of 7 enrolled)
• Filipino: 100% (tested 5 out of 5 enrolled)
• Black: 90% (tested 9 out of 10 enrolled)
• White: 100% (tested 20 out of 20 enrolled)

• Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 99% (tested 64 out of 65 enrolled)
• English Learners: 100% (tested 63 out of 63 enrolled)
• Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 113 out of 114 enrolled)

• Hispanic: Yes

• Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
• English Learners: Yes
• Students with Disabilities: Yes

Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or Above

Here:	67.9%
State:	59.6%

Math Proficient or Above

• Hispanic67
• White74
• SED77
• LEP73
• With Disabilities68

• Hispanic: 67% (47 out of 70 valid scores)
• White: 74% (14 out of 19 valid scores)

• Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 77% (49 out of 64 valid scores)
• English Learners: 73% (46 out of 63 valid scores)
• Students with Disabilities: 68% (76 out of 112 valid scores)

---

Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 16
Number of AYP criteria possible: 21
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)

---

ELA met overall: Yes
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 77.8%

ELA Participation Rate

Fred E. Lull Special Education Center School:	98.0%
California:	98.3%

ELA Participation Rate

• Hispanic100
• American Indian100
• Asian100
• Filipino100
• Black84
• White100
• SED99
• LEP100
• With Disabilities98

• Hispanic: 100% (tested 62 out of 62 enrolled)
• American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
• Asian: 100% (tested 5 out of 5 enrolled)
• Filipino: 100% (tested 4 out of 4 enrolled)
• Black: 84% (tested 10 out of 12 enrolled)
• White: 100% (tested 22 out of 22 enrolled)

• Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 99% (tested 79 out of 80 enrolled)
• English Learners: 100% (tested 53 out of 53 enrolled)
• Students with Disabilities: 98% (tested 105 out of 107 enrolled)

• Hispanic: Yes

• Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
• English Learners: Yes
• Students with Disabilities: Yes

Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or Above

Fred E. Lull Special Education Center School:	84.2%
California:	57.4%

ELA Proficient or Above

• Hispanic84
• White85
• SED82
• LEP79
• With Disabilities84

• Hispanic: 84% (51 out of 61 valid scores)
• White: 85% (17 out of 20 valid scores)

• Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 82% (62 out of 76 valid scores)
• English Learners: 79% (41 out of 52 valid scores)
• Students with Disabilities: 84% (85 out of 101 valid scores)

---

Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: No
Math Percent Proficient Target: 77.4%

Math Participation Rate

Fred E. Lull Special Education Center School:	98.0%
State:	98.1%

Math Participation Rate

• Hispanic100
• American Indian100
• Asian100
• Filipino100
• Black84
• White100
• SED99
• LEP100
• With Disabilities98

• Hispanic: 100% (tested 62 out of 62 enrolled)
• American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
• Asian: 100% (tested 5 out of 5 enrolled)
• Filipino: 100% (tested 4 out of 4 enrolled)
• Black: 84% (tested 10 out of 12 enrolled)
• White: 100% (tested 22 out of 22 enrolled)

• Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 99% (tested 79 out of 80 enrolled)
• English Learners: 100% (tested 53 out of 53 enrolled)
• Students with Disabilities: 98% (tested 105 out of 107 enrolled)

• Hispanic: Yes

• Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
• English Learners: Yes
• Students with Disabilities: Yes

Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or Above

School:	75.2%
California:	59.9%

Math Proficient or Above

• Hispanic72
• White80
• SED75
• LEP67
• With Disabilities75

• Hispanic: 72% (44 out of 61 valid scores)
• White: 80% (16 out of 20 valid scores)

• Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 75% (57 out of 76 valid scores)
• English Learners: 67% (35 out of 52 valid scores)
• Students with Disabilities: 75% (76 out of 101 valid scores)

---

Met all AYP Criteria: Yes
Number of AYP criteria met: 21
Number of AYP criteria possible: 21
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)

---

ELA met overall: Yes
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 67.6%

ELA Participation Rate

Fred E. Lull Special Education Center School:	97.0%
State:	98.2%

ELA Participation Rate

• Hispanic99
• American Indian100
• Asian86
• Filipino100
• Black93
• White95
• SED95
• LEP99
• With Disabilities97

• Hispanic: 99% (tested 73 out of 74 enrolled)
• American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
• Asian: 86% (tested 6 out of 7 enrolled)
• Filipino: 100% (tested 4 out of 4 enrolled)
• Black: 93% (tested 13 out of 14 enrolled)
• White: 95% (tested 17 out of 18 enrolled)

• Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 95% (tested 85 out of 90 enrolled)
• English Learners: 99% (tested 63 out of 64 enrolled)
• Students with Disabilities: 97% (tested 115 out of 119 enrolled)

• Hispanic: Yes

• Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
• English Learners: Yes
• Students with Disabilities: Yes

Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or Above

Here:	83.9%
State:	55.9%

ELA Proficient or Above

• Hispanic79
• Black100
• White94
• SED83
• LEP81
• With Disabilities84

• Hispanic: 79% (57 out of 72 valid scores)
• Black: 100% (12 out of 12 valid scores)
• White: 94% (15 out of 16 valid scores)

• Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 83% (68 out of 82 valid scores)
• English Learners: 81% (50 out of 62 valid scores)
• Students with Disabilities: 84% (94 out of 112 valid scores)

---

Math met overall: Yes
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
Math Percent Proficient Target: 68.5%

Math Participation Rate

School:	97.0%
California:	98.0%

Math Participation Rate

• Hispanic99
• American Indian100
• Asian86
• Filipino100
• Black93
• White95
• SED95
• LEP99
• With Disabilities97

• Hispanic: 99% (tested 73 out of 74 enrolled)
• American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
• Asian: 86% (tested 6 out of 7 enrolled)
• Filipino: 100% (tested 4 out of 4 enrolled)
• Black: 93% (tested 13 out of 14 enrolled)
• White: 95% (tested 17 out of 18 enrolled)

• Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 95% (tested 85 out of 90 enrolled)
• English Learners: 99% (tested 63 out of 64 enrolled)
• Students with Disabilities: 97% (tested 115 out of 119 enrolled)

• Hispanic: Yes

• Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
• English Learners: Yes
• Students with Disabilities: Yes

Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or Above

Fred E. Lull Special Education Center School:	76.8%
State:	59.3%

Math Proficient or Above

• Hispanic74
• Black83
• White81
• SED79
• LEP77
• With Disabilities77

• Hispanic: 74% (53 out of 72 valid scores)
• Black: 83% (10 out of 12 valid scores)
• White: 81% (13 out of 16 valid scores)

• Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 79% (65 out of 82 valid scores)
• English Learners: 77% (48 out of 62 valid scores)
• Students with Disabilities: 77% (86 out of 112 valid scores)

---

Met all AYP Criteria: Yes
Number of AYP criteria met: 21
Number of AYP criteria possible: 21
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)

---

ELA met overall: Yes
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 56.8%

ELA Participation Rate

Here:	96.0%
California:	98.2%

ELA Participation Rate

• Hispanic98
• Asian78
• Filipino100
• Black92
• White100
• SED98
• LEP98
• With Disabilities96

• Hispanic: 98% (tested 76 out of 78 enrolled)
• Asian: 78% (tested 7 out of 9 enrolled)
• Filipino: 100% (tested 8 out of 8 enrolled)
• Black: 92% (tested 11 out of 12 enrolled)
• White: 100% (tested 20 out of 20 enrolled)

• Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 98% (tested 90 out of 92 enrolled)
• English Learners: 98% (tested 70 out of 72 enrolled)
• Students with Disabilities: 96% (tested 122 out of 127 enrolled)

• Hispanic: Yes

• Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
• English Learners: Yes
• Students with Disabilities: Yes

Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or Above

Here:	84.4%
State:	53.7%

ELA Proficient or Above

• Hispanic81
• White89
• SED86
• LEP83
• With Disabilities84

• Hispanic: 81% (56 out of 69 valid scores)
• White: 89% (16 out of 18 valid scores)

• Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 86% (68 out of 79 valid scores)
• English Learners: 83% (53 out of 64 valid scores)
• Students with Disabilities: 84% (92 out of 109 valid scores)

---

Math met overall: Yes
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
Math Percent Proficient Target: 58%

Math Participation Rate

School:	96.0%
California:	98.1%

Math Participation Rate

• Hispanic98
• Asian78
• Filipino100
• Black92
• White100
• SED98
• LEP98
• With Disabilities96

• Hispanic: 98% (tested 76 out of 78 enrolled)
• Asian: 78% (tested 7 out of 9 enrolled)
• Filipino: 100% (tested 8 out of 8 enrolled)
• Black: 92% (tested 11 out of 12 enrolled)
• White: 100% (tested 20 out of 20 enrolled)

• Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 98% (tested 90 out of 92 enrolled)
• English Learners: 98% (tested 70 out of 72 enrolled)
• Students with Disabilities: 96% (tested 122 out of 127 enrolled)

• Hispanic: Yes

• Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
• English Learners: Yes
• Students with Disabilities: Yes

Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or Above

Here:	73.4%
California:	57.1%

Math Proficient or Above

• Hispanic74
• White61
• SED77
• LEP75
• With Disabilities73

• Hispanic: 74% (51 out of 69 valid scores)
• White: 61% (11 out of 18 valid scores)

• Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 77% (61 out of 79 valid scores)
• English Learners: 75% (48 out of 64 valid scores)
• Students with Disabilities: 73% (80 out of 109 valid scores)

---

Met all AYP Criteria: Yes
Number of AYP criteria met: 22
Number of AYP criteria possible: 22
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)

Graduation Rate

Here:	71.1%
California:	84.3%

Met Graduation Rate: Yes
(Note: To meet this criteria the graduation rate must be met at the schoolwide level and for all numerically significant student groups.)

---

ELA met overall: Yes
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 46%

ELA Participation Rate

Fred E. Lull Special Education Center School:	95.0%
California:	98.3%

ELA Participation Rate

• Hispanic98
• American Indian100
• Asian86
• Filipino100
• Black86
• White92
• SED97
• LEP99
• With Disabilities95

• Hispanic: 98% (tested 69 out of 71 enrolled)
• American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
• Asian: 86% (tested 6 out of 7 enrolled)
• Filipino: 100% (tested 6 out of 6 enrolled)
• Black: 86% (tested 6 out of 7 enrolled)
• White: 92% (tested 23 out of 25 enrolled)

• Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 97% (tested 83 out of 86 enrolled)
• English Learners: 99% (tested 64 out of 65 enrolled)
• Students with Disabilities: 95% (tested 111 out of 117 enrolled)

• Hispanic: Yes

• Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
• English Learners: Yes
• Students with Disabilities: Yes

Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or Above

Fred E. Lull Special Education Center School:	83.7%
State:	52.4%

ELA Proficient or Above

• Hispanic83
• White91
• SED84
• LEP82
• With Disabilities84

• Hispanic: 83% (53 out of 64 valid scores)
• White: 91% (20 out of 22 valid scores)

• Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 84% (64 out of 76 valid scores)
• English Learners: 82% (49 out of 60 valid scores)
• Students with Disabilities: 84% (87 out of 104 valid scores)

---

Math met overall: Yes
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
Math Percent Proficient Target: 47.5%

Math Participation Rate

School:	95.0%
State:	98.2%

Math Participation Rate

• Hispanic98
• American Indian100
• Asian86
• Filipino100
• Black86
• White92
• SED97
• LEP99
• With Disabilities95

• Hispanic: 98% (tested 69 out of 71 enrolled)
• American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
• Asian: 86% (tested 6 out of 7 enrolled)
• Filipino: 100% (tested 6 out of 6 enrolled)
• Black: 86% (tested 6 out of 7 enrolled)
• White: 92% (tested 23 out of 25 enrolled)

• Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 97% (tested 83 out of 86 enrolled)
• English Learners: 99% (tested 64 out of 65 enrolled)
• Students with Disabilities: 95% (tested 111 out of 117 enrolled)

• Hispanic: Yes

• Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
• English Learners: Yes
• Students with Disabilities: Yes

Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or Above

Fred E. Lull Special Education Center School:	76.0%
State:	55.6%

Math Proficient or Above

• Hispanic73
• White82
• SED79
• LEP77
• With Disabilities76

• Hispanic: 73% (47 out of 64 valid scores)
• White: 82% (18 out of 22 valid scores)

• Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 79% (60 out of 76 valid scores)
• English Learners: 77% (46 out of 60 valid scores)
• Students with Disabilities: 76% (79 out of 104 valid scores)

---

Met all AYP Criteria: Yes
Number of AYP criteria met: 22
Number of AYP criteria possible: 22
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)

Graduation Rate

School:	66.0%
State:	84.5%

Met Graduation Rate: Yes
(Note: To meet this criteria the graduation rate must be met at the schoolwide level and for all numerically significant student groups.)

---

ELA met overall: Yes
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 35.2%

ELA Participation Rate

Fred E. Lull Special Education Center School:	100.0%
California:	98.1%

ELA Participation Rate

• Hispanic100
• Asian100
• Filipino100
• Black100
• White100
• SED100
• LEP100
• With Disabilities100

• Hispanic: 100% (tested 70 out of 70 enrolled)
• Asian: 100% (tested 8 out of 8 enrolled)
• Filipino: 100% (tested 9 out of 9 enrolled)
• Black: 100% (tested 9 out of 9 enrolled)
• White: 100% (tested 25 out of 25 enrolled)

• Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 95 out of 95 enrolled)
• English Learners: 100% (tested 69 out of 69 enrolled)
• Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 121 out of 121 enrolled)

• Hispanic: Yes

• Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
• English Learners: Yes
• Students with Disabilities: Yes

Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or Above

School:	80.5%
California:	48.6%

ELA Proficient or Above

• Hispanic78
• White92
• SED84
• LEP78
• With Disabilities81

• Hispanic: 78% (53 out of 68 valid scores)
• White: 92% (22 out of 24 valid scores)

• Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 84% (77 out of 92 valid scores)
• English Learners: 78% (53 out of 68 valid scores)
• Students with Disabilities: 81% (95 out of 118 valid scores)

---

Math met overall: Yes
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
Math Percent Proficient Target: 37%

Math Participation Rate

Here:	100.0%
State:	98.0%

Math Participation Rate

• Hispanic100
• Asian100
• Filipino100
• Black100
• White100
• SED100
• LEP100
• With Disabilities100

• Hispanic: 100% (tested 70 out of 70 enrolled)
• Asian: 100% (tested 8 out of 8 enrolled)
• Filipino: 100% (tested 9 out of 9 enrolled)
• Black: 100% (tested 9 out of 9 enrolled)
• White: 100% (tested 25 out of 25 enrolled)

• Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 95 out of 95 enrolled)
• English Learners: 100% (tested 69 out of 69 enrolled)
• Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 121 out of 121 enrolled)

• Hispanic: Yes

• Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
• English Learners: Yes
• Students with Disabilities: Yes

Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or Above

Here:	60.2%
California:	52.3%

Math Proficient or Above

• Hispanic60
• White67
• SED63
• LEP60
• With Disabilities60

• Hispanic: 60% (41 out of 68 valid scores)
• White: 67% (16 out of 24 valid scores)

• Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 63% (58 out of 92 valid scores)
• English Learners: 60% (41 out of 68 valid scores)
• Students with Disabilities: 60% (71 out of 118 valid scores)

---

Met all AYP Criteria: Yes
Number of AYP criteria met: 22
Number of AYP criteria possible: 22
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)

Graduation Rate

School:	62.9%
State:	85.6%

Met Graduation Rate: YMA
(Note: To meet this criteria the graduation rate must be met at the schoolwide level and for all numerically significant student groups.)

---

ELA met overall: Yes
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 24.4%

ELA Participation Rate

School:	99.0%
California:	97.8%

ELA Participation Rate

• Hispanic100
• Asian100
• Filipino100
• Black100
• White96
• SED99
• LEP99
• With Disabilities99

• Hispanic: 100% (tested 79 out of 79 enrolled)
• Asian: 100% (tested 9 out of 9 enrolled)
• Filipino: 100% (tested 9 out of 9 enrolled)
• Black: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
• White: 96% (tested 20 out of 21 enrolled)

• Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 99% (tested 96 out of 97 enrolled)
• English Learners: 99% (tested 83 out of 84 enrolled)
• Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 120 out of 121 enrolled)

• Hispanic: Yes

• Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
• English Learners: Yes
• Students with Disabilities: Yes

Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or Above

School:	43.6%
California:	46.4%

ELA Proficient or Above

• Hispanic39
• White72
• SED40
• LEP38
• With Disabilities44

• Hispanic: 39% (28 out of 72 valid scores)
• White: 72% (13 out of 18 valid scores)

• Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 40% (35 out of 88 valid scores)
• English Learners: 38% (29 out of 77 valid scores)
• Students with Disabilities: 44% (48 out of 110 valid scores)

---

Math met overall: Yes
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
Math Percent Proficient Target: 26.5%

Math Participation Rate

School:	99.0%
State:	97.9%

Math Participation Rate

• Hispanic100
• Asian100
• Filipino100
• Black100
• White96
• SED99
• LEP99
• With Disabilities99

• Hispanic: 100% (tested 79 out of 79 enrolled)
• Asian: 100% (tested 9 out of 9 enrolled)
• Filipino: 100% (tested 9 out of 9 enrolled)
• Black: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
• White: 96% (tested 20 out of 21 enrolled)

• Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 99% (tested 96 out of 97 enrolled)
• English Learners: 99% (tested 83 out of 84 enrolled)
• Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 120 out of 121 enrolled)

• Hispanic: Yes

• Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
• English Learners: Yes
• Students with Disabilities: Yes

Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or Above

School:	35.5%
State:	50.5%

Math Proficient or Above

• Hispanic35
• White50
• SED33
• LEP34
• With Disabilities36

• Hispanic: 35% (25 out of 72 valid scores)
• White: 50% (9 out of 18 valid scores)

• Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 33% (29 out of 88 valid scores)
• English Learners: 34% (26 out of 77 valid scores)
• Students with Disabilities: 36% (39 out of 110 valid scores)

---

Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 12
Number of AYP criteria possible: 14
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)

Graduation Rate

Here:	65.7%
California:	87.5%

Met Graduation Rate: YMA
(Note: To meet this criteria the graduation rate must be met at the schoolwide level and for all numerically significant student groups.)

---

ELA met overall: Yes
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 24.4%

ELA Participation Rate

Here:	99.0%
State:	97.3%

ELA Participation Rate

• Hispanic99
• Asian100
• Filipino100
• Black100
• White100
• SED99
• LEP99
• With Disabilities99

• Hispanic: 99% (tested 63 out of 64 enrolled)
• Asian: 100% (tested 9 out of 9 enrolled)
• Filipino: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
• Black: 100% (tested 6 out of 6 enrolled)
• White: 100% (tested 20 out of 20 enrolled)

• Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 99% (tested 83 out of 84 enrolled)
• English Learners: 99% (tested 70 out of 71 enrolled)
• Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 101 out of 102 enrolled)

• Hispanic: Yes

• Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
• English Learners: Yes
• Students with Disabilities: Yes

Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or Above

Here:	23.7%
California:	45.9%

ELA Proficient or Above

• Hispanic16
• White32
• SED20
• LEP16
• With Disabilities24

• Hispanic: 16% (9 out of 57 valid scores)
• White: 32% (6 out of 19 valid scores)

• Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 20% (15 out of 77 valid scores)
• English Learners: 16% (10 out of 64 valid scores)
• Students with Disabilities: 24% (22 out of 93 valid scores)

---

Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: No
Math Percent Proficient Target: 26.5%

Math Participation Rate

School:	99.0%
California:	97.5%

Math Participation Rate

• Hispanic99
• Asian100
• Filipino100
• Black100
• White100
• SED99
• LEP99
• With Disabilities99

• Hispanic: 99% (tested 63 out of 64 enrolled)
• Asian: 100% (tested 9 out of 9 enrolled)
• Filipino: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
• Black: 100% (tested 6 out of 6 enrolled)
• White: 100% (tested 20 out of 20 enrolled)

• Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 99% (tested 83 out of 84 enrolled)
• English Learners: 99% (tested 70 out of 71 enrolled)
• Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 101 out of 102 enrolled)

• Hispanic: Yes

• Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
• English Learners: Yes
• Students with Disabilities: Yes

Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or Above

Here:	10.8%
State:	49.9%

Math Proficient or Above

• White21
• SED9
• LEP5
• With Disabilities11

• White: 21% (4 out of 19 valid scores)

• Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 9% (7 out of 77 valid scores)
• English Learners: 5% (3 out of 64 valid scores)
• Students with Disabilities: 11% (10 out of 93 valid scores)

---

Health & Safety

Chronic Student Absenteeismt:

Show data for

• 2013-14

---

A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.

Chronic Student Absenteeism

• Hispanic43
• Asian4
• Native Hawaiian2
• Black2
• White10
• LEP34
• IDEA61

Chronic Student Absenteeism: 61 (male: 40, female: 21)

• Hispanic: 43 (male: 29, female: 14)
• Asian: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
• Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 2 (all male)
• Black: 2 (all male)
• White: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)

• Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 34 (male: 23, female: 11)
• Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 61 (male: 41, female: 20)

Comments

---

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Name:

E-mail:

Show my email publicly

Human Verification:

Public Comment: (50-4000 characters)

Send comment

---