City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is
50.
Other nearby schools ratings:
Hamilton Correctional Institution School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:Florida: | 45 |
Hamilton County: | 25 |
Jasper: | 24 |
Hamilton Correctional Institution: | 50 |
Discuss this school with others on our active
Florida forum
Phone: (904) 792-5363 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 76
School number: 2151
School type: Adult
District Name: CESA
Grade range: ADULT
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (904) 792-5159
Principal: William Orr
The function/setting of the school: Adult Education
The main educational program offered at the school: Adult
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHAMILTON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 65% |
State average from 133 schools: | 72% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 73% |
State average from 133 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 89% |
State average from 133 schools: | 87% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 54% |
State average from 133 schools: | 52% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 64% |
State average from 133 schools: | 63% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 76% |
State average from 133 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 66% |
State average from 133 schools: | 59% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 74% |
State average from 133 schools: | 65% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 561 |
State average from 133 schools: | 541 |
Percent TestedHere: | 99% |
State average from 133 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: A
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: B
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 119999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 72% |
State average from 133 schools: | 52% |
Minority RateHere: | 81% |
State average from 133 schools: | 43% |
Region: 5
Title I: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 390 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 389 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 87
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 20% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 374
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 367
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 14% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 375
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 365
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 191 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 191 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 39
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 24% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 184
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 181
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 21% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 185
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 179
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 158 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 157 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 38
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 13% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 151
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 149
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 150
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 148
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 307 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 306 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 66
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 19% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 295
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 291
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 13% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 296
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 289
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 90 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 90 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 20% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 88
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 87
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 16% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 89
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 88
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHAMILTON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 64% |
State average from 133 schools: | 72% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 68% |
State average from 133 schools: | 74% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 98% |
State average from 133 schools: | 91% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 45% |
State average from 133 schools: | 51% |
Making Reading Gains HAMILTON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 65% |
State average from 133 schools: | 67% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 74% |
State average from 133 schools: | 70% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 63% |
State average from 133 schools: | 65% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 72% |
State average from 133 schools: | 68% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 549 |
State average from 133 schools: | 557 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 133 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: B
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 62% |
State average from 132 schools: | 48% |
Minority RateHere: | 77% |
State average from 133 schools: | 42% |
Region: 5
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 413 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 413 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 93% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 95
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 18% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 382
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 370
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 14% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 383
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 369
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 191 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 191 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 91% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 46
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 24% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 181
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 172
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 20% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 182
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 172
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 176 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 176 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 40
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 9% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 164
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 161
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 164
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 161
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 322 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 322 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 91% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 78
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 17% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 297
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 289
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 13% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 298
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 288
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 108 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 108 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHAMILTON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 19% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 99
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 96
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 19% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 100
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 96
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHAMILTON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 64% |
State average from 131 schools: | 70% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 66% |
State average from 131 schools: | 72% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 93% |
State average from 131 schools: | 85% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 43% |
State average from 131 schools: | 48% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 65% |
State average from 131 schools: | 64% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 74% |
State average from 131 schools: | 70% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 67% |
State average from 131 schools: | 61% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 72% |
State average from 131 schools: | 69% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 544 |
State average from 131 schools: | 540 |
Percent TestedHere: | 99% |
State average from 131 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: B
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 56% |
State average from 131 schools: | 47% |
Minority RateHere: | 72% |
State average from 131 schools: | 44% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 382 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 382 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 89
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 12% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 367
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 360
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHAMILTON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 11% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 369
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 359
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 184 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 184 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 38
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 15% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 175
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 171
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 17% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 176
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 170
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 163 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 163 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 44
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHAMILTON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 6% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 157
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 154
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 158
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 155
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 279 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 279 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 94% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 65
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 10% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 269
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 264
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 10% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 271
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 264
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 95 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 95 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 10% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 90
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 87
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 14% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 91
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 87
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1239 |
State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 290 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 27% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 15% |
State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 40% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 16% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 5HAMILTON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 2% |
State average: | 8% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 58% |
State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1494 |
State average: | 1604 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 305 |
State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 23% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 16% |
State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 32% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4HAMILTON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 25% |
State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 61% |
State average: | 72% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17HAMILTON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 18 |
State average: | 19 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1355 |
State average: | 1659 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 257 |
State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 55% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 22% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 18% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 24% |
State average: | 70% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2HAMILTON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 1 |
State average: | 2 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1387 |
State average: | 1716 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 253 |
State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 57% |
State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 21% |
State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 20% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4HAMILTON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 1% |
State average: | 25% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 21% |
State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1542 |
State average: | 1810 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 266 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 46% |
State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 34% |
State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 14% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5HAMILTON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 1% |
State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 20% |
State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1692 |
State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 269 |
State average: | 308 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 48% |
State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 34% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 15% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 18% |
State average: | 52% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2HAMILTON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 5 |
State average: | 6 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1734 |
State average: | 1922 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 277 |
State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 50% |
State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 32% |
State average: | 30% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 18% |
State average: | 26% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 18% |
State average: | 45% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500HAMILTON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 249 |
State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1HAMILTON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 69% |
State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 19% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 12% |
State average: | 36% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 12% |
State average: | 51% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 254 |
State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 62% |
State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 24% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 12% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 13% |
State average: | 41% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12HAMILTON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 5 |
State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHAMILTON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 1426 |
State average: | 1481 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 327 |
State average: | 339 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 20% |
State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 31% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 38% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 73% |
State average: | 79% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1578 |
State average: | 1585 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 328 |
State average: | 330 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 18% |
State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 43% |
State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4HAMILTON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 32% |
State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 77% |
State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1384 |
State average: | 1674 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 273 |
State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1HAMILTON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 58% |
State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 33% |
State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 10% |
State average: | 27% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 10% |
State average: | 63% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6HAMILTON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 3 |
State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHAMILTON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 1407 |
State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 248 |
State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 69% |
State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2HAMILTON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 19% |
State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3HAMILTON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 12% |
State average: | 29% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 12% |
State average: | 55% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6HAMILTON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 3 |
State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1567 |
State average: | 1786 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 251 |
State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 64% |
State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 30% |
State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
% in each Achievement Level 4
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1754 |
State average: | 1892 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 284 |
State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 41% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 34% |
State average: | 21% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 20% |
State average: | 38% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 25% |
State average: | 64% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7HAMILTON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 3 |
State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1799 |
State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 265 |
State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 34% |
State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 41% |
State average: | 22% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 25% |
State average: | 31% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHAMILTON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 25% |
State average: | 61% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12HAMILTON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 4 |
State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7HAMILTON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 3 |
State average: | 4 |
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1122 |
State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500HAMILTON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 271 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1453 |
State average: | 1605 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 298 |
State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 02%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 08
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1308 |
State average: | 1656 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 249 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 25%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1461 |
State average: | 1707 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 266 |
State average: | 310 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 19%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1587 |
State average: | 1800 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 275 |
State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1616 |
State average: | 1864 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 253 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 66%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1703 |
State average: | 1907 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 272 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 58%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 13%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 242 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 79%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 4%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 229 |
State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 78%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 5%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1147 |
State average: | 1476 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 267 |
State average: | 338 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1419 |
State average: | 1578 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 292 |
State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1326 |
State average: | 1675 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 260 |
State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 68%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1428 |
State average: | 1679 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 253 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 71%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 5%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1652 |
State average: | 1799 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 272 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1723 |
State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 277 |
State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 22%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1771 |
State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 257 |
State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 51
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 4 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Unscore - Combined: 2
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 41%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 65%
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 105
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHAMILTON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 4 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 39%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 78%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHAMILTON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 1167 |
State average: | 1396 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 278 |
State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1359 |
State average: | 1582 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 282 |
State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1284 |
State average: | 1627 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 245 |
State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 57%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 13%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1394 |
State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 254 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 12%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHAMILTON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 1517 |
State average: | 1775 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 261 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 19%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1685 |
State average: | 1857 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 268 |
State average: | 304 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 9%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1682 |
State average: | 1894 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 268 |
State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 66%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 3%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 236 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 78%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 3%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 237 |
State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 72%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 2%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1236 |
State average: | 1461 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 286 |
State average: | 335 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1370 |
State average: | 1563 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 280 |
State average: | 325 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1360 |
State average: | 1668 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 268 |
State average: | 333 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 58%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 4%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHAMILTON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 1395 |
State average: | 1670 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500HAMILTON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 245 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 77%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 5%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1646 |
State average: | 1801 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500HAMILTON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 271 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1717 |
State average: | 1882 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 275 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1693 |
State average: | 1915 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 234 |
State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 4%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 606 |
State average from 3241 schools: | 633 |
Literary (max 18)HAMILTON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 10 |
State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)HAMILTON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 11 |
State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHAMILTON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 628 |
State average from 3233 schools: | 653 |
Informational (max 18)HAMILTON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 10 |
State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)HAMILTON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 8 |
State average: | 10 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHAMILTON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 68 |
State average: | 101 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 628 |
State average from 3309 schools: | 667 |
Median NPRHAMILTON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 36 |
State average: | 71 |
Literary (max 18)HAMILTON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 10 |
State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Interpretation (max 20)HAMILTON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 10 |
State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere: | 104 |
State average: | 190 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 628 |
State average from 2604 schools: | 671 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Interpretation (max 20)HAMILTON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 10 |
State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 647 |
State average from 2487 schools: | 682 |
Functional (max 18)HAMILTON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 9 |
State average: | 12 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 655 |
State average from 2497 schools: | 687 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Strategies (max 10)HAMILTON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 6 |
State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 651 |
State average from 2275 schools: | 694 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Interpretation (max 20)HAMILTON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION: | 9 |
State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 42
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 244 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 19%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 7%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 48%
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 95
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 255 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 11%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 7
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 52%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 88%
- All Cities
- Florida forum
- Florida
- Jasper, FL
- Hamilton Correctional Institution School in Jasper, Florida (FL)
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: