Herbert C. Hoover Middle School in Indialantic, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 89.

2000 HAWK HAVEN DR
Indialantic, FL 32903

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Wabasso School (16.6 miles):

96
Herbert C. Hoover Middle School:

89
Odyssey Charter School (11.0 miles):

53
Explorer Elementary/Middle Charter School (7.6 miles):

52
Palm Bay Community Charter-Patriot Campus School (11.0 miles):

27
South Area Alternative Learning Center School (6.4 miles):

17
Sawgrass Academy School (16.6 miles):

11
Devereux Hospital School (12.0 miles):

0
Herbert C. Hoover Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Brevard County:

49
Indialantic:

89
Herbert C. Hoover Middle School:

89

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (321) 727-1611 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 5
School number: 6082
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: BREVARD
Grade range: GRADES 7 TO 8
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (321) 725-0076
Principal: Colleen H Skinner
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 15
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 31
Senate District: 26
School Web Address: http://www.hoover.brevard.k12.fl.us

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
HERBERT C. HOOVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

86%
State average from 8 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

91%
State average from 8 schools:

78%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

93%
State average from 8 schools:

87%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

73%
State average from 8 schools:

52%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

63%
State average from 8 schools:

59%
Making Math Gains
Here:

80%
State average from 8 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

68%
State average from 8 schools:

57%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

85%
State average from 8 schools:

66%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

639
State average from 8 schools:

541
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 8 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 119999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

17%
State average from 8 schools:

43%
Minority Rate
Here:

10%
State average from 8 schools:

26%
Region: 3

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 423 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 423 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 199
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
HERBERT C. HOOVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 412
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 385

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 412
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 385
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 381 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 381 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 183
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
HERBERT C. HOOVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 371
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 348

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 371
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 348
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 71 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 71 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 34
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 68
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 62

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
HERBERT C. HOOVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 67
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 61
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 42 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 42 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

86%
State average from 8 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

93%
State average from 8 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

96%
State average from 8 schools:

92%
Meeting High Standards in Science
HERBERT C. HOOVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

74%
State average from 8 schools:

54%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

65%
State average from 8 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

83%
State average from 8 schools:

72%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

64%
State average from 8 schools:

66%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

84%
State average from 8 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

645
State average from 8 schools:

559
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 8 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

16%
State average from 8 schools:

45%
Minority Rate
Here:

10%
State average from 8 schools:

28%
Region: 3


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 435 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 435 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 197
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

82%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 419
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 397

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 418
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 396
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 389 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 389 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 178
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

82%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 377
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 357

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 376
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 356
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 71 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 71 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 26

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 67
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 63

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 67
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 63
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 56 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 56 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 29
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 49
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 48
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

88%
State average from 8 schools:

68%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

93%
State average from 8 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

95%
State average from 8 schools:

92%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

74%
State average from 8 schools:

51%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

66%
State average from 8 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

86%
State average from 8 schools:

76%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

73%
State average from 8 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

88%
State average from 8 schools:

73%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

663
State average from 8 schools:

567
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 8 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

11%
State average from 8 schools:

42%
Minority Rate
Here:

8%
State average from 8 schools:

29%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 456 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 456 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 228
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 440
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 415

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 440
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 414
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 417 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 417 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 207
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 405
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 384

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 405
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 384
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 45 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 46 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 25
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 44
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 67 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 68 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 26
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 65
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 60
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 66
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 60
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

85%
State average from 8 schools:

68%
Meeting High Standards in Math
HERBERT C. HOOVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

90%
State average from 8 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

92%
State average from 8 schools:

90%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

75%
State average from 8 schools:

51%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

58%
State average from 8 schools:

57%
Making Math Gains
Here:

79%
State average from 8 schools:

76%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

61%
State average from 8 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

82%
State average from 8 schools:

78%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

622
State average from 8 schools:

555
Percent Tested
HERBERT C. HOOVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

99%
State average from 8 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

13%
State average from 8 schools:

32%
Minority Rate
Here:

8%
State average from 8 schools:

22%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 476 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 475 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

98%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 224
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 459
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
HERBERT C. HOOVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 459
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 433 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 433 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

98%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 206
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 420
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 420
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 60 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 60 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 26
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 55
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 55
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 53 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 52 (95%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 50
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 50
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

84%
State average from 8 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

91%
State average from 8 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

88%
State average from 8 schools:

87%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

64%
State average from 8 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

79%
State average from 8 schools:

76%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

72%
State average from 8 schools:

72%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

478
State average from 8 schools:

441
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 8 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

11%
State average from 8 schools:

32%
Minority Rate
Here:

8%
State average from 8 schools:

21%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 508 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 508 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
HERBERT C. HOOVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

95%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 267
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 488
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
HERBERT C. HOOVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 488
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 468 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 468 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

95%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 248

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 451
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 451
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 54 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 54 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 19

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 48

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 48
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 61 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 61 (97%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 34
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
HERBERT C. HOOVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 55

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 55
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

82%
State average from 7 schools:

63%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

86%
State average from 7 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

92%
State average from 7 schools:

80%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

59%
State average from 7 schools:

54%
Making Math Gains
HERBERT C. HOOVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

81%
State average from 7 schools:

79%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

63%
State average from 7 schools:

62%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

463
State average from 7 schools:

411
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 7 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

11%
State average from 7 schools:

31%
Minority Rate
HERBERT C. HOOVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

9%
State average from 7 schools:

18%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1957
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

345
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

3%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
HERBERT C. HOOVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

13%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

33%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

18%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

84%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
HERBERT C. HOOVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

18
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2016
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

337
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

2%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

15%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

50%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

27%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

5%
State average:

3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

83%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

19
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
HERBERT C. HOOVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

7
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

348
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

7%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

22%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

49%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

16%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

6%
State average:

2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

71%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

11
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

9
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

10
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1934
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

342
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
HERBERT C. HOOVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

6%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

10%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

36%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

32%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

16%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

84%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

7
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

7
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2008
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

349
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
HERBERT C. HOOVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

3%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

7%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

35%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

29%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 5
HERBERT C. HOOVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

26%
State average:

10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

90%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

8
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

8
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

9
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

7
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1966
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

347
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1999
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

334
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

345
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 10

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1984
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

354
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 27%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1999
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
HERBERT C. HOOVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

347
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 25%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 201
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 34%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 6%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 96%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1941
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

342
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1998
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

334
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

347
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1949
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

346
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2008
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

349
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 25%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

218
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
Here:

706
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
Here:

84
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

16
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
HERBERT C. HOOVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

14
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

16
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

229
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
HERBERT C. HOOVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

714
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

84
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
HERBERT C. HOOVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

14
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

16
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

12
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

8
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 233
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

324
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 64%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 36%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 7%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 92%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1895
State average from 808 schools:

1746
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

334
State average:

305
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1918
State average:

1743
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1909
State average:

1668
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 10

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1979
State average from 819 schools:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

330
State average:

294
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 8
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1989
State average:

1807
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1959
State average:

1738
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 30

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
HERBERT C. HOOVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

345
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1934
State average from 804 schools:

1777
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

342
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1951
State average:

1774
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1865
State average:

1645
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 87

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1971
State average from 815 schools:

1851
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

340
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1981
State average:

1845
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1945
State average:

1755
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 36

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 233
Mean Scale Score
HERBERT C. HOOVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

696
State average from 796 schools:

675
Median NPR: 79
Literary (max 18): 16
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 227
Mean Scale Score
HERBERT C. HOOVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

711
State average from 810 schools:

685
Median NPR: 83
Literary (max 18): 16
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 15
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 14): 11
Strategies (max 10): 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 233
Mean Scale Score
HERBERT C. HOOVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

716
State average from 796 schools:

685
Median NPR: 87
Number Sense (max 9): 6
Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 7
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 7
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 227
Mean Scale Score
Here:

722
State average from 810 schools:

698
Median NPR: 85
Number Sense (max 9): 7
Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 228
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

305
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 55%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 11
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 44%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 89%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 78%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Indialantic, FL
  5. Herbert C. Hoover Middle School in Indialantic, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.