Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


James E Randolph Elementary School in Fulshear, TX
(PK-05 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 98
Address
 5303 FLEWELLEN OAKS LN
Fulshear, TX 77441
Telephone
(281) 234-3800
(make sure to verify first before calling)
Website
http://www.katyisd.org/
City-data.com school rating
98
Students
977
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
65.6
Free lunch eligible students
16
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
3
School district
KATY ISD
Charter school
No
Title I status
Not a Title I school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
STANLEY C STANLEY EL (1.0 miles):

99
KEIKO DAVIDSON EL (1.3 miles):

99
FRED AND PATTI SHAFER EL (0.5 miles):

98
TOM WILSON EL (1.7 miles):

98
James E Randolph Elementary School:

98
SEVEN LAKES H S (2.4 miles):

96
DEAN LEAMAN J H SCHOOL (2.4 miles):

91
TOMPKINS H S (2.6 miles):

89
FULSHEAR H S (2.4 miles):

73
James E Randolph Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Fort Bend County:

70
Fulshear:

88
James E Randolph Elementary:

98

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 977
Enrollment in 2015: 816

Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)

GradePKKGG01G02G03G04G05Total
All students12161173174155159143977
Female students2787475638273447
Male students10839999927770530
American Indian/Alaska Native students - 1211 - - 5
Asian students416121810101484
Hispanic students2172328263326155
Black students111491561157
White students51061271129710589641
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander students - - - 1 - 1 - 2
Two or More Races students - 105564333

Enrollment by grade:
Pre-Kindergarten enrollment: 12
Kindergarten enrollment: 161
1st grade enrollment: 173
2nd grade enrollment: 174
3rd grade enrollment: 155
4th grade enrollment: 159
5th grade enrollment: 143

James E Randolph Elementary School - Enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

Female enrollment: 447 (45.8%)
James E Randolph Elementary School:

45.8%
State:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 530 (54.2%)
Here:

54.2%
Texas:

50.1%

James E Randolph Elementary School - Enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

American Indian/Alaska Native enrollment: 5 (0.5%)
Here:

0.5%
State:

0.4%
Asian enrollment: 84 (8.6%)
James E Randolph Elementary School:

8.6%
Texas:

3.1%
Hispanic enrollment: 155 (15.9%)
School:

15.9%
State:

46.9%
Black enrollment: 57 (5.8%)
School:

5.8%
State:

11.6%
White enrollment: 641 (65.6%)
Here:

65.6%
State:

32.3%
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander enrollment: 2 (0.2%)
Here:

0.2%
Texas:

0.1%
Two or More Races enrollment: 33 (3.4%)
Here:

3.4%
Texas:

2.1%

James E Randolph Elementary School - Enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)

Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 19 (1.9%)
School:

1.9%
State:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 16 (1.6%)
Here:

1.6%
Texas:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 3 (0.3%)
James E Randolph Elementary School:

0.3%
Texas:

6.2%

James E Randolph Elementary School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)

Classroom Teachers (FTE): 65.6

Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 4
Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 4
Number of FTE school counselors: 1
Number of FTE teachers who were absent more than 10 school days during the school years: 19
Number of FTE nurses: 1
Number of FTE psychologists: 0.5

Student/Teacher Ratio
School:

14.9
Texas:

15.6

School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $4,060,464
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 64 (Salary Expenditures: $3,432,257)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 13 (Salary Expenditures: $59,842)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 6.2 (Salary Expenditures: $217,136)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 3 (Salary Expenditures: $351,229)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $293,270
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $4,061,644
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $3,432,647
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 13 (Salary Expenditures: $59,842)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 6.2 (Salary Expenditures: $217,926)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 3 (Salary Expenditures: $351,229)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $300,404

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for

    Students Enrolled in LEP Programs

  • Hispanic31
  • Asian19
  • Black2
  • White10
  • Multirace2
  • IDEA5
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 64 (male: 38, female: 26)
  • Hispanic: 31 (male: 17, female: 14)
  • Asian: 19 (male: 11, female: 8)
  • Black: 2 (all male)
  • White: 10 (male: 8, female: 2)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all female)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 5 (all male)

Students with disabilities:
Show data for

Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.

Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.

    Students with disabilities served under IDEA

  • Hispanic13
  • Asian7
  • Black7
  • White59
  • LEP7
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 86 (male: 70, female: 16)
  • Hispanic: 13 (all male)
  • Asian: 7 (all male)
  • Black: 7 (all male)
  • White: 59 (male: 43, female: 16)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 7 (all male)

    Students with disabilities served under Section 504

  • Hispanic7
  • White46
  • Multirace2
  • LEP4
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 55 (male: 28, female: 27)
  • Hispanic: 7 (male: 2, female: 5)
  • White: 46 (male: 26, female: 20)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all female)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Retention:
Show data for

(State average from 3,162 schools)

A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained
Total number of students retained in Kindergarten: 6 (male: 4, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all male)
  • White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)

Percent of Kindergarten students retained
Here:

3.7%
State:

5.2%

Total number of students retained in 1st grade: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Asian: 2 (all female)
  • White: 2 (all male)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all female)

Percent of 1st grade students retained
School:

2.3%
State:

6.1%

Total number of students retained in 2nd grade: 2 (all female)
  • Hispanic: 2

Percent of 2nd grade students retained
School:

1.1%
State:

4.8%

Total number of students retained in 3rd grade: 2 (all female)
  • Black: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2

Percent of 3rd grade students retained
Here:

1.3%
Texas:

4.1%

Total number of students retained in 4th grade: 2 (all male)
  • Two or More Races: 2

Percent of 4th grade students retained
School:

1.3%
State:

3.6%


Gifted and Talented:
Show data for

(State average from 7,254 schools)

This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.

    Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment

  • Hispanic4
  • Asian13
  • Black5
  • White43
  • Multirace4
  • LEP2
  • IDEA2
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 69 (male: 32, female: 37)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Asian: 13 (male: 8, female: 5)
  • Black: 5 (all female)
  • White: 43 (male: 20, female: 23)
  • Two or More Races: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)

Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
School:

70.6
Texas:

79.4

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,539 schools)

The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
3rd Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,582
  • Males1,589
  • Females1,573
  • Hispanic1,584
  • Asian1,668
  • Black1,522
  • White1,572
Math Average Scale Score:

1,582
Texas:

1,453
Math students tested: 220
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 220

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.7 (84%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.5 (81%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.7 (82%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.3 (81%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 17%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 31%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 47%

5%
17%
31%
47%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,589, Tested: 123, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 12%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 50%)
5%
12%
33%
50%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,573, Tested: 97, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 43%)
5%
23%
29%
43%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,584, Tested: 33, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 3%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 45%)
3%
18%
34%
45%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,668, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 73%)
27%
73%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,522, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 46%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 36%)
18%
46%
36%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,572, Tested: 145, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 44%)
6%
16%
34%
44%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,565
  • Males1,555
  • Females1,577
  • Hispanic1,559
  • Asian1,646
  • Black1,513
  • White1,559
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,565
Texas:

1,423
Reading students tested: 220
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 220

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.5 (89%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.5 (83%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 11 (78%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 16%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 21%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 57%

6%
16%
21%
57%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,555, Tested: 123, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 56%)
7%
18%
19%
56%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,577, Tested: 97, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 13%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 59%)
5%
13%
23%
59%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,559, Tested: 33, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 9%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 52%)
6%
9%
33%
52%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,646, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 11%, Masters: 85%)
4%
11%
85%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,513, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 9%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 45%)
27%
9%
19%
45%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,559, Tested: 145, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 19%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 55%)
6%
19%
20%
55%

4th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,656
  • Males1,659
  • Females1,653
  • Hispanic1,620
  • Asian1,742
  • Black1,628
  • White1,644
  • Multirace1,710
Math Average Scale Score:

1,656
Texas:

1,546
Math students tested: 217
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 218

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 7.2 (81%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.6 (78%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8 (80%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.2 (79%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 21%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 22%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 51%

6%
21%
22%
51%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,659, Tested: 111, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 50%)
6%
20%
24%
50%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,653, Tested: 106, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 51%)
5%
23%
21%
51%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,620, Tested: 41, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 44%)
5%
27%
24%
44%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,742, Tested: 32, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 6%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 75%)
6%
19%
75%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,628, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 33%)
8%
34%
25%
33%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,644, Tested: 126, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 48%)
7%
24%
21%
48%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,710, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 60%)
40%
60%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,630
  • Males1,616
  • Females1,644
  • Hispanic1,610
  • Asian1,702
  • Black1,606
  • White1,622
  • Multirace1,607
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,630
State:

1,496
Reading students tested: 218
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 218

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.5 (81%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12 (80%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.8 (83%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 18%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 28%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 48%

6%
18%
28%
48%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,616, Tested: 111, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 32%, Masters: 41%)
6%
21%
32%
41%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,644, Tested: 107, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 55%)
5%
16%
24%
55%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,610, Tested: 41, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 19%, Meets: 37%, Masters: 39%)
5%
19%
37%
39%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,702, Tested: 32, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 9%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 63%)
9%
28%
63%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,606, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 42%)
25%
33%
42%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,622, Tested: 127, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 19%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 48%)
8%
19%
25%
48%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,607, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 40%)
40%
20%
40%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All4,360
  • Males4,232
  • Females4,494
  • Hispanic4,303
  • Asian4,670
  • Black4,220
  • White4,326
  • Multirace4,016
Writing Average Scale Score:

4,360
Texas:

3,570
Writing students tested: 218
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 218

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.3 (66%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.9 (74%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 13 (81%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 16%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 34%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 39%

11%
16%
34%
39%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,232, Tested: 111, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 36%, Masters: 32%)
14%
18%
36%
32%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,494, Tested: 107, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 15%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 47%)
7%
15%
31%
47%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 4,303, Tested: 41, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 19%, Meets: 42%, Masters: 34%)
5%
19%
42%
34%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 4,670, Tested: 32, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 7%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 69%)
9%
7%
15%
69%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 4,220, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 66%, Masters: 17%)
17%
66%
17%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,326, Tested: 127, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 36%)
13%
18%
33%
36%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 4,016, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 20%)
40%
40%
20%

5th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,699
  • Males1,691
  • Females1,708
  • Hispanic1,688
  • Asian1,756
  • Black1,671
  • White1,699
  • Multirace1,702
Math Average Scale Score:

1,699
State:

1,603
Math students tested: 212
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 212

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.5 (74%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 13.4 (79%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.2 (80%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.3 (83%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 2%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 15%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 39%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 44%

2%
15%
39%
44%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,691, Tested: 115, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 3%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 37%, Masters: 44%)
3%
16%
37%
44%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,708, Tested: 97, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 1%, Approaches: 13%, Meets: 42%, Masters: 44%)
1%
13%
42%
44%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,688, Tested: 49, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 2%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 41%, Masters: 39%)
2%
18%
41%
39%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,756, Tested: 20, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 15%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 65%)
15%
20%
65%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,671, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 13%, Meets: 32%, Masters: 41%)
14%
13%
32%
41%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,699, Tested: 111, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 1%, Approaches: 13%, Meets: 43%, Masters: 43%)
1%
13%
43%
43%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,702, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 11%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 56%)
11%
33%
56%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,677
  • Males1,664
  • Females1,691
  • Hispanic1,692
  • Asian1,709
  • Black1,639
  • White1,673
  • Multirace1,650
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,677
Texas:

1,546
Reading students tested: 212
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 212

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.7 (84%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 13.6 (85%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 11.2 (80%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 14%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 29%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 53%

4%
14%
29%
53%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,664, Tested: 115, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 3%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 49%)
3%
18%
30%
49%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,691, Tested: 97, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%, Approaches: 11%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 58%)
4%
11%
27%
58%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,692, Tested: 49, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 65%)
18%
17%
65%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,709, Tested: 20, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 10%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 60%)
10%
30%
60%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,639, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 32%, Masters: 36%)
5%
27%
32%
36%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,673, Tested: 111, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 12%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 50%)
5%
12%
33%
50%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,650, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 11%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 44%)
11%
11%
34%
44%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All4,196
  • Males4,204
  • Females4,186
  • Hispanic4,139
  • Asian4,212
  • Black3,963
  • White4,263
  • Multirace4,224
Science Average Scale Score:

4,196
State:

3,771
Science students tested: 211
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 211

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.7 (79%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6.7 (84%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.3 (83%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 9.4 (78%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 26%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 36%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 33%

5%
26%
36%
33%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,204, Tested: 115, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 3%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 39%, Masters: 32%)
3%
26%
39%
32%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,186, Tested: 96, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 32%, Masters: 34%)
6%
28%
32%
34%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 4,139, Tested: 49, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 2%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 33%)
2%
37%
28%
33%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 4,212, Tested: 20, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 35%)
25%
40%
35%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,963, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 27%)
14%
36%
23%
27%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,263, Tested: 110, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 38%, Masters: 35%)
5%
22%
38%
35%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 4,224, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 11%, Meets: 56%, Masters: 33%)
11%
56%
33%

Health & Safety


Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
Show data for

(State average from 7,777 schools)

A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.

    Chronic Student Absenteeism

  • Hispanic2
  • American Indian2
  • Asian2
  • Black2
  • White16
  • Multirace2
  • LEP2
  • IDEA7
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 26 (male: 12, female: 14)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all male)
  • American Indian / Alaska Native: 2 (all male)
  • Asian: 2 (all male)
  • Black: 2 (all male)
  • White: 16 (male: 2, female: 14)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
James E Randolph Elementary School:

26.6
Texas:

147.9

Restraint and Seclusion:
Show data for

(State average from 2,148 schools)

Physical restraint refers to a personal restriction that immobilizes or reduces the ability of a student to move his or her torso, arms, legs, or head freely. The term physical restraint does not include a physical escort. Physical escort means a temporary touching or holding of the hand, wrist, arm, shoulder or back for the purpose of inducing a student who is acting out to walk to a safe location.
Total Number of students with disabilities (IDEA) subjected to physical restraint: 4 (all male)
  • White: 2
  • Two or More Races: 2

Students with disabilities (IDEA) subjected to physical restraint per 1,000 students
James E Randolph Elementary School:

4.1
State:

6.8


Suspensions:
Show data for

(State average from 3,231 schools)

Out-of-school suspension
  • For students with disabilities served under IDEA : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his/her regular school for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes to another setting (e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include both removals in which no individualized family service plan(IFSP) or individualized education plan(IEP) services are provided because the removal is 10 days or less as well as removals in which the child continues to receive services according to his/her IFSP or IEP.
  • For students without disabilities and students with disabilities served solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his / her regular school for at least half a day(but less than the remainder of the school year) for disciplinary purposes to another setting(e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include removals in which no educational services are provided, and removals in which educational services are provided(e.g., school-provided at home instruction or tutoring).
In-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his or her regular classroom(s) for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes, but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel. Direct supervision means school personnel are physically in the same location as students under their supervision.
School days missed due to out-of-school suspension: 4 (all male)
  • Black: 1
  • White: 3
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 1

Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students without disabilities): 4

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students without disabilities)
James E Randolph Elementary School:

4.1
Texas:

102.7
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Black: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2 (all female)

Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 4 (all male)
  • Black: 2
  • White: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2

Students without disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2

Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 4 (all male)
  • White: 2
  • Two or More Races: 2
  • Section 504: 2

Comments


Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss Fulshear, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents