Joseph Littles-Nguzo Saba School in West Palm Beach, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 5.

5829 CORPORATE WAY
West Palm Beach, FL 33407

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Bak Middle Of The Arts School (1.2 miles):

94
Independence Middle School (9.9 miles):

73
Osceola Creek Middle School (15.1 miles):

61
Chancellor Charter At Lantana School (12.9 miles):

51
Berkshire Elementary School (7.1 miles):

43
Plumosa Elementary School (19.4 miles):

35
Royal Palm School (12.5 miles):

23
Joseph Littles-Nguzo Saba School:

5
Joseph Littles-Nguzo Saba School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Palm Beach County:

45
West Palm Beach:

47
Joseph Littles-Nguzo Saba School:

5

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (561) 689-9970 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 50
School number: 2661
School type: Combination Elementary and Secondary
District Name: PALM BEACH
Grade range: GRADES KINDERGARTEN TO 8
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (561) 682-1342
Principal: Richard Scott
Regular charter school.
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 23
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 84
Senate District: 29

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

54%
State average from 79 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

27%
State average from 79 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

69%
State average from 79 schools:

82%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

59%
State average from 79 schools:

52%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

73%
State average from 79 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

68%
State average from 78 schools:

67%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

77%
State average from 79 schools:

61%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

63%
State average from 79 schools:

66%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

490
State average from 79 schools:

530
Percent Tested
Here:

98%
State average from 78 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: C

Grade in 2009: D

Grade in 2008: D

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: D

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: D

Grade in 2003: N

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

94%
State average from 80 schools:

54%
Minority Rate
Here:

100%
State average from 80 schools:

47%
Region: 5

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 65 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 65 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 42

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

23%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 42
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 62 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 62 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

22%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 60 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 60 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
JOSEPH LITTLES-NGUZO SABA:

23%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

27%
State average from 74 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

14%
State average from 74 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

94%
State average from 74 schools:

87%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

56%
State average from 74 schools:

52%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

59%
State average from 74 schools:

69%
Making Math Gains
Here:

54%
State average from 74 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

63%
State average from 74 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
JOSEPH LITTLES-NGUZO SABA:

57%
State average from 74 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

424
State average from 74 schools:

556
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 74 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: D

Grade in 2008: D

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: D

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: D

Grade in 2003: N

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

92%
State average from 74 schools:

47%
Minority Rate
Here:

100%
State average from 74 schools:

44%
Region: 5


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 76 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 76 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

30%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 50
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 49

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

16%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 50
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 73 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 73 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

30%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

17%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 68 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 68 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

28%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

13%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

28%
State average from 73 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

14%
State average from 73 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

91%
State average from 73 schools:

81%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

53%
State average from 73 schools:

47%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

45%
State average from 73 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

67%
State average from 73 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

47%
State average from 73 schools:

63%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

73%
State average from 73 schools:

69%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

418
State average from 73 schools:

537
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 73 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: D

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: D

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: D

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

92%
State average from 72 schools:

45%
Minority Rate
Here:

100%
State average from 73 schools:

43%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 66 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 66 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

26%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 53

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

16%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 55
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 62 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 62 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

27%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 55
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

16%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 53
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 61 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 61 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

29%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 50

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

17%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 53
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

34%
State average from 66 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

19%
State average from 66 schools:

66%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

90%
State average from 66 schools:

82%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

51%
State average from 66 schools:

48%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

59%
State average from 66 schools:

67%
Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Included
Making Math Gains
Here:

50%
State average from 66 schools:

65%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

53%
State average from 66 schools:

68%
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Included
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

53%
State average from 66 schools:

66%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

409
State average from 66 schools:

534
Percent Tested
Here:

96%
State average from 66 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: D

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: D

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

95%
State average from 66 schools:

44%
Minority Rate
Here:

100%
State average from 66 schools:

49%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 81 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 80 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 69
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

20%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 69
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 76 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 75 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 66
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 66
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 76 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 76 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 66
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 66
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

30%
State average from 62 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

16%
State average from 62 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

88%
State average from 62 schools:

82%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

59%
State average from 62 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

38%
State average from 62 schools:

67%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

65%
State average from 62 schools:

65%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

296
State average from 62 schools:

413
Percent Tested
Here:

98%
State average from 62 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: D

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: D

Grade in 2003: N

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

71%
State average from 62 schools:

44%
Minority Rate
Here:

100%
State average from 62 schools:

48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 95 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 95 (98%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
JOSEPH LITTLES-NGUZO SABA:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 25
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 84
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

19%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 84
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 95 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 95 (98%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 25

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 84
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

19%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 84
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 70 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 70 (98%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 14

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

32%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 63
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 63
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

31%
State average from 55 schools:

67%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

25%
State average from 55 schools:

61%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

85%
State average from 55 schools:

77%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

60%
State average from 55 schools:

63%
Making Math Gains
Here:

54%
State average from 55 schools:

66%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

63%
State average from 55 schools:

62%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

318
State average from 55 schools:

395
Percent Tested
JOSEPH LITTLES-NGUZO SABA:

98%
State average from 55 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: D

Grade in 2003: N

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

82%
State average from 55 schools:

45%
Minority Rate
Here:

100%
State average from 55 schools:

45%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1291
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

298
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

18%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

18%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
JOSEPH LITTLES-NGUZO SABA:

27%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

36%
State average:

32%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

64%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
JOSEPH LITTLES-NGUZO SABA:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1446
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
JOSEPH LITTLES-NGUZO SABA:

296
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

14%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

21%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

57%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

7%
State average:

29%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

64%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

15
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1468
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

268
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

46%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

15%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

31%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

8%
State average:

25%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
JOSEPH LITTLES-NGUZO SABA:

38%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

11
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1630
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

283
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

38%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

38%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

23%
State average:

33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

23%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

13
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1397
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

321
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

9%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

18%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

55%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

9%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

9%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

73%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
JOSEPH LITTLES-NGUZO SABA:

1162
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

233
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

71%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

29%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

3
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

2
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

2
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

2
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1489
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

267
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

62%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

15%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

23%
State average:

29%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

23%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
JOSEPH LITTLES-NGUZO SABA:

2
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
JOSEPH LITTLES-NGUZO SABA:

1630
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

267
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

54%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
JOSEPH LITTLES-NGUZO SABA:

23%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

15%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

8%
State average:

19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
JOSEPH LITTLES-NGUZO SABA:

23%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
JOSEPH LITTLES-NGUZO SABA:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

911
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
JOSEPH LITTLES-NGUZO SABA:

236
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 71%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1235
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

236
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 70%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1456
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

265
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 13%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1615
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

280
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1635
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

257
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 63%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

244
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 80%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

230
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 75%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

950
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

224
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 67%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 13%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1295
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

254
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 90%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1360
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

237
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 80%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
JOSEPH LITTLES-NGUZO SABA:

1500
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

234
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 75%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1657
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

260
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 56%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 25%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 16
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 63%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 94%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1324
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

276
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1414
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

268
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 25%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1500
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
JOSEPH LITTLES-NGUZO SABA:

258
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 69%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1772
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

286
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 23%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

240
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 92%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

275
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1154
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

231
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1325
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

260
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 67%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1519
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
JOSEPH LITTLES-NGUZO SABA:

239
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 69%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1793
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

294
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

9
State average:

103

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

10
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
Here:

619
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

39
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

11
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
JOSEPH LITTLES-NGUZO SABA:

7
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

12
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

641
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
Here:

48
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
JOSEPH LITTLES-NGUZO SABA:

11
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
JOSEPH LITTLES-NGUZO SABA:

8
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

11
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

8
State average:

190

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

13
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
Here:

641
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
Here:

31
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
JOSEPH LITTLES-NGUZO SABA:

7
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

10
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

13
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

675
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

52
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
JOSEPH LITTLES-NGUZO SABA:

8
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
JOSEPH LITTLES-NGUZO SABA:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 10
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

287
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 70%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 30%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 30%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 80%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 100%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 12
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

269
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 17%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 92%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1082
State average:

1342
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

264
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1263
State average from 1875 schools:

1542
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

265
State average:

313
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1218
State average:

1546
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1041
State average:

1397
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 177

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1458
State average from 878 schools:

1661
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

266
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1432
State average:

1663
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1358
State average:

1592
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 74

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1615
State average from 808 schools:

1746
Mean Scale Score 100-500
JOSEPH LITTLES-NGUZO SABA:

280
State average:

305
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 26%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 84%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1632
State average:

1743
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1510
State average:

1668
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 122

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1785
State average from 819 schools:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

289
State average:

294
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 82%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1728
State average:

1807
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1611
State average:

1738
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 117

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

265
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1003
State average:

1413
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

236
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1: 69%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 1

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1186
State average from 1874 schools:

1525
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

238
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 73%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1148
State average:

1528
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

981
State average:

1414
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 167

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1388
State average from 873 schools:

1641
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

244
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1361
State average:

1645
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1366
State average:

1620
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: -5

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1609
State average from 804 schools:

1777
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

262
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 75%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 85%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1596
State average:

1774
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1391
State average:

1645
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 204

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1765
State average from 815 schools:

1851
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

287
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 80%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
JOSEPH LITTLES-NGUZO SABA:

1726
State average:

1845
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1622
State average:

1755
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 104

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 13
Mean Scale Score
JOSEPH LITTLES-NGUZO SABA:

605
State average from 1891 schools:

633
Median NPR: 36
Literary (max 18): 10
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 12): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 11
Mean Scale Score
Here:

607
State average from 1874 schools:

642
Median NPR: 30
Literary (max 18): 9
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 7
Initial Understanding (max 12): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 11
Critical Analysis (max 12): 5
Strategies (max 10): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 15
Mean Scale Score
Here:

655
State average from 874 schools:

671
Median NPR: 49
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 19
Mean Scale Score
Here:

657
State average from 796 schools:

675
Median NPR: 45
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 9
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 10
Mean Scale Score
JOSEPH LITTLES-NGUZO SABA:

675
State average from 810 schools:

685
Median NPR: 53
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 14): 8
Strategies (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 13
Mean Scale Score
Here:

577
State average from 1891 schools:

632
Median NPR: 23
Number Sense (max 14): 7
Operations (max 11): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 2
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 11
Mean Scale Score
Here:

603
State average from 1874 schools:

652
Median NPR: 35
Number Sense (max 12): 6
Operations (max 12): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 15
Mean Scale Score
JOSEPH LITTLES-NGUZO SABA:

636
State average from 874 schools:

669
Median NPR: 32
Number Sense (max 10): 4
Operations (max 12): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 3
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 19
Mean Scale Score
Here:

653
State average from 796 schools:

685
Median NPR: 40
Number Sense (max 9): 3
Operations (max 9): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 10
Mean Scale Score
JOSEPH LITTLES-NGUZO SABA:

677
State average from 810 schools:

698
Median NPR: 50
Number Sense (max 9): 5
Operations (max 9): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 11
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

259
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 27%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 27%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 36%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 73%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 45%

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 9
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. West Palm Beach, FL
  5. Joseph Littles-Nguzo Saba School in West Palm Beach, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.