Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Landrum Middle School in Houston, TX
(05-08 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 22
Address
 2200 RIDGECREST
Houston, TX 77055
Telephone
(713) 251-3700
(make sure to verify first before calling)
Website
http://lms.springbranchisd.com
City-data.com school rating
22
Students
1,062
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
54.3
Free lunch eligible students
892
School district
SPRING BRANCH ISD
Charter school
No
Title I status
Title I schoolwide school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
CORNERSTONE ACADEMY (0.7 miles):

98
VALLEY OAKS EL (1.3 miles):

90
RIDGECREST EL (0.3 miles):

76
EDGEWOOD EL (1.0 miles):

50
BENBROOK EL (1.1 miles):

50
CEDAR BROOK EL (0.7 miles):

28
Landrum Middle School:

22
ACADEMY OF CHOICE (0.7 miles):

21
TREASURE FOREST EL (1.0 miles):

12
Landrum Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Harris County:

51
Houston:

47
Landrum Middle School:

22

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 1,062
Enrollment in 2015: 1,045
Enrollment in 2014: 945
Enrollment in 2013: 828
Enrollment in 2012: 750
Enrollment in 2011: 726
Enrollment in 2010: 710
Enrollment in 2009: 717
Enrollment in 2008: 664
Enrollment in 2007: 700
Enrollment in 2006: 684
Enrollment in 2005: 725
Enrollment in 2004: 754
Enrollment in 2003: 799
Enrollment in 2002: 821
Enrollment in 2001: 860
Enrollment in 2000: 869
Enrollment in 1999: 895

Landrum Middle School - Historical enrollment


Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)
GradeG05G06G07G08Total
All students1133243312941,062
Female students66153151141511
Male students47171180153551
American Indian/Alaska Native students1 - 2 - 3
Asian students12216
Hispanic students1013123172801,010
Black students224513
White students786728
Two or More Races students1 - - 12

Enrollment by grade:
5th grade enrollment: 113
6th grade enrollment: 324
7th grade enrollment: 331
8th grade enrollment: 294

Landrum Middle School - Historical enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
Female enrollment: 511 (48.1%)
School:

48.1%
Texas:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 551 (51.9%)
Landrum Middle School:

51.9%
State:

50.1%

Landrum Middle School - Historical enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
American Indian/Alaska Native enrollment: 3 (0.3%)
Landrum Middle School:

0.3%
State:

0.4%
Asian enrollment: 6 (0.6%)
Here:

0.6%
State:

3.1%
Hispanic enrollment: 1,010 (95.1%)
School:

95.1%
State:

46.9%
Black enrollment: 13 (1.2%)
Landrum Middle School:

1.2%
State:

11.6%
White enrollment: 28 (2.6%)
Landrum Middle School:

2.6%
Texas:

32.3%
Two or More Races enrollment: 2 (0.2%)
Here:

0.2%
State:

2.1%

Landrum Middle School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)
Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 892 (84.0%)
Here:

84.0%
State:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 892 (84.0%)
Landrum Middle School:

84.0%
State:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 0 (0.0%)
School:

0.0%
State:

6.2%

Landrum Middle School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)
Classroom Teachers (FTE): 54.3

Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 3
Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 6
Number of FTE school counselors: 3
Number of FTE teachers who were absent more than 10 school days during the school years: 10

Student/Teacher Ratio
Landrum Middle School:

19.6
State:

15.6

Landrum Middle School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio


School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $3,159,307
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 61 (Salary Expenditures: $2,500,454)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 1 (Salary Expenditures: $18,928)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 7 (Salary Expenditures: $324,121)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 4 (Salary Expenditures: $315,804)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $74,615
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $3,763,960
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $2,871,204
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 3 (Salary Expenditures: $60,228)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 11.5 (Salary Expenditures: $516,724)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 4 (Salary Expenditures: $315,804)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $74,615

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for

    Students Enrolled in LEP Programs

  • Hispanic538
  • American Indian2
  • White2
  • IDEA58
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 542 (male: 301, female: 241)
  • Hispanic: 538 (male: 299, female: 239)
  • American Indian / Alaska Native: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2 (all female)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 58 (male: 38, female: 20)

Students with disabilities:
Show data for
Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.

Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 90 (male: 62, female: 28)
  • Hispanic: 86 (male: 58, female: 28)
  • White: 4 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 59 (male: 37, female: 22)

Retention:
Show data for

(State average from 1,054 schools)
A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained
Total number of students retained in 6th grade: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2

Percent of 6th grade students retained
Landrum Middle School:

0.6%
State:

6.3%
Total number of students retained in 7th grade: 13 (male: 8, female: 5)
  • Hispanic: 13 (male: 8, female: 5)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)

Percent of 7th grade students retained
School:

3.9%
State:

6.0%
Total number of students retained in 8th grade: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Percent of 8th grade students retained
Landrum Middle School:

1.4%
State:

7.0%

Gifted and Talented:
Show data for

(State average from 7,254 schools)
This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 56 (male: 34, female: 22)
  • Hispanic: 52 (male: 32, female: 20)
  • White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 10 (male: 8, female: 2)

Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
Here:

52.7
State:

79.4

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,265 schools)
The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
End-of-course (EOC)

    Algebra I Average Scale Score

  • All4,310
  • Males4,381
  • Females4,264
  • Hispanic4,311
Algebra I Average Scale Score:

4,310
Texas:

4,001
Algebra I students tested: 89
Algebra I # Answer Documents Submitted: 89

Algebra I Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 7.5 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.8 (74%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.9 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 8 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 5: 4.9 (81%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 1%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 20%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 35%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 44%

1%
20%
35%
44%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,381, Tested: 35, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 54%)
23%
23%
54%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,264, Tested: 54, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 2%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 43%, Masters: 37%)
2%
18%
43%
37%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 4,311, Tested: 85, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 1%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 45%)
1%
20%
34%
45%
5th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,558
  • Males1,551
  • Females1,563
  • Hispanic1,556
Math Average Scale Score:

1,558
State:

1,603
Math students tested: 110
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 110

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.1 (52%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.2 (60%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.3 (59%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 1.9 (48%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 34%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 27%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 30%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 9%

34%
27%
30%
9%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,551, Tested: 48, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 32%, Masters: 8%)
38%
23%
32%
8%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,563, Tested: 62, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 31%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 10%)
31%
30%
29%
10%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,556, Tested: 102, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 34%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 8%)
34%
29%
29%
8%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,519
  • Males1,507
  • Females1,528
  • Hispanic1,517
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,519
State:

1,546
Reading students tested: 110
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 110

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5 (62%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.3 (64%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8 (57%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 29%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 21%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 14%

36%
29%
21%
14%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,507, Tested: 48, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 44%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 13%)
44%
23%
20%
13%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,528, Tested: 62, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 31%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 15%)
31%
32%
22%
15%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,517, Tested: 102, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 37%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 14%)
37%
29%
20%
14%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All3,754
  • Males3,776
  • Females3,737
  • Hispanic3,741
Science Average Scale Score:

3,754
Texas:

3,771
Science students tested: 108
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 108

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.8 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.6 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.4 (64%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 8.1 (68%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 28%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 41%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 22%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 9%

28%
41%
22%
9%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,776, Tested: 47, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 30%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 11%)
30%
36%
23%
11%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,737, Tested: 61, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%, Approaches: 46%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 8%)
26%
46%
20%
8%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,741, Tested: 101, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 41%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 10%)
29%
41%
20%
10%
6th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,558
  • Males1,562
  • Females1,554
  • Hispanic1,554
  • Asian1,718
  • Black1,497
  • White1,607
Math Average Scale Score:

1,558
Texas:

1,546
Math students tested: 296
# Absent - Not Tested: 2
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 299

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.1 (41%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6.4 (43%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 2.4 (41%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.6 (37%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 48%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 32%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 16%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 4%

48%
32%
16%
4%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,562, Tested: 154, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 49%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 5%)
49%
30%
16%
5%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,554, Tested: 142, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 46%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 2%)
46%
36%
16%
2%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,554, Tested: 274, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 49%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 3%)
49%
32%
16%
3%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,718, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 50%)
17%
33%
50%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,497, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 67%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 0%)
67%
33%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,607, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 57%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 0%)
14%
57%
29%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,520
  • Males1,494
  • Females1,549
  • Hispanic1,513
  • Asian1,679
  • Black1,500
  • White1,655
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,520
State:

1,457
Reading students tested: 296
# Absent - Not Tested: 3
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 299

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.3 (53%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.3 (61%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.8 (52%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 49%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 30%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 13%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 8%

49%
30%
13%
8%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,494, Tested: 155, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 56%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 6%)
56%
26%
12%
6%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,549, Tested: 141, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 41%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 11%)
41%
36%
12%
11%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,513, Tested: 274, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 51%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 10%, Masters: 8%)
51%
31%
10%
8%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,679, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 66%, Masters: 17%)
17%
66%
17%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,500, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 67%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 0%)
67%
16%
17%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,655, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 15%, Meets: 42%, Masters: 29%)
14%
15%
42%
29%
7th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All1,609
  • Males1,610
  • Females1,607
  • Hispanic1,605
  • Asian1,694
  • Black1,611
  • White1,651
Math Average Scale Score:

1,609
State:

1,571
Math students tested: 311
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 316

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3 (50%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7.2 (48%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.6 (47%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.6 (38%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 42%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 35%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 15%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 8%

42%
35%
15%
8%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,610, Tested: 158, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 45%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 11%)
45%
28%
16%
11%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,607, Tested: 153, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 39%, Approaches: 42%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 5%)
39%
42%
14%
5%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,605, Tested: 277, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 43%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 8%)
43%
36%
13%
8%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,694, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 42%, Masters: 29%)
29%
42%
29%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,611, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 44%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 0%)
44%
31%
25%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,651, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 11%)
33%
23%
33%
11%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All1,613
  • Males1,604
  • Females1,623
  • Hispanic1,608
  • Asian1,689
  • Black1,630
  • White1,663
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,613
State:

1,550
Reading students tested: 314
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 316

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.9 (61%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.1 (62%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.3 (58%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 37%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 29%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 16%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 18%

37%
29%
16%
18%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,604, Tested: 159, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 41%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 20%)
41%
24%
15%
20%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,623, Tested: 155, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 17%)
33%
33%
17%
17%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,608, Tested: 278, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 37%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 17%)
37%
31%
15%
17%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,689, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 63%)
25%
12%
63%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,630, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 19%)
38%
32%
12%
19%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,663, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 11%)
33%
23%
33%
11%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All3,565
  • Males3,481
  • Females3,651
  • Hispanic3,518
  • Asian4,136
  • Black3,788
  • White3,955
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,565
Texas:

3,515
Writing students tested: 315
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 315

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 7.5 (47%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7.3 (56%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.3 (60%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 46%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 31%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 17%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 6%

46%
31%
17%
6%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,481, Tested: 159, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 52%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 4%)
52%
31%
13%
4%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,651, Tested: 156, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 8%)
40%
32%
20%
8%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,518, Tested: 279, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 48%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 4%)
48%
32%
16%
4%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 4,136, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 50%)
25%
25%
50%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,788, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 31%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 13%)
31%
38%
18%
13%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,955, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 22%)
22%
22%
34%
22%
8th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All1,609
  • Males1,596
  • Females1,626
  • Hispanic1,611
  • Black1,589
  • White1,632
Math Average Scale Score:

1,609
State:

1,539
Math students tested: 227
# Absent - Not Tested: 6
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 324

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 1.9 (49%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7.4 (46%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.3 (48%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.3 (47%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 48%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 32%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 18%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 2%

48%
32%
18%
2%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,596, Tested: 127, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 56%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 2%)
56%
27%
15%
2%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,626, Tested: 100, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 37%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 2%)
37%
40%
21%
2%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,611, Tested: 210, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 47%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 1%)
47%
33%
19%
1%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,589, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 0%)
40%
40%
20%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,632, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 44%, Approaches: 45%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 11%)
44%
45%
11%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All1,616
  • Males1,583
  • Females1,651
  • Hispanic1,616
  • Black1,550
  • White1,640
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,616
Texas:

1,561
Reading students tested: 320
# Absent - Not Tested: 4
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 324

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.8 (60%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.6 (61%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.7 (57%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 41%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 32%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 15%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 12%

41%
32%
15%
12%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,583, Tested: 166, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 6%)
50%
30%
14%
6%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,651, Tested: 154, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 31%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 18%)
31%
35%
16%
18%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,616, Tested: 301, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 42%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 12%)
42%
30%
16%
12%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,550, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 60%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 0%)
60%
40%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,640, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 55%, Meets: 9%, Masters: 18%)
18%
55%
9%
18%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All3,760
  • Males3,691
  • Females3,835
  • Hispanic3,766
  • Black3,612
  • White3,767
Science Average Scale Score:

3,760
State:

3,634
Science students tested: 316
# Absent - Not Tested: 9
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 325

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.5 (59%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.6 (62%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.4 (58%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 6.8 (62%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 35%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 28%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 21%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 16%

35%
28%
21%
16%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,691, Tested: 164, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 14%)
38%
30%
18%
14%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,835, Tested: 152, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 32%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 17%)
32%
25%
26%
17%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,766, Tested: 296, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 35%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 16%)
35%
27%
22%
16%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,612, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 0%)
40%
40%
20%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,767, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 8%)
25%
33%
34%
8%

    Social Studies Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All3,651
  • Males3,615
  • Females3,689
  • Hispanic3,653
  • Black3,670
  • White3,721
Social Studies Average Scale Score:

3,651
State:

3,461
Social Studies students tested: 319
# Absent - Not Tested: 6
Social Studies # Answer Documents Submitted: 325

Social Studies Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 9.8 (58%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.6 (56%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.5 (55%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.7 (53%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 33%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 17%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 10%

40%
33%
17%
10%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,615, Tested: 164, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 45%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 10%)
45%
31%
14%
10%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,689, Tested: 155, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 35%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 10%)
35%
36%
19%
10%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,653, Tested: 299, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 39%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 10%)
39%
35%
16%
10%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,670, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 20%)
40%
20%
20%
20%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,721, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 42%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 17%)
42%
25%
16%
17%

Health & Safety


Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
Show data for

(State average from 7,777 schools)
A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.

    Chronic Student Absenteeism

  • Hispanic133
  • Black4
  • White4
  • LEP70
  • IDEA25
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 141 (male: 75, female: 66)
  • Hispanic: 133 (male: 71, female: 62)
  • Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 70 (male: 41, female: 29)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 25 (male: 17, female: 8)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
Here:

132.8
Texas:

147.9

Restraint and Seclusion:
Show data for

(State average from 2,148 schools)
Mechanical restraint refers to the use of any device or equipment to restrict a student's freedom of movement. The term does not include devices implemented by trained school personnel, or utilized by a student that have been prescribed by an appropriate medical or related services professional and are used for the specific and approved purposes for which such devices were designed, such as:
  • Adaptive devices or mechanical supports used to achieve proper body position, balance, or alignment to allow greater freedom of mobility than would be possible without the use of such devices or mechanical supports;
  • Vehicle safety restraints when used as intended during the transport of a student in a moving vehicle;
  • Restraints for medical immobilization; or Orthopedically prescribed devices that permit a student to participate in activities without risk of harm.
Total Number of Non-IDEA students subjected to mechanical restraint: 2 (all female)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2

Non-IDEA students subjected to mechanical restraint per 1,000 students
Landrum Middle School:

1.9
State:

5.4

Suspensions:
Show data for

(State average from 3,231 schools)
Out-of-school suspension
  • For students with disabilities served under IDEA : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his/her regular school for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes to another setting (e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include both removals in which no individualized family service plan(IFSP) or individualized education plan(IEP) services are provided because the removal is 10 days or less as well as removals in which the child continues to receive services according to his/her IFSP or IEP.
  • For students without disabilities and students with disabilities served solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his / her regular school for at least half a day(but less than the remainder of the school year) for disciplinary purposes to another setting(e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include removals in which no educational services are provided, and removals in which educational services are provided(e.g., school-provided at home instruction or tutoring).
In-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his or her regular classroom(s) for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes, but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel. Direct supervision means school personnel are physically in the same location as students under their supervision.

    School days missed due to out-of-school suspension

  • Hispanic633
  • Black3
  • White4
  • LEP425
  • IDEA51
School days missed due to out-of-school suspension: 640 (male: 374, female: 266)
  • Hispanic: 633 (male: 367, female: 266)
  • Black: 3 (all male)
  • White: 4 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 425 (male: 261, female: 164)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 51 (male: 37, female: 14)
Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students without disabilities): 301

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students without disabilities)
Landrum Middle School:

283.4
State:

102.7

    Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension

  • Hispanic172
  • Asian2
  • Black2
  • White4
  • LEP112
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 180 (male: 117, female: 63)
  • Hispanic: 172 (male: 113, female: 59)
  • Asian: 2 (all male)
  • Black: 2 (all female)
  • White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 112 (male: 77, female: 35)
Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 93 (male: 46, female: 47)
  • Hispanic: 91 (male: 44, female: 47)
  • Black: 2 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 58 (male: 32, female: 26)
Students without disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 64 (male: 41, female: 23)
  • Hispanic: 64 (male: 41, female: 23)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 43 (male: 29, female: 14)
Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students with disabilities): 33

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students with disabilities)
Here:

31.1
State:

27.5
Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 39 (male: 31, female: 8)
  • Hispanic: 37 (male: 29, female: 8)
  • White: 2 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 25 (male: 20, female: 5)
Students with disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 9 (male: 7, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • White: 2 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)
Students with disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 7 (male: 5, female: 2)

Classes & Courses


Algebra I:
Show data for

(State average from 1,291 schools)
Algebra I is a (college-preparatory) course that includes the study of properties and operations of the real number system; evaluating rational algebraic expressions; solving and graphing first degree equations and inequalities; translating word problems into equations; operations with and factoring of polynomials; and solving simple quadratic equations. Algebra I is a foundation course leading to higher-level mathematics courses, including Geometry and Algebra II.
7th grade student enrollment in Algebra I: 2
7th grade studenst who passed Algebra I: 4
Percent of 7th grade students who passed
Here:

100.0%
Texas:

102.7%

    8th grade student enrollment in Algebra I

  • Hispanic103
  • Asian2
  • Black4
  • White5
  • LEP19
8th grade student enrollment in Algebra I: 114 (male: 56, female: 58)
  • Hispanic: 103 (male: 47, female: 56)
  • Asian: 2 (all male)
  • Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 5 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 19 (male: 8, female: 11)
8th grade studenst who passed Algebra I: 99 (male: 47, female: 52)
  • Hispanic: 95 (male: 43, female: 52)
  • White: 4 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 17 (male: 7, female: 10)
Percent of 8th grade students who passed
Here:

86.8%
Texas:

87.0%

Geometry:
Show data for
Geometry is a (college-preparatory) course that typically includes topics such as properties of plane and solid figures; deductive methods of reasoning and use of logic; geometry as an axiomatic system including the study of postulates, theorems, and formal proofs; concepts of congruence, similarity, parallelism, perpendicularity, and proportion; and rules of angle measurement in triangles.Geometry is considered a prerequisite for Algebra II.
8th grade students enrolled in Geometry: 5

Comments

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss Houston, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.

  1. All Cities
  2. Texas
  3. Houston main city page
  4. Schools in Texas
  5. Landrum Middle School


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents