Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Menard J H School in Menard, TX
(06-08 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 10
Address
 300 GAY ST
Menard, TX 76859
Telephone
(325) 396-2348
(make sure to verify first before calling)
Website
http://www.menardisd.net
City-data.com school rating
10
Students
62
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
4.7
Free lunch eligible students
41
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
5
School district
MENARD ISD
Charter school
No
Title I status
Title I schoolwide school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
MENARD H S (0.0 miles):

38
MENARD EL (0.3 miles):

37
Menard J H School:

10
Menard J H School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Menard County:

28
Menard:

28
Menard J H School:

10

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 62

Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)
GradeG06G07G08Total
All students19182562
Female students691429
Male students1391133
Hispanic students10111536
White students971026

Enrollment by grade:
6th grade enrollment: 19
7th grade enrollment: 18
8th grade enrollment: 25

Menard J H School - Enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
Female enrollment: 29 (46.8%)
Here:

46.8%
Texas:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 33 (53.2%)
Menard J H School:

53.2%
Texas:

50.1%

Menard J H School - Enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
Hispanic enrollment: 36 (58.1%)
Menard J H School:

58.1%
Texas:

46.9%
White enrollment: 26 (41.9%)
Here:

41.9%
State:

32.3%

Menard J H School - Enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)
Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 46 (74.2%)
Menard J H School:

74.2%
Texas:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 41 (66.1%)
Menard J H School:

66.1%
State:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 5 (8.1%)
Here:

8.1%
State:

6.2%

Menard J H School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)
Classroom Teachers (FTE): 4.7

Number of FTE teachers who were absent more than 10 school days during the school years: 1

Student/Teacher Ratio
Here:

13.1
Texas:

15.6

School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $236,070
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 3.8 (Salary Expenditures: $236,070)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 1 (Salary Expenditures: $27,229)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $71,000
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $27,229
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $25,421
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 1 (Salary Expenditures: $27,229)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $71,364

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 7 (male: 2, female: 5)
  • Hispanic: 7 (male: 2, female: 5)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all female)

Students with disabilities:
Show data for
Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.

Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 8 (male: 4, female: 4)
  • Hispanic: 8 (male: 4, female: 4)
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 6 (male: 4, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all male)
  • White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Gifted and Talented:
Show data for

(State average from 7,254 schools)
This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2

Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
Here:

32.3
Texas:

79.4

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 2,606 schools)
The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
6th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,585
  • Males1,599
  • Females1,566
  • Hispanic1,529
  • White1,607
Math Average Scale Score:

1,585
Texas:

1,546
Math students tested: 27
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 27

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.4 (54%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6.4 (43%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 2.4 (40%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.3 (47%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 37%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 37%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 19%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 7%

37%
37%
19%
7%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,599, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 46%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 13%)
27%
46%
14%
13%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,566, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 0%)
50%
25%
25%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,529, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 44%, Approaches: 56%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 0%)
44%
56%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,607, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 35%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 12%)
35%
30%
23%
12%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,569
  • Males1,545
  • Females1,599
  • Hispanic1,507
  • White1,586
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,569
State:

1,457
Reading students tested: 27
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 27

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.1 (64%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.9 (59%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 44%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 19%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 11%

26%
44%
19%
11%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,545, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 47%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 7%)
33%
47%
13%
7%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,599, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 41%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 17%)
17%
41%
25%
17%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,507, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 44%, Approaches: 56%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 0%)
44%
56%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,586, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 41%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 12%)
18%
41%
29%
12%
7th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All1,626
  • Males1,576
  • Females1,662
  • Hispanic1,559
  • White1,684
Math Average Scale Score:

1,626
State:

1,571
Math students tested: 19
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 19

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.6 (60%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7.4 (49%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.2 (43%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.8 (41%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 53%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 21%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 10%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 16%

53%
21%
10%
16%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,576, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 63%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 13%)
63%
25%
13%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,662, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 45%, Approaches: 19%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 18%)
45%
19%
18%
18%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,559, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 71%, Approaches: 15%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 0%)
71%
15%
14%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,684, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 9%, Masters: 27%)
36%
28%
9%
27%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All1,658
  • Males1,621
  • Females1,684
  • Hispanic1,661
  • White1,676
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,658
State:

1,550
Reading students tested: 19
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 19

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.9 (61%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.4 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.6 (66%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 42%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 5%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 11%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 42%

42%
5%
11%
42%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,621, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 63%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 38%)
63%
38%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,684, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 9%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 45%)
27%
9%
19%
45%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,661, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 43%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 43%)
43%
14%
43%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,676, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%, Approaches: 9%, Meets: 10%, Masters: 45%)
36%
9%
10%
45%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All3,633
  • Males3,346
  • Females3,869
  • Hispanic3,698
  • White3,607
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,633
Texas:

3,515
Writing students tested: 20
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 20

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 7.1 (44%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7.7 (59%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 11.5 (68%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 20%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 25%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 5%

50%
20%
25%
5%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,346, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 78%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 0%)
78%
22%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,869, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 9%)
27%
37%
27%
9%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,698, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 57%, Approaches: 14%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 14%)
57%
14%
15%
14%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,607, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 42%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 0%)
42%
25%
33%
8th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All1,618
  • Males1,633
  • Females1,583
  • Hispanic1,622
  • White1,614
Math Average Scale Score:

1,618
Texas:

1,539
Math students tested: 24
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 24

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 2.3 (58%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8 (50%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.8 (46%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.1 (45%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 42%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 45%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 9%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 4%

42%
45%
9%
4%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,633, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 41%, Approaches: 41%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 6%)
41%
41%
12%
6%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,583, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 43%, Approaches: 57%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 0%)
43%
57%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,622, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 46%, Approaches: 46%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 8%)
46%
46%
8%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,614, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%, Approaches: 46%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 0%)
36%
46%
18%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All1,623
  • Males1,636
  • Females1,592
  • Hispanic1,620
  • White1,627
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,623
Texas:

1,561
Reading students tested: 24
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 24

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.1 (64%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.8 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.3 (55%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 50%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 13%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 4%

33%
50%
13%
4%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,636, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 53%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 6%)
29%
53%
12%
6%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,592, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 43%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 0%)
43%
43%
14%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,620, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 54%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 8%)
38%
54%
8%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,627, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 46%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 0%)
27%
46%
27%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All3,837
  • Males3,840
  • Females3,829
  • Hispanic3,857
  • White3,811
Science Average Scale Score:

3,837
Texas:

3,634
Science students tested: 23
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 24

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.4 (58%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.4 (60%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.7 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 7.6 (69%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 57%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 17%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 9%

17%
57%
17%
9%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,840, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%, Approaches: 56%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 13%)
19%
56%
12%
13%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,829, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 57%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 0%)
14%
57%
29%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,857, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 54%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 8%)
15%
54%
23%
8%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,811, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 60%, Meets: 10%, Masters: 10%)
20%
60%
10%
10%

    Social Studies Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All3,558
  • Males3,666
  • Females3,309
  • Hispanic3,582
  • White3,525
Social Studies Average Scale Score:

3,558
State:

3,461
Social Studies students tested: 23
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Social Studies # Answer Documents Submitted: 24

Social Studies Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 8.5 (50%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.7 (57%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.2 (52%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.5 (50%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 57%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 30%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 9%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 4%

57%
30%
9%
4%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,666, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 44%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 6%)
38%
44%
13%
6%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,309, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 100%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 0%)
100%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,582, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 54%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 0%)
54%
31%
15%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,525, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 60%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 10%)
60%
30%
10%

Health & Safety


Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
Show data for

(State average from 7,777 schools)
A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 6 (male: 4, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 2 (all male)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
School:

96.8
Texas:

147.9

Comments

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss Menard, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.

  1. All Cities
  2. Texas
  3. Menard main city page
  4. Schools in Texas
  5. Menard J H School


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents