Metrowest Elementary School in Orlando, Florida (FL) - Test Results, Rating, Ranking, Grades, Scores, Classes, Enrollment, Teachers, Students, and Report Card

City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 83.

1801 LAKE VILMA DR
Orlando, FL 32835

Show street view No street view available for this location

Other nearby schools ratings:

Lake Eola Charter School (7.3 miles):	98
Metrowest Elementary School:	83
West Creek Elementary School (11.6 miles):	69
Ventura Elementary School (15.7 miles):	60
Rock Springs Elementary School (13.7 miles):	53
Pershing Elementary School (8.6 miles):	45
Wolf Lake Elementary School (14.7 miles):	36
William S. Maxey Elementary School (5.3 miles):	26

Metrowest Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:

Florida:	45
Orange County:	44
Orlando:	42
Metrowest Elementary School:	83

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum

Phone: (407) 296-6450 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 48
School number: 1021
School type: Elementary
District Name: ORANGE
Grade range: KINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 5
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (407) 445-5432
Principal: Patricia Smith
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 8
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 41
Senate District: 9

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	88%
State average from 734 schools:	73%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	88%
State average from 734 schools:	77%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	82%
State average from 734 schools:	85%

Meeting High Standards in Science

METROWEST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	61%
State average from 733 schools:	53%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	75%
State average from 734 schools:	64%

Making Math Gains

Here:	70%
State average from 733 schools:	67%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	66%
State average from 734 schools:	58%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	69%
State average from 734 schools:	66%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	599
State average from 734 schools:	543

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 733 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 119999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	52%
State average from 734 schools:	57%

Minority Rate

METROWEST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	65%
State average from 735 schools:	46%

Region: 3

Title I: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 641 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 642 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	94%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 187
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	84%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 589
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 569

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	85%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 590
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 570
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 222 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 222 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 69
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

METROWEST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	89%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 211
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 206

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	91%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 211
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 206
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 180 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 180 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	88%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 52
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	76%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 160
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 152

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	76%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 160
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 152
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 160 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 161 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 42
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	85%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 142
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 136

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	85%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 143
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 137
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 47 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 47 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 44
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 44
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 337 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 337 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	91%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 98
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	81%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 305
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 295

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	82%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 305
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 295
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 214 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 215 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 64
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	82%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 185
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 182

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	87%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 186
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 183
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 55 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 55 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	87%
State average from 735 schools:	74%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	89%
State average from 734 schools:	76%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	95%
State average from 734 schools:	88%

Meeting High Standards in Science

METROWEST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	63%
State average from 734 schools:	51%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	76%
State average from 734 schools:	67%

Making Math Gains

Here:	75%
State average from 735 schools:	68%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	72%
State average from 735 schools:	65%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	80%
State average from 734 schools:	67%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	637
State average from 734 schools:	557

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 734 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

METROWEST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	47%
State average from 734 schools:	53%

Minority Rate

Here:	62%
State average from 734 schools:	45%

Region: 3

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 618 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 618 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 185
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	84%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 546
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 530

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	87%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 546
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 530
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 222 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 222 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 69
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	89%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 203
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 198

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 203
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 198
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 166 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 166 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 46
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	77%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 147
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 139

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	79%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 147
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 139
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 146 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 146 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 46
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	81%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 123
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 122

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	86%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 123
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 122
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 46 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 46 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 41
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 41
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 304 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 304 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 92
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	78%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 259
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 249

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	81%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 259
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 249
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 192 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 192 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 50
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	76%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 156
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 155

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	89%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 156
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 155
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 52 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 52 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	89%
State average from 711 schools:	73%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	90%
State average from 711 schools:	75%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	81%
State average from 711 schools:	82%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	62%
State average from 711 schools:	47%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	77%
State average from 711 schools:	65%

Making Math Gains

Here:	81%
State average from 711 schools:	70%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	76%
State average from 711 schools:	62%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	78%
State average from 711 schools:	69%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	634
State average from 711 schools:	544

Percent Tested

Here:	99%
State average from 711 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

METROWEST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	42%
State average from 711 schools:	50%

Minority Rate

Here:	63%
State average from 711 schools:	44%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 578 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 578 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 171
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	84%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 539
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 511

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	86%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 539
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 511
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 214 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 214 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 66
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	90%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 204
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 195

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	91%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 204
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 195
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 155 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 154 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 44
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	78%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 144
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 139

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	77%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 143
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 138
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 141 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 142 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 42
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	79%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 126
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 116

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	83%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 127
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 117
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 42 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 42 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 252 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 252 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 74
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	80%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 231
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 220

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	82%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 231
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 220
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 157 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 157 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 43
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	77%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 152
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 142

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	86%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 152
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 142
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 49 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 50 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	89%
State average from 652 schools:	75%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	89%
State average from 652 schools:	73%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	93%
State average from 652 schools:	83%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	72%
State average from 650 schools:	46%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	80%
State average from 652 schools:	72%

Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Included

Making Math Gains

Here:	79%
State average from 652 schools:	68%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

METROWEST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	73%
State average from 652 schools:	67%

% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	76%
State average from 652 schools:	69%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns

Here:	651
State average from 652 schools:	553

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 652 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

METROWEST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	39%
State average from 655 schools:	53%

Minority Rate

Here:	60%
State average from 655 schools:	55%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 597 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 596 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	95%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 173
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	83%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 555
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	85%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 554
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 232 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 231 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 67
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	92%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 227
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	92%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 226
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 163 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 163 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	100%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 40
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	73%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 143
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	73%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 143
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 116 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 116 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	95%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 37
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	73%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 104
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	84%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 104
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 55 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 55 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 53
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 53
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 243 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 243 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	94%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 72
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	77%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 222
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

METROWEST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	79%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 222
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 151 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 151 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	96%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 47
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

METROWEST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	79%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 142
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	84%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 142
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 57 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 57 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	88%
State average from 643 schools:	75%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	83%
State average from 643 schools:	71%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	83%
State average from 643 schools:	81%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	68%
State average from 643 schools:	63%

Making Math Gains

Here:	80%
State average from 643 schools:	69%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

METROWEST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	58%
State average from 643 schools:	61%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns

Here:	460
State average from 643 schools:	420

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 643 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	34%
State average from 644 schools:	54%

Minority Rate

Here:	60%
State average from 644 schools:	54%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 615 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 617 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	92%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 197
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	81%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 568
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

METROWEST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	80%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 570
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 228 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 228 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	94%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 85

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	87%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 214
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	88%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 214
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 158 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 158 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	85%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 48

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	74%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 150
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	73%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 150
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 148 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 149 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 40

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	76%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 130
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	75%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 131
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 54 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 54 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 14

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	86%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 49

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	82%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 49
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 218 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 218 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	91%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 65

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	75%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 204
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	77%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 204
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 188 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 188 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	92%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 51

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	78%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 168
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	79%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 168
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 71 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 71 (99%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 22

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	48%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 69

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	59%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 69
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	87%
State average from 631 schools:	74%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	84%
State average from 631 schools:	69%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	82%
State average from 631 schools:	80%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	81%
State average from 631 schools:	66%

Making Math Gains

Here:	83%
State average from 631 schools:	69%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	76%
State average from 631 schools:	60%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns

Here:	493
State average from 631 schools:	417

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 631 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	38%
State average from 631 schools:	54%

Minority Rate

Here:	58%
State average from 631 schools:	52%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1497
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	332
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	8%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	6%
State average:	11%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	34%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	44%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	9%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	86%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	19
State average:	17

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1697
State average:	1604

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	339
State average:	324

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	9%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	9%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	32%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	32%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	18%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	82%
State average:	72%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

METROWEST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	21
State average:	19

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	9
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	2
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

METROWEST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	1720
State average:	1659

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	323
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	12%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	11%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	29%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	37%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	12%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	77%
State average:	70%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	4
State average:	3

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	16
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	11
State average:	10

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	2
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1522
State average:	1716

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	277
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	35%
State average:	19%

% in each Achievement Level 2

METROWEST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	34%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	26%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	4%
State average:	25%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	31%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

METROWEST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	11
State average:	14

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	6
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	3
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1690
State average:	1810

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	294
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	20%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	37%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	31%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	10%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	2%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	43%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	15
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

METROWEST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	3
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1787
State average:	1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	289
State average:	308

% in each Achievement Level 1

METROWEST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	30%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	42%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	26%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	2%
State average:	16%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

METROWEST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	29%
State average:	52%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	3
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	14
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	6
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	323
State average:	321

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	19%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 2

METROWEST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	27%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

METROWEST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	37%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	13%
State average:	11%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	4%
State average:	4%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	54%
State average:	51%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	10
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	9
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	9
State average:	9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	277
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	46%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	44%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

METROWEST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	8%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	2%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	10%
State average:	41%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	8
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	6
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

METROWEST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	6
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	6
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1576
State average:	1481

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	360
State average:	339

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	5%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	5%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	31%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	32%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	27%
State average:	16%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	89%
State average:	79%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	9
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	5
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	6
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1694
State average:	1585

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	355
State average:	330

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	3%
State average:	10%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	13%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	30%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	31%
State average:	26%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	23%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

METROWEST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	85%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	5
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1755
State average:	1674

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	351
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	10%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	17%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	21%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	36%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

METROWEST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	17%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	73%
State average:	63%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	9
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

METROWEST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	7
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

METROWEST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	1595
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	292
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	36%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	25%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	26%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	12%
State average:	18%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	38%
State average:	55%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	3
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	5
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1734
State average:	1786

Mean Scale Score 100-500

METROWEST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	293
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	34%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	23%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	30%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	13%
State average:	19%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

METROWEST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	43%
State average:	57%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	3
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	4
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1803
State average:	1892

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	297
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	29%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	29%
State average:	21%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	37%
State average:	38%

% in each Achievement Level 4

METROWEST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	3%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 5

METROWEST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	2%
State average:	10%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	43%
State average:	64%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	4
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	4
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	6
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	4
State average:	5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1437
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	323
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1670
State average:	1605

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	335
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 07%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 09%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1723
State average:	1656

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	323
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1559
State average:	1707

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	284
State average:	310

% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1717
State average:	1800

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	300
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1741
State average:	1864

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	280
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	324
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	252
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1578
State average:	1476

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	360
State average:	338

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 27%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1678
State average:	1578

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	351
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1775
State average:	1675

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	356
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1534
State average:	1679

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	277
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1748
State average:	1799

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	296
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1753
State average:	1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	284
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 26%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 202

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 44%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 91%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 80

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 44%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 76%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1470
State average:	1396

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	328
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1710
State average:	1582

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	342
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 21
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1730
State average:	1627

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	324
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1629
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	296
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1647
State average:	1775

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	286
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1796
State average:	1857

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	291
State average:	304

% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	328
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	273
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1595
State average:	1461

Mean Scale Score 100-500

METROWEST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	364
State average:	335

% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 29%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 90%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1690
State average:	1563

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	353
State average:	325

% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1785
State average:	1668

Mean Scale Score 100-500

METROWEST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	358
State average:	333

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 23%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1612
State average:	1670

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	296
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1747
State average:	1801

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	296
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1823
State average:	1882

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	302
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	202
State average:	103

Mean Scale Score

Here:	645
State average from 3241 schools:	633

Median NPR

Here:	71
State average:	61

Literary (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

METROWEST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	9
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	186
State average:	97

Mean Scale Score

Here:	666
State average from 3233 schools:	653

Median NPR

METROWEST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	79
State average:	69

Literary (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	10

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	16
State average:	15

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	8

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	8
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	197
State average:	101

Mean Scale Score

Here:	677
State average from 3309 schools:	667

Median NPR

METROWEST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	80
State average:	71

Literary (max 18)

METROWEST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	14
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	64
State average:	190

Mean Scale Score

Here:	661
State average from 2604 schools:	671

Median NPR

Here:	54
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	7
State average:	8

Interpretation (max 20)

METROWEST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	13
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	65
State average:	201

Mean Scale Score

Here:	663
State average from 2487 schools:	682

Median NPR

Here:	50
State average:	66

Literary (max 18)

METROWEST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	13
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	12

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	12
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

METROWEST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	6
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Number of Students

METROWEST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	69
State average:	192

Mean Scale Score

Here:	672
State average from 2497 schools:	687

Median NPR

Here:	49
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	12

Informational (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

METROWEST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	7
State average:	7

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	13
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	10

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 188

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	319
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 70%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 36%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 79%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 70

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	263
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 19%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 40%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 89%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1474
State average:	1342

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	329
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1683
State average from 1875 schools:	1542

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	337
State average:	313

% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 86%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1707
State average:	1546

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

METROWEST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	1468
State average:	1397

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 239

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1739
State average from 1873 schools:	1629

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	326
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 86%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1758
State average:	1632

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

METROWEST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	1632
State average:	1532

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 126

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	331
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1538
State average:	1413

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	351
State average:	324

% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1642
State average from 1874 schools:	1525

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	343
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 85%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1662
State average:	1528

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1543
State average:	1414

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 119

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1775
State average from 1872 schools:	1647

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	355
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 87%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1792
State average:	1649

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1642
State average:	1519

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 150

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 205

Mean Scale Score

METROWEST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	648
State average from 1891 schools:	633

Median NPR: 73
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 10
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 192

Mean Scale Score

Here:	654
State average from 1874 schools:	642

Median NPR: 71
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 200

Mean Scale Score

Here:	682
State average from 1870 schools:	667

Median NPR: 83
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 206

Mean Scale Score

METROWEST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:	647
State average from 1891 schools:	632

Median NPR: 79
Number Sense (max 14): 11
Operations (max 11): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 192

Mean Scale Score

Here:	668
State average from 1874 schools:	652

Median NPR: 84
Number Sense (max 12): 10
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 199

Mean Scale Score

Here:	679
State average from 1870 schools:	663

Median NPR: 84
Number Sense (max 12): 10
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 191

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	324
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 75%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 14
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 40%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 86%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 74%

City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DC	DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID
IL	IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	MD
ME	MI	MN	MO	MS	MT	NC
ND	NE	NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY
OH	OK	OR	PA	RI	SC	SD
TN	TX	UT	VA	VT	WA	WI
WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DC	DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID
IL	IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	MD
ME	MI	MN	MO	MS	MT	NC
ND	NE	NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY
OH	OK	OR	PA	RI	SC	SD
TN	TX	UT	VA	VT	WA	WI
WV	WY

AB	BC	MB	NB	NL	NS	NT
NU	ON	PE	QC	SK	YT