Miami Park Elementary School in Miami, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 25.

2225 NW 103RD ST
Miami, FL 33147

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Hallandale Elementary School (8.8 miles):

96
Sunset Park Elementary School (14.4 miles):

80
William H. Lehman Elementary School (16.6 miles):

67
Broward Estates Elementary School (17.9 miles):

55
Sunland Park Elementary School (19.0 miles):

45
Dania Elementary School (13.6 miles):

36
Miami Park Elementary School:

25
Skyway Elementary School (6.0 miles):

23
Miami Park Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Miami-Dade County:

45
Miami:

44
Miami Park Elementary School:

25

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (305) 691-6361 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 13
School number: 3301
School type: Elementary
District Name: DADE
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (305) 694-8328
Magnet School.
Principal: Sandra V Barky
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status: Year 5 in Need of Improvement
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 17
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 104
Senate District: 33
School Web Address: http://miamipark.dadeschools.net/

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

50%
State average from 963 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

58%
State average from 963 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

87%
State average from 963 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

33%
State average from 962 schools:

53%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

59%
State average from 963 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
MIAMI PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

60%
State average from 963 schools:

66%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

63%
State average from 963 schools:

58%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

68%
State average from 963 schools:

66%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

478
State average from 963 schools:

543
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 963 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: C

Grade in 2009: C

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: F

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: D

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 119999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

96%
State average from 963 schools:

58%
Minority Rate
Here:

100%
State average from 963 schools:

47%
Region: 5

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 248 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 248 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 76
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 227
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 225

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 227
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 225
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 153 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 153 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 46
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 139
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 138

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
MIAMI PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 139
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 138
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 95 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 95 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 30
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 88
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 87

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 88
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 87
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 238 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 238 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 72
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 219
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 217

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 219
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 217
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 74 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 74 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 67
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 66

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 67
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 66
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 53 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 53 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 49
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 48

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 49
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 48
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
MIAMI PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

50%
State average from 959 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

51%
State average from 959 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

82%
State average from 959 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

20%
State average from 959 schools:

52%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

58%
State average from 959 schools:

67%
Making Math Gains
Here:

59%
State average from 959 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

59%
State average from 959 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

66%
State average from 959 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

445
State average from 959 schools:

560
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 959 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: C

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: F

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: D

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

93%
State average from 959 schools:

54%
Minority Rate
Here:

99%
State average from 959 schools:

46%
Region: 5


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 239 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 239 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 66
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 218
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 217

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 218
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 217
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 161 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 161 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 47
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 154
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 153

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 154
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 153
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 76 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 76 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 62
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 62

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 62
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 62
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 220 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 220 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 60
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 200
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 199

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 200
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 199
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 57 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 57 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 44
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 44

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 44
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 44
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 51 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 51 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

22%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

48%
State average from 954 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

43%
State average from 954 schools:

76%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

72%
State average from 954 schools:

82%
Meeting High Standards in Science
MIAMI PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

11%
State average from 954 schools:

48%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

48%
State average from 954 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

62%
State average from 954 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

67%
State average from 954 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

90%
State average from 954 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

441
State average from 954 schools:

544
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 954 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: F

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: D

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

89%
State average from 954 schools:

51%
Minority Rate
Here:

99%
State average from 954 schools:

45%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 251 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 251 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 63
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 231
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 228

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 231
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 228
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 186 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 186 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 48
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 173
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 172

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

32%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 173
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 172
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 62 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 62 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 55
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 53

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 55
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 53
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 222 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 222 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 56
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 204
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 201

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 204
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 201
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 50 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 50 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 73 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 73 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

30%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 66
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 66

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

14%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 66
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 66
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 87 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 87 (100%)

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
MIAMI PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 77
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 77
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 84 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 84 (100%)

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 76
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 76
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 74 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 74 (100%)

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 65
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 65
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 101 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 101 (100%)

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 93
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 93
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 98 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 98 (100%)

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 92
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
MIAMI PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 92
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 79 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 79 (100%)

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 71
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 71
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1152
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

276
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

36%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

19%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

34%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

11%
State average:

32%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

45%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

14
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1394
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

288
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

32%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
MIAMI PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

20%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

34%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

14%
State average:

29%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

48%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1413
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

268
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

37%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

21%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

31%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

8%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

41%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

12
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

8
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

1
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

290
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
MIAMI PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

32%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

39%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

23%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

5%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

28%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

8
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

7
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1317
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

304
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

13%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

26%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

42%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

17%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

61%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
MIAMI PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1436
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

295
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

16%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

32%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
MIAMI PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

38%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

14%
State average:

26%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

52%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
MIAMI PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1541
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

306
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

28%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

34%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
MIAMI PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

21%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

16%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

38%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1090
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

265
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1411
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

291
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 01%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 04
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 09
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 02

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1388
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MIAMI PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

263
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

264
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 14%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
MIAMI PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1290
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

298
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1419
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

292
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1497
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

297
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 26%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 71
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 38%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 69%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1141
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

274
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1322
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

275
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1402
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

266
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

259
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 9%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
MIAMI PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1259
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MIAMI PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

291
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
MIAMI PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1356
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

277
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1435
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

284
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 14%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

91
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
Here:

603
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

34
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
MIAMI PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

10
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
MIAMI PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

10
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

11
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

72
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
Here:

625
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

45
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

12
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

98
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

636
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
Here:

44
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

11
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
MIAMI PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
MIAMI PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

5
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 70
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

262
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 40%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 39%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 66%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1292
State average:

1342
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

299
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1384
State average:

1413
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MIAMI PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

318
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 87
Mean Scale Score
MIAMI PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

627
State average from 1891 schools:

633
Median NPR: 56
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 87
Mean Scale Score
Here:

620
State average from 1891 schools:

632
Median NPR: 59
Number Sense (max 14): 10
Operations (max 11): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Miami, FL
  5. Miami Park Elementary School in Miami, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.