Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Midland Academy Charter School in Midland, TX
(PK-08 • Public • Alternative School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 33
Address
 500 N BAIRD ST
Midland, TX 79701
Telephone
(432) 686-0003
(make sure to verify first before calling)
City-data.com school rating
33
Students
427
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
30.0
Free lunch eligible students
139
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
49
School district
MIDLAND ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL
Charter school
Yes
Charter authorizer name
STATE BOARD OF (#000001)
Title I status
Title I schoolwide school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
CARVER CENTER (0.8 miles):

100
JAMES BOWIE FINE ARTS ACADEMY (1.0 miles):

64
MIDLAND H S (0.7 miles):

44
Midland Academy Charter School:

33
SOUTH EL (1.0 miles):

28
WASHINGTON MATH/SCIENCE INSTITUTE (1.1 miles):

27
DE ZAVALA EL (0.4 miles):

22
RALPH BUNCHE EL (1.2 miles):

12
VIOLA M COLEMAN H S (1.3 miles):

9
Midland Academy Charter School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Midland County:

36
Midland:

36
Midland Academy Charter School:

33

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 427
Enrollment in 2015: 441
Enrollment in 2014: 469
Enrollment in 2013: 490
Enrollment in 2012: 499
Enrollment in 2011: 514
Enrollment in 2010: 538
Enrollment in 2009: 488
Enrollment in 2008: 499
Enrollment in 2007: 469
Enrollment in 2006: 503
Enrollment in 2005: 511
Enrollment in 2004: 392
Enrollment in 2003: 501
Enrollment in 2002: 550
Enrollment in 2001: 702
Enrollment in 2000: 586

Midland Academy Charter School - Historical enrollment


Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)

GradePKKGG01G02G03G04G05G06G07G08Total
All students43675356595336202614427
Female students2937262933311910189241
Male students143027272622171085186
American Indian/Alaska Native students21 - - - 1 - 2 - - 6
Asian students - 11 - - - - - - - 2
Hispanic students294437423734199207278
Black students643542432336
White students517128181512644101
Two or More Races students1 - - 1 - 11 - - - 4

Enrollment by grade:
Pre-Kindergarten enrollment: 43
Kindergarten enrollment: 67
1st grade enrollment: 53
2nd grade enrollment: 56
3rd grade enrollment: 59
4th grade enrollment: 53
5th grade enrollment: 36
6th grade enrollment: 20
7th grade enrollment: 26
8th grade enrollment: 14

Midland Academy Charter School - Historical enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

Female enrollment: 241 (56.4%)
Midland Academy Charter School:

56.4%
State:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 186 (43.6%)
Here:

43.6%
Texas:

50.1%

Midland Academy Charter School - Historical enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

American Indian/Alaska Native enrollment: 6 (1.4%)
School:

1.4%
State:

0.4%
Asian enrollment: 2 (0.5%)
Here:

0.5%
State:

3.1%
Hispanic enrollment: 278 (65.1%)
Here:

65.1%
Texas:

46.9%
Black enrollment: 36 (8.4%)
Here:

8.4%
Texas:

11.6%
White enrollment: 101 (23.7%)
Here:

23.7%
Texas:

32.3%
Two or More Races enrollment: 4 (0.9%)
Midland Academy Charter School:

0.9%
State:

2.1%

Midland Academy Charter School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)

Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 188 (44.0%)
Here:

44.0%
Texas:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 139 (32.6%)
Here:

32.6%
State:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 49 (11.5%)
Here:

11.5%
Texas:

6.2%

Midland Academy Charter School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)

Classroom Teachers (FTE): 30

Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 2
Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 4
Number of FTE teachers who were absent more than 10 school days during the school years: 10
Number of FTE nurses: 1

Student/Teacher Ratio
Midland Academy Charter School:

14.2
Texas:

15.6

Midland Academy Charter School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio


School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $1,659,091
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 30 (Salary Expenditures: $1,494,069)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 1 (Salary Expenditures: $33,318)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 4 (Salary Expenditures: $195,375)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 3 (Salary Expenditures: $192,107)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $124,385
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $538,135
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $1,784,399
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 5 (Salary Expenditures: $150,652)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 4 (Salary Expenditures: $195,375)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 3 (Salary Expenditures: $192,107)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $221,046

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for

Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 28 (male: 17, female: 11)
  • Hispanic: 28 (male: 17, female: 11)

Students with disabilities:
Show data for

Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.

Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 21 (male: 17, female: 4)
  • Hispanic: 14 (male: 10, female: 4)
  • White: 7 (all male)

Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 4 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • White: 2

Retention:
Show data for

(State average from 3,162 schools)

A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained
Total number of students retained in 1st grade: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2

Percent of 1st grade students retained
Here:

3.8%
Texas:

6.1%

Total number of students retained in 2nd grade: 2 (all female)
  • Hispanic: 2

Percent of 2nd grade students retained
School:

3.6%
State:

4.8%

Total number of students retained in 5th grade: 2 (all female)
  • Hispanic: 2

Percent of 5th grade students retained
School:

5.6%
Texas:

4.3%


Gifted and Talented:
Show data for

(State average from 7,254 schools)

This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 14 (male: 7, female: 7)
  • Hispanic: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • White: 7 (male: 2, female: 5)

Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
School:

32.8
Texas:

79.4

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,539 schools)

The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
3rd Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,475
  • Males1,480
  • Females1,471
  • Hispanic1,455
  • White1,542
Math Average Scale Score:

1,475
Texas:

1,453
Math students tested: 47
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 47

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.9 (73%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.8 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 4.1 (59%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.6 (65%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 28%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 30%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 19%

23%
28%
30%
19%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,480, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 14%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 24%)
29%
14%
33%
24%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,471, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%, Approaches: 39%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 15%)
19%
39%
27%
15%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,455, Tested: 33, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 18%)
27%
31%
24%
18%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,542, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 42%, Masters: 25%)
8%
25%
42%
25%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,435
  • Males1,446
  • Females1,426
  • Hispanic1,409
  • White1,503
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,435
State:

1,423
Reading students tested: 47
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 47

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4 (80%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.7 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9 (64%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 39%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 17%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 21%

23%
39%
17%
21%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,446, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 24%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 29%)
24%
28%
19%
29%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,426, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 46%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 15%)
23%
46%
16%
15%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,409, Tested: 33, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 49%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 12%)
27%
49%
12%
12%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,503, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 8%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 42%)
17%
8%
33%
42%

4th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,623
  • Males1,649
  • Females1,594
  • Hispanic1,593
  • Black1,648
  • White1,665
Math Average Scale Score:

1,623
State:

1,546
Math students tested: 45
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 45

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.6 (73%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.5 (77%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.1 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.2 (80%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 32%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 24%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 40%

4%
32%
24%
40%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,649, Tested: 24, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 54%)
4%
29%
13%
54%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,594, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 38%, Masters: 24%)
5%
33%
38%
24%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,593, Tested: 31, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 32%)
6%
36%
26%
32%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,648, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 60%)
20%
20%
60%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,665, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 43%)
29%
28%
43%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,548
  • Males1,565
  • Females1,530
  • Hispanic1,533
  • Black1,522
  • White1,608
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,548
State:

1,496
Reading students tested: 45
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 45

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.7 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.8 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.3 (72%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 22%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 27%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 29%

22%
22%
27%
29%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,565, Tested: 24, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 42%)
21%
16%
21%
42%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,530, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 24%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 14%)
24%
28%
34%
14%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,533, Tested: 31, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 19%)
23%
32%
26%
19%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,522, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 60%, Masters: 20%)
20%
60%
20%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,608, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 57%)
29%
14%
57%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All3,660
  • Males3,705
  • Females3,608
  • Hispanic3,598
  • Black3,752
  • White3,638
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,660
State:

3,570
Writing students tested: 45
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 45

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.8 (47%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 4.3 (54%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.3 (64%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 31%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 27%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 2%

40%
31%
27%
2%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,705, Tested: 24, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 4%)
38%
30%
29%
4%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,608, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 43%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 0%)
43%
33%
24%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,598, Tested: 31, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 45%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 0%)
45%
29%
26%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,752, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 60%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 0%)
20%
60%
20%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,638, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 43%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 0%)
43%
28%
29%

5th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,629
  • Males1,609
  • Females1,644
  • Hispanic1,620
  • White1,634
Math Average Scale Score:

1,629
State:

1,603
Math students tested: 49
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 49

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.8 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.3 (66%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7 (78%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.5 (62%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 45%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 25%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 22%

8%
45%
25%
22%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,609, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 47%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 19%)
10%
47%
24%
19%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,644, Tested: 28, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 25%)
7%
43%
25%
25%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,620, Tested: 28, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 18%)
4%
50%
28%
18%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,634, Tested: 18, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 39%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 22%)
17%
39%
22%
22%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,569
  • Males1,514
  • Females1,611
  • Hispanic1,549
  • White1,609
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,569
State:

1,546
Reading students tested: 49
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 49

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.8 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.7 (73%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.8 (63%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 33%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 25%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 22%

20%
33%
25%
22%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,514, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 10%)
33%
38%
19%
10%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,611, Tested: 28, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 32%)
11%
28%
29%
32%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,549, Tested: 28, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 18%)
25%
32%
25%
18%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,609, Tested: 18, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 33%)
17%
22%
28%
33%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All3,842
  • Males3,748
  • Females3,912
  • Hispanic3,759
  • White3,977
Science Average Scale Score:

3,842
Texas:

3,771
Science students tested: 49
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 49

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6.1 (76%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.6 (66%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 8.4 (70%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 47%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 19%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 16%

18%
47%
19%
16%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,748, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 24%, Approaches: 47%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 10%)
24%
47%
19%
10%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,912, Tested: 28, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 47%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 21%)
14%
47%
18%
21%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,759, Tested: 28, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%, Approaches: 47%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 14%)
21%
47%
18%
14%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,977, Tested: 18, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 44%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 22%)
17%
44%
17%
22%

6th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,606
  • Males1,636
  • Females1,585
  • Hispanic1,611
  • White1,613
Math Average Scale Score:

1,606
Texas:

1,546
Math students tested: 37
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 37

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.9 (49%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7.5 (50%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 3 (50%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.6 (52%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 43%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 27%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 3%

27%
43%
27%
3%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,636, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 54%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 7%)
13%
54%
26%
7%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,585, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 0%)
36%
37%
27%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,611, Tested: 31, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%, Approaches: 42%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 3%)
26%
42%
29%
3%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,613, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 60%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 0%)
20%
60%
20%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,627
  • Males1,651
  • Females1,611
  • Hispanic1,640
  • White1,556
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,627
Texas:

1,457
Reading students tested: 37
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 37

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.8 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 13.2 (78%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.4 (69%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 43%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 24%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 22%

11%
43%
24%
22%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,651, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 53%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 20%)
53%
27%
20%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,611, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 23%)
18%
37%
22%
23%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,640, Tested: 31, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 26%)
10%
38%
26%
26%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,556, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 60%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 0%)
20%
60%
20%

7th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All1,671
  • Males1,653
  • Females1,693
  • Hispanic1,687
Math Average Scale Score:

1,671
Texas:

1,571
Math students tested: 16
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 16

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.5 (58%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9 (60%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.6 (55%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 4.1 (58%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 56%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 19%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 19%

6%
56%
19%
19%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,653, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 78%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 0%)
78%
22%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,693, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 43%)
14%
29%
14%
43%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,687, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 30%)
10%
40%
20%
30%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All1,679
  • Males1,666
  • Females1,696
  • Hispanic1,697
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,679
State:

1,550
Reading students tested: 16
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 16

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.9 (74%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.7 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 11.6 (73%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 25%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 32%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 31%

13%
25%
32%
31%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,666, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 45%, Masters: 22%)
11%
22%
45%
22%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,696, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 43%)
14%
29%
14%
43%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,697, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 40%)
10%
20%
30%
40%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All4,358
  • Males4,260
  • Females4,484
  • Hispanic4,460
Writing Average Scale Score:

4,358
State:

3,515
Writing students tested: 16
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 16

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 10.5 (66%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.6 (81%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 14.6 (86%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 13%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 50%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 31%

6%
13%
50%
31%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,260, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 45%, Masters: 22%)
11%
22%
45%
22%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,484, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 57%, Masters: 43%)
57%
43%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 4,460, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 10%, Meets: 50%, Masters: 40%)
10%
50%
40%

8th Grade
Math Average Scale Score:

1,685
Texas:

1,539
Math students tested: 7
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 7

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 2.6 (64%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.4 (53%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.3 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 4.1 (59%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 57%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 15%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 14%

14%
57%
15%
14%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,663, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 80%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 0%)
80%
20%

Reading Average Scale Score:

1,648
Texas:

1,561
Reading students tested: 7
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 7

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.6 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 13.4 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.9 (58%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 42%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 15%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 14%

29%
42%
15%
14%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,662, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 20%)
20%
40%
20%
20%

Science Average Scale Score:

3,801
State:

3,634
Science students tested: 7
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 7

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.1 (56%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.6 (60%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 7.7 (70%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 42%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 15%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 14%

29%
42%
15%
14%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,697, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 0%)
40%
40%
20%

Social Studies Average Scale Score:

3,702
Texas:

3,461
Social Studies students tested: 7
Social Studies # Answer Documents Submitted: 7

Social Studies Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 9.7 (57%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6.4 (64%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.3 (53%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 4.6 (65%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 71%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 0%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 0%

29%
71%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,729, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 80%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 0%)
20%
80%

Health & Safety


Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
Show data for

(State average from 7,777 schools)

A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
Midland Academy Charter School:

4.7
State:

147.9

Comments


Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss Midland, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents