Okeechobee Intensive Halfway House School in Okeechobee, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 0.

800 NE 72ND CIR N
Okeechobee, FL 34972

Show street view No street view available for this location

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (863) 357-0047 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 47
School number: 8017
School type: Senior High
District Name: OKEECHOBEE
Grade range: GRADES 5 TO 12
School's status regarding neglected and delinquent criteria: Delinquent, Residential
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (863) 763-2269
Principal: Jeannette Smet
The function/setting of the school: Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ)
The main educational program offered at the school: Alternative Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 16
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 78
Senate District: 17
School Web Address: http://www.g4s.com/us/us-youth_services.htm

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

13%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading: 3%

Meeting High Standards in Math: 9%

Meeting High Standards in Writing: 42%

Meeting High Standards in Science: 1%

Making Reading Gains: 26%

Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Included
Making Math Gains: 45%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading: 42%

% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Included
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math: 59%

11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0

Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns: 227

Percent Tested: 88%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: P

Grade in 2006: P

Grade in 2005: F

Grade in 2004: P

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate: 68%

Minority Rate: 95%


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1030 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1008 (92%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 262
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 579
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

8%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 562
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 36 (86%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (83%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 572 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 557 (93%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 146
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 337
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

7%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 321
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 417 (92%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 411 (92%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 110
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 224
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

9%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 224
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 742 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 730 (93%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 194
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 424
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

8%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 414
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 94 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 93 (94%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 105 (87%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 103 (86%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

6%
State average from 4 schools:

40%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

8%
State average from 4 schools:

35%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

43%
State average from 4 schools:

73%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

37%
State average from 4 schools:

50%
Making Math Gains
OKEECHOBEE INTENSIVE HALFWAY HOUSE:

45%
State average from 4 schools:

52%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

53%
State average from 4 schools:

55%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

192
State average from 4 schools:

304
Percent Tested
Here:

85%
State average from 4 schools:

96%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: P

Grade in 2005: F

Grade in 2004: P

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

69%
State average from 4 schools:

70%
Minority Rate
Here:

96%
State average from 4 schools:

66%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1079 (87%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1061 (87%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 347
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 669
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

7%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 652
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 41 (85%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 41 (85%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 534 (88%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 529 (88%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 164
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 333
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 323
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 498 (86%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 486 (85%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 168
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 315
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

10%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 309
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 805 (89%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 793 (89%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 252

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

6%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 526
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

7%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 516
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 97 (85%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 92 (84%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

26%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 34
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 61

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

7%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 58
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 102 (86%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 102 (86%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 38
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 60
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 57
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

3%
State average from 4 schools:

39%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

9%
State average from 4 schools:

38%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

45%
State average from 4 schools:

68%
Making Reading Gains
OKEECHOBEE INTENSIVE HALFWAY HOUSE:

30%
State average from 4 schools:

47%
Making Math Gains
Here:

43%
State average from 4 schools:

57%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

42%
State average from 4 schools:

49%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

172
State average from 4 schools:

298
Percent Tested
Here:

85%
State average from 4 schools:

94%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: No%

Grade in 2005: F

Grade in 2004: P

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

66%
State average from 4 schools:

67%
Minority Rate
Here:

96%
State average from 4 schools:

62%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 209 Results


2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1300
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

237
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 76%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1415
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

242
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 71%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1488
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

227
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 88%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 4%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
OKEECHOBEE INTENSIVE HALFWAY HOUSE:

1533
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

240
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 81%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 5%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1512
State average:

1935
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

223
State average:

302
Percent Passing: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 88%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 1%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

199
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 90%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 1%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

222
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 87%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 4%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 3
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1278
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

218
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 85%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 9%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1510
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

237
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 74%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 14%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1597
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

245
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 71%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
OKEECHOBEE INTENSIVE HALFWAY HOUSE:

1671
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

228
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 66%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 9%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1738
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

263
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 59%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 14%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
OKEECHOBEE INTENSIVE HALFWAY HOUSE:

1
State average:

103

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
OKEECHOBEE INTENSIVE HALFWAY HOUSE:

1
State average:

101

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

47
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

608
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

12
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
OKEECHOBEE INTENSIVE HALFWAY HOUSE:

6
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

7
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

4
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

8
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

4
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

79
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
Here:

623
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
OKEECHOBEE INTENSIVE HALFWAY HOUSE:

17
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

7
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

7
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
OKEECHOBEE INTENSIVE HALFWAY HOUSE:

5
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

9
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
OKEECHOBEE INTENSIVE HALFWAY HOUSE:

5
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
OKEECHOBEE INTENSIVE HALFWAY HOUSE:

4
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

104
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

627
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
OKEECHOBEE INTENSIVE HALFWAY HOUSE:

13
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

7
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

7
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
OKEECHOBEE INTENSIVE HALFWAY HOUSE:

4
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
OKEECHOBEE INTENSIVE HALFWAY HOUSE:

8
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

4
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

254
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

652
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
Here:

23
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

7
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
Here:

7
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

10
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

3
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

193
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
Here:

652
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
Here:

16
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

10
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

8

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Writing Results



2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 88
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
OKEECHOBEE INTENSIVE HALFWAY HOUSE:

201
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 82%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 7%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 6
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 51%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 173
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

216
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 69%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 8%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 7
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 45%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1226
State average from 878 schools:

1661
Mean Scale Score 100-500
OKEECHOBEE INTENSIVE HALFWAY HOUSE:

224
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 71%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 13%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 79%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1191
State average:

1663
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
OKEECHOBEE INTENSIVE HALFWAY HOUSE:

1260
State average:

1592
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -69

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1373
State average from 808 schools:

1746
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

234
State average:

305
% in each Achievement Level 1: 71%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 85%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1368
State average:

1743
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
OKEECHOBEE INTENSIVE HALFWAY HOUSE:

1405
State average:

1668
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -38

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
OKEECHOBEE INTENSIVE HALFWAY HOUSE:

1427
State average from 819 schools:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

214
State average:

294
% in each Achievement Level 1: 80%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 4%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 81%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1421
State average:

1807
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1467
State average:

1738
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -45

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1536
State average from 612 schools:

1849
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

241
State average:

298
% in each Achievement Level 1: 84%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 3%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 6
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 61%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
OKEECHOBEE INTENSIVE HALFWAY HOUSE:

1553
State average:

1837
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1520
State average:

1779
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 34

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1448
State average from 573 schools:

1879
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

212
State average:

291
Percent Passing: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 90%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 2%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 6
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 75%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1478
State average:

1873
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1610
State average:

1876
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -132

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
OKEECHOBEE INTENSIVE HALFWAY HOUSE:

195
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 91%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 2%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 2
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

217
State average:

295
% in each Achievement Level 1: 88%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 2%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 13: 2
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 14: 4

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1242
State average from 873 schools:

1641
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

210
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 82%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 73%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1271
State average:

1645
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1316
State average:

1620
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: -45

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1468
State average from 804 schools:

1777
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

227
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 78%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 7%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 84%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1472
State average:

1774
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1390
State average:

1645
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 82

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1532
State average from 815 schools:

1851
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

228
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 78%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 79%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1537
State average:

1845
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1551
State average:

1755
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: -14

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
OKEECHOBEE INTENSIVE HALFWAY HOUSE:

1685
State average from 613 schools:

1884
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

232
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 68%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 7%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 61%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1700
State average:

1869
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1658
State average:

1821
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 42

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1760
State average from 581 schools:

1950
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

269
State average:

315
Percent Passing: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 76%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1769
State average:

1939
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
OKEECHOBEE INTENSIVE HALFWAY HOUSE:

1744
State average:

1901
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 25

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 3

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 45
Mean Scale Score
Here:

618
State average from 874 schools:

671
Median NPR: 18
Literary (max 18): 8
Informational (max 18): 7
Functional (max 18): 8
Initial Understanding (max 12): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 9
Critical Analysis (max 12): 5
Strategies (max 10): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 112
Mean Scale Score
Here:

625
State average from 796 schools:

675
Median NPR: 19
Literary (max 18): 9
Informational (max 18): 6
Functional (max 18): 7
Initial Understanding (max 12): 5
Interpretation (max 20): 9
Critical Analysis (max 12): 4
Strategies (max 10): 3

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 224
Mean Scale Score
Here:

631
State average from 810 schools:

685
Median NPR: 16
Literary (max 18): 9
Informational (max 18): 6
Functional (max 18): 8
Initial Understanding (max 10): 5
Interpretation (max 20): 8
Critical Analysis (max 14): 6
Strategies (max 10): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 408
Mean Scale Score
Here:

644
State average from 597 schools:

696
Median NPR: 18
Literary (max 18): 8
Informational (max 18): 7
Functional (max 18): 8
Initial Understanding (max 10): 4
Interpretation (max 20): 9
Critical Analysis (max 14): 6
Strategies (max 10): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 251
Mean Scale Score
Here:

658
State average from 575 schools:

695
Median NPR: 19
Literary (max 18): 9
Informational (max 18): 7
Functional (max 18): 9
Initial Understanding (max 10): 5
Interpretation (max 20): 10
Critical Analysis (max 14): 7
Strategies (max 10): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 3

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 45
Mean Scale Score
Here:

619
State average from 874 schools:

669
Median NPR: 17
Number Sense (max 10): 3
Operations (max 12): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 3
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 109
Mean Scale Score
Here:

636
State average from 796 schools:

685
Median NPR: 24
Number Sense (max 9): 2
Operations (max 9): 3
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 3
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 222
Mean Scale Score
Here:

649
State average from 810 schools:

698
Median NPR: 22
Number Sense (max 9): 3
Operations (max 9): 3
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 3
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 401
Mean Scale Score
Here:

664
State average from 597 schools:

708
Median NPR: 27
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 3
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 3
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 250
Mean Scale Score
OKEECHOBEE INTENSIVE HALFWAY HOUSE:

678
State average from 575 schools:

710
Median NPR: 23
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 3
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 4
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 198
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

191
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 83%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 3%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 6
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 46%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 25%

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 207
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
OKEECHOBEE INTENSIVE HALFWAY HOUSE:

209
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 75%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 5%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 7
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 39%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 22%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Okeechobee, FL
  5. Okeechobee Intensive Halfway House School in Okeechobee, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.