Richmond Perrine Optimist School in Miami, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 6.

18055 HOMESTEAD AVE
Miami, FL 33157

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Herbert A. Ammons Middle School (4.2 miles):

98
Neva King Cooper Educational Center School (11.8 miles):

76
International Studies Charter High School (13.5 miles):

67
Keys Gate Charter School (12.7 miles):

48
Sunset Heights Charter (Inactive 10/02) School (7.8 miles):

33
Kinloch Park Middle School (13.1 miles):

18
School For Applied Technology (16.9 miles):

7
Richmond Perrine Optimist School:

6
Turner/Guilford/Knight School (14.7 miles):

0
Richmond Perrine Optimist School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Miami-Dade County:

45
Miami:

44
Richmond Perrine Optimist School:

6

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (305) 636-6147 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 13
School number: 7835
School type: Senior High
District Name: DADE
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 12
School's status regarding neglected and delinquent criteria: Delinquent, Non-residential
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (305) 636-6198
Principal: Samuel Johnson
The main educational program offered at the school: Alternative Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 25
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 118
Senate District: 39
School Web Address: outreach.dadeschools.net

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 74 (78%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 72 (77%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

11%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 53
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

10%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 65 (80%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 65 (81%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

11%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

9%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 59 (82%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 57 (79%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

9%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 44
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

9%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 45 (84%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 41 (81%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

7%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 41 (84%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 37 (81%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 41 (82%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 37 (79%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 62 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 62 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

6%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 54 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 54 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

6%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 46 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 47 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1611
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

279
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

33%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
RICHMOND PERRINE OPTIMIST:

20%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

47%
State average:

33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

47%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

14
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
RICHMOND PERRINE OPTIMIST:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1529
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
RICHMOND PERRINE OPTIMIST:

235
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

69%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

31%
State average:

28%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

2
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

9
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1587
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

250
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
RICHMOND PERRINE OPTIMIST:

74%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

26%
State average:

30%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
RICHMOND PERRINE OPTIMIST:

7
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
RICHMOND PERRINE OPTIMIST:

1544
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

229
State average:

302
Percent Passing
Here:

6%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

89%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

11%
State average:

28%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

10
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
RICHMOND PERRINE OPTIMIST:

4
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

206
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

73%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

27%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
RICHMOND PERRINE OPTIMIST:

5
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

4
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

4
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

4
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1546
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

246
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

63%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

25%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

13%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

13%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

2
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1614
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

249
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

73%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

20%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

7%
State average:

38%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

7%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

2
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
RICHMOND PERRINE OPTIMIST:

3
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

2
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1699
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
RICHMOND PERRINE OPTIMIST:

236
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

67%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

17%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

17%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

17%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

2
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

2
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
RICHMOND PERRINE OPTIMIST:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

2
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1822
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

284
State average:

326
Percent Passing
Here:

17%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

56%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

33%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

6%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

6%
State average:

33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

11%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
RICHMOND PERRINE OPTIMIST:

4
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
RICHMOND PERRINE OPTIMIST:

2
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

2
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

3
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1485
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

255
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 25%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1423
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
RICHMOND PERRINE OPTIMIST:

213
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 93%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1544
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

231
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 73%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 15
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

3
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 33%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 53%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 8

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Miami, FL
  5. Richmond Perrine Optimist School in Miami, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.