School For The Highly Gifted in Grand Prairie, TX
(01-05 • Public • Regular School)
City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 100
- Address
- 2990 S HWY 161
Grand Prairie, TX 75052
- Telephone
- (972) 343-7864
(make sure to verify first before calling)
- Website
- http://www.gpisd.org/shg
- City-data.com school rating
- 100
- Students
- 87
- Classroom Teachers (FTE)
- 8.3
- Free lunch eligible students
- 16
- Reduced-price lunch
eligible students - 12
- School district
- GRAND PRAIRIE ISD
- Charter school
- Yes
- Charter authorizer name
- GRAND PRAIRIE (#057910)
- Title I status
- Not a Title I school
- Magnet School Indicator
- No
- Shared Time Indicator
- Missing
- Adult education offered
- No
Ratings
This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
School For The Highly Gifted: | 100 |
THURGOOD MARSHALL LEADERSHIP ACADEMY (0.1 miles): | 70 |
LORENZO DE ZAVALA ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE ACADEMY (1.3 miles): | 69 |
JOHN A DUBISKI CAREER H S (0.0 miles): | 51 |
SOUTH GRAND PRAIRIE H S (1.1 miles): | 39 |
ADVANTAGE ACADEMY (0.9 miles): | 37 |
REMYNSE EL (0.8 miles): | 33 |
ELLEN OCHOA STEM ACADEMY AT BEN MILIAM EL (1.3 miles): | 18 |
SALLYE R MOORE EL (0.6 miles): | 12 |
School For The Highly Gifted rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas: | 54 |
Dallas County: | 53 |
Grand Prairie: | 53 |
School For The Highly Gifted: | 100 |
Students & Teachers
Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 87
Enrollment in 2015: 46
Enrollment in 2015: 46
Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)
Grade | G01 | G02 | G03 | G04 | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
All students | 10 | 20 | 29 | 28 | 87 |
Female students | 3 | 6 | 11 | 12 | 32 |
Male students | 7 | 14 | 18 | 16 | 55 |
Asian students | - | 4 | 2 | 6 | 12 |
Hispanic students | 3 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 24 |
Black students | 2 | 2 | 9 | 2 | 15 |
White students | 3 | 7 | 9 | 13 | 32 |
Two or More Races students | 2 | - | 1 | 1 | 4 |
Enrollment by grade:
1st grade enrollment: 10
2nd grade enrollment: 20
3rd grade enrollment: 29
4th grade enrollment: 28
2nd grade enrollment: 20
3rd grade enrollment: 29
4th grade enrollment: 28
School For The Highly Gifted - Enrollment by grade
Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
Female enrollment: 32 (36.8%)
School: | 36.8% |
State: | 49.0% |
Male enrollment: 55 (63.2%)
School For The Highly Gifted: | 63.2% |
Texas: | 50.1% |
School For The Highly Gifted - Enrollment by gender
Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
Asian enrollment: 12 (13.8%)
School For The Highly Gifted: | 13.8% |
Texas: | 3.1% |
Hispanic enrollment: 24 (27.6%)
School: | 27.6% |
State: | 46.9% |
Black enrollment: 15 (17.2%)
Here: | 17.2% |
Texas: | 11.6% |
White enrollment: 32 (36.8%)
School: | 36.8% |
State: | 32.3% |
Two or More Races enrollment: 4 (4.6%)
Here: | 4.6% |
Texas: | 2.1% |
School For The Highly Gifted - Enrollment by race/ethnicity
Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)
Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 28 (32.2%)
School: | 32.2% |
State: | 61.6% |
Free lunch eligible students: 16 (18.4%)
Here: | 18.4% |
Texas: | 55.4% |
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 12 (13.8%)
School For The Highly Gifted: | 13.8% |
State: | 6.2% |
School For The Highly Gifted - Lunch Program Eligibility
Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)
Classroom Teachers (FTE): 8.3
Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 1
Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 1
Number of FTE school counselors: 1
Number of FTE teachers who were absent more than 10 school days during the school years: 3
Number of FTE sworn law enforcement officers: 0.3
Number of FTE security guards: 0.1
Student/Teacher Ratio
Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 1
Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 1
Number of FTE school counselors: 1
Number of FTE teachers who were absent more than 10 school days during the school years: 3
Number of FTE sworn law enforcement officers: 0.3
Number of FTE security guards: 0.1
Student/Teacher Ratio
School For The Highly Gifted: | 10.4 |
Texas: | 15.6 |
School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $534,994
- Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 8.3 (Salary Expenditures: $435,238)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 1 (Salary Expenditures: $22,531)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $77,225)
Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 16 (male: 9, female: 7)
- Hispanic: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
- Asian: 7 (male: 2, female: 5)
- Two or More Races: 2 (all male)
Students with disabilities:
Show data for
Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 2 (all male)
- Hispanic: 2
Gifted and Talented:
Show data for
(State average from 7,254 schools)
This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.
- Hispanic25
- Asian10
- Black16
- White28
- Multirace7
- LEP13
- IDEA2
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment
- Hispanic: 25 (male: 20, female: 5)
- Asian: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
- Black: 16 (male: 5, female: 11)
- White: 28 (male: 20, female: 8)
- Two or More Races: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 13 (male: 8, female: 5)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
School: | 988.5 |
Texas: | 79.4 |
Statewide Student Assessments
State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for
(State average from 4,539 schools)
The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
End-of-course (EOC)
Algebra I students tested: 12
Algebra I # Answer Documents Submitted: 12
Algebra I Avg Items Correct:
Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 0%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 8%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 92%
3rd Grade
Math students tested: 18
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 18
Math Avg Items Correct:
Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 6%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 33%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 61%
Reading students tested: 18
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 18
Reading Avg Items Correct:
Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 6%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 11%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 83%
4th Grade
Math students tested: 26
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 26
Math Avg Items Correct:
Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 0%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 19%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 81%
Reading students tested: 26
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 26
Reading Avg Items Correct:
Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 12%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 15%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 73%
5th Grade
Math students tested: 40
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 40
Math Avg Items Correct:
Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 2%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 38%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 60%
Reading students tested: 40
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 40
Reading Avg Items Correct:
Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 2%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 18%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 80%
Science students tested: 40
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 40
Science Avg Items Correct:
Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 3%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 10%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 38%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 50%
6th Grade
Math students tested: 14
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 26
Math Avg Items Correct:
Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 7%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 43%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 50%
Reading students tested: 26
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 26
Reading Avg Items Correct:
Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 4%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 23%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 73%
- All4,943
- Males4,929
- Females4,957
- White4,851
Algebra I Average Scale Score
Algebra I Average Scale Score: | 4,943 |
State: | 4,001 |
Algebra I # Answer Documents Submitted: 12
Algebra I Avg Items Correct:
- Reporting Category 1: 9.5 (86%)
- Reporting Category 2: 10.8 (90%)
- Reporting Category 3: 12.3 (88%)
- Reporting Category 4: 10.4 (95%)
- Reporting Category 5: 5.5 (92%)
Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 0%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 8%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 92%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,929, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 100%)
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,957, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 83%)
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,851, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 100%)
3rd Grade
- All1,627
- Males1,605
- Females1,684
- Black1,646
- White1,583
Math Average Scale Score
(3rd Grade)
Math Average Scale Score: | 1,627 |
State: | 1,453 |
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 18
Math Avg Items Correct:
- Reporting Category 1: 7.2 (90%)
- Reporting Category 2: 11.8 (91%)
- Reporting Category 3: 5.8 (83%)
- Reporting Category 4: 3.5 (88%)
Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 6%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 33%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 61%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,605, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 8%, Meets: 38%, Masters: 54%)
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,684, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 80%)
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,646, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 60%)
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,583, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 60%)
- All1,611
- Males1,601
- Females1,637
- Black1,613
- White1,618
Reading Average Scale Score
(3rd Grade)
Reading Average Scale Score: | 1,611 |
Texas: | 1,423 |
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 18
Reading Avg Items Correct:
- Reporting Category 1: 4.9 (98%)
- Reporting Category 2: 13 (87%)
- Reporting Category 3: 12.3 (88%)
Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 6%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 11%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 83%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,601, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 8%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 77%)
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,637, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 100%)
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,613, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 100%)
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,618, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 100%)
4th Grade
- All1,790
- Males1,810
- Females1,725
- Hispanic1,710
- White1,849
Math Average Scale Score
(4th Grade)
Math Average Scale Score: | 1,790 |
State: | 1,546 |
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 26
Math Avg Items Correct:
- Reporting Category 1: 8.2 (91%)
- Reporting Category 2: 10.2 (93%)
- Reporting Category 3: 9 (90%)
- Reporting Category 4: 3.7 (93%)
Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 0%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 19%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 81%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,810, Tested: 20, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 10%, Masters: 90%)
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,725, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 50%, Masters: 50%)
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,710, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 75%)
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,849, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 88%)
- All1,686
- Males1,700
- Females1,641
- Hispanic1,688
- White1,672
Reading Average Scale Score
(4th Grade)
Reading Average Scale Score: | 1,686 |
Texas: | 1,496 |
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 26
Reading Avg Items Correct:
- Reporting Category 1: 7.1 (88%)
- Reporting Category 2: 13.1 (87%)
- Reporting Category 3: 11.3 (87%)
Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 12%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 15%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 73%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,700, Tested: 20, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 10%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 75%)
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,641, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 67%)
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,688, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 12%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 63%)
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,672, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 12%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 75%)
5th Grade
- All1,738
- Males1,743
- Females1,728
- Hispanic1,698
- Black1,791
- White1,754
Math Average Scale Score
(5th Grade)
Math Average Scale Score: | 1,738 |
State: | 1,603 |
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 40
Math Avg Items Correct:
- Reporting Category 1: 5.2 (87%)
- Reporting Category 2: 13.8 (81%)
- Reporting Category 3: 7.7 (85%)
- Reporting Category 4: 3.6 (89%)
Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 2%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 38%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 60%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,743, Tested: 27, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 41%, Masters: 59%)
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,728, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 8%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 62%)
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,698, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 8%, Meets: 50%, Masters: 42%)
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,791, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 80%)
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,754, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 69%)
- All1,757
- Males1,733
- Females1,806
- Hispanic1,757
- Black1,800
- White1,755
Reading Average Scale Score
(5th Grade)
Reading Average Scale Score: | 1,757 |
Texas: | 1,546 |
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 40
Reading Avg Items Correct:
- Reporting Category 1: 7.5 (94%)
- Reporting Category 2: 14.2 (89%)
- Reporting Category 3: 12.6 (90%)
Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 2%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 18%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 80%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,733, Tested: 27, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 4%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 78%)
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,806, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 85%)
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,757, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 67%)
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,800, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 10%, Masters: 90%)
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,755, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 8%, Masters: 92%)
- All4,412
- Males4,507
- Females4,214
- Hispanic4,330
- Black4,233
- White4,563
Science Average Scale Score
(5th Grade)
Science Average Scale Score: | 4,412 |
Texas: | 3,771 |
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 40
Science Avg Items Correct:
- Reporting Category 1: 5.4 (90%)
- Reporting Category 2: 7.3 (91%)
- Reporting Category 3: 8.3 (83%)
- Reporting Category 4: 10.3 (85%)
Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 3%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 10%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 38%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 50%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,507, Tested: 27, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%, Approaches: 3%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 59%)
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,214, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 46%, Masters: 31%)
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 4,330, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 41%, Masters: 42%)
Black: (Average Scale Score: 4,233, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 10%, Meets: 70%, Masters: 20%)
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,563, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 8%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 69%)
6th Grade
- All1,761
- Males1,753
- Females1,774
- White1,769
Math Average Scale Score
(6th Grade)
Math Average Scale Score: | 1,761 |
Texas: | 1,546 |
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 26
Math Avg Items Correct:
- Reporting Category 1: 7.9 (79%)
- Reporting Category 2: 11.9 (79%)
- Reporting Category 3: 4.8 (80%)
- Reporting Category 4: 5 (71%)
Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 7%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 43%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 50%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,753, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 67%, Masters: 33%)
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,774, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 80%)
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,769, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 50%, Masters: 50%)
- All1,756
- Males1,753
- Females1,761
- Hispanic1,796
- Asian1,794
- White1,746
Reading Average Scale Score
(6th Grade)
Reading Average Scale Score: | 1,756 |
State: | 1,457 |
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 26
Reading Avg Items Correct:
- Reporting Category 1: 7 (88%)
- Reporting Category 2: 15.4 (91%)
- Reporting Category 3: 13.2 (88%)
Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 4%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 23%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 73%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,753, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 7%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 73%)
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,761, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 73%)
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,796, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 100%)
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,794, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 100%)
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,746, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 9%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 73%)
Health & Safety
Harassment & Bullying:
Show data for
(State average from 919 schools)
An allegation is a claim or assertion that someone has done something wrong or illegal, typically made without proof.
Harassment or bullying on the basis of sex includes sexual harassment or bullying and gender-based harassment or bullying. Sexual harassment or bullying is unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature, such as unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal, nonverbal, or physical conduct of a sexual nature. Gender-based harassment or bullying is nonsexual intimidation or abusive behavior toward a student based on the student's actual or perceived sex, including harassment based on gender identity, gender expression, and nonconformity with gender stereotypes. Harassing conduct may take many forms, including verbal acts and name-calling, as well as non-verbal behavior, such as graphic and written statements, or conduct that is physically threatening, harmful or humiliating. The conduct can be carried out by school employees, other students, and non-employee third parties. Both male and female students can be victims of harassment or bullying on the basis of sex, and the harasser or bully and the victim can be of the same sex. Bullying on the basis of sex constitutes sexual harassment.
Harassment or bullying on the basis of sex includes sexual harassment or bullying and gender-based harassment or bullying. Sexual harassment or bullying is unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature, such as unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal, nonverbal, or physical conduct of a sexual nature. Gender-based harassment or bullying is nonsexual intimidation or abusive behavior toward a student based on the student's actual or perceived sex, including harassment based on gender identity, gender expression, and nonconformity with gender stereotypes. Harassing conduct may take many forms, including verbal acts and name-calling, as well as non-verbal behavior, such as graphic and written statements, or conduct that is physically threatening, harmful or humiliating. The conduct can be carried out by school employees, other students, and non-employee third parties. Both male and female students can be victims of harassment or bullying on the basis of sex, and the harasser or bully and the victim can be of the same sex. Bullying on the basis of sex constitutes sexual harassment.
Allegations of harassment or bullying on the basis of sex: 1
Allegations of harassment or bullying on the basis of sex per 1,000 students
Here: | 11.5 |
Texas: | 2.5 |
Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
Show data for
(State average from 7,777 schools)
A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 4 (all male)
- White: 2
- Two or More Races: 2
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
School For The Highly Gifted: | 46.0 |
State: | 147.9 |
Suspensions:
Show data for
(State average from 3,231 schools)
In-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his or her regular classroom(s) for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes, but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel. Direct supervision means school personnel are physically in the same location as students under their supervision.
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 2 (all male)
- Hispanic: 2
Discuss Grand Prairie, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.
Comments
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: