All Cities
Nevada Forum
Nevada
Tonopah, NV
Tonopah Middle School in Tonopah, Nevada (NV)
Tonopah Middle School in Tonopah, Nevada (NV)
City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Nevada) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is
45 .
Address:
Principal: Alvin Eiseman
Phone Number (Verify before using): (775) 482-6644
Fax Number (Verify before using): (775) 482-5717
Website: tonopah-ems.nye.k12.nv.us
Title I School: No
AYP School Designation: In Need of Improvement (Year 1)
Special Programs: Full-Day Kindergarten: No
Other nearby schools ratings:
Tonopah Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings: Nevada:
43Nye County:
33Tonopah:
36Tonopah Middle School:
45
Adequate Yearly Progress English Language Arts School English Language Arts AYP Designation: Adequate
Participation Individual Education Plan Students:
100.0%Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students:
100.0%All Students:
98.8%White:
98.7%
Percent Proficient White:
63.4%All Students:
59.0%Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students:
40.6%
Math School Math AYP Designation: Adequate
Participation Individual Education Plan Students:
100.0%Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students:
100.0%All Students:
98.8%White:
98.7%
Average Daily Attendance School Average Daily Attendance AYP Designation: Adequate
Hispanic:
94.5%Pacific Islander:
94.3%Individual Education Plan Students:
93.8%American Indian:
93.7%All Students:
93.3%White:
93.1%Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students:
91.3%Limited English Proficiency Students:
83.0%
Discuss this school with others on our active
Nevada Forum
Nevada Writing Examination Grade 8
Studets Results in 2010/2011
Approaches Standard This School:
42.9%Nevada:
36.5%
Meets Standard This School:
54.3%State:
59.1%
Tonopah Middle School Results
Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective
All Students
This School : -9.5%Nevada : -3.0%
Male
Here : -16.7%State : -12.8%
Female
This School : -2.7%Nevada : 7.1%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students
This School : -13.8%State : -15.2%
Detailed Students Results Percent of Tonopah Middle School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 35 -9.5% -3.0% 2.9% 2.7% 42.9% 36.5% 54.3% 59.1% 0.0% 1.7%
Male 17 -16.7% -12.8% 5.9% 4.0% 47.1% 45.0% 47.1% 50.2% 0.0% 0.8%
Female 18 -2.7% 7.1% 0.0% 1.4% 38.9% 27.8% 61.1% 68.3% 0.0% 2.6%
White 30 -10.5% 7.3% 3.3% 1.6% 43.3% 27.3% 53.3% 68.6% 0.0% 2.5%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 10 -13.8% -15.2% 10.0% 4.2% 40.0% 47.3% 50.0% 48.0% 0.0% 0.6%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 31 2.9% -6.9% 6.7% 5.1% 26.7% 38.0% 66.7% 48.1% 0.0% 8.8%
Male 13 -25.3% -15.7% 7.7% 7.5% 53.8% 44.4% 38.5% 42.3% 0.0% 5.8%
Female 18 24.4% 2.3% 5.9% 2.6% 5.9% 31.3% 88.2% 54.1% 0.0% 12.0%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 13 -33.0% -18.2% 15.4% 7.5% 53.8% 46.9% 30.8% 41.3% 0.0% 4.3%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 43 4.8% -1.3% 11.6% 5.7% 25.6% 37.7% 51.2% 47.3% 11.6% 9.4%
Male 20 -3.0% -9.6% 20.0% 8.0% 25.0% 43.7% 50.0% 42.1% 5.0% 6.2%
Female 23 11.6% 7.1% 4.3% 3.3% 26.1% 31.6% 52.2% 52.6% 17.4% 12.6%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 33 2.6% -2.1% 3.0% 6.2% 36.4% 37.8% 51.5% 46.1% 9.1% 9.8%
Male 13 -4.2% -10.7% 7.7% 8.8% 38.5% 44.0% 46.2% 40.8% 7.7% 6.5%
Female 20 7.0% 7.3% 0.0% 3.5% 35.0% 31.2% 55.0% 52.0% 10.0% 13.3%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 42 43.7% 19.1% 0.0% 6.8% 16.7% 34.5% 73.8% 46.6% 9.5% 12.1%
Male 24 35.4% 11.1% 0.0% 9.2% 25.0% 40.1% 75.0% 42.2% 0.0% 8.6%
Female 18 54.8% 27.6% 0.0% 4.2% 5.6% 28.7% 72.2% 51.3% 22.2% 15.9%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 24 40.0% 15.7% 0.0% 5.7% 12.5% 31.1% 75.0% 47.9% 12.5% 15.3%
Male 17 40.7% 8.0% 0.0% 7.9% 11.8% 36.6% 76.5% 44.6% 11.8% 10.9%
White 22 38.9% 26.3% 0.0% 2.6% 13.6% 23.7% 72.7% 52.7% 13.6% 21.1%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 10 22.5% 2.1% 0.0% 9.6% 30.0% 40.9% 60.0% 42.0% 10.0% 7.6%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 38 31.4% 18.3% 0.0% 6.1% 21.1% 28.1% 65.8% 48.0% 13.2% 17.7%
Male 15 25.8% 10.3% 0.0% 7.9% 26.7% 34.3% 60.0% 45.3% 13.3% 12.5%
Female 23 35.1% 26.9% 0.0% 4.2% 17.4% 21.5% 69.6% 50.9% 13.0% 23.5%
White 33 31.3% 29.2% 0.0% 2.9% 21.2% 20.4% 63.6% 52.5% 15.2% 24.1%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 30 43.0% 27.7% 0.0% 9.8% 20.0% 25.5% 50.0% 45.9% 30.0% 18.9%
Male 15 36.3% 20.1% 0.0% 12.5% 26.7% 30.5% 46.7% 43.3% 26.7% 13.8%
Female 15 49.7% 36.0% 0.0% 7.0% 13.3% 20.1% 53.3% 48.7% 33.3% 24.3%
White 25 43.0% 37.6% 0.0% 6.6% 20.0% 18.8% 52.0% 49.5% 28.0% 25.1%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 10 23.0% 13.9% 0.0% 13.9% 40.0% 35.2% 50.0% 41.9% 10.0% 9.0%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Criterion Referenced Test Mathematics Grade 6
Studets Results in 2010/2011
Meets Standard This School:
60.7%State:
64.7%
Tonopah Middle School Results
Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Female This School:
15.9%State:
5.9%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students
Detailed Students Results Percent of Tonopah Middle School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 30 -5.2% 4.5% 10.7% 10.0% 28.6% 19.6% 60.7% 64.7% 0.0% 5.7%
Male 18 -18.8% 3.1% 11.8% 11.4% 41.2% 19.6% 47.1% 63.2% 0.0% 5.8%
Female 12 15.9% 5.9% 9.1% 8.6% 9.1% 19.6% 81.8% 66.2% 0.0% 5.6%
White 25 -0.7% 14.3% 8.7% 5.8% 26.1% 14.0% 65.2% 71.3% 0.0% 8.9%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 14 -19.7% -4.7% 15.4% 14.2% 38.5% 24.6% 46.2% 58.6% 0.0% 2.6%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 25 -21.9% -1.9% 16.0% 11.9% 40.0% 24.0% 40.0% 58.5% 4.0% 5.5%
Male 12 -32.6% -3.0% 25.0% 13.4% 41.7% 23.7% 25.0% 57.1% 8.3% 5.8%
Female 13 -12.1% -0.8% 7.7% 10.4% 38.5% 24.4% 53.8% 60.0% 0.0% 5.1%
White 22 -20.4% 10.0% 13.6% 7.0% 40.9% 17.1% 40.9% 67.5% 4.5% 8.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 13 -27.4% -13.5% 15.4% 16.8% 46.2% 30.8% 30.8% 50.3% 7.7% 2.1%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 42 -2.3% 12.3% 14.3% 8.9% 33.3% 24.2% 31.0% 42.2% 21.4% 24.7%
Male 25 -2.7% 10.9% 16.0% 10.3% 32.0% 24.1% 32.0% 40.3% 20.0% 25.3%
Female 17 -1.7% 13.7% 11.8% 7.4% 35.3% 24.3% 29.4% 44.2% 23.5% 24.1%
White 38 -4.7% 23.0% 15.8% 5.0% 34.2% 17.3% 28.9% 43.0% 21.1% 34.6%
Individual Education Plan Students 14 -33.2% -28.4% 35.7% 36.9% 42.9% 36.8% 14.3% 21.5% 7.1% 4.7%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 16 -4.7% 2.2% 12.5% 12.7% 37.5% 30.5% 31.3% 42.1% 18.8% 14.8%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 29 10.8% 7.6% 10.3% 12.5% 24.1% 25.2% 51.7% 39.5% 13.8% 22.8%
Male 11 9.0% 5.7% 0.0% 14.4% 36.4% 25.1% 54.5% 37.7% 9.1% 22.7%
Female 18 12.0% 9.6% 16.7% 10.4% 16.7% 25.3% 50.0% 41.4% 16.7% 22.9%
White 29 10.8% 19.4% 10.3% 7.1% 24.1% 18.9% 51.7% 42.0% 13.8% 32.0%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 35 22.4% 16.6% 11.4% 14.4% 22.9% 25.7% 57.1% 40.7% 8.6% 19.2%
Male 15 23.4% 14.8% 13.3% 16.7% 20.0% 25.2% 60.0% 38.5% 6.7% 19.6%
Female 20 21.7% 18.5% 10.0% 12.0% 25.0% 26.3% 55.0% 43.0% 10.0% 18.8%
White 29 32.6% 29.4% 6.9% 8.4% 17.2% 18.9% 65.5% 45.2% 10.3% 27.5%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Criterion Referenced Test Mathematics Grade 7 Students Tested: 22
Tonopah Middle School:
100.0%Nevada:
99.6%
Studets Results in 2010/2011 Developing This School:
13.6%State:
11.4%
Meets Standard This School:
63.6%State:
62.7%
Exceeds Standard This School:
4.6%Nevada:
7.7%
Tonopah Middle School Results
Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Female This School:
9.1%State:
6.1%
White This School:
9.1%State:
15.0%
Detailed Students Results Percent of Tonopah Middle School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 22 2.3% 4.5% 13.6% 11.4% 18.2% 18.2% 63.6% 62.7% 4.6% 7.7%
Male 10 -5.9% 3.1% 10.0% 12.5% 30.0% 18.6% 60.0% 61.0% 0.0% 8.0%
Female 12 9.1% 6.1% 16.7% 10.2% 8.3% 17.8% 66.7% 64.5% 8.3% 7.5%
White 20 9.1% 15.0% 15.0% 6.3% 10.0% 12.9% 70.0% 69.2% 5.0% 11.7%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 37 -0.2% -0.6% 11.4% 12.2% 22.9% 22.5% 62.9% 59.0% 2.9% 6.3%
Male 20 -2.7% -0.9% 10.5% 13.1% 26.3% 22.0% 63.2% 58.3% 0.0% 6.7%
Female 17 2.9% -0.2% 12.5% 11.3% 18.8% 23.0% 62.5% 59.8% 6.3% 5.9%
White 33 5.1% 11.3% 12.9% 6.7% 16.1% 16.1% 67.7% 67.8% 3.2% 9.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 15 -12.1% -12.1% 23.1% 17.8% 23.1% 28.5% 46.2% 51.1% 7.7% 2.7%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 26 -4.7% 8.7% 15.4% 11.6% 34.6% 25.1% 38.5% 39.5% 11.5% 23.8%
Male 10 5.3% 6.4% 0.0% 13.6% 40.0% 25.3% 50.0% 37.7% 10.0% 23.4%
Female 16 -10.9% 11.0% 25.0% 9.5% 31.3% 24.9% 31.3% 41.5% 12.5% 24.2%
White 26 -4.7% 19.7% 15.4% 6.6% 34.6% 19.1% 38.5% 41.6% 11.5% 32.7%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 39 17.1% 4.5% 5.1% 14.3% 23.1% 26.5% 51.3% 38.2% 20.5% 20.9%
Male 17 4.2% 2.1% 0.0% 16.7% 41.2% 26.6% 47.1% 36.0% 11.8% 20.7%
Female 22 27.1% 6.9% 9.1% 11.9% 9.1% 26.5% 54.5% 40.5% 27.3% 21.1%
White 34 18.9% 16.3% 2.9% 8.7% 23.5% 20.3% 52.9% 41.7% 20.6% 29.3%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 10 5.3% -8.5% 10.0% 20.3% 30.0% 33.5% 40.0% 34.9% 20.0% 11.3%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 36 6.7% 14.8% 11.1% 15.2% 38.9% 26.7% 41.7% 39.2% 8.3% 18.9%
Male 16 6.7% 12.1% 6.3% 18.1% 43.8% 26.5% 37.5% 36.1% 12.5% 19.3%
Female 20 6.7% 17.6% 15.0% 12.2% 35.0% 26.8% 45.0% 42.5% 5.0% 18.5%
White 33 8.2% 27.2% 9.1% 9.0% 39.4% 20.5% 42.4% 42.9% 9.1% 27.7%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Criterion Referenced Test Mathematics Grade 8
Studets Results in 2010/2011 Developing This School:
11.4%Nevada:
8.8%
Tonopah Middle School Results
Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective
All Students
Here : -14.5%Nevada : -6.7%
Male
This School : -13.0%State : -8.8%
Female
This School : -15.9%State : -4.6%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students
This School : -35.9%Nevada : -16.9%
Detailed Students Results Percent of Tonopah Middle School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 36 -14.5% -6.7% 11.4% 8.8% 37.1% 32.0% 48.6% 55.0% 2.9% 4.2%
Male 18 -13.0% -8.8% 11.8% 10.3% 35.3% 32.6% 52.9% 52.9% 0.0% 4.3%
Female 18 -15.9% -4.6% 11.1% 7.2% 38.9% 31.4% 44.4% 57.2% 5.6% 4.2%
White 31 -12.6% 3.4% 13.3% 5.5% 33.3% 25.2% 50.0% 63.5% 3.3% 5.9%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 11 -35.9% -16.9% 40.0% 12.1% 30.0% 39.0% 20.0% 47.0% 10.0% 2.0%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 30 -9.2% -10.0% 3.3% 13.5% 40.0% 30.6% 53.3% 52.2% 3.3% 3.7%
Male 12 0.8% -10.5% 0.0% 14.2% 33.3% 30.4% 66.7% 51.6% 0.0% 3.8%
Female 18 -15.9% -9.5% 5.6% 12.8% 44.4% 30.8% 44.4% 52.8% 5.6% 3.6%
White 30 -9.2% 0.6% 3.3% 8.6% 40.0% 25.0% 53.3% 61.1% 3.3% 5.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 12 -15.9% -22.1% 0.0% 19.4% 50.0% 36.8% 50.0% 42.3% 0.0% 1.5%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 44 9.0% 0.0% 6.8% 13.0% 29.5% 32.3% 52.3% 41.1% 11.4% 13.6%
Male 20 0.3% 0.1% 5.0% 14.0% 40.0% 31.2% 50.0% 40.3% 5.0% 14.5%
Female 24 16.2% -0.1% 8.3% 12.1% 20.8% 33.4% 54.2% 41.8% 16.7% 12.7%
White 39 12.0% 12.4% 7.7% 7.1% 25.6% 25.9% 53.8% 47.6% 12.8% 19.5%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 33 -3.2% -2.3% 12.1% 17.0% 36.4% 30.7% 48.5% 41.9% 3.0% 10.4%
Male 13 14.6% -3.4% 0.0% 18.3% 30.8% 30.4% 61.5% 40.3% 7.7% 11.0%
Female 20 -14.7% -1.2% 20.0% 15.5% 40.0% 31.1% 40.0% 43.6% 0.0% 9.8%
White 29 -2.9% 11.1% 10.3% 9.4% 37.9% 24.8% 48.3% 49.8% 3.4% 15.9%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 11 -18.3% -15.8% 36.4% 24.2% 27.3% 36.9% 36.4% 34.9% 0.0% 4.0%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 40 16.7% 9.5% 10.0% 19.0% 30.0% 28.2% 50.0% 43.1% 10.0% 9.7%
Male 23 8.9% 8.9% 17.4% 20.6% 30.4% 27.2% 52.2% 41.8% 0.0% 10.4%
Female 17 27.3% 10.1% 0.0% 17.3% 29.4% 29.3% 47.1% 44.5% 23.5% 8.9%
White 34 21.4% 23.5% 2.9% 10.4% 32.4% 22.8% 52.9% 52.5% 11.8% 14.2%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 24 19.2% 7.2% 0.0% 16.4% 37.5% 33.2% 54.2% 39.8% 8.3% 10.7%
Male 17 21.4% 6.0% 0.0% 18.6% 35.3% 32.1% 52.9% 38.0% 11.8% 11.3%
White 22 20.3% 20.0% 0.0% 9.5% 36.4% 27.2% 54.5% 47.4% 9.1% 15.9%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 10 -3.3% -8.4% 0.0% 24.3% 60.0% 40.8% 40.0% 30.9% 0.0% 4.0%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 37 13.5% 5.7% 8.1% 19.6% 35.1% 31.4% 54.1% 38.1% 2.7% 10.9%
Male 15 23.4% 5.1% 6.7% 22.1% 26.7% 29.5% 66.7% 36.7% 0.0% 11.7%
Female 22 6.7% 6.7% 9.1% 16.5% 40.9% 33.5% 45.5% 39.8% 4.5% 10.1%
White 34 15.5% 18.2% 2.9% 11.6% 38.2% 26.9% 55.9% 45.7% 2.9% 15.8%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 11 -6.9% -9.6% 18.2% 28.9% 45.5% 37.4% 27.3% 29.4% 9.1% 4.3%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 30 34.7% 15.9% 16.7% 18.7% 16.7% 33.4% 53.3% 37.5% 13.3% 10.4%
Male 15 21.3% 15.0% 20.0% 21.4% 26.7% 31.5% 40.0% 35.7% 13.3% 11.3%
Female 15 48.0% 17.1% 13.3% 15.5% 6.7% 35.4% 66.7% 39.6% 13.3% 9.5%
White 26 37.2% 28.6% 11.5% 11.6% 19.2% 27.7% 53.8% 45.7% 15.4% 14.9%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Criterion Referenced Test Reading Grade 6 Students Tested: 30
This School:
93.3%Nevada:
99.8%
Studets Results in 2010/2011
Approaches Standard This School:
17.9%Nevada:
17.9%
Meets Standard This School:
35.7%State:
35.3%
Tonopah Middle School Results
Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective
All Students
This School : -19.5%Nevada : -8.6%
Male
Here : -30.6%State : -13.4%
Female
This School : -2.3%State : -3.5%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students
This School : -35.1%State : -20.0%
Detailed Students Results Percent of Tonopah Middle School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 30 -19.5% -8.6% 35.7% 24.8% 17.9% 17.9% 35.7% 35.3% 10.7% 22.0%
Male 18 -30.6% -13.4% 47.1% 29.3% 17.7% 18.3% 23.5% 33.2% 11.8% 19.3%
Female 12 -2.3% -3.5% 18.2% 20.1% 18.2% 17.5% 54.6% 37.6% 9.1% 24.9%
White 25 -18.1% 3.9% 34.8% 15.9% 17.4% 14.3% 34.8% 37.7% 13.0% 32.1%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 14 -35.1% -20.0% 46.2% 33.1% 23.1% 21.0% 30.8% 32.8% 0.0% 13.1%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 25 10.1% -0.5% 12.0% 8.8% 12.0% 25.8% 44.0% 38.5% 32.0% 27.0%
Male 12 -7.6% -6.0% 25.0% 11.9% 16.7% 28.3% 33.3% 36.8% 25.0% 23.1%
Female 13 26.4% 5.4% 0.0% 5.6% 7.7% 23.1% 53.8% 40.2% 38.5% 31.0%
White 22 6.8% 11.2% 13.6% 5.2% 13.6% 17.7% 45.5% 39.9% 27.3% 37.2%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 13 11.0% -11.8% 7.7% 12.8% 15.4% 33.1% 53.8% 37.8% 23.1% 16.4%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 42 -2.3% 7.7% 16.7% 9.7% 31.0% 28.0% 28.6% 39.9% 23.8% 22.4%
Male 25 1.3% 2.8% 20.0% 12.4% 24.0% 30.1% 40.0% 37.7% 16.0% 19.8%
Female 17 -7.6% 12.8% 11.8% 6.8% 41.2% 25.7% 11.8% 42.3% 35.3% 25.2%
White 38 0.6% 20.4% 15.8% 5.8% 28.9% 19.1% 28.9% 42.6% 26.3% 32.5%
Individual Education Plan Students 14 -19.0% -37.1% 35.7% 41.9% 28.6% 40.5% 28.6% 14.1% 7.1% 3.5%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 16 1.6% -4.8% 6.3% 14.0% 37.5% 36.1% 37.5% 37.3% 18.8% 12.6%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 29 17.7% 5.2% 0.0% 12.5% 27.6% 27.6% 58.6% 41.1% 13.8% 18.8%
Male 11 18.1% -0.1% 0.0% 16.2% 27.3% 29.2% 63.6% 39.4% 9.1% 15.1%
Female 18 17.6% 10.8% 0.0% 8.7% 27.8% 25.9% 55.6% 42.8% 16.7% 22.7%
White 29 17.7% 18.4% 0.0% 6.8% 27.6% 20.1% 58.6% 45.8% 13.8% 27.3%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 35 36.7% 13.6% 5.7% 11.9% 14.3% 31.2% 57.1% 44.0% 22.9% 12.9%
Male 15 23.4% 8.2% 6.7% 15.4% 26.7% 33.1% 53.3% 41.3% 13.3% 10.3%
Female 20 46.7% 19.2% 5.0% 8.3% 5.0% 29.2% 60.0% 46.9% 30.0% 15.5%
White 29 39.5% 27.3% 3.4% 6.3% 13.8% 23.0% 55.2% 51.0% 27.6% 19.6%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Criterion Referenced Test Reading Grade 7 Students Tested: 22
Tonopah Middle School:
100.0%State:
99.6%
Studets Results in 2010/2011 Developing This School:
22.7%Nevada:
24.4%
Meets Standard This School:
36.4%Nevada:
35.3%
Exceeds Standard This School:
22.7%State:
18.4%
Tonopah Middle School Results
Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective
Male
This School : -25.9%Nevada : -19.0%
Detailed Students Results Percent of Tonopah Middle School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 22 -6.8% -12.2% 22.7% 24.4% 18.2% 22.0% 36.4% 35.3% 22.7% 18.4%
Male 10 -25.9% -19.0% 30.0% 30.6% 30.0% 22.5% 30.0% 32.8% 10.0% 14.1%
Female 12 9.1% -5.1% 16.7% 17.8% 8.3% 21.5% 41.7% 38.0% 33.3% 22.9%
White 20 -5.9% 0.2% 25.0% 16.0% 15.0% 17.9% 35.0% 39.5% 25.0% 26.6%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 37 11.2% 8.1% 2.9% 4.7% 20.0% 21.3% 45.7% 49.5% 31.4% 24.5%
Male 20 13.0% 3.3% 5.3% 6.5% 15.8% 24.3% 57.9% 48.2% 21.1% 21.1%
Female 17 9.1% 13.0% 0.0% 2.9% 25.0% 18.2% 31.3% 50.8% 43.8% 28.1%
White 33 11.5% 17.8% 3.2% 2.8% 19.4% 13.5% 45.2% 48.4% 32.3% 35.3%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 15 11.0% -2.0% 7.7% 7.2% 15.4% 28.9% 46.2% 49.7% 30.8% 14.2%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 26 26.1% 14.9% 0.0% 5.5% 19.2% 25.0% 73.1% 50.6% 7.7% 18.9%
Male 10 15.3% 9.3% 0.0% 7.3% 30.0% 28.7% 70.0% 47.8% 0.0% 16.1%
Female 16 32.8% 20.8% 0.0% 3.5% 12.5% 21.1% 75.0% 53.5% 12.5% 21.9%
White 26 26.1% 25.2% 0.0% 2.9% 19.2% 17.2% 73.1% 52.7% 7.7% 27.2%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 39 22.3% 9.6% 5.1% 10.2% 17.9% 25.5% 53.8% 52.2% 23.1% 12.0%
Male 17 15.9% 3.3% 5.9% 13.9% 23.5% 28.1% 52.9% 49.0% 17.6% 8.9%
Female 22 27.1% 16.1% 4.5% 6.5% 13.6% 22.8% 54.5% 55.5% 27.3% 15.2%
White 34 21.8% 20.9% 2.9% 5.9% 20.6% 18.6% 52.9% 57.8% 23.5% 17.7%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 10 15.3% -2.9% 20.0% 14.7% 10.0% 33.5% 50.0% 46.3% 20.0% 5.4%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 36 28.9% 21.2% 2.8% 8.5% 25.0% 27.0% 61.1% 50.5% 11.1% 14.0%
Male 16 38.0% 14.9% 0.0% 11.5% 18.8% 30.3% 62.5% 47.1% 18.8% 11.0%
Female 20 21.7% 27.9% 5.0% 5.3% 30.0% 23.5% 60.0% 54.1% 5.0% 17.2%
White 33 29.4% 32.9% 3.0% 4.5% 24.2% 19.3% 60.6% 55.0% 12.1% 21.2%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Criterion Referenced Test Reading Grade 8 Students Tested: 36
This School:
97.2%Nevada:
99.5%
Studets Results in 2010/2011
Meets Standard This School:
22.9%Nevada:
26.6%
Exceeds Standard This School:
28.6%State:
18.0%
Tonopah Middle School Results
Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective
All Students
This School : -14.5%Nevada : -21.3%
Male
Here : -13.0%Nevada : -26.7%
Female
This School : -15.9%Nevada : -15.6%
White
This School : -12.6%Nevada : -9.3%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students
This School : -25.9%Nevada : -32.6%
Detailed Students Results Percent of Tonopah Middle School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 36 -14.5% -21.3% 22.9% 27.6% 25.7% 27.8% 22.9% 26.6% 28.6% 18.0%
Male 18 -13.0% -26.7% 17.7% 33.0% 29.4% 27.8% 35.3% 24.4% 17.7% 14.8%
Female 18 -15.9% -15.6% 27.8% 22.0% 22.2% 27.7% 11.1% 29.0% 38.9% 21.3%
White 31 -12.6% -9.3% 26.7% 19.3% 20.0% 24.1% 20.0% 30.8% 33.3% 25.9%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 11 -25.9% -32.6% 50.0% 36.1% 10.0% 30.6% 20.0% 22.8% 20.0% 10.5%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 30 14.1% 0.1% 0.0% 3.7% 20.0% 30.4% 53.3% 44.0% 26.7% 22.0%
Male 12 25.8% -4.7% 0.0% 4.9% 8.3% 33.9% 58.3% 42.7% 33.3% 18.5%
Female 18 6.3% 5.1% 0.0% 2.3% 27.8% 26.7% 50.0% 45.4% 22.2% 25.6%
White 30 14.1% 10.5% 0.0% 1.9% 20.0% 21.7% 53.3% 46.4% 26.7% 30.0%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 12 17.4% -11.1% 0.0% 5.5% 16.7% 39.8% 58.3% 41.9% 25.0% 12.9%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 44 24.9% 6.2% 0.0% 5.1% 20.5% 34.0% 63.6% 46.2% 15.9% 14.7%
Male 20 15.3% 0.3% 0.0% 7.2% 30.0% 37.9% 65.0% 43.6% 5.0% 11.4%
Female 24 32.8% 12.4% 0.0% 2.9% 12.5% 30.1% 62.5% 48.9% 25.0% 18.2%
White 39 24.8% 18.0% 0.0% 2.9% 20.5% 24.5% 64.1% 51.2% 15.4% 21.5%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 33 21.1% -0.5% 6.1% 8.7% 18.2% 37.1% 66.7% 42.3% 9.1% 11.8%
Male 13 29.9% -5.9% 0.0% 11.2% 15.4% 40.0% 69.2% 39.5% 15.4% 9.4%
Female 20 15.3% 5.3% 10.0% 6.1% 20.0% 33.9% 65.0% 45.4% 5.0% 14.5%
White 29 21.2% 13.8% 6.9% 4.4% 17.2% 27.1% 65.5% 50.5% 10.3% 18.0%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 11 9.0% -15.2% 18.2% 12.6% 18.2% 48.0% 63.6% 34.4% 0.0% 5.1%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 40 39.2% 13.6% 0.0% 7.3% 17.5% 35.9% 72.5% 44.3% 10.0% 12.5%
Male 23 26.3% 7.9% 0.0% 9.8% 30.4% 39.0% 65.2% 41.3% 4.3% 9.9%
Female 17 56.7% 19.6% 0.0% 4.6% 0.0% 32.5% 82.4% 47.5% 17.6% 15.3%
White 34 44.9% 27.6% 0.0% 3.7% 11.8% 25.4% 76.5% 51.9% 11.8% 19.1%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 24 23.4% 7.7% 0.0% 8.3% 33.3% 40.7% 54.2% 37.1% 12.5% 13.9%
Male 17 27.3% 2.8% 0.0% 11.0% 29.4% 42.9% 52.9% 34.3% 17.6% 11.9%
White 22 29.4% 21.3% 0.0% 4.6% 27.3% 30.8% 59.1% 44.3% 13.6% 20.3%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 10 6.7% -7.7% 0.0% 12.5% 50.0% 51.9% 40.0% 29.5% 10.0% 6.1%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 37 24.3% 7.6% 0.0% 10.6% 32.4% 38.6% 45.9% 38.0% 21.6% 12.8%
Male 15 23.4% 3.3% 0.0% 13.1% 33.3% 40.3% 46.7% 36.0% 20.0% 10.6%
Female 22 24.9% 12.5% 0.0% 7.6% 31.8% 36.6% 45.5% 40.4% 22.7% 15.3%
White 34 27.3% 22.2% 0.0% 5.2% 29.4% 29.3% 47.1% 46.3% 23.5% 19.2%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 11 11.2% -9.3% 0.0% 16.8% 45.5% 49.2% 36.4% 28.5% 18.2% 5.5%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 30 41.3% 17.6% 10.0% 11.7% 16.7% 38.7% 46.7% 35.9% 26.7% 13.7%
Male 15 28.0% 12.8% 20.0% 14.7% 20.0% 40.5% 40.0% 33.8% 20.0% 11.0%
Female 15 54.7% 23.0% 0.0% 8.5% 13.3% 36.5% 53.3% 38.3% 33.3% 16.7%
White 26 41.1% 31.8% 7.7% 7.1% 19.2% 29.2% 50.0% 43.3% 23.1% 20.4%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Iowa Tests of Basic Skills Language Grade 7 Detailed Students Results Percent of Tonopah Middle School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 40 20.0% 33.9% 35.0% 26.4% 30.0% 22.4% 15.0% 17.3%
Male 18 27.8% 41.2% 44.4% 25.8% 22.2% 19.5% 5.6% 13.5%
Female 22 13.6% 26.5% 27.3% 26.9% 36.4% 25.4% 22.7% 21.1%
White 35 20.0% 22.4% 34.3% 25.8% 28.6% 27.5% 17.1% 24.3%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 38 26.3% 34.5% 47.4% 26.3% 15.8% 21.4% 10.5% 17.8%
Male 16 12.5% 41.5% 62.5% 26.0% 12.5% 18.2% 12.5% 14.3%
Female 22 36.4% 27.3% 36.4% 26.6% 18.2% 24.8% 9.1% 21.4%
White 34 29.4% 22.6% 47.1% 25.7% 11.8% 26.0% 11.8% 25.6%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 44 22.5% 34.6% 27.5% 25.5% 22.5% 21.7% 27.5% 18.3%
Male 24 36.4% 42.2% 27.3% 24.9% 22.7% 18.7% 13.6% 14.2%
Female 20 5.6% 26.7% 27.8% 26.0% 22.2% 24.8% 44.4% 22.4%
White 37 14.7% 23.1% 29.4% 24.7% 23.5% 26.4% 32.4% 25.7%
Individual Education Plan Students 11 75.0% 81.2% 12.5% 13.8% 0.0% 3.4% 12.5% 1.6%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 14 23.1% 49.0% 38.5% 26.5% 38.5% 16.2% 0.0% 8.3%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 26 16.0% 33.6% 48.0% 26.0% 28.0% 22.5% 8.0% 17.9%
Male 18 17.6% 40.9% 52.9% 25.9% 17.6% 19.4% 11.8% 13.7%
White 24 17.4% 23.2% 43.5% 25.2% 30.4% 26.9% 8.7% 24.7%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 37 18.9% 35.5% 35.1% 25.0% 40.5% 22.0% 5.4% 17.5%
Male 15 26.7% 42.1% 46.7% 25.2% 26.7% 19.1% 0.0% 13.5%
Female 22 13.6% 28.4% 27.3% 24.7% 50.0% 25.1% 9.1% 21.8%
White 33 21.2% 26.1% 30.3% 24.0% 42.4% 26.0% 6.1% 23.9%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 12 16.7% 49.3% 50.0% 26.8% 25.0% 15.9% 8.3% 8.1%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Iowa Tests of Basic Skills Mathematics Grade 7 Detailed Students Results Percent of Tonopah Middle School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 40 20.0% 31.2% 27.5% 27.2% 35.0% 21.7% 17.5% 19.9%
Male 18 22.2% 33.7% 38.9% 25.9% 33.3% 20.3% 5.6% 20.2%
Female 22 18.2% 28.7% 18.2% 28.6% 36.4% 23.1% 27.3% 19.6%
White 35 17.1% 20.7% 28.6% 25.1% 37.1% 25.9% 17.1% 28.2%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 38 26.3% 31.1% 28.9% 26.8% 28.9% 21.7% 15.8% 20.3%
Male 16 12.5% 33.8% 31.3% 25.6% 37.5% 19.9% 18.8% 20.8%
Female 22 36.4% 28.3% 27.3% 28.1% 22.7% 23.7% 13.6% 19.9%
White 34 26.5% 20.2% 29.4% 24.9% 29.4% 25.3% 14.7% 29.6%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 44 24.4% 32.0% 26.8% 26.1% 29.3% 21.1% 19.5% 20.7%
Male 24 26.1% 35.1% 34.8% 24.6% 30.4% 19.2% 8.7% 21.1%
Female 20 22.2% 28.7% 16.7% 27.7% 27.8% 23.1% 33.3% 20.4%
White 37 14.3% 21.1% 28.6% 24.0% 34.3% 25.3% 22.9% 29.5%
Individual Education Plan Students 11 70.0% 75.4% 20.0% 16.9% 10.0% 5.2% 0.0% 2.5%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 14 30.8% 44.8% 15.4% 28.6% 46.2% 16.4% 7.7% 10.2%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 26 4.0% 31.5% 48.0% 27.0% 28.0% 21.5% 20.0% 20.0%
Male 18 0.0% 34.6% 47.1% 25.2% 23.5% 20.3% 29.4% 19.9%
White 24 4.3% 21.1% 43.5% 25.5% 30.4% 25.4% 21.7% 28.1%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 37 29.7% 34.3% 37.8% 25.4% 21.6% 21.3% 10.8% 19.0%
Male 15 33.3% 36.7% 26.7% 24.4% 26.7% 19.8% 13.3% 19.1%
Female 22 27.3% 31.6% 45.5% 26.6% 18.2% 22.8% 9.1% 19.0%
White 33 27.3% 24.8% 39.4% 23.9% 21.2% 25.0% 12.1% 26.3%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 12 41.7% 47.5% 25.0% 27.1% 16.7% 16.5% 16.7% 8.9%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Iowa Tests of Basic Skills Reading Grade 7 Detailed Students Results Percent of Tonopah Middle School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 40 20.0% 33.9% 27.5% 27.7% 27.5% 21.6% 25.0% 16.9%
Male 18 27.8% 36.9% 33.3% 26.4% 22.2% 19.9% 16.7% 16.9%
Female 22 13.6% 30.8% 22.7% 29.0% 31.8% 23.3% 31.8% 16.9%
White 35 20.0% 19.5% 28.6% 26.4% 25.7% 27.4% 25.7% 26.7%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 38 15.8% 33.6% 31.6% 27.0% 39.5% 22.0% 13.2% 17.4%
Male 16 12.5% 37.0% 31.3% 25.3% 37.5% 20.4% 18.8% 17.3%
Female 22 18.2% 30.0% 31.8% 28.8% 40.9% 23.7% 9.1% 17.4%
White 34 17.6% 19.5% 29.4% 25.5% 41.2% 27.4% 11.8% 27.6%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 44 25.6% 34.1% 27.9% 26.6% 27.9% 21.8% 18.6% 17.6%
Male 24 30.4% 37.6% 34.8% 24.6% 17.4% 20.6% 17.4% 17.2%
Female 20 20.0% 30.4% 20.0% 28.7% 40.0% 23.0% 20.0% 17.9%
White 37 16.7% 19.5% 33.3% 26.2% 27.8% 27.2% 22.2% 27.2%
Individual Education Plan Students 11 60.0% 75.5% 30.0% 16.8% 10.0% 5.3% 0.0% 2.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 14 46.2% 49.9% 15.4% 26.9% 38.5% 15.7% 0.0% 7.4%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 26 32.0% 33.3% 24.0% 26.8% 28.0% 22.4% 16.0% 17.5%
Male 18 29.4% 36.4% 23.5% 25.4% 29.4% 20.8% 17.6% 17.4%
White 24 30.4% 19.8% 21.7% 26.0% 30.4% 27.7% 17.4% 26.5%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 37 18.9% 35.1% 29.7% 26.2% 29.7% 20.4% 21.6% 18.4%
Male 15 20.0% 38.1% 33.3% 25.3% 26.7% 18.9% 20.0% 17.8%
Female 22 18.2% 31.8% 27.3% 27.1% 31.8% 22.0% 22.7% 19.0%
White 33 18.2% 22.5% 27.3% 25.0% 30.3% 25.5% 24.2% 26.9%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 12 25.0% 50.6% 33.3% 26.8% 33.3% 14.5% 8.3% 8.2%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Iowa Tests of Basic Skills Science Grade 7 Detailed Students Results Percent of Tonopah Middle School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 40 7.5% 29.2% 22.5% 28.5% 42.5% 22.2% 27.5% 20.1%
Male 18 5.6% 32.0% 27.8% 27.9% 38.9% 20.3% 27.8% 19.8%
Female 22 9.1% 26.3% 18.2% 29.1% 45.5% 24.2% 27.3% 20.4%
White 35 8.6% 17.2% 20.0% 24.9% 40.0% 26.9% 31.4% 31.0%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 38 26.3% 29.3% 13.2% 28.1% 28.9% 22.6% 31.6% 20.0%
Male 16 18.8% 31.7% 12.5% 27.6% 18.8% 20.8% 50.0% 19.9%
Female 22 31.8% 26.8% 13.6% 28.7% 36.4% 24.5% 18.2% 20.0%
White 34 23.5% 16.9% 14.7% 24.5% 26.5% 27.6% 35.3% 31.1%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 44 11.6% 29.6% 27.9% 27.9% 23.3% 22.2% 37.2% 20.2%
Male 24 13.0% 32.7% 26.1% 27.1% 26.1% 20.0% 34.8% 20.2%
Female 20 10.0% 26.4% 30.0% 28.8% 20.0% 24.4% 40.0% 20.3%
White 37 8.3% 17.2% 25.0% 24.7% 25.0% 27.5% 41.7% 30.7%
Individual Education Plan Students 11 20.0% 60.0% 40.0% 27.0% 20.0% 9.3% 20.0% 3.7%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 14 15.4% 42.7% 38.5% 30.6% 15.4% 17.0% 30.8% 9.7%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 26 12.0% 28.8% 24.0% 28.8% 40.0% 22.9% 24.0% 19.5%
Male 18 11.8% 31.5% 23.5% 28.3% 29.4% 20.8% 35.3% 19.4%
White 24 13.0% 17.5% 21.7% 25.4% 39.1% 27.9% 26.1% 29.2%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 37 16.2% 32.4% 27.0% 22.3% 32.4% 24.7% 24.3% 20.6%
Male 15 13.3% 35.0% 26.7% 22.2% 26.7% 22.8% 33.3% 20.1%
Female 22 18.2% 29.7% 27.3% 22.5% 36.4% 26.7% 18.2% 21.1%
White 33 15.2% 21.2% 27.3% 20.0% 30.3% 28.4% 27.3% 30.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 12 8.3% 45.7% 16.7% 25.4% 50.0% 19.2% 25.0% 9.7%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
All Cities
Nevada Forum
Nevada
Tonopah, NV
Tonopah Middle School in Tonopah, Nevada (NV)
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: