Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Ume Preparatory Academy School in Dallas, TX
(KG-12 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 85
Address
 3838 SPUR 408
Dallas, TX 75236
Telephone
(214) 445-6243
(make sure to verify first before calling)
Website
http://www.umeprep.org
City-data.com school rating
85
Students
429
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
25.5
Free lunch eligible students
77
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
42
School district
UME PREPARATORY ACADEMY
Charter school
Yes
Charter authorizer name
STATE BOARD OF (#000001)
Title I status
Title I schoolwide school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
Ume Preparatory Academy School:

85
CLAY CLASSICAL ACADEMY (0.8 miles):

78
LESLIE A STEMMONS EL (2.5 miles):

51
FAIRMEADOWS EL (2.6 miles):

49
JAMES R BILHARTZ JR EL (2.0 miles):

32
LA ACADEMIA DE ESTRELLAS (2.2 miles):

32
DUNCANVILLE H S (2.3 miles):

27
LIFE SCHOOL MOUNTAIN CREEK (2.3 miles):

25
MOISES E MOLINA H S (2.5 miles):

21
Ume Preparatory Academy School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Dallas County:

53
Dallas:

53
Ume Preparatory Academy School:

85

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 429
Enrollment in 2015: 413
Enrollment in 2014: 392
Enrollment in 2013: 337

Ume Preparatory Academy School - Historical enrollment


Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)
GradeKGG01G02G03G04G05G06G07G08G09G10G11Total
All students323335363940384142353226429
Female students141815181721162724181610214
Male students181520182219221418171616215
Asian students1 - 162142211223
Hispanic students410138916151211765116
Black students35335452353243
White students241816192118142523202016234
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander students - - - - 1 - - - - - 1 - 2
Two or More Races students - - 2 - 11 - - 321111

Enrollment by grade:
Kindergarten enrollment: 32
1st grade enrollment: 33
2nd grade enrollment: 35
3rd grade enrollment: 36
4th grade enrollment: 39
5th grade enrollment: 40
6th grade enrollment: 38
7th grade enrollment: 41
8th grade enrollment: 42
9th grade enrollment: 35
10th grade enrollment: 32
11th grade enrollment: 26

Ume Preparatory Academy School - Historical enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
Female enrollment: 214 (49.9%)
Ume Preparatory Academy School:

49.9%
Texas:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 215 (50.1%)
School:

50.1%
Texas:

50.1%

Ume Preparatory Academy School - Historical enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
Asian enrollment: 23 (5.4%)
Here:

5.4%
Texas:

3.1%
Hispanic enrollment: 116 (27.0%)
Here:

27.0%
State:

46.9%
Black enrollment: 43 (10.0%)
Ume Preparatory Academy School:

10.0%
Texas:

11.6%
White enrollment: 234 (54.5%)
Ume Preparatory Academy School:

54.5%
Texas:

32.3%
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander enrollment: 2 (0.5%)
Ume Preparatory Academy School:

0.5%
Texas:

0.1%
Two or More Races enrollment: 11 (2.6%)
Here:

2.6%
State:

2.1%

Ume Preparatory Academy School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)
Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 119 (27.7%)
School:

27.7%
Texas:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 77 (17.9%)
Here:

17.9%
Texas:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 42 (9.8%)
Here:

9.8%
Texas:

6.2%

Ume Preparatory Academy School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)
Classroom Teachers (FTE): 25.5

Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 2.8
Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 1.8
Number of FTE teachers who were absent more than 10 school days during the school years: 0.7
Number of FTE nurses: 1

Student/Teacher Ratio
Ume Preparatory Academy School:

16.8
State:

15.6

Ume Preparatory Academy School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio


School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $1,523,585
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 28.3 (Salary Expenditures: $667,863)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 8.1 (Salary Expenditures: $40,464)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 5 (Salary Expenditures: $105,558)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 14 (Salary Expenditures: $503,827)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $1,334,623
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $1,581,775
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $686,210
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 8.1 (Salary Expenditures: $40,464)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 13.8 (Salary Expenditures: $199,218)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 14 (Salary Expenditures: $503,827)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $1,334,623

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 9 (male: 2, female: 7)
  • Hispanic: 7 (male: 2, female: 5)
  • Asian: 2 (all female)

Students with disabilities:
Show data for
Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.

Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 8 (male: 4, female: 4)
  • White: 8 (male: 4, female: 4)
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 22 (male: 16, female: 6)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Black: 2 (all female)
  • White: 16 (male: 14, female: 2)

Retention:
Show data for

(State average from 2,061 schools)
A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained
Total number of students retained in 3rd grade: 2 (all female)
  • Hispanic: 2

Percent of 3rd grade students retained
Here:

5.6%
Texas:

4.1%

Dual Enrollment:
(State average from 1,381 schools)
This school has students in grades 9-12 enrolled in a dual enrollment / dual credit program
Dual enrollment/dual credit programs provide opportunities for high school students to take college-level courses offered by colleges, and earn concurrent credit toward a high school diploma and a college degree while still in high school.These programs are for high school - enrolled students who are academically prepared to enroll in college and are interested in taking on additional coursework.For example, students who want to study subjects not offered at their high school may seek supplemental education at colleges nearby.
Dual Enrollment: 14 (male: 8, female: 6)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all female)
  • White: 10 (male: 8, female: 2)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all female)

Dual Enrollment per 1,000 students
School:

32.6
Texas:

133.0

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,539 schools)
The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
End-of-course (EOC)

    Algebra I Average Scale Score

  • All4,286
  • Males4,316
  • Females4,262
  • Hispanic4,156
  • White4,309
Algebra I Average Scale Score:

4,286
Texas:

4,001
Algebra I students tested: 58
Algebra I # Answer Documents Submitted: 58

Algebra I Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 7.6 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.2 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.7 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 8 (73%)
  • Reporting Category 5: 4.4 (74%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 19%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 22%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 52%

7%
19%
22%
52%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,316, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 50%)
4%
23%
23%
50%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,262, Tested: 32, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 53%)
9%
16%
22%
53%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 4,156, Tested: 23, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 43%)
9%
30%
18%
43%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,309, Tested: 27, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%, Approaches: 15%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 52%)
4%
15%
29%
52%

    Biology Average Scale Score

  • All4,303
  • Males4,131
  • Females4,389
  • Hispanic4,176
  • White4,453
Biology Average Scale Score:

4,303
Texas:

3,772
Biology students tested: 51
Biology # Answer Documents Submitted: 51

Biology Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 8 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7.1 (64%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.2 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 8.1 (74%)
  • Reporting Category 5: 7.7 (70%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 2%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 27%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 38%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 33%

2%
27%
38%
33%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,131, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 41%, Meets: 41%, Masters: 18%)
41%
41%
18%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,389, Tested: 34, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 3%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 35%, Masters: 41%)
3%
21%
35%
41%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 4,176, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 43%, Masters: 19%)
5%
33%
43%
19%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,453, Tested: 24, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 50%)
21%
29%
50%

    English I Average Scale Score

  • All4,131
  • Males3,905
  • Females4,273
  • Hispanic4,060
  • White4,183
English I Average Scale Score:

4,131
Texas:

3,637
English I students tested: 52
English I # Answer Documents Submitted: 52

English I Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10 (77%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.2 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 9.3 (58%)
  • Reporting Category 5: 6.2 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 6: 6.6 (74%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 11%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 41%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 21%

27%
11%
41%
21%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,905, Tested: 20, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%, Approaches: 15%, Meets: 35%, Masters: 10%)
40%
15%
35%
10%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,273, Tested: 32, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%, Approaches: 9%, Meets: 44%, Masters: 28%)
19%
9%
44%
28%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 4,060, Tested: 20, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 30%, Approaches: 15%, Meets: 35%, Masters: 20%)
30%
15%
35%
20%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,183, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 12%, Meets: 42%, Masters: 23%)
23%
12%
42%
23%

    English II Average Scale Score

  • All4,105
  • Males4,112
  • Females4,099
  • Hispanic3,973
  • Black3,552
  • White4,324
English II Average Scale Score:

4,105
Texas:

3,718
English II students tested: 53
English II # Answer Documents Submitted: 53

English II Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.2 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.6 (74%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 9.5 (60%)
  • Reporting Category 5: 7 (78%)
  • Reporting Category 6: 6.9 (77%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 17%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 56%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 8%

19%
17%
56%
8%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,112, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 56%, Masters: 4%)
16%
24%
56%
4%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,099, Tested: 28, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%, Approaches: 11%, Meets: 57%, Masters: 11%)
21%
11%
57%
11%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,973, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 13%, Meets: 64%, Masters: 0%)
23%
13%
64%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,552, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 60%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 0%)
60%
40%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,324, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 60%, Masters: 16%)
8%
16%
60%
16%

    U.S. History Average Scale Score

  • All4,319
  • Males4,382
  • Females4,230
  • Hispanic4,327
  • Black3,870
  • White4,445
U.S. History Average Scale Score:

4,319
Texas:

3,953
U.S. History students tested: 34
U.S. History # Answer Documents Submitted: 34

U.S. History Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 21.9 (73%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.2 (77%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.2 (62%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 12.2 (76%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 3%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 23%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 30%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 44%

3%
23%
30%
44%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,382, Tested: 20, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 50%)
20%
30%
50%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,230, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 36%)
7%
29%
28%
36%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 4,327, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 50%)
33%
17%
50%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,870, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 0%)
20%
40%
40%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,445, Tested: 20, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 60%)
20%
20%
60%
3rd Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,530
  • Males1,539
  • Females1,524
  • Hispanic1,468
  • Black1,493
  • White1,602
Math Average Scale Score:

1,530
Texas:

1,453
Math students tested: 39
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 39

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.4 (80%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.5 (73%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.3 (76%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3 (75%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 28%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 26%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 36%

10%
28%
26%
36%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,539, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 36%, Masters: 21%)
7%
36%
36%
21%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,524, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 44%)
12%
24%
20%
44%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,468, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 7%)
20%
33%
40%
7%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,493, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 67%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 33%)
67%
33%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,602, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 6%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 65%)
6%
6%
23%
65%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,517
  • Males1,463
  • Females1,547
  • Hispanic1,424
  • Black1,489
  • White1,613
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,517
State:

1,423
Reading students tested: 39
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 39

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.4 (88%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.4 (76%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.6 (69%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 31%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 13%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 41%

15%
31%
13%
41%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,463, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 21%)
14%
50%
15%
21%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,547, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 52%)
16%
20%
12%
52%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,424, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 13%)
27%
40%
20%
13%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,489, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 33%)
17%
50%
33%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,613, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 12%, Meets: 11%, Masters: 71%)
6%
12%
11%
71%
4th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,608
  • Males1,651
  • Females1,554
  • Hispanic1,579
  • White1,627
Math Average Scale Score:

1,608
State:

1,546
Math students tested: 41
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 41

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.5 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.2 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.9 (73%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 36%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 27%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 27%

10%
36%
27%
27%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,651, Tested: 23, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 35%)
35%
30%
35%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,554, Tested: 18, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%, Approaches: 39%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 17%)
22%
39%
22%
17%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,579, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 19%)
6%
50%
25%
19%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,627, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 33%)
14%
29%
24%
33%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,609
  • Males1,640
  • Females1,569
  • Hispanic1,578
  • White1,645
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,609
Texas:

1,496
Reading students tested: 41
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 41

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.3 (78%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.2 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.9 (84%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 22%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 22%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 49%

7%
22%
22%
49%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,640, Tested: 23, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 57%)
26%
17%
57%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,569, Tested: 18, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 39%)
17%
16%
28%
39%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,578, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 38%)
6%
31%
25%
38%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,645, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 14%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 62%)
10%
14%
14%
62%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All4,120
  • Males4,210
  • Females4,004
  • Hispanic4,055
  • White4,168
Writing Average Scale Score:

4,120
Texas:

3,570
Writing students tested: 41
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 41

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.5 (56%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.2 (66%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 12.5 (78%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 15%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 39%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 24%

22%
15%
39%
24%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,210, Tested: 23, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 39%, Masters: 26%)
17%
18%
39%
26%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,004, Tested: 18, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 28%, Approaches: 11%, Meets: 39%, Masters: 22%)
28%
11%
39%
22%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 4,055, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 19%)
25%
25%
31%
19%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,168, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 24%, Approaches: 5%, Meets: 38%, Masters: 33%)
24%
5%
38%
33%
5th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,609
  • Males1,593
  • Females1,633
  • Hispanic1,569
  • Black1,547
  • White1,637
Math Average Scale Score:

1,609
State:

1,603
Math students tested: 42
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 42

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.3 (56%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.8 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.9 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.8 (69%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 45%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 31%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 14%

10%
45%
31%
14%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,593, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 56%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 8%)
8%
56%
28%
8%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,633, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 35%, Masters: 24%)
12%
29%
35%
24%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,569, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 72%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 0%)
7%
72%
21%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,547, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 80%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 0%)
20%
80%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,637, Tested: 20, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 45%, Masters: 20%)
10%
25%
45%
20%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,589
  • Males1,588
  • Females1,590
  • Hispanic1,526
  • Black1,649
  • White1,607
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,589
State:

1,546
Reading students tested: 42
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 42

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.9 (74%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.7 (73%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.9 (70%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 26%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 26%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 31%

17%
26%
26%
31%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,588, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 32%)
20%
24%
24%
32%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,590, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 29%)
12%
29%
30%
29%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,526, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 43%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 21%)
43%
21%
15%
21%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,649, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 40%)
40%
20%
40%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,607, Tested: 20, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 30%)
5%
25%
40%
30%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All3,835
  • Males3,908
  • Females3,728
  • Hispanic3,705
  • Black3,804
  • White3,876
Science Average Scale Score:

3,835
Texas:

3,771
Science students tested: 42
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 42

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.2 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6 (74%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.5 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 8.4 (70%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 39%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 26%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 14%

21%
39%
26%
14%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,908, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 24%)
16%
40%
20%
24%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,728, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 35%, Masters: 0%)
29%
36%
35%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,705, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 7%, Masters: 14%)
29%
50%
7%
14%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,804, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 80%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 20%)
80%
20%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,876, Tested: 20, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 10%)
25%
25%
40%
10%
6th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,715
  • Males1,770
  • Females1,640
  • Hispanic1,657
  • White1,736
Math Average Scale Score:

1,715
Texas:

1,546
Math students tested: 38
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 39

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.8 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.3 (62%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 4.3 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 5 (71%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 29%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 32%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 34%

5%
29%
32%
34%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,770, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 32%, Masters: 50%)
18%
32%
50%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,640, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 44%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 13%)
13%
44%
31%
13%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,657, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 55%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 18%)
55%
27%
18%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,736, Tested: 20, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 35%)
5%
20%
40%
35%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,636
  • Males1,642
  • Females1,627
  • Hispanic1,616
  • White1,627
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,636
State:

1,457
Reading students tested: 39
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 39

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.5 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 13.1 (77%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.9 (73%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 39%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 28%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 23%

10%
39%
28%
23%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,642, Tested: 23, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 22%)
9%
43%
26%
22%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,627, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 25%)
13%
32%
31%
25%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,616, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 46%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 18%)
9%
46%
27%
18%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,627, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 42%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 19%)
10%
42%
29%
19%
7th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All1,618
  • Males1,628
  • Females1,612
  • Hispanic1,602
  • Black1,629
  • White1,655
Math Average Scale Score:

1,618
Texas:

1,571
Math students tested: 46
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 64

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.1 (52%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7.4 (49%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.5 (46%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.4 (48%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 28%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 50%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 20%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 2%

28%
50%
20%
2%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,628, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 64%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 0%)
18%
64%
18%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,612, Tested: 29, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 34%, Approaches: 42%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 3%)
34%
42%
21%
3%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,602, Tested: 23, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 39%, Approaches: 48%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 0%)
39%
48%
13%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,629, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 14%)
14%
43%
29%
14%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,655, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 59%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 0%)
8%
59%
33%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All1,726
  • Males1,716
  • Females1,734
  • Hispanic1,674
  • Black1,808
  • White1,761
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,726
Texas:

1,550
Reading students tested: 64
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 64

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.1 (76%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 14.1 (78%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 12.3 (77%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 19%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 23%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 47%

11%
19%
23%
47%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,716, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 42%)
15%
20%
23%
42%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,734, Tested: 38, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 50%)
8%
18%
24%
50%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,674, Tested: 27, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 30%)
22%
30%
18%
30%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,808, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 78%)
22%
78%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,761, Tested: 23, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%, Approaches: 13%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 57%)
4%
13%
26%
57%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All4,128
  • Males4,025
  • Females4,201
  • Hispanic4,002
  • Black4,401
  • White4,191
Writing Average Scale Score:

4,128
Texas:

3,515
Writing students tested: 65
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 65

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 9 (57%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.1 (78%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 13.6 (80%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 25%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 43%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 20%

12%
25%
43%
20%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,025, Tested: 27, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 45%, Masters: 11%)
19%
25%
45%
11%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,201, Tested: 38, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 42%, Masters: 26%)
8%
24%
42%
26%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 4,002, Tested: 27, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 41%, Masters: 11%)
22%
26%
41%
11%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 4,401, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 50%)
10%
40%
50%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,191, Tested: 23, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 48%, Masters: 22%)
4%
26%
48%
22%
8th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All1,757
  • Males1,766
  • Females1,748
  • Hispanic1,731
  • Black1,753
  • White1,775
Math Average Scale Score:

1,757
Texas:

1,539
Math students tested: 58
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 78

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 2.8 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.1 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 11.2 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 5.4 (77%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 19%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 53%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 19%

9%
19%
53%
19%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,766, Tested: 28, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 11%, Meets: 50%, Masters: 25%)
14%
11%
50%
25%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,748, Tested: 30, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 3%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 57%, Masters: 13%)
3%
27%
57%
13%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,731, Tested: 23, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 57%, Masters: 13%)
13%
17%
57%
13%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,753, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 57%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 29%)
57%
14%
29%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,775, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 12%, Meets: 60%, Masters: 20%)
8%
12%
60%
20%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All1,732
  • Males1,735
  • Females1,727
  • Hispanic1,696
  • Black1,727
  • White1,762
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,732
Texas:

1,561
Reading students tested: 57
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 78

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 15 (79%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 13.4 (79%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 26%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 35%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 32%

7%
26%
35%
32%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,735, Tested: 31, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 39%, Masters: 29%)
6%
26%
39%
29%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,727, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 35%)
8%
27%
30%
35%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,696, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 39%, Masters: 19%)
12%
30%
39%
19%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,727, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 60%, Masters: 20%)
20%
60%
20%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,762, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 32%, Masters: 41%)
5%
22%
32%
41%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All4,305
  • Males4,438
  • Females4,139
  • Hispanic4,045
  • Black3,904
  • White4,591
Science Average Scale Score:

4,305
State:

3,634
Science students tested: 56
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 56

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 8 (73%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7.2 (80%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.4 (76%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 8.6 (78%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 18%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 32%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 41%

9%
18%
32%
41%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,438, Tested: 31, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 13%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 55%)
6%
13%
26%
55%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,139, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 24%)
12%
24%
40%
24%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 4,045, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 36%, Masters: 24%)
12%
28%
36%
24%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,904, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 20%)
20%
40%
20%
20%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,591, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 4%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 64%)
5%
4%
27%
64%

    Social Studies Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All3,761
  • Males3,876
  • Females3,619
  • Hispanic3,570
  • Black3,539
  • White3,955
Social Studies Average Scale Score:

3,761
Texas:

3,461
Social Studies students tested: 56
Social Studies # Answer Documents Submitted: 56

Social Studies Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 10.1 (60%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6.1 (61%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.9 (59%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 4.1 (58%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 31%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 18%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 14%

38%
31%
18%
14%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,876, Tested: 31, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 32%, Masters: 16%)
23%
29%
32%
16%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,619, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 56%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 12%)
56%
32%
12%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,570, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 44%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 4%)
44%
40%
12%
4%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,539, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 60%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 0%)
60%
40%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,955, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 23%)
27%
23%
27%
23%

Health & Safety


Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
Show data for

(State average from 7,777 schools)
A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.

    Chronic Student Absenteeism

  • Hispanic7
  • Black2
  • White13
  • Multirace2
  • 5044
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 24 (male: 13, female: 11)
  • Hispanic: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • Black: 2 (all female)
  • White: 13 (male: 8, female: 5)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all female)
  • Section 504: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
School:

55.9
Texas:

147.9

Suspensions:
Show data for

(State average from 3,231 schools)
Out-of-school suspension
  • For students with disabilities served under IDEA : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his/her regular school for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes to another setting (e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include both removals in which no individualized family service plan(IFSP) or individualized education plan(IEP) services are provided because the removal is 10 days or less as well as removals in which the child continues to receive services according to his/her IFSP or IEP.
  • For students without disabilities and students with disabilities served solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his / her regular school for at least half a day(but less than the remainder of the school year) for disciplinary purposes to another setting(e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include removals in which no educational services are provided, and removals in which educational services are provided(e.g., school-provided at home instruction or tutoring).
School days missed due to out-of-school suspension: 10 (male: 4, female: 6)
  • Hispanic: 9 (male: 4, female: 5)
  • Two or More Races: 1 (all female)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (all female)
Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students without disabilities): 10

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students without disabilities)
Here:

23.3
Texas:

102.7
Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 6 (male: 2, female: 4)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all female)
Students without disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all female)

Classes & Courses


Algebra I:
Show data for

(State average from 1,490 schools)
Algebra I is a (college-preparatory) course that includes the study of properties and operations of the real number system; evaluating rational algebraic expressions; solving and graphing first degree equations and inequalities; translating word problems into equations; operations with and factoring of polynomials; and solving simple quadratic equations. Algebra I is a foundation course leading to higher-level mathematics courses, including Geometry and Algebra II.
Number of Algebra I classes: 2
Number of Algebra I classes taught by certified teachers: 2

    8th grade student enrollment in Algebra I

  • Hispanic2
  • Asian2
  • White10
  • Multirace2
8th grade student enrollment in Algebra I: 16 (male: 9, female: 7)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all female)
  • Asian: 2 (all male)
  • White: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all male)
8th grade studenst who passed Algebra I: 11 (male: 4, female: 7)
  • White: 11 (male: 4, female: 7)
Percent of 8th grade students who passed
Here:

68.8%
State:

87.0%

    9-10th grade student enrollment in Algebra I

  • Hispanic7
  • Asian2
  • Black4
  • White13
  • Multirace4
  • LEP2
  • IDEA2
9-10th grade student enrollment in Algebra I: 30 (male: 14, female: 16)
  • Hispanic: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • Asian: 2 (all female)
  • Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 13 (male: 5, female: 8)
  • Two or More Races: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all female)
9-10th grade studenst who passed Algebra I: 22 (male: 11, female: 11)
  • Hispanic: 4 (all male)
  • Black: 4 (all female)
  • White: 14 (male: 7, female: 7)
Percent of 9-10th grade students who passed
Ume Preparatory Academy School:

73.3%
State:

77.3%
11-12th grade student enrollment in Algebra I: 2 (all female)
  • White: 2
Percent of 11-12th grade students who passed
Ume Preparatory Academy School:

0.0%
State:

73.9%

Algebra II:
Show data for
Algebra II (college-preparatory) course topics typically include field properties and theorems; set theory; operations with rational and irrational expressions; factoring of rational expressions; in - depth study of linear equations and inequalities; quadratic equations; solving systems of linear and quadratic equations; graphing of constant, linear, and quadratic equations; properties of higher degree equations; and operations with rational and irrational exponents.
Number of Algebra II classes: 3

    Student Enrollment in Algebra II

  • Hispanic2
  • Asian2
  • Black2
  • White13
  • Multirace2
  • IDEA2
Student Enrollment in Algebra II: 21 (male: 14, female: 7)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all female)
  • Asian: 2 (all male)
  • Black: 2 (all male)
  • White: 13 (male: 8, female: 5)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all male)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)

Calculus:
Show data for
Calculus (college-preparatory) course topics include the study of derivatives, differentiation, integration, the definite and indefinite integral, and applications of calculus.Typically, students have previously attained knowledge of precalculus topics (some combination of trigonometry, elementary functions, analytic geometry, and math analysis).
Number of Calculus classes: 1
Number of Calculus classes taught by certified teachers: 1

    Student Enrollment in Calculus

  • Hispanic2
  • Asian2
  • White7
  • Multirace2
Student Enrollment in Calculus: 13 (male: 9, female: 4)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all male)
  • Asian: 2 (all female)
  • White: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all male)

Geometry:
Show data for
Geometry is a (college-preparatory) course that typically includes topics such as properties of plane and solid figures; deductive methods of reasoning and use of logic; geometry as an axiomatic system including the study of postulates, theorems, and formal proofs; concepts of congruence, similarity, parallelism, perpendicularity, and proportion; and rules of angle measurement in triangles.Geometry is considered a prerequisite for Algebra II.
Number of Geometry classes: 3

    Student Enrollment in Geometry

  • Hispanic4
  • Black2
  • White19
  • IDEA2
Student Enrollment in Geometry: 25 (male: 10, female: 15)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Black: 2 (all female)
  • White: 19 (male: 8, female: 11)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all female)

Advanced Mathematics:
Show data for
Advanced mathematics (college-preparatory) courses cover the following topics: trigonometry, trigonometry/algebra, trigonometry / analytic geometry, trigonometry / math analysis, analytic geometry, math analysis, math analysis / analytic geometry, probability and statistics, and precalculus
Number of Advanced Mathematics classes: 1
Number of Advanced Mathematics classes taught by certified teachers: 1

    Student Enrollment in Advanced Mathematics

  • Hispanic2
  • Asian2
  • White7
  • Multirace2
Student Enrollment in Advanced Mathematics: 13 (male: 9, female: 4)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all male)
  • Asian: 2 (all female)
  • White: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all male)

Biology:
Show data for
Biology (college-preparatory) courses are designed to provide information regarding the fundamental concepts of life and life processes.These courses include(but are not restricted to) such topics as cell structure and function, general plant and animal physiology, genetics, and taxonomy.
Number of Biology classes: 2
Number of Biology classes taught by certified teachers: 2

    Student Enrollment in Biology

  • Hispanic7
  • Asian2
  • Black4
  • White25
  • Multirace4
  • LEP2
  • IDEA2
Student Enrollment in Biology: 42 (male: 20, female: 22)
  • Hispanic: 7 (male: 2, female: 5)
  • Asian: 2 (all female)
  • Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 25 (male: 14, female: 11)
  • Two or More Races: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all female)

Chemistry:
Show data for
Chemistry (college-preparatory) courses involve studying the composition, properties, and reactions of substances. These courses typically explore such concepts as the behaviors of solids, liquids, and gases; acid / base and oxidation / reduction reactions; and atomic structure.Chemical formulas and equations and nuclear reactions are also studied.
Number of Chemistry classes: 4
Number of Chemistry classes taught by certified teachers: 4

    Student Enrollment in Chemistry

  • Hispanic10
  • Asian4
  • Black4
  • White31
  • Multirace4
  • IDEA4
Student Enrollment in Chemistry: 53 (male: 28, female: 25)
  • Hispanic: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
  • Asian: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 31 (male: 17, female: 14)
  • Two or More Races: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Physics:
Show data for
Physics (college-preparatory) courses involve the study of the forces and laws of nature affecting matter, such as equilibrium, motion, momentum, and the relationships between matter and energy.The study of physics includes examination of sound, light, and magnetic and electric phenomena.
Number of Physics classes: 2


    Student Enrollment in Physics

  • Hispanic7
  • American Indian2
  • Asian2
  • Black4
  • White28
  • Multirace2
Student Enrollment in Physics: 45 (male: 28, female: 17)
  • Hispanic: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • American Indian / Alaska Native: 2 (all male)
  • Asian: 2 (all female)
  • Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 28 (male: 17, female: 11)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all male)

Comments

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss Dallas, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.

  1. All Cities
  2. Texas
  3. Dallas main city page
  4. Schools in Texas
  5. Ume Preparatory Academy School


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents