Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Mexico > Albuquerque
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-03-2008, 01:52 PM
 
Location: Burque!
3,557 posts, read 10,219,236 times
Reputation: 859

Advertisements

Cocoposts: Justifying Albuquerque Sprawl

"Now that's a real job.
Using tax increment financing to build the major infrastructure required for raw land development formalizes a massive sprawl subsidy that has been going on for years. This is especially desirable to developers because it reduces or eliminates the unpredictable vagaries of the back room deals otherwise necessary to wrest funding from the government for new roads,water lines and storm drains that make sprawl possible."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-03-2008, 09:08 PM
 
Location: Albuquerque, NM - Summerlin, NV
3,435 posts, read 6,988,088 times
Reputation: 682
Might as well be houses.. what is that land ever going to be used for?... Grow Albuquerque, Grow..were not a little town anymore.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2008, 09:21 PM
 
Location: Burque!
3,557 posts, read 10,219,236 times
Reputation: 859
I'm interviewing for your job Bradly. (is he joking... I don't know)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2008, 10:54 PM
 
Location: Albuquerque, NM - Summerlin, NV
3,435 posts, read 6,988,088 times
Reputation: 682
Quote:
Originally Posted by rybert View Post
I'm interviewing for your job Bradly. (is he joking... I don't know)
I don't get it..?
I'm not joking about the Houses part, its true.. what would be done with the land?..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2008, 09:32 AM
 
Location: Burque!
3,557 posts, read 10,219,236 times
Reputation: 859
I want to replace you with someone more balanced in the Planning Department... I'm kidding of course, because it takes all kinds.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-05-2008, 11:30 PM
 
Location: Albuquerque, NM - Summerlin, NV
3,435 posts, read 6,988,088 times
Reputation: 682
Quote:
Originally Posted by rybert View Post
I want to replace you with someone more balanced in the Planning Department... I'm kidding of course, because it takes all kinds.
Dude, the land sits there,.. were a growing city, its always been that way, and sometimes cities need to use the available land that will never be used..homes are in demand here, lists are outrageous like you would never belive.. it is obvious we need to cut this sarcity, every Planner you talk with in this area is for growth, thats what keeps us with a job of course.. Then again i wouldnt mind seeing a race car track out there, or an arena for pro sports, but it wont happen.. not here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2008, 01:20 AM
 
Location: San Antonio
4,468 posts, read 10,615,820 times
Reputation: 4244
Houses aren't the problem. It's the lack of control and planning that's the issue. If you're going to build houses, you need to plan the infrastructure in advance - sewer & electrical, roads, density, ratio of residential to commercial, etc. Better planning some years back might have resulted in a 5th bridge across the river.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2008, 02:53 AM
 
Location: Albuquerque
90 posts, read 251,220 times
Reputation: 35
Quote:
Originally Posted by yukon View Post
Houses aren't the problem. It's the lack of control and planning that's the issue. If you're going to build houses, you need to plan the infrastructure in advance - sewer & electrical, roads, density, ratio of residential to commercial, etc. Better planning some years back might have resulted in a 5th bridge across the river.
i read somewhere (might have been forbs) that Albuquerque is planed extremely well, better then phoenix. I honestly dont know about the "sprawl", sprawl is an ugly word btw. i would rather there be actually houses and not ugly ass abandoned trailer homes and garbage it reminds me of el paso. anyways it would be nice however to see homes and really nice businesses out there so it doesn't look like a carpet of brown and pink draped over the valley. speaking of bridges, wouldn't it be cool if the interstate bridge over the river looked more like the Leonard P. Zakim Bunker Hill Bridge in Boston? or the millennium bridge in Denver? kinda the gateway into ABQ showing off modern art i donno.... its kinda sad that we have THE most innovating architects in the world right here in Albuquerque where most of their inspiration comes from New Mexico, and we dont have one single really nice public or private building or ANYTHING to show it off but everyone else does. so its like spreading the wealth with out keeping any for ourselves. sadness...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2008, 07:58 AM
 
1,763 posts, read 5,998,033 times
Reputation: 831
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shmikker View Post
../..btw. i would rather there be actually houses and not ugly ass abandoned trailer homes and garbage it reminds me of el paso. ...
Wow shmikker, that is quite the provocative post. How about "well-kept trailers on large parcels of unaltered land instead of ugly ***, abandoned, cookie-cutter homes."

Anyway, you better not be criticizing El Paso or EnjoyEP's gonna bust in here and clean your clock.

p.s. Good post above, Yukon. Many parts of the country have developers pay impact fees - it slows down the development to a sustainable pace, and provides a more equitable and solid source of funding for the infrastructure projects.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2008, 08:42 PM
 
Location: San Antonio
4,468 posts, read 10,615,820 times
Reputation: 4244
Does the city/county charge impact fees here? I know in Florida, impact fees were a big revenue source. Okaloosa County actually had a moratorium on permits for awhile - density max had been reached and the county told developers no more permits for building until you figure out better ways for ingress/egress and reduction of traffic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Mexico > Albuquerque
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:37 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top