Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Mexico > Albuquerque
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-28-2014, 10:47 PM
 
Location: San Antonio
4,468 posts, read 10,617,004 times
Reputation: 4244

Advertisements

I'm not an investor, but if I had the money, I'd rent here for myself and buy property to use as rentals in Denver.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-28-2014, 11:13 PM
 
434 posts, read 1,106,481 times
Reputation: 243
Did someone just argue that renting is smarter than buying...oh boy...
rent if you cant afford or if you plan on only being there a year or 2..Other than that, I don't see any long term benefits.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-31-2014, 02:09 PM
 
Location: New Mexico U.S.A.
26,527 posts, read 51,773,200 times
Reputation: 31329
Quote:
Originally Posted by jayely1 View Post
Did someone just argue that renting is smarter than buying...oh boy...
"smarter than buying" Sometimes it is, sometimes it is not...

There was no argument. We have bought about 5 homes and rented maybe 10 times...

Last edited by Poncho_NM; 02-06-2015 at 12:21 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-01-2014, 12:42 AM
 
434 posts, read 1,106,481 times
Reputation: 243
Quote:
Originally Posted by Poncho_NM View Post
"smarter than buying" Sometimes it is, sometimes it is not...

There was no argument. We have bought about 5 homes and rented maybe 10 times...
Not sure what that meant at all, but besides the examples that I gave, it's not smarter..Ever...If it is, tell me how please? You aren't putting equity towards anything..And for the most part, renting is just as much as a house payment. But with a house payment, you're actually acquiring something of value that's yours.

Last edited by Poncho_NM; 02-06-2015 at 12:22 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-01-2014, 06:51 AM
 
581 posts, read 1,172,612 times
Reputation: 509
Quote:
Originally Posted by jayely1 View Post
Not sure what that meant at all, but besides the examples that I gave, it's not smarter..Ever...If it is, tell me how please? You aren't putting equity towards anything..And for the most part, renting is just as much as a house payment. But with a house payment, you're actually acquiring something of value that's yours.
That is a very simplistic view. There are many cases when its smarter to rent. Especially when you plan to stay somewhere under 5 years.

The equity you are building up in the short term often won't cover closing costs/commissions, etc that come in to play when buying.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-01-2014, 07:15 AM
 
Location: The Bayou State
686 posts, read 1,101,821 times
Reputation: 967
Quote:
Originally Posted by jayely1 View Post
Not sure what that meant at all, but besides the examples that I gave, it's not smarter..Ever...If it is, tell me how please? You aren't putting equity towards anything..And for the most part, renting is just as much as a house payment. But with a house payment, you're actually acquiring something of value that's yours.
Tell that to all the people who bought in 2004, 2005...

I sold the last house I owned in 2005. I have rented since then. I put money to work in the stock market in early 2009, money that I took out of my last house, along with all of my other savings. I was able to retire in my mid 50s a year ago, something I thought (in 2005) that I would not be able to do until my mid 60s...

In most of the country, it has been far 'smarter' to rent for the last 9+/- years, especially if you took the money you had in a house if you were fortunate enough to have sold pre-crash, or if you had taken the cash you planned to put towards a house and invested it elsewhere. Are there exceptions? Sure, for hot pockets like NYC or SF, but for the vast majority of housing markets, renting has trumped home ownership for almost a decade, and for ABQ, this trend looks to be continuing indefinitely.

As for your statement that "renting is as much as a house payment," which is frankly incorrect for most markets even if the discussion ended there, you are missing the point that the cost of ownership is far more than a house payment. The cost to buy and sell a house, the cost to insure, the cost to maintain and repair a house, and the cost of property taxes, all factor into home ownership. In a declining or even flat market where houses don't even keep up with nominal inflation, the cost to own a house exceeds the cost of renting, and the opportunity cost of having cash and equity tied up in such a home is detrimental to your overall financial well being.

Last edited by Westbound and Down; 08-01-2014 at 07:34 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-01-2014, 08:41 AM
 
Location: Alamogordo, NM
7,940 posts, read 9,499,383 times
Reputation: 5695
Exactly my thoughts Westbound and Down. My wife and I have been renting since the spring of 2010 and may never (I know...never is a long time) buy a house again. Ever.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-01-2014, 09:30 AM
 
Location: Old Town
1,992 posts, read 4,062,159 times
Reputation: 2051
I bought a house in 2009 for $155k (severely dilapidated)in Old Town. Remodeled it entirely. Everything is new except for the walls. Expanded it from 1100 sq ft to nearly 2500 sq ft. Remodel costs were $104k. Total in, $259k. It is worth $348k today.

So, no it is not ALWAYS better to rent in Alb current market.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-01-2014, 10:11 AM
 
Location: The Bayou State
686 posts, read 1,101,821 times
Reputation: 967
Quote:
Originally Posted by NMHacker View Post
I bought a house in 2009 for $155k (severely dilapidated)in Old Town. Remodeled it entirely. Everything is new except for the walls. Expanded it from 1100 sq ft to nearly 2500 sq ft. Remodel costs were $104k. Total in, $259k. It is worth $348k today.

So, no it is not ALWAYS better to rent.
First, nicely done. However...

I never said "always." There are ALWAYS exceptions.

Since early 2009, my net worth has more than doubled due to the risks I took with my money in the stock market. Timing is everything, be it in real estate or in other investments.

And there are plenty of people who bought houses in ABQ in 2009 who have found they can't sell it for little more and maybe not anymore today than they paid for it and put into it. For example: i looked at a house to buy a few months ago located in highly desirable Spruce Park.Approx 50 years old, completely renovated in 2004 with a very nicely done master suite put in the top floor attic space. The guy who bought it in 2004 paid $425k for it, and I estimate he spent an additional $100k. He tried to sell it from 2007 onward with an asking price of $595k, finally sold it in late 2009 to someone for $350k, and I am pretty sure that buyer thought they had "stolen" it. That buyer put in a forced air a/c system for $20k, plus had other ongoing maintenance expenses but did not do a great job of maintaining the house, so say total amount in improvements of $370k. The house in April of 2014 was listed for $425k, where it had been on the market for the same price since last August. i told my buyer agent that while I liked the house, it wasn't worth more than $380k to $390k (I had all the sales comps and did an "appraisal" for my own use), and to me it wasn't worth more than around $360k because of deferred maintenance (needed paint exterior, lots of rotten wood, a new front entry landing, and needed replacement of the ancient boiler system for the baseboard heat), and I passed because I didn't want to get into a protracted back and forth and felt it unlikely I would get my price. I see that it sold in June for $385k...I was right on the button for "market value," but do some math and you will concur that the first owner lost a lot of money over a 5 year holding period (yes, the market crashed in his holding period), and the most recent seller also "lost" money after closing costs, again a 5 year holding period.

And you have to admit that what you did is pretty darned atypical; most people don't buy a dilapidated house and more than double it in size, etc. You took a risk, and the market has rewarded you for your risk. Chances are if you had bought the house in the same condition in 2005, the price would have been significantly higher - I am curious, what was the sales and offering history of the house? Was it an estate sale? Or had it been offered at a higher price in prior years? Was it a distress sale?

What do you base the "worth $348k today" on? Assessment? Have you had it appraised? Did someone make you an offer? Just curious...the appraiser in me wants to know.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-01-2014, 10:17 AM
 
Location: Old Town
1,992 posts, read 4,062,159 times
Reputation: 2051
Quote:
Originally Posted by Westbound and Down View Post
And you have to admit that what you did is pretty darned atypical; most people don't buy a dilapidated house and more than double it in size, etc. You took a risk, and the market has rewarded you for your risk. Chances are if you had bought the house in the same condition in 2005, the price would have been significantly higher - I am curious, what was the sales and offering history of the house? Was it an estate sale? Or had it been offered at a higher price in prior years? Was it a distress sale?

What do you base the "worth $348k today" on? Assessment? Have you had it appraised? Did someone make you an offer? Just curious...the appraiser in me wants to know.
It was a house that was vacant for several years. It was part of a probate fight and after probate was finally over the family was trying to get it sold before the city issued an order to demolish. I bought it for the land mostly. Using the house as a remodel also saved me on impact fees from building new. Yes, I have had it appraised. I'm in the construction business and have all the tools afforded to know the value of my house. There have been several homes in our immediate area sold in the last few months that support the appraised value.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Mexico > Albuquerque

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:11 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top