Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Mexico > Albuquerque
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-04-2011, 05:40 PM
 
Location: Albuquerque
5,548 posts, read 16,082,189 times
Reputation: 2756

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan from NM
Quote:
Originally Posted by N8!
Seems to me ...
Wow, you are odd.
Yeah, but in a good way.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-04-2011, 06:20 PM
 
Location: Old Town
1,992 posts, read 4,061,735 times
Reputation: 2051
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mezter View Post
Change isn't bad. Who said you can't see the mountains AND Buildings? Common' people, its common sense. The mountains wont just disappear.

A taller skyline would give Albuquerque more reconization. How will a 650ft building over take a mountain? Really people.

Tall buildings don't make a city. NY is the only city I can think of that I think about their skyline.

LA . Nope
Seattle. Nope
Denver. Nope
San diego. Nope
Portland. Nope


How about similar sized cities? Nope. Simply cannot imagine someone would say, I'm going to visit Abq because they have tall buildings.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-04-2011, 09:03 PM
 
Location: ABQ, NM
372 posts, read 711,798 times
Reputation: 148
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mezter View Post
Change isn't bad. Who said you can't see the mountains AND Buildings? Common' people, its common sense. The mountains wont just disappear.

A taller skyline would give Albuquerque more reconization. How will a 650ft building over take a mountain? Really people.
Did you just call me common?!

I don't think anyone is suggesting that the mountains will disappear, I just know I don't want to look at tall buildings when I could instead see MORE of the mountains, volcanoes, etc. I also don't think that a 650 foot building would be economically viable for Albuquerque, and that the only recognition we might get would be others talking about how Albuquerque doesn't make good decisions. A skyscraper would be a bad idea, but a skyscraper with a low occupancy rate would be worse, and I think that's what would happen here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-04-2011, 10:11 PM
 
581 posts, read 1,172,452 times
Reputation: 509
Quote:
Originally Posted by NMHacker View Post
Tall buildings don't make a city. NY is the only city I can think of that I think about their skyline.

LA . Nope
Seattle. Nope
Denver. Nope
San diego. Nope
Portland. Nope


How about similar sized cities? Nope. Simply cannot imagine someone would say, I'm going to visit Abq because they have tall buildings.
Come on, Seattle has a great skyline that is instantly recognizable. Tall buildings don't make a city, but great architecture and a lively downtown can definitely enhance a city.

I don't think the city should build tall empty buildings just for the sake of having a nice skyline. But if a developer wants to build a tall building in certain areas(downtown) they should be encouraged to do so. Another few buildings downtown isn't going to block anyone's view of the Sandias 5000 ft above the city that isn't already blocked by the buildings downtown.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2011, 10:58 AM
 
Location: Denver/Atlanta
6,083 posts, read 10,704,020 times
Reputation: 5872
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stanrice View Post
Did you just call me common?!

I don't think anyone is suggesting that the mountains will disappear, I just know I don't want to look at tall buildings when I could instead see MORE of the mountains, volcanoes, etc. I also don't think that a 650 foot building would be economically viable for Albuquerque, and that the only recognition we might get would be others talking about how Albuquerque doesn't make good decisions. A skyscraper would be a bad idea, but a skyscraper with a low occupancy rate would be worse, and I think that's what would happen here.
I actually agree with most of this. But I didn't say ABQ needs buildings (for economical purposes), and much as it would just look 10x better with them!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2011, 12:52 PM
 
Location: Santa Fe
713 posts, read 1,846,075 times
Reputation: 606
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mezter View Post
I actually agree with most of this. But I didn't say ABQ needs buildings (for economical purposes), and much as it would just look 10x better with them!
So let's just build skyscrapers for aesthetics? If so they should just be skeletons, with no interior. Put some lights inside and you'll have what you want at a fraction of the price!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2011, 01:25 PM
N8!
 
2,408 posts, read 5,306,891 times
Reputation: 4236
The reality is no one will be building any skyscrapers in downtown ABQ within the next decade or two.

A perfect blend of no/low demand, no financing, and high construction cost (foundation stabilization) will keep ABQ's skyline pleasingly retro.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2011, 01:53 PM
 
Location: Old Town
1,992 posts, read 4,061,735 times
Reputation: 2051
There so many empty building in dowtown it is not funny. The Simms building is 25% occupied. Both the old Federal buildings are empty. I could go on and on about all the vacancies. Concentration should be on renovating existing buildings and occupy them then building new. There are so many amenities missing from downtown also. Want a decent selection in groceries? You got to drive miles to get to one. Need some sort of electronics choice? Same thing. Office supplies? Something after 6pm?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2011, 04:14 PM
 
430 posts, read 1,650,950 times
Reputation: 332
Not only do they need to update the skyline, but visiting downtown is weak too, that needs lots of improvement.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2011, 10:02 AM
 
Location: Abu Al-Qurq
3,689 posts, read 9,184,329 times
Reputation: 2991
Quote:
Originally Posted by mt971x View Post
Not only do they need to update the skyline, but visiting downtown is weak too, that needs lots of improvement.
Who is "they" again? I think we could all use some improvement.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Mexico > Albuquerque

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:02 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top