Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality > Atheism and Agnosticism
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
 
Old 08-21-2007, 11:03 PM
 
Location: Santa Monica
4,714 posts, read 8,462,246 times
Reputation: 1052

Advertisements

"The Church of the Non-Believers" (Wired mag, Nov. 2006)
Wired 14.11: The Church of the Non-Believers


Webring of Atheist Writers:
Atheist Writers


"Atheists hoping to assert rights in religious era" (S.F. Chronicle, 2/20/2006)
Atheists hoping to assert rights in religious era


"Smackdown" (MSNBC, June 18, 2007)
BeliefWatch: An Atheist Uproar - Newsweek Beliefs - MSNBC.com (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19140641/site/newsweek/ - broken link)


"A Flowering of Doubt in America" (Philadelphia Inquirer, Aug 11, 2007)
A flowering of doubt in America | Inquirer | 08/11/2007 (broken link)


The Brights movement
Brights movement - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Brights' Net - Home Page
BrightsOnline.net


"Rational Atheism" (Scientific American, Sept. 2007)
Rational Atheism: Scientific American


Atheism @ Wikipedia.org
Atheism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
//
Further reading

* Berman, David (1990). A History of Atheism in Britain: From Hobbes to Russell. London: Routledge. ISBN 0-415-04727-7.
* Buckley, M. J. (1990). At the Origins of Modern Atheism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. ISBN 0300048971.
* Dawkins, Richard (2006). The God Delusion. Bantam Press. ISBN 0593055489.
* Flew, Antony (2005). God and Philosophy. Prometheus Books. ISBN 1591023300.
* Flynn, Tom, ed. (2007). The New Encyclopedia of Unbelief. Prometheus Books. ISBN 1591023912.
* Gaskin, J.C.A., ed. (1989), Varieties of Unbelief: From Epicurus to Sartre, New York: Macmillan, ISBN 0-02-340681-X
* Harbour, Daniel. An Intelligent Person's Guide to Atheism. London: Duckworth. ISBN 0-7156-3229-9.
* Harris, Sam. Letter to a Christian Nation. Knopf (September 19, 2006). ISBN 978-0307265777.
* Hitchens, Christopher. God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything. Twelve (May 1, 2007). ISBN 978-0446579803.
* Jacoby, Susan (2004). Freethinkers: A History of American Secularism. Metropolitan Books. ISBN 978-0805074420.
* Krueger, D. E. (1998). What is Atheism?: A Short Introduction. New York: Prometheus. ISBN 1-57392-214-5.
* Le Poidevin, R. (1996). Arguing for Atheism: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Religion. London: Routledge. ISBN 0-415-09338-4.
* Mackie, J. L. (1982). The Miracle of Theism: Arguments For and Against the Existence of God. Oxford: Oxford UP. ISBN 019824682X
* Maritain, Jacques (1953). The Range of Reason. London: Geoffrey Bles. ISBN B0007DKP00. Retrieved on 2006-10-27.
* Martin, Michael (1990). Atheism: A Philosophical Justification. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press. ISBN 0-87722-943-0.
* Martin, Michael, ed. (2007). The Cambridge Companion to Atheism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0521603676
* Martin, Michael & Monnier, R., eds. (2003). The Impossibility of God. Amherst, NY: Prometheus. ISBN 1591021200
* Martin, Michael & Monnier, R., eds. (2006). The Improbability of God. Amherst, NY: Prometheus. ISBN 1591023815
* McTaggart, John & McTaggart, Ellis (1930). Some Dogmas of Religion. London: Edward Arnold & Co., new edition. [First published 1906]
* Nielsen, Kai (1985). Philosophy and Atheism. New York: Prometheus. ISBN ISBN 0-87975-289-0.
* Nielsen, Kai (2001). Naturalism and Religion. New York: Prometheus. ISBN 1573928534.
* Oppy, Graham (2006). Arguing about Gods. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0521863864.
* Robinson, Richard (1964). An Atheist's Values. Oxford: Clarendon Press. ISBN 0198241917.
* Sharpe, R.A. (1997). The Moral Case Against Religious Belief. London: SCM Press. ISBN 0-334-02680-6.
* Smith, George Atheism: The Case Against God, (1974).
* Stenger, Victor J. (2007). God: The Failed Hypothesis. How Science Shows that God Does Not Exist. Amherst, NY: Prometheus. ISBN 1591024811
* Thrower, James (1971). A Short History of Western Atheism. London: Pemberton. ISBN 0-301-71101-1.
//


RUSSELL's TEAPOT @ Wikipedia.org
Russell's teapot - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
//
Russell's teapot, sometimes called the Celestial Teapot, was an analogy first coined
by the philosopher Bertrand Russell (1872-1970), intended to refute the idea that
the burden of proof lies upon the sceptic to disprove unfalsifiable claims of
religions
. In an article entitled "Is There a God?",[1] commissioned (but never
published) by Illustrated magazine in 1952, Russell said the following:

If I were to suggest that between the Earth and Mars there is a china teapot
revolving about the sun in an elliptical orbit, nobody would be able to disprove my
assertion provided I were careful to add that the teapot is too small to be revealed
even by our most powerful telescopes
. But if I were to go on to say that, since my
assertion cannot be disproved, it is an intolerable presumption on the part of human
reason to doubt it, I should rightly be thought to be talking nonsense. If, however,
the existence of such a teapot were affirmed in ancient books, taught as the sacred
truth every Sunday
, and instilled into the minds of children at school, hesitation
to believe in its existence would become a mark of eccentricity and entitle the
doubter to the attentions of the psychiatrist in an enlightened age or of the Inquisitor
in an earlier time. ”

In his book A Devil's Chaplain, Richard Dawkins developed the teapot theme a little
further:

“ The reason organized religion merits outright hostility is that, unlike belief
in Russell's teapot, religion is powerful, influential, tax-exempt and systematically
passed on to children too young to defend themselves
. Children are not compelled to
spend their formative years memorizing loony books about teapots. Government-subsidized
schools don't exclude children whose parents prefer the wrong shape of teapot.
Teapot-believers don't stone teapot-unbelievers, teapot-apostates, teapot-heretics
and teapot-blasphemers to death
. Mothers don't warn their sons off marrying
teapot-shiksas whose parents believe in three teapots rather than one. People who
put the milk in first don't kneecap those who put the tea in first. ”

The concept of Russell's teapot has been extrapolated into humorous, more explicitly
religion-parodying forms such as the Invisible Pink Unicorn[2] and the Flying
Spaghetti Monster.[3]
//

Last edited by ParkTwain; 08-21-2007 at 11:18 PM..
Quick reply to this message

 
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:
Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality > Atheism and Agnosticism
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top