Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality > Atheism and Agnosticism
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-26-2018, 10:26 AM
 
Location: Germany
16,768 posts, read 4,974,055 times
Reputation: 2111

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by OzzyRules View Post
I think atheistic scientists tend to overlook a lot of errors in past science, while they magnify errors in the Bible.
Science replaces those errors (like phlogiston) with new findings.

I doubt very much atheist scientists even bother with the Bible.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-26-2018, 10:28 AM
 
Location: Germany
16,768 posts, read 4,974,055 times
Reputation: 2111
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thoreau424 View Post
Defeating foolishness is more important, whether with a Christian, atheist, Jehovah's Witness, or any other group of belief. It is the idea(s) that matter, not the person. We're all made of the same flesh and blood; all of the same species.

Attacking people serves no healthiness or good in the world.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2018, 12:22 PM
 
Location: Valencia, Spain
16,155 posts, read 12,853,575 times
Reputation: 2881
Quote:
Originally Posted by OzzyRules View Post
You haven't provided evidence that the universe just popped out of nowhere for no reason.
...and who claims that it did... other than theists who claim that their god created everything - from NOTHING.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2018, 12:43 PM
 
Location: Parts Unknown, Northern California
48,564 posts, read 24,110,503 times
Reputation: 21239
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thoreau424 View Post
Defeating foolishness is more important, whether with a Christian, atheist, Jehovah's Witness, or any other group of belief. It is the idea(s) that matter, not the person.

We're all made of the same flesh and blood; all of the same species. Attacking and/or "defeating" people serves no healthiness or good in the world.

Once someone wants to defeat someone else, they've instantly lowered themselves. Before saying a word, they are showing his or herself to be petty and shallow.
Sometimes you cannot separate the fool from the foolishness and both need defeating.

The "we are all one" business works fine until there is conflict, and then sides materialize. The tendency of humans to support the familiar, the "home team" so to speak, flies in the face world peace philosophies. To eliminate such tendencies would require re-engineering humans so that their emotional reactions would always be subordinate to their logical ones. And that might not be a fun world.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2018, 03:45 PM
 
Location: Middle America
11,070 posts, read 7,142,399 times
Reputation: 16977
Some see the world and the meaning of life as 'one person against another'. That's the point I was making. They don't try to separate the person from the idea. If the person is infected, so to speak, it still goes back to the root/originating idea. So separating the idea from the person is the all-important first step. If you don't do that, you'll be stuck in the dog eat dog mentality.

That's what also breeds racism, separatism, nationalism, culturalism, etc. The differences between us - ultimately in the mind - are shifted to physical and material differences, such as person's race and ethnicity, regionality, and appearance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2018, 03:59 PM
 
28,432 posts, read 11,571,363 times
Reputation: 2070
The time it takes is inversely proportional to the amount the atheists hates religion. The more an atheists has to change science to get away from religion the faster we prove that denomination of atheism wrong.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2018, 04:10 PM
 
28,432 posts, read 11,571,363 times
Reputation: 2070
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harry Diogenes View Post
Science replaces those errors (like phlogiston) with new findings.

I doubt very much atheist scientists even bother with the Bible.
well, actually, we can tell a lot about a person by how they describe the bible. foaming at the mouth and googly eyes tells us a lot.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2018, 05:30 PM
 
Location: Parts Unknown, Northern California
48,564 posts, read 24,110,503 times
Reputation: 21239
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arach Angle View Post
The more an atheists has to change science to get away from religion the faster we prove that denomination of atheism wrong.
Getting away from religion has never been a scientific goal. It is a side effect. The Big Bang theory was crafted as a response to the evidence available, not as a deliberate project designed to overthrow Genesis. Carbon dating is based on the known decay rates of the radioactivity of certain carbon isotopes. It was crafted to determine the age of organic matter, not to spoil a specific Biblical timetable.

Science didn't set out to make an enemy of religion, it set out to make the best determination of truth available. What they found has made religion start treating them like they are the enemy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2018, 06:46 PM
2K5Gx2km
 
n/a posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arach Angle View Post
well, actually, we can tell a lot about a person by how they describe the bible. foaming at the mouth and googly eyes tells us a lot.

We can tell a lot about you by how you describe atheists and atheism.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2018, 09:22 PM
 
63,785 posts, read 40,053,123 times
Reputation: 7868
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harry Diogenes View Post
You don't? With your PHD?
As it ever been a god? No.
Like you, I just have my opinion. How exactly do you KNOW it has not ever been a God?
Quote:
The first is just redefining the word god, and the second may be true, but we have no evidence for it, and logically no need for it.
You have the order wrong. Until science, it has always BEEN God. The religious autocrats and their horrendous benighted treatment of the progenitors of science forced the creation of the term Nature to avoid their religious authoritarianism. The label God does not necessarily add anything that needs additional evidence and is no different than the label natural.
Quote:
Good, as no one is pretending that.
Yes, you are pretending that when you default to the label Nature or natural laws AS IF they explain anything different from a reference to God and God's laws.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality > Atheism and Agnosticism
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top