Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Georgia > Atlanta
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-20-2017, 12:59 PM
 
Location: Ca$hville via Atlanta
2,427 posts, read 2,478,601 times
Reputation: 2229

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by cqholt View Post
GRTA and SRTA are the same now.

Board of Directors – State Road and Tollway Authority
The difference between MARTA and SRTA/GRTA is the latter is appointed by the Governor, who is republican and has suburban/rural interest in mind. MARTA is appointed by leaders of it's sales tax jurisdictions, who are democrats and have urban/inner ring suburb interest in mind.


Totally Correct,, I know SRTA real real well!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-20-2017, 01:01 PM
 
Location: Prescott, AZ
5,559 posts, read 4,695,326 times
Reputation: 2284
Quote:
Originally Posted by cqholt View Post
GRTA and SRTA are the same now.

Board of Directors – State Road and Tollway Authority
The difference between MARTA and SRTA/GRTA is the latter is appointed by the Governor, who is republican and has suburban/rural interest in mind. MARTA is appointed by leaders of it's sales tax jurisdictions, who are democrats and have urban/inner ring suburb interest in mind.
GRTA and SRTA can be separated. They are still two separate agencies on paper, after all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-20-2017, 04:26 PM
 
Location: Seattle, WA
9,829 posts, read 7,265,185 times
Reputation: 7790
I'm a fan of that map, too, fourthwarden. I like that it doesn't have heavy rail lines to Cobb and Gwinnett that will never happen.

Cobb and Gwinnett should pour all their MARTA tax monies into frequent, excellent commuter rail, and excellent bus services.

Only exception maybe would be... extend the Blue line to Six Flags, and the Gold line to Norcross/ Peachtree Corners. But that's it. Commuter rail is a far more appropriate solution in a lot of ways for those 2 counties, and a much better value, anyway.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-20-2017, 08:34 PM
 
Location: Prescott, AZ
5,559 posts, read 4,695,326 times
Reputation: 2284
Quote:
Originally Posted by primaltech View Post
I'm a fan of that map, too, fourthwarden. I like that it doesn't have heavy rail lines to Cobb and Gwinnett that will never happen.

Cobb and Gwinnett should pour all their MARTA tax monies into frequent, excellent commuter rail, and excellent bus services.

Only exception maybe would be... extend the Blue line to Six Flags, and the Gold line to Norcross/ Peachtree Corners. But that's it. Commuter rail is a far more appropriate solution in a lot of ways for those 2 counties, and a much better value, anyway.
Well, the reason it doesn't have those lines is becuase it's concentrating on currently planned projects, of which there are none in the 'HRT to Cobb and Gwinnett' categories.

As I've said before, a layered appraoch is needed for both counties, with HRT backbones, frequent CRT, and BRT, as well as the other tiers of buses all working together to feed one another through network affects.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-20-2017, 09:11 PM
 
Location: Atlanta
5,242 posts, read 6,240,118 times
Reputation: 2784
Quote:
Originally Posted by cqholt View Post
Why are we going to create ANOTHER state-level agency? eg: GRTA
MARTA already has state oversight, while SRTA is just governor appointments SRTA Leadership & Board of Directors – State Road and Tollway Authority, which works well when republicans are in control, but when the state flips how are they going to control it?
I don't think it's worth fighting for honestly. Many other cities have different agencies running different modes of transit. It's a good idea too as RRs are not going to want to partner with multiple agencies sharing their ROW. For more comprehensive service, a state agency could run lines extending much further out than the 5 counties.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-20-2017, 10:16 PM
 
Location: Seattle, WA
9,829 posts, read 7,265,185 times
Reputation: 7790
I just disagree with much OTP heavy rail. It's expensive and uncomfortable ride, and the construction is a huge long mess.

Clayton/Cobb/Gwinnett/S Fulton/ NE DeKalb need THIS:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=poTjpTdUFKM

Where it's, like, commuter rail meets light rail. FRA-compliant light rail, basically. (And in our metro, they'd be sharing tracks with active freight corridor, so there might need to be 3+ tracks.)

The key aspects being the 15-minute frequency, and the rapid stops with the level boarding. Again sort of combining aspects of LRT with CRT.

If Cumberland Blvd @ Cumberland Pkwy had one of these bad boys, that ran between Acworth and Atlanta, then HRT between Cumberland and Arts Center would become unnecessary and redundant.

I'd rather have gold-standard, amazing commuter rail, than just pretty good commuter rail and a "HRT backbone" that would probably only reach out to Windy Hill.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-20-2017, 11:57 PM
 
Location: Atlanta
9,818 posts, read 7,937,279 times
Reputation: 9991
Quote:
Originally Posted by primaltech View Post
No MARTA in Cobb is a non-solution, no matter what. Cobb County is an ITP county. I live in ITP unincorporated Atlanta, in Cobb.

The Atlanta Braves play in Cobb. Cumberland is a major high rise business district area. MARTA not operating in Cobb is a joke, no matter what changes occur.
Then you need to demand that your County Commissioners and State Legislators allow a vote to join the system.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-21-2017, 04:19 AM
 
Location: Decatur, GA
7,359 posts, read 6,529,813 times
Reputation: 5182
Quote:
Originally Posted by primaltech View Post
I just disagree with much OTP heavy rail. It's expensive and uncomfortable ride, and the construction is a huge long mess.

Clayton/Cobb/Gwinnett/S Fulton/ NE DeKalb need THIS:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=poTjpTdUFKM

Where it's, like, commuter rail meets light rail. FRA-compliant light rail, basically. (And in our metro, they'd be sharing tracks with active freight corridor, so there might need to be 3+ tracks.)

The key aspects being the 15-minute frequency, and the rapid stops with the level boarding. Again sort of combining aspects of LRT with CRT.

If Cumberland Blvd @ Cumberland Pkwy had one of these bad boys, that ran between Acworth and Atlanta, then HRT between Cumberland and Arts Center would become unnecessary and redundant.

I'd rather have gold-standard, amazing commuter rail, than just pretty good commuter rail and a "HRT backbone" that would probably only reach out to Windy Hill.
No, it's not, it's simply plain old commuter rail. There's nothing "hybrid" or "light" about any of that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-21-2017, 06:09 AM
 
Location: Kirkwood
23,726 posts, read 24,872,089 times
Reputation: 5703
Quote:
Originally Posted by MattCW View Post
No, it's not, it's simply plain old commuter rail. There's nothing "hybrid" or "light" about any of that.
Yep, SEPTA has been running something similar for decades.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-21-2017, 07:22 AM
 
Location: Prescott, AZ
5,559 posts, read 4,695,326 times
Reputation: 2284
Quote:
Originally Posted by primaltech View Post
I just disagree with much OTP heavy rail. It's expensive and uncomfortable ride, and the construction is a huge long mess.
Commuter rail isn't the cure-all that you're playing it to be.

Cobb's I-75 / Cobb Parkway corridor needs something more than BRT. LRT is too slow for the distance. Commuter rail isn't any better cost wise outside open land or shared right of way.

Heavy rail makes sense for the corridor, or as much of it as possible. Put TODs on top of new stations to help off-set long-term costs.

Commuter rail is cosidered to cost ~$25 Mil. a mile. Denver built the A-Line for just about $47 Mil. a mile. At the first cost, we could lay heavy rail up to Marietta from Arts Center, and still have commuter rail going to Powder Springs, Noonday, and Acworth. At the second cost, we could still build Heavy Rail up past Cumberland with all three commuter rail lines.

That's without touching funds for buses, or BRT:

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Georgia > Atlanta

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:38 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top