Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Austin
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-18-2012, 05:41 PM
 
Location: Austin, TX
16,787 posts, read 49,063,260 times
Reputation: 9478

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by FueledByBlueBell View Post
So basically all areas around Dell.
Not at all, I think #10 was around Dell, but most of the rest were SW and West Austin.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-18-2012, 05:43 PM
 
Location: Austin, TX
16,787 posts, read 49,063,260 times
Reputation: 9478
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eastcoasting View Post
What is considered a high salary in Austin? The median household incomes are interesting but really not all that informative.

I realize that the numbers can be all over the place dependent on experience, sector, etc... but I wondered if we could nail down a few numbers here.

I'm thinking an individual making 200K is doing very well for themselves in Austin.

Thoughts
Yes! https://www.city-data.com/income/inco...tin-Texas.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-18-2012, 05:45 PM
 
Location: Austin, TX
16,787 posts, read 49,063,260 times
Reputation: 9478
Quote:
Originally Posted by scm53 View Post
The issue is, the rankings were based on household income. Yet it was labeled "wealthiest". The two are only tangentially linked. Like when some unnamed politician talks about "the wealthiest Americans" as being anyone making over a certain income. Wealth is assets. Income is income. Not the same.
It is talking about neighborhoods / zip codes, not individuals.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-18-2012, 09:17 PM
 
Location: The People's Republic of Austin
5,184 posts, read 7,277,620 times
Reputation: 2575
Quote:
Originally Posted by CptnRn View Post
It is talking about neighborhoods / zip codes, not individuals.
No. The rankings were based on median household incomes for a given zip code. The mistake is labeling "income" as "wealth", whether it is individuals, households, zip codes, cities, counties, states - you name it. Not the same.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-19-2012, 07:34 AM
 
Location: Austin, TX
302 posts, read 690,536 times
Reputation: 169
Not really that shocking on the SW thing. Houses in the area are pretty expensive, so you either need decent income or previously accumulated wealth to be able to move down here. Plus you can sort of tell by how some families live around here that they're at a minimum making a good amount of cash. Either that, or their credit card companies absolutely love them!!!

And yes, income <> wealth. But remember, most families in SW are very young. Takes time to accumulate wealth and savings. Specially when you're raising children!

I'd just be curious as to whether folk will stick around once they're able to accrue wealth, or whether they'll move to other areas.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-19-2012, 10:53 AM
 
Location: SW Austin & Wimberley
6,333 posts, read 18,055,006 times
Reputation: 5532
Quote:
Originally Posted by JERiv View Post
...

I'd just be curious as to whether folk will stick around once they're able to accrue wealth, or whether they'll move to other areas.
Actually, I think the opposite actually happens. Many empty-nesters leave Eanes, for example, and move to 78749, 78739, 78737. When I lived in Granada Oaks, I knew 3 neighbors who did just that, because for $600K they could live in a nicer custom new home that was better than the older $1M+ home they were departing, And the prop tax rate was $1.8% of $600K ($10K/yr) instead of 2.3% of $1.5M ($34K/yr).

On the other end, you have high income people just entering the school age years, who maybe live Central in a 1500-2000 sqft $500K home in Travis Heights or Zilker. They are outgrowing the home and even if they like the lifestyle and schools, a 2800 sqft home in Circle C for $350K, surrounded by other moms and kids, plus all the amenities and conveniences, starts to seem like a good 10-15 year plan.

My wife and I have done the "move further out for the kids", leaving Travis Heights in 1996 for the SW burbs, though it was strictly for more house because we did private schoools through 8th grade with both kids. Now that we're in Eanes (for the high school years), we regularly discuss whether we'll remain in 3 years after our youngest graduates highschool. We love SW Austin and could live in a nicer home that costs half of our current home.

So, in short, I think you have a lot of people in SW Austin living well below their means, alongside people living at their means. Makes for a good blend and great neighborhoods.

Steve
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-19-2012, 11:19 AM
 
1,157 posts, read 2,652,029 times
Reputation: 483
I am surprised 78731 isn't on the list. Seems like a pretty expensive zip code. Maybe everyone bought low and hasn't moved, or are living off of invest interest? Could the apartments be bringing the average for income level down?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-19-2012, 11:43 AM
 
Location: SW Austin & Wimberley
6,333 posts, read 18,055,006 times
Reputation: 5532
Quote:
Originally Posted by FueledByBlueBell View Post
I am surprised 78731 isn't on the list. ...

High concentration of cheap 1960s-1980s condos and apartments, largely occupied by students because the UT Shuttle services the Far West area, and that drags down the household income averages.

Steve
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-19-2012, 12:12 PM
 
10,130 posts, read 19,878,202 times
Reputation: 5815
Quote:
Originally Posted by austin-steve View Post
High concentration of cheap 1960s-1980s condos and apartments, largely occupied by students because the UT Shuttle services the Far West area, and that drags down the household income averages.

Steve
Also a good amount of retired people, in those condos and some assisted living facilities..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-19-2012, 09:28 PM
 
1,430 posts, read 2,375,758 times
Reputation: 832
Pretty tough to take the methodology seriously when it doesn't include Pemberton, Tarrytown, Barton Hills, and NW Hills.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Austin
Similar Threads
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top