Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Austin
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-20-2021, 10:56 AM
 
Location: Austin, TX via San Antonio, TX
9,853 posts, read 13,714,030 times
Reputation: 5702

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Need4Camaro View Post
I’m definitely certain Cedar Park and Leander were considered rural and exurban at best within the recent years but the trend of growth on those suburbs hasn’t met a blip, it only keeps growing. I’m basing my opinion on current trajectory not its history.

Never said you were wrong. A lot of the issue is the land. The land out east isn't the same as northwest of the city. I mean, how many people in the Travisso thread have said they want "views"? They don't want the open land of Del Valle or Bastrop. They want "views." But, even those areas are experiencing a price bump. There are two houses in Lockhart that meet the parents' criteria and one is 396k and the other is 324k. Last year at this time (or maybe right pre-COVID) the homes in Kyle/Buda were going at the same price.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-20-2021, 01:01 PM
 
11,844 posts, read 8,045,546 times
Reputation: 10000
Well, Travisso particularly is far west Leander. Most of Leander while not as flat as eastern Austin metro isn’t exactly hilly. It’s just more attuned to the northern job market and off the toll road and cap metro rail.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-20-2021, 01:03 PM
 
Location: Austin, TX via San Antonio, TX
9,853 posts, read 13,714,030 times
Reputation: 5702
Quote:
Originally Posted by Need4Camaro View Post
Well, Travisso particularly is far west Leander. Most of Leander while not as flat as eastern Austin metro isn’t exactly hilly. It’s just more attuned to the northern job market and off the toll road and cap metro rail.
There were people bidding on the lots with “views” like it was the Rockies. And it being “far west” just speaks to the sprawl. Before we know it there will be people living in Boerne who work in Austin. And while a great weekend Riad trip I wouldn’t want to drive 46 to New Braunfels and then another hour to Austin. (Or even 290 then to west Austin for the ‘scenic’ route).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-20-2021, 01:05 PM
 
11,844 posts, read 8,045,546 times
Reputation: 10000
Quote:
Originally Posted by ashbeeigh View Post
There were people bidding on the lots with “views” like it was the Rockies.
Probably because it’s too difficult to get into other neighborhoods like Lakeway, Steiner Ranch, ect.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-20-2021, 01:17 PM
 
539 posts, read 442,333 times
Reputation: 734
Just wait until those "views" are filled with new houses.

5 years from now, everyone in western Leander will have views of each other, and the commute to Downtown will be back to 1.5 hours like it was pre-Covid. That's when the fun begins.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-20-2021, 01:19 PM
 
11,844 posts, read 8,045,546 times
Reputation: 10000
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScoPro View Post
A 40’ lot? Might as well live in a shoebox apartment.
As much space as we have in Texas, those kinds of sardine developments are a ridiculous joke, IMO, unless townhome living is the desired goal.

I thought the 60’ lot for our current 2,000 sq/ft house was a huge downsize from our previous home.
I particularly have always wondered why Texas in general despite how much land it has is ridiculously expensive to have lots with acres. The lots, while not Chicago or NY, are on the smaller side for homes compared to what what we had in Georgia. Another question is, why aren’t basements popular here?

Quote:
Originally Posted by cheeva View Post
Just wait until those "views" are filled with new houses.

5 years from now, everyone in western Leander will have views of each other, and the commute to Downtown will be back to 1.5 hours like it was pre-Covid. That's when the fun begins.
It’s happening pretty fast. When I bought last year, I had a view directly across U.S. 183 to the Toll Road. Since that time, two sets of apartments have been thrown up obstructing that view and three new subdivisions have broken ground... Now where Leander is going to trip is that the city hasn’t upgraded its water infrastructure and doesn’t seem to have plans to do so despite criticism to the mayor... it’s why all the major shopping and restaurants are all in Cedar Park. I’m going to enjoy seeing Leander fill up that pond they have planned for it’s new mixed use downtown while it’s residents can’t even water their grass.

Last edited by Need4Camaro; 03-20-2021 at 01:29 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-20-2021, 05:26 PM
 
7,742 posts, read 15,139,852 times
Reputation: 4295
Quote:
Originally Posted by ashbeeigh View Post
Never said you were wrong. A lot of the issue is the land. The land out east isn't the same as northwest of the city. I mean, how many people in the Travisso thread have said they want "views"? They don't want the open land of Del Valle or Bastrop. They want "views." But, even those areas are experiencing a price bump. There are two houses in Lockhart that meet the parents' criteria and one is 396k and the other is 324k. Last year at this time (or maybe right pre-COVID) the homes in Kyle/Buda were going at the same price.
the city 100% is going to expand east. There is only so far north you can go before commutes become untenable. 130 into downtown is about the same distance as great hills is from downtown.

People coming from other areas are often used to no views so it isnt a big deal. The city is doing a poor job of encouraging development to 130 and even past 130.

The southern edge of cedar park is about 13 miles from downtown, which is about the same as manor/webberville. The thing is the city could make really good east west transit corridors while the land is empty and we can easily fit the 100K homes austin needs in the next 10 years between 130 and 183.

The land can be zoned high density mixed use before people move out there so no one complains about it later.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-20-2021, 05:39 PM
 
Location: Austin, TX via San Antonio, TX
9,853 posts, read 13,714,030 times
Reputation: 5702
Quote:
Originally Posted by Austin97 View Post
the city 100% is going to expand east. There is only so far north you can go before commutes become untenable. 130 into downtown is about the same distance as great hills is from downtown.

People coming from other areas are often used to no views so it isnt a big deal. The city is doing a poor job of encouraging development to 130 and even past 130.

The southern edge of cedar park is about 13 miles from downtown, which is about the same as manor/webberville. The thing is the city could make really good east west transit corridors while the land is empty and we can easily fit the 100K homes austin needs in the next 10 years between 130 and 183.

The land can be zoned high density mixed use before people move out there so no one complains about it later.
The city will try to make these areas desirable, but until grocery, entertainment and education are desirable no one will move there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-20-2021, 05:40 PM
 
Location: Austin, TX via San Antonio, TX
9,853 posts, read 13,714,030 times
Reputation: 5702
Quote:
Originally Posted by Need4Camaro View Post
Probably because it’s too difficult to get into other neighborhoods like Lakeway, Steiner Ranch, ect.
It’s difficult getting in anywhere right now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-21-2021, 12:43 PM
 
11,844 posts, read 8,045,546 times
Reputation: 10000
It would be good to see cities out east and southeast along 130 absorb more growth. It would help stabilize prices. They would need more amenities like better schools, shopping and transportation but could help to ease the westward and northward sprawl.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2022 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Austin

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top