Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-18-2012, 02:35 AM
 
106,691 posts, read 108,856,202 times
Reputation: 80169

Advertisements

i have one in the jeep
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-18-2012, 04:20 AM
 
Location: Grosse Ile Michigan
30,708 posts, read 79,820,680 times
Reputation: 39453
Pontiac Vibe had them since at least 2003. All the Dodge/Jeeps I looked at last week had them.

I have always had inversters in my car (after market). What you can run on them depends on the size of the inverter. Right now we have 2000 and 2500 watt inverster in our cars. You can run a lot on a 2500 watt inverter. Yes, you can even run a hair dryer (Panasonic makes a 400 wattt hair dryer.) I used one once when my heater was not working.

We mostly run computer chargers and telephone chargers on them and we have had five computers running and four cell phone chargers at once. Oh an my electric razor was charging too. (an a light, but we did not use the light much).

One reason I think they may not have put them in cars in the past is that they burn out frequently and rarely last more than a year regardless of light or heavy loads. Newer ones seem to last longer.

If there is any difference in mileage using an inverter, it is 1/10 of 1 mile per gallon or less. They make no difference.

I think the reason they did not have them before is that they take up space, they are expensive, they would break often and soon. Once they got smaller and longer lasting, they became more practical.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2012, 04:25 AM
 
24,488 posts, read 41,146,617 times
Reputation: 12920
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldjensens View Post
We mostly run computer chargers and telephone chargers on them and we have had five computers running and four cell phone chargers at once.
Running computer chargers and phone chargers through an inverter? This has got to be the worst way to do that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2012, 04:31 AM
 
Location: Grosse Ile Michigan
30,708 posts, read 79,820,680 times
Reputation: 39453
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJBest View Post
Running computer chargers and phone chargers through an inverter? This has got to be the worst way to do that.
Why is that? Done it for seven years. I also run a printer/scanner at times.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2012, 04:55 AM
 
24,488 posts, read 41,146,617 times
Reputation: 12920
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldjensens View Post
Why is that? Done it for seven years. I also run a printer/scanner at times.
Converting DC power to AC power back to DC power is VERY inefficient. For devices that run on DC, skip the inverter. Especially for devices that have DC plugs readily available... like computers and phones.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2012, 05:51 AM
 
3,244 posts, read 7,449,469 times
Reputation: 1604
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJBest View Post
Converting DC power to AC power back to DC power is VERY inefficient. For devices that run on DC, skip the inverter. Especially for devices that have DC plugs readily available... like computers and phones.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

My Lexus has an 110V outlet, with a power switch so it turns off the inverter when you are not using it.

Not to get too far off topic:

I would even say anything close to 'very inefficient', unless you consider 95-98% poor.

For an experimental inverter (obviously not for use in a car): http://www.netl.doe.gov/publications...ca/pdf/Lai.pdf

For a more realist, off-the-shelf inverter, the efficiency can be up to about 95%, as long as the load is close to the rated capacity of the inverter. (Since an inverter draws power even with no load) The only other losses are the wall-wart that is used step the voltage back down.

While I agree that two voltage conversions is not nearly as good or simple as something that can directly run on 12 volts, it really isn't that inefficient.
For devices that run on DC at say 24V at low current (I have a few amplifiers that do), the simplest way is to just build a simple chopper and use a capacitor-based voltage doubler.

On an old chevy I had, I tapped into the stator side of the alternator, before the diodes, and then all it took was a single simple 10:1 xformer.

YMMV
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2012, 05:59 AM
 
24,488 posts, read 41,146,617 times
Reputation: 12920
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperSparkle928 View Post
----------------------------------------------------------------------

My Lexus has an 110V outlet, with a power switch so it turns off the inverter when you are not using it.

Not to get too far off topic:

I would even say anything close to 'very inefficient', unless you consider 95-98% poor.

For an experimental inverter (obviously not for use in a car): http://www.netl.doe.gov/publications...ca/pdf/Lai.pdf

For a more realist, off-the-shelf inverter, the efficiency can be up to about 95%, as long as the load is close to the rated capacity of the inverter. (Since an inverter draws power even with no load) The only other losses are the wall-wart that is used step the voltage back down.

While I agree that two voltage conversions is not nearly as good or simple as something that can directly run on 12 volts, it really isn't that inefficient.
For devices that run on DC at say 24V at low current (I have a few amplifiers that do), the simplest way is to just build a simple chopper and use a capacitor-based voltage doubler.

On an old chevy I had, I tapped into the stator side of the alternator, before the diodes, and then all it took was a single simple 10:1 xformer.

YMMV
I'm not worried about the inverter. The AC to DC adapter of laptops range from 65% to 88.4% (with the apple adapters being the highest rated thus far at 88.4%)

DC -> 10% Loss (after heat and cooling) -> AC -> ~20% Loss -> DC.

The idea of it is silly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2012, 08:22 AM
 
3,244 posts, read 7,449,469 times
Reputation: 1604
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJBest View Post
I'm not worried about the inverter. The AC to DC adapter of laptops range from 65% to 88.4% (with the apple adapters being the highest rated thus far at 88.4%)

DC -> 10% Loss (after heat and cooling) -> AC -> ~20% Loss -> DC.

The idea of it is silly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You are correct. This is totally silly. If I get 90% efficiency from the DC-AC conversion, and my AC-DC conversion is level IV, 85% (which it is)
http://www.energystar.gov/ia/partner..._challenge.pdf
(it is over 50W)
Then the amount of power wasted is totally silly, No one cares. It is irrelevant. In the noise compared to most things. Look up the efficiency of your internal-combustion engine.

It IS convenient, however, (to be able run a lot of other household stuff in the car) and I will take that convenience for the solid $0.08 it costs me. Geez.

Last edited by SuperSparkle928; 03-18-2012 at 08:33 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2012, 08:25 AM
 
28,803 posts, read 47,705,555 times
Reputation: 37905
Quote:
Originally Posted by vmaxnc View Post
besides the reasons mentioned, ac kills. Dc does not. I'd be willing to bet that this is a part of why ac outlets aren't more common.

I doubt usb will replace the dc accessory port as a standard, because that would preclude the use of every ac powered device. As a minor example, i've used an inverter to show a prospective buyer that their craigslist purchase works fine, when meeting away from home. I use a laptop for work when on the road, and that won't work from a usb port. Usb can't pass enough current to operate air compressors and other tools/chargers.
Quote:
Originally Posted by wilson513 View Post
because they would cost $9 and they are not creative enough to see that it would be $9 well spent.

also, morons would plug chain saws and hair dryers into them and burn them up.
lmao!!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2012, 08:32 AM
 
8,402 posts, read 24,231,738 times
Reputation: 6822
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJBest View Post
To be fair, more than 17 volts DC does happen in many cars... just not at the cigarette lighter.
Are we going to count lightning strikes too? Might as well factor them in, along with any other higher voltage possibility that may occur. Or we could use some common sense and stick to battery and cigarette lighter voltage, which is really the only thing relevant to this thread.

If someone wants to plug their laptop into the output of the HEI, well, that's their stupidity. If someone wants to work on their electric car batteries and thinks they are safe because I posted that DC doesn't kill, too bad for them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top