Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-24-2014, 01:07 PM
 
Location: Dunnellon, FL
486 posts, read 653,972 times
Reputation: 1730

Advertisements

I live in Florida. As above, it's a guarantee that at the front of every traffic jam, there's somebody in a minivan holding up the flow. They're in their own little world. They're on the phone. They're texting. They're weaving all over the road. They're screaming at the kids.

I hate minivans. They're the scourge of the earth and should be outlawed.

And my SUV (Chevy Equinox) gets 26 mpg in town and better than 32 on the open road. Plus I can carry four bales of hay in it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-24-2014, 01:17 PM
 
Location: Texas
44,254 posts, read 64,351,440 times
Reputation: 73932
Quote:
Originally Posted by StPaulGal View Post
I have a Chevy Spark. It could not be any more ideal for me: it fits my budget and my commuting needs and my aesthetic tastes and my city parking requirements, plus of course I appreciate the high MPG. Even if cars ran on sunshine and rainbows, the Spark would still have been my choice. As stated above, I know it is not a fit for everyone but it is absolutely a fit for me.

My partner just recently purchased a Ford Fusion hybrid. It is physically larger than he wanted, but other than that it is everything he was going for. He drives a lot for work so he needs something comfortable enough to spend a lot of time in, and most of that mileage is reimbursed so the fuel efficiency is directly putting money in his pocket. He likes to have all the bells and whistles, and he loves that he was able to get it loaded with luxury features like heated/cooled seats, heated steering wheel, remote start, adaptive cruise control, auto high-beams, lane keep assist, etc. etc. etc. As a late 20-something dude, he also appreciates that it has some oomph, unlike some sluggish options we test drove. *coughPriuscough* Of course it is a sedan and not a sports car, but a sports car wouldn't fit his needs anyway.

In conclusion: I have no idea whether our cars would excite you or not. But they certainly excite us.
As a true car lover, I find something to enjoy or admire in just about any car.
But no...those would not be what I'd consider fun/exciting cars, but that is certainly my opinion only. And they have their own merits.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2014, 10:14 PM
 
Location: Holly Neighborhood, Austin, Texas
3,981 posts, read 6,735,213 times
Reputation: 2882
Quote:
Originally Posted by Merc63 View Post
Except SUVs were around before minivans. Crossovers have replaced minivans for the most part, even though the minivan has more utility.

His hatred of SUVs however, is in fact full of falshoods and misinformation, so it's relevant to call him out on it. I've never had an SUF flip over and I've gone around corners over the suggested speed limit with no problems. It takes a tripping event to flip one, just like for a car, and that's why less than .0001% of SUVs flip over annually (and in fact, according to NHTSA data, twice as many cars flip over annually than SUVs/pickups/vans).
SUVs were around before minivans, but they were niche products, e.g. the coach in 'Dazed and Confused.' It was not until the four door Ford Explorer debuted in 1991, seven years after the Chrysler minivan came out, that they became a viable family vehicle.

Also from NHTSA:

"The proportion differs greatly by vehicle type: 46 percent of passenger car occupant fatalities in single-vehicle crashes involved rollover, compared to 63 percent for pickup trucks, 60 percent for vans, and 78 percent for sport utility vehicles (SUVs)."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2014, 07:11 AM
 
Location: Pikesville, MD
5,228 posts, read 15,288,738 times
Reputation: 4846
Quote:
Originally Posted by verybadgnome View Post
SUVs were around before minivans, but they were niche products, e.g. the coach in 'Dazed and Confused.' It was not until the four door Ford Explorer debuted in 1991, seven years after the Chrysler minivan came out, that they became a viable family vehicle.

Also from NHTSA:

"The proportion differs greatly by vehicle type: 46 percent of passenger car occupant fatalities in single-vehicle crashes involved rollover, compared to 63 percent for pickup trucks, 60 percent for vans, and 78 percent for sport utility vehicles (SUVs)."
Percentages are used for scare tactics. You'll note that your stats are misleading in that you are trying to paint the picture than 78% of SUVs flip over and that's factually incorrect. What they are talking about is fatalities. The total number of rollovers for fatalities is still in the hundreds per year. What your stats are REALLY saying is that IF you are in a rollover, you are more likely to die in an SUV than in a car, not that more SUVs roll over. But you are very unlikely to get into a rollover in the first place. Total number of rollovers tend to be in the 2000-4000 range annually.

Compare that to how many SUVs are out there and you'll see that very few SUVs actually flip over. Not enough to worry about unless you're a crap driver or drunk, which is still a factor in over half the fatalities on the road. Fact is, twice as many CARS flip over annually as SUVs in sheer numbers! While the RATE (number of rollovers per hundred vehciles of that type on the road) is slightly higher for SUVs than cars, the totals are still in the .0001-.0002% range for either (i.e. only .0001% of cars and .0002% of SUVs flip over). It's pretty easy to be in the 99.9998% of SUVs that DON"T flip over, even driving fast in the corners.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2014, 07:15 AM
 
Location: new yawk zoo
8,689 posts, read 11,076,893 times
Reputation: 6363
Quote:
Originally Posted by FloridaHappy View Post
I live in Florida. As above, it's a guarantee that at the front of every traffic jam, there's somebody in a minivan holding up the flow. They're in their own little world. They're on the phone. They're texting. They're weaving all over the road. They're screaming at the kids.

I hate minivans. They're the scourge of the earth and should be outlawed.

And my SUV (Chevy Equinox) gets 26 mpg in town and better than 32 on the open road. Plus I can carry four bales of hay in it.
Or it could be a florida thing. In NY, it always the SUV driver or someone in a Benz that is on the phone or texting.

I do agree minivan drivers tend to be slow...which is why insurance rates are dirt cheap. When I went from a minivan to a SUV, my rates went up 30%. no joke.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2014, 08:36 AM
 
Location: Treasure/Space coast.
459 posts, read 619,714 times
Reputation: 460
My wife beats the arse off our 2013 Sienna lol, probably whilst using the phone and yelling at the kids.
The Sienna is a very quick van, don't take one on without knowing what you are up against lol

The OEM tires are going to be knackered by 20K, just as well because they are dangerous in the snow.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2014, 09:52 AM
 
2,600 posts, read 8,790,192 times
Reputation: 2483
Its not the mini van but rather the people that drive then.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2014, 10:00 AM
 
Location: NoVa
18,431 posts, read 34,354,404 times
Reputation: 19814
I don't think it is that. I think it is the fact that they are right for certain people at certain times. As a teenager, I had no need for one. I had a sporty little Toyota Celica GTS.

In my twenties, I had two young children and I had a minivan and that thing was the best! As they grew older, I didn't need as much space.

Then as they grew even older, I needed more space again! Leg room, trunk room, etc. So now, at forty years old and with a teenager and a twenty year old who is six feet five inches tall,I need plenty of leg room and their luggage is bigger!

Now I have a Grand Cherokee Laredo and it is perfect.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2014, 10:02 AM
 
Location: Out in the Badlands
10,420 posts, read 10,826,300 times
Reputation: 7801
It marks you as a person of common sense and practicality...which I think went out in the late 50s.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2014, 10:03 AM
 
1,174 posts, read 2,513,609 times
Reputation: 1414
Quote:
Originally Posted by CoastalMaineiac View Post
Seriously, I don't get it! When I was 17, my first car, which was a hand-me-down from my folks, was a 1993 Dodge Caravan. That thing was awesome, as far as I remember. It was a tank, held seven people, and I could take the rear seats out and fit a 4'×8' sheet of plywood inside it with no overhang. It got way better gas mileage than an SUV (somewhere around 25 to 26 mpg, whereas most SUVs of that era were lucky to get 18 on the highway) and had more cargo room.

The other thing about them: they're about the most inexpensive vehicle to buy used. It's why I suggested a coworker look into one. He had no vehicle at all, and said above all else, he needed it to be cheap. He said he'd rather walk than drive one. This seems to be a common attitude, and I don't get it.

Maybe I'm idealizing the one I had due to nostalgia, but I know I had a ton of fun with it as a 17 year old. Especially once I got past the "no other teenagers in the car with you" restriction, which at the time was only like 3 or 6 months.

I realize that some people don't like the handling of big vehicles, but it seems a lot better than walking!
I used to hate minivans with a passion derived purely from dogma associated with the condition of being a human male under the age of 25.

I now drive an appropriately masculine 4x4, but I don't like driving it as much as I like my wife's T&C. If I'm being honest and objective, minivans are actually pretty awesome.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top