Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-25-2016, 05:23 AM
 
Location: Baltimore
1,022 posts, read 2,550,200 times
Reputation: 1176

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by goillini8 View Post
Totaled my '03 Honda Accord (190k), which was a great car that gave me little trouble. I had purchased the Accord in March of 2003 after leasing a Civic for three years. Haven't sniffed a car lot since.

I really have to do something in the next two weeks before all the deals expire.

Thinking midsize sedan or small SUV/Crossover. Another Accord is the obvious starting point. Mazda 6 and Mazda CX-5 will get a look. Am thinking about checking out Ford Fusion and Hyundai Sonata and Tuscon. But, the last time I bought a car, Ford was not in a good position and known for a lot of crap (at least for cars, if not trucks), and Hyundai was at best just starting its emergence as something other than bargain basement transportation. So, I have a little bias against those brands, even though I know they've come a long way. I know plenty of people who own Hyundais and love them. I've seen plenty of positive reviews. I don't know a ton of Ford owners, but do know one guy with a Fusion, who really likes it (though it is fairly new).

I don't want to reduce my options by being "bigoted" towards certain brands.

Really just venting as I nervously prepare to buy a car in the coming weeks.
I have a 2005 Accord with 185K, no major issues at all. If I need to buy another car, my choices are between the new Accord, a Mazda 3, or a Mazda 6. As much as I like how Mazdas look and drive, however, I'm a bit leery about jumping to an unfamiliar brand, especially considering the exceptional reliability I've gotten out of the Accord. I'm not entirely sold on Hyundai/Kia and was never a fan of American cars. It would likely come down to another Honda, a Toyota, Mazda, or even a Subaru. If I was in a better financial position, I'd lease an Audi.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-25-2016, 05:34 AM
 
Location: New Albany, Indiana (Greater Louisville)
11,974 posts, read 25,464,896 times
Reputation: 12187
My experience is the Detroit brands make some good cars but it's not consistently good. GM made the very reliable 1980s Chevy Cavaliers but then also made the Quad 4 nightmare. Ford Ranger from the early 1990s is as reliable as a Toyota but new Fords with the CVT can barely make it 30k miles before having major problems. The best Japanese brands (Toyota, Honda, Subaru) don't have that issue. IMO the ultimate measure of reliable is how many old cars from each brand you see on the road today. I routinely see 25 year old Toyotas and Hondas but I rarely see a Detroit brand car that goes beyond year 2000. How can any survey put out the same time as a new car know anything about reliability?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-25-2016, 05:39 AM
 
Location: detroit mi
676 posts, read 725,439 times
Reputation: 1620
I always buy american cars. I work.in the industry so it keeps food on my table. I try to stay away from anything that has a 4 cylender in it, they seem like they start having big problems after 100,000 miles. I try to stay away from chrysler / dodge as their transmissions seem finicky. although the chalenger is looking pretty nice but they have changed hands half a dozen times so ill pass. Personally I would go with a nice camaro or suburban. Cadillac is putting out some nice looking cars too these days.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-25-2016, 06:34 AM
 
Location: Over yonder a piece
4,270 posts, read 6,294,457 times
Reputation: 7144
I bought a Hyundai Elantra in 1995 and had nothing but trouble with it. It was an awful, awful car. Two years later I told it and moved to a city where I didn't need a car. I was grateful to be rid of that albatross.

Cut to: 2005. I'm in need of a car now that I've moved back to the suburbs, but I do not have a lot of money to spend. My husband and I researched and found that Hyundai was the only brand that fit into our budget (we wanted to get a new car, not used). I pitched a fit, saying I would NEVER own a Hyundai again. My husband reminded me it was the only brand we could afford at the time.

Begrudgingly, we went to Hyundai, where I test drove their 2005 Hyundai Elantra. I was miserable. Resentful, bitter - I'm sure the sales guy just wanted me GONE rather than get a sale. I flat out told him I didn't want the car and didn't care how low a price he offered me.

But then he offered me a rock bottom price. WELL BELOW what we had been prepared to pay. And the car had some options included that were not on the base model we were prepared to purchase. After a brief discussion, I agreed to go ahead and get the car, figuring I'd keep it for a couple years TOPS and then get rid of it.

Here I am, 11+ years later, still driving that same Hyundai Elantra I didn't want to buy in 2005. It has been a GREAT car to me - so much so that I'm most likely going to get a Hyundai as my next car as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-25-2016, 06:55 AM
 
Location: Grosse Ile Michigan
30,708 posts, read 79,772,406 times
Reputation: 39453
First there is little difference in reliability between brands or models. Once in a while, any brand makes some bad choices for one or more models.

Most brands buy the same parts or simlar parts from the same supplier, so there is no real difference in those parts. Look at the airbag recall. Not one brand, or two, not really specific to any models. Everyone was buying the same thing from the same place.

Transmissions are much the same. Some companies make some of their transmissions in house, but most buy from a small number of outside transmission manufacturers (Mostly ZF) for many of their models.

All companies squeeze the supplier so all suppliers cut corners. This is a factor of our society wanting bling over quality.

Even within a model, unless there is some particularly bad component (like CVT) you can usually end up with a super reliable car or a POS depending on who was working that day and how they were feeling. Some people will point to the automated assembly plants and say workers have little impact on quality anymore - however there is a lot more to a vehicle than final assembly. All cars contain critical parts made in a small Chinese factory somewhere, primarily using human labor.

So the bottom line is any car maker makes some great cars and some junky ones. You really have no way to ensure you get one that is somewhat more reliable than another. Aside form certain models with parts that have 100% failure problems, the difference from one brand to another or one model to another is miniscule. Do you really care whether your model has reported an 18% problem rate or a 22% problem? How, where you drive and how you maintain your car will have a massively larger impact on reliability than ratings from studies or polls.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-25-2016, 07:03 AM
 
Location: Bay Area, CA
97 posts, read 101,895 times
Reputation: 216
In order of most to least reliable new vehicles I've owned - Mazda 3, Hummer H3, Chevy Camaro, Ford Explorer x 2, and BMW 328i. The first 2 on the list are a factor above the rest. I was also thinking the other day that Acura has done a poor job of branding themselves as a luxury car. Being based on a Honda platform should mean high reliability but it's rarely mentioned in the same sentence as Lexus. My next vehicle will be a Lexus. My first little one is on the way and I don't want to risk my wife being stranded on the side of the road (it's happened multiple times with our BMW).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-25-2016, 07:18 AM
 
Location: SW OK (AZ Native)
24,279 posts, read 13,134,357 times
Reputation: 10568
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbohm View Post
WRONG WRONG WRONG!!! the mazda pick up was a rebadged ranger. it used mazda engines as well as ford engines. the ford courier was rebadged mazda.
rbohm is totally correct. The Mazda B series was built in the US (Louisville, St. Paul and Edison, New Jersey) with pushrod engines (exception: the 2.3/2.5 I4 and the later 4.0 V6) and was just a fancy Ranger. It was the reverse setup of the Courier.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-25-2016, 07:22 AM
 
3,754 posts, read 4,235,035 times
Reputation: 7773
I have a couple biases, rooted in the experiences of others and not my own, and some of my own making. For example, I highly doubt I will ever own an Audi.

I've had several friends over the years own them, and none of them have had a good experience. I don't even like the styling either, though that is subjective. Reliability issues have been a major complaint from every single one of my friends, so I've sworn off the brand even though I've never owned one.

I'll never buy another Acura either. On the surface, they look nice, refined, etc. However, that's just "lipstick on a pig" as they say, because the quality of materials underlying everything is cheap. I had a poor experience with an MDX, and my mother's RL looks absolutely terrible after 10 years but only 50k miles. Here's an example that sums up what Acura is... the interior door handle. It's wrapped in leather, with uniform stitching, feels nice to the hand. But, underneath, it's just leather wrapped over a cheap plastic handle, and that weak plastic handle is expected to open/close a 75 lb door? Try that in the TX heat sometime, and you'll snap the damn thing right off. Cost to replace $240. That's how all their cars are built, looks good for appearances sake, but underneath, you aren't getting luxury, you're getting bargain basement Honda.

Those are the only brands that I can say I will absolutely never own. There are others that are pretty unlikely, but could sway me if they came out with something exceptional.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-25-2016, 07:25 AM
 
Location: East of Seattle since 1992, 615' Elevation, Zone 8b - originally from SF Bay Area
44,551 posts, read 81,103,317 times
Reputation: 57750
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbohm View Post
WRONG WRONG WRONG!!! the mazda pick up was a rebadged ranger. it used mazda engines as well as ford engines. the ford courier was rebadged mazda.
I had a 1973 Courier and yes, it even said Mazda on the engine.
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlaskaErik View Post
^^^ This is the reality. Same with the Mazda Tribute...just a rebadged Ford Escape.
The Mazda Navaho was a rebadged Ford Explorer, too. Ford and Mazda ended their relationship in 2010, since then there have been no common platforms.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-25-2016, 07:34 AM
 
Location: East of Seattle since 1992, 615' Elevation, Zone 8b - originally from SF Bay Area
44,551 posts, read 81,103,317 times
Reputation: 57750
Quote:
Originally Posted by mo8414 View Post
I always buy american cars. I work.in the industry so it keeps food on my table. I try to stay away from anything that has a 4 cylender in it, they seem like they start having big problems after 100,000 miles. I try to stay away from chrysler / dodge as their transmissions seem finicky. although the chalenger is looking pretty nice but they have changed hands half a dozen times so ill pass. Personally I would go with a nice camaro or suburban. Cadillac is putting out some nice looking cars too these days.
I did the research before buying my Challenger, and went with a 2013, which has a Mercedes 5G-Tronic transmission.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top