Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Aviation
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: For passenger satisfaction, which is better?
Airbus 23 23.71%
Boeing 53 54.64%
Doesn't matter 21 21.65%
Voters: 97. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-25-2013, 05:33 PM
 
Location: Mokelumne Hill, CA & El Pescadero, BCS MX.
6,957 posts, read 22,304,764 times
Reputation: 6471

Advertisements

There is a cartoon out there somewhere. 2 panels left and right. Left is a Boeing cockpit, dials and controls everywhere. Right is an Airbus. two buttons. up and down.

The only route I fly is SFO to SJD and Virgin chooses to use the A-319/20. I like the Virgin interior, but I still like the 737 airframe better.

At least the Airbus floats well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-26-2013, 06:20 PM
 
Location: La Jolla, CA
7,284 posts, read 16,678,248 times
Reputation: 11675
It depends on the carrier, age of the aircraft (or when it was updated) and whether I'm sitting in first class... There are things I like about specific models or even configurations of the same model, I don't "prefer" one manufacturer over the other, as a whole.

I'm not too particular about the merits of different schools of thought when it comes to flight systems. I like knowing about aircraft systems, but I'm not doing the flying, so the finer points of which is better doesn't really matter to me as a passsenger. The way I look at it, everything's fallible in some way.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-28-2013, 12:19 PM
 
Location: North West Northern Ireland.
20,633 posts, read 23,870,349 times
Reputation: 3107
Obviously Boeing I hate Airbus planes particularly their shape. I don't know what it is, they look French or something.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-28-2013, 12:34 PM
 
Location: Lahaina, Hi.
6,384 posts, read 4,825,814 times
Reputation: 11326
LOL, the biggest difference I've noticed is that Boeing jets have stainless steel counters in the lavatories, and Airbus have a composite, similar to Corian. I think the composite is more attractive. Maybe it's now available on Boeing too? Aside from that, I prefer flying on Boeing aircraft simply out of loyalty to American workers. Go USA!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-28-2013, 07:45 PM
 
Location: Limbo
6,512 posts, read 7,545,788 times
Reputation: 6319
Quote:
Originally Posted by Futuremauian View Post
LOL, the biggest difference I've noticed is that Boeing jets have stainless steel counters in the lavatories, and Airbus have a composite, similar to Corian. I think the composite is more attractive. Maybe it's now available on Boeing too? Aside from that, I prefer flying on Boeing aircraft simply out of loyalty to American workers. Go USA!!!
Airbuses are more advanced. Little things about the aircraft make a difference when flying it or working as a ramp crew. With that said, I still prefer Boeing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-29-2013, 06:26 AM
 
Location: Melbourne Australia
688 posts, read 841,517 times
Reputation: 393
I prefer the looks and design of Boeings. It seems they have slightly better performance specs aswell.

However, give me an A330 with normal 2-4-2 seating over a 3-4-3 777. Having flown on the standard 3-3-3 777's, the aisles are already narrow enough and if you are in the middle seat, it is awkward to eat your meal without bumping the people next to you. I shudder at the thought of a 3-4-3 layout.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-29-2013, 09:04 AM
 
Location: East Bay, San Francisco Bay Area
23,518 posts, read 24,000,129 times
Reputation: 23946
I have flown in most all of the Boeing jets and Airbus jets, I would say the edge goes to Boeing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-29-2013, 10:17 AM
 
Location: The City
22,378 posts, read 38,895,654 times
Reputation: 7976
Really depends, 330s are decent, but like the 777s a little better

I do like the 319/20s better than the 37s - seems more roome for the passenger and a little quiter (feel to seal better to em)

Think a lot in general has to do with age.

Cant compare the 380 yet - havent flown yet

Sort of on topic

For larger RJs I really like the comfort of the Embraer 190s
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-29-2013, 06:23 PM
 
5,114 posts, read 6,087,504 times
Reputation: 7184
I have always found the nylon web 'paratrooper' seats in C-130s and C-141s (Never had a chance to use them in a C-17) perfectly adequate. Take off out of a warm humid airfield and have it snow inside the Fuselage as you gain altitude. Once you get up in altitude unbuckle grab your field jacket and a hunk of foam (or even a ziplock bag full of air) find an unoccupied spot on the baggage pallets down the middle and go to sleep.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-01-2013, 08:42 PM
 
Location: New York
1,999 posts, read 4,995,108 times
Reputation: 2035
McDonnell Douglas is superior to both Airbus and Boeing in almost every category.
  • Cabin Noise
    The DC-9 derivitive planes are quieter than the evivilient A320 or 737 with a much smoother ride for pax.
  • Window Size
    Windows in the MD series are larger than both Boeing or Airbus equipment. In fact Boeing finally incorporated the superior MD engineering in the 787 project.
  • Build Quality
    Many 1970's built DC-10s are still in service while almost no Boeing equipment from the era is in service. Hundreds of 1980 built MD-80's are still in service (even 1970's built DC-9s with Delta) while almost all 1980's built 737-300's are retired due to retrograde Boeing build quality. Delta is retiring all 1995 and earlier built A320s while 1980's built MD-88s endure for years to come.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Aviation
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top