Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Sports > Basketball
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-24-2013, 09:32 AM
 
Location: spring tx
7,912 posts, read 10,093,678 times
Reputation: 1990

Advertisements

The question in that mater orangish, was Lebrun that much better at 22? Durant at 22= much better scorer then Lebron at 22, and Durants defense at 22 isn't far behind lebrons at 22. Only think IMO Lebron at 22 was better at was passing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-24-2013, 09:39 AM
 
Location: Cook County
5,289 posts, read 7,490,863 times
Reputation: 3105
The question is to "Anchor" the franchise. And I am very comfortable saying that Durant will never be to the ceiling that LBJ has reached (and is still trending upwards) as an all around player. Besides, I don't think he is that much more of an offensive force than LeBron.

LBJ season when he turned 22: 27.3/7.2/6.7 with a FG % of 476
Durant at 22: 27.7/2.7/6.8 with a FG % of .462

(PPG/APG/RPG if it needs to be said)

Now Durant regulary flirts with 30 ppg in his splits per season, but so does LBJ. LeBron wasn't exactly a 'raw but not refined' offensive player at 22. He was an efficent and effective scorer.

The defense isn't even close. That puts LeBron so far ahead of Durant in this discussion it's not even CLOSE. I can at least understand Duncan because he is a different kind of player completely. Durant is a poor mans LBJ in this discussion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2013, 10:10 AM
 
78,417 posts, read 60,613,724 times
Reputation: 49725
Quote:
Originally Posted by Orangeish View Post
My issue with Durant, is the only thing he does better than LBJ is score. And it's not by that much. Lets call it ppg - I think LBJ makes up for those 5 ppg with his defense and passing ability.

So LBJ > Durant in every aspect except for overall offensive ability, and Durant only has a slim lead in that category.
That's why I left Durant out, we just don't know how much further he might develop....or if he will develop chronic injuries etc. We've seen guys lots of guys that had bright starts both plateau, get even better and in some cases regress.

Crap, if we had this thread a year or two ago we'd be having to hear about Bynum.

P.S. I think Orangish and Rigas are kinda arguing different points and that's again....exactly why I didn't even drag Durant or other promising yet far far far from established younger talents.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2013, 12:30 PM
 
Location: Earth
3,652 posts, read 4,708,073 times
Reputation: 1816
Quote:
Originally Posted by Orangeish View Post
So LBJ > Durant in every aspect except for overall offensive ability, and Durant only has a slim lead in that category.
I think we need to distinguish the difference between scorer and offensive player. In terms of pure scoring ability, I'd give the edge to Durant even though the scoring numbers career-wise are similar. In terms of overall offensive ability, which to me combines scoring ability with playmaking/passing, Lebron is unquestionably better.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2013, 12:33 PM
 
Location: Cook County
5,289 posts, read 7,490,863 times
Reputation: 3105
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg1977 View Post
I think we need to distinguish the difference between scorer and offensive player. In terms of pure scoring ability, I'd give the edge to Durant even though the scoring numbers career-wise are similar. In terms of overall offensive ability, which to me combines scoring ability with playmaking/passing, Lebron is unquestionably better.
Absolutely, I did a poor job in my wording there. I'd be ok giving Durant a slight edge in scoring ability, but I'd draw the line there. I think there is a complelling arguement though that LeBron is just as good at scoring.

But for the sake of the discussion I'd concede that point.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2013, 12:40 PM
 
Location: Earth
3,652 posts, read 4,708,073 times
Reputation: 1816
Quote:
Originally Posted by Orangeish View Post
Absolutely, I did a poor job in my wording there. I'd be ok giving Durant a slight edge in scoring ability, but I'd draw the line there. I think there is a complelling arguement though that LeBron is just as good at scoring.

But for the sake of the discussion I'd concede that point.
An argument can easily be made that they're on par. Lebron scores at a similar clip, he's not as good a shooter but he's obviously a superior slasher and finisher,; at the end of the day 2 points is 2 points so an argument can be made that Lebron is as good a scorer. And really, his physicality is something that Durant will never be able to match.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Sports > Basketball

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:55 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top