Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Entertainment and Arts > Books
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-05-2009, 03:02 PM
 
2,002 posts, read 4,583,354 times
Reputation: 1772

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattie Jo View Post
Do you think any books should be banned? If so, why? If not, why?
Maybe if I'm a parent I can decide some books aren't for my children yet, but banning certain books completely? I don't think so.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-05-2009, 03:12 PM
 
Location: Denver 'burbs
24,012 posts, read 28,448,855 times
Reputation: 41122
Are we talking of free speech vs hate speech in general or about books being banned? I read the link to the NYT article and was starting to respond then decided that my response was more in line with a discussion of free speech...If we are speaking about banning books I reiterate my feeling that books should not be banned; if we are discussing free speech then I think we belong in a different forum.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-05-2009, 03:21 PM
 
14,993 posts, read 23,881,675 times
Reputation: 26523
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattie Jo View Post
I like what these countries did:

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/11/wo....13645369.html

Canada, Britain, France, Germany, the Netherlands, South Africa, Australia and India all have laws or have signed international conventions banning hate speech. Israel and France forbid the sale of Nazi items like swastikas and flags. It is a crime to deny the Holocaust in Canada, Germany and France.
I don't like, these same laws are misused. Germany has a strict law against displaying the swastika. OK that's sounds good right? Wrong - any historical document with the swastika gets banned, and magazine displaying a swastika (anti-nazi, doesn't matter) gets banned, any computer simulation, any historical accurate program, and war reenactment, any movie... - gets banned. Hindu groups in Germany, who have used the swastika as a religious symbol for centuries, are now banned from displaying this.

No thanks. Deny the holocaust. Any nut wants to do that fine, but don't put them in prison for "thought-crime". I don't need a nanny-government (i.e.- the social democracies of Europe) telling me what's not healthy and "right" to read, or watch, or think. And the day it becomes that is the day I move away from this country, or the day I take arms up against it.

Last edited by Dd714; 10-05-2009 at 03:44 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-08-2009, 12:31 PM
 
1,598 posts, read 1,936,031 times
Reputation: 1101
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dd714 View Post
I don't like, these same laws are misused. Germany has a strict law against displaying the swastika. OK that's sounds good right? Wrong - any historical document with the swastika gets banned, and magazine displaying a swastika (anti-nazi, doesn't matter) gets banned, any computer simulation, any historical accurate program, and war reenactment, any movie... - gets banned. Hindu groups in Germany, who have used the swastika as a religious symbol for centuries, are now banned from displaying this.

No thanks. Deny the holocaust. Any nut wants to do that fine, but don't put them in prison for "thought-crime". I don't need a nanny-government (i.e.- the social democracies of Europe) telling me what's not healthy and "right" to read, or watch, or think. And the day it becomes that is the day I move away from this country, or the day I take arms up against it.

Agreed.

The way to combat a moron who denies the holocaust or wants to spread racist literature is to challenge him/her and disprove his claims with facts.

The only form of censorship I support would be to forbid the display of pornography or gratuitus violence in a public place or to school aged children.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2009, 07:27 AM
 
Location: wrong planet
5,168 posts, read 11,435,815 times
Reputation: 4379
Please stay on the topic of banning books, if you want to discuss politics in general, I suggest visiting our Politics and other controversies forum.
Thank you.
__________________
The price of anything is the amount of life you exchange for it. ~Henry David Thoreau


forum rules, please read them
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2009, 07:37 AM
 
6,034 posts, read 10,680,491 times
Reputation: 3989
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattie Jo View Post
Do you think any books should be banned? If so, why? If not, why?
No, I don't think any books should be banned. It's not up to a church, priest, government official, teacher, or my neighbor to tell me what I can and cannot read. It's not up to anyone but myself and the father of my children to tell them what they can read.

Censorship is bad, mmkay?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2009, 08:30 AM
 
2,377 posts, read 5,401,098 times
Reputation: 1728
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sunnydee View Post
If you look at history, each time books have been banned/burned bad things follow closely afterward.
Yes.. like the Inquistion
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2009, 08:41 AM
 
Location: Right where I want to be.
4,507 posts, read 9,060,696 times
Reputation: 3360
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattie Jo View Post
What about the violence that is created due to commentators in the news, due to Nazi material or other hate groups, what about the violence in movies that have caused our nation to become more violent? What about protecting our children until they are old enough to read these things?
It's your job to protect your children from materials you don't feel are appropriate for them. It's the job of any other parent to protect their children as well. By banning books you usurp that authority in the name of ..... protecting children?

Banning books doesn't eliminate hate, hate speech, hate groups or anything else that you think your children should not be exposed to.

Of course in your home you can ban anything you want and should be free to do so. We have tried to determine what is age appropriate but still challenging and informative. Our kids are teens, I can't think of much that we would want to ban instead of discuss. OK, we do have filters on the computer, mostly to keep out the porn so I guess we have a ban on porn.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2009, 06:15 PM
 
Location: Michigan--good on the rocks
2,544 posts, read 4,281,755 times
Reputation: 1958
If you want to protect your children you begin by educating them. Teach them how to think analytically and critically. Teach them how to weed out the truth from the lies. Teach them right from wrong. Teach them to respect and yet question authority. Be aware of what they are doing, what they are reading and listening to. Do not presuppose the right to tell me what I can or cannot allow my children to read, or myself.

Books should never be banned under any circumstances. The fundamental freedom underlying all others is freedom of thought. If you ban books, you begin to take that away.

The question which immediately comes to my mind when I hear of a book being banned is this: What knowledge is in there that someone doesn't want me to know?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2009, 06:27 PM
 
Location: Somewhere between here and there.
124 posts, read 333,686 times
Reputation: 58
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattie Jo View Post
What about the violence that is created due to commentators in the news, due to Nazi material or other hate groups, what about the violence in movies that have caused our nation to become more violent? What about protecting our children until they are old enough to read these things?

Violence created due to commentators? That is just so wrong. I haven't seen any commentators creating violence! If someone is violent it is their own choice and they can't blame what someone else says! People have always been violent. Ever read the bible? Very violent. There are more people on the earth now....more people=more violence.

And to answer the OP.....NO!!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Entertainment and Arts > Books
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top