Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-27-2013, 08:30 AM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,660 posts, read 67,557,504 times
Reputation: 21249

Advertisements

Modoc and Siskiyou counties.

Second county votes to secede from California | Al Jazeera America
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-27-2013, 10:16 AM
 
Location: San Diego, California Republic
16,588 posts, read 27,400,357 times
Reputation: 9059
Quote:
Over the years, many rural residents have been frustrated by federal environmental laws restricting logging and other forestry activities.
Unless they plan on also seceding from the USA, this will still apply. How does that glaringly obvious fact escape them?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-27-2013, 02:25 PM
 
Location: Carmichael, CA
2,410 posts, read 4,458,748 times
Reputation: 4379
It's my understanding that people in those counties are pretty much ignored by the "more important" parts of California and see themselves as paying taxes to support stuff that doesn't help them. Plus they don't see eye to eye with some of the California environmentalists. I have family in Yreka and hear lots of complaints from them against "those California people".

We have other cities that vote for things like "nuclear-free zone" and such, and everyone knows it has no real meaning, and no one has a problem with it. If the counties want to declare themselves to be free of California, what does it hurt?

It's unlikely that it will ever truly happen anyway. Don't they have to go through Congress or something?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-27-2013, 02:57 PM
 
Location: San Diego, California Republic
16,588 posts, read 27,400,357 times
Reputation: 9059
Quote:
Originally Posted by cb73 View Post
It's my understanding that people in those counties are pretty much ignored by the "more important" parts of California and see themselves as paying taxes to support stuff that doesn't help them. Plus they don't see eye to eye with some of the California environmentalists. I have family in Yreka and hear lots of complaints from them against "those California people".

We have other cities that vote for things like "nuclear-free zone" and such, and everyone knows it has no real meaning, and no one has a problem with it. If the counties want to declare themselves to be free of California, what does it hurt?

It's unlikely that it will ever truly happen anyway. Don't they have to go through Congress or something?
The tax thing is almost humorous. They receive more from the state than they pay in taxes so the way I look at it, let them go. That way the rest won't have to pay for them. The idea of a mostly rural state hasn't been viable since the days of the wild wild west. Medford or Redding would make decent capitals but they chose Yreka??? Then there's congress. Congress would have no real logical reason to say no other than it throwing the current balance into disarray with the addition of two more senators and a couple of congressmen. Congress would never vote on it though. They are going to shut down on Monday and with the gridlock that caused this circus, worrying about some rural part of the west coast that's far from anything is the least of their concerns. There's a better chance of Texas and California seceding from the union before there will be a state of Jefferson. We know how remote a chance the former is, the latter will forever remain just and idea and a wish IMO.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-30-2013, 06:42 PM
 
12,823 posts, read 24,411,374 times
Reputation: 11042
Isn't this a redundant thread?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-01-2013, 07:17 AM
 
Location: Orange County, CA
3,727 posts, read 6,226,240 times
Reputation: 4257
Quote:
Originally Posted by BayAreaHillbilly View Post
Isn't this a redundant thread?
Yes, which goes to show that this issue is not going away. These Northern California folks are serious about this, it is not just light hearted tongue-in-cheek humor. Last Friday one of the leaders of the movement was a guest on the John and Ken radio program, KFI 640 AM. This gentleman presented some very good points. One of them was that when Jefferson became business friendly by easing restrictions and regulations, many companies might relocate there instead of leaving the state, as they are now doing. This would create many jobs, greatly increase tax revenues, and enhance the overall prosperity of the area. Despite unfounded fears, environmental precautions would be observed, no company would be allowed to come in and wreck and despoil the area.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-01-2013, 07:25 AM
 
25,619 posts, read 36,717,554 times
Reputation: 23295
Been going on since the 19th century. Isn't gonna happen. As much as a state of Jefferson would be nice.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-01-2013, 08:50 AM
 
Location: San Diego, California Republic
16,588 posts, read 27,400,357 times
Reputation: 9059
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackShoe View Post
Yes, which goes to show that this issue is not going away. These Northern California folks are serious about this, it is not just light hearted tongue-in-cheek humor. Last Friday one of the leaders of the movement was a guest on the John and Ken radio program, KFI 640 AM. This gentleman presented some very good points. One of them was that when Jefferson became business friendly by easing restrictions and regulations, many companies might relocate there instead of leaving the state, as they are now doing. This would create many jobs, greatly increase tax revenues, and enhance the overall prosperity of the area. Despite unfounded fears, environmental precautions would be observed, no company would be allowed to come in and wreck and despoil the area.
I see a couple of problems with this; the first is, most of the restrictions are regulations they seem to have a problem with are federal ones effecting federal land. How does becoming a new state within the USA make that go away? the second is, businesses don't just pick up and move to a new area blindly. There must be some resources there like an educated population to do the jobs that will be brought in. There must be a proper infrastructure as well. In what way does a mostly rural area provide that? The people of "Jefferson" don't seem to realize the reason they like their area so much right now is because most of the elements they don't like are concentrated in other parts of their respective states hundreds of miles from them. That'll all change if they become a state and start to grow.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-01-2013, 08:52 AM
 
7,150 posts, read 10,902,925 times
Reputation: 3806
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackShoe View Post
Yes, which goes to show that this issue is not going away. These Northern California folks are serious about this, it is not just light hearted tongue-in-cheek humor. Last Friday one of the leaders of the movement was a guest on the John and Ken radio program, KFI 640 AM. This gentleman presented some very good points. One of them was that when Jefferson became business friendly by easing restrictions and regulations, many companies might relocate there instead of leaving the state, as they are now doing. This would create many jobs, greatly increase tax revenues, and enhance the overall prosperity of the area. Despite unfounded fears, environmental precautions would be observed, no company would be allowed to come in and wreck and despoil the area.
Ah, AM Radio talk ... great source for measuring the future ... and fleeing the Bay areas and south in droves for the far north? What a refreshing new take on the exodus!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-01-2013, 09:30 AM
 
Location: Redding,CA
200 posts, read 454,152 times
Reputation: 329
....and we may be adding a third county looking towards forming a new State of Jefferson with Shasta County examining this issue. Redding council puts Jefferson in the spotlight tonight » Redding Record Searchlight
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top