Villaraigosa and Newsom want to build more houses in California than ever before. Experts see the candidates' goal as an (Los Angeles: townhome, to buy)

[Radical347]

Originally Posted by Finper

I don't know one person that likes Newsome or voted for him. Lots of people think the election was fixed but not many liked Cox either.

Pretty much. I actually didn’t mind Brown, but I strongly dislike Newsom. Newsom is a product of the exact same type of arrogance that brought us Hillary/Trump (and unfortunately, one of those had to win.) For example, he didn’t even bother making a statement in the CA voter guides for either the primaries or general election. His section was completely blank. That said...Cox didn’t put up anything close to a fight.

Feinstein has been around for eons. People are comfortable with her but a good candidate could have beaten her. That definitely wasn't DeLe Loser

^^^exactly.

[CaliRestoration]

Originally Posted by wac_432

If it weren't for Trump poisoning the well, I would've voted for Cox, to balance our wackadoo legislature.

Well, unfortunately now you get to live the next 2-4 years under what you voted for. Higher taxes, more illegals, and possibly the dissolution of Prop 13.

[expatCA]

Originally Posted by CaliRestoration

Well, unfortunately now you get to live the next 2-4 years under what you voted for. Higher taxes, more illegals, and possibly the dissolution of Prop 13.

It is CA and, ... they don't care.

[NewbieHere]

One thing I approve from Newsom is that he decided to stop building the fast train. This is the dumb thing from Brown’s Governorship.

[CaliRestoration]

Originally Posted by NewbieHere

One thing I approve from Newsom is that he decided to stop building the fast train. This is the dumb thing from Brown’s Governorship.

I'm sure California tax payers are happy that billions were spent to tear up prime agricultural land between Bakersfield and Madera.

Sure it was worth all the costs (to contractors and sub-contractors who can now finance Harvard educations for their children).

[jm1982]

Originally Posted by CaliRestoration

I'm sure California tax payers are happy that billions were spent to tear up prime agricultural land between Bakersfield and Madera.

Sure it was worth all the costs (to contractors and sub-contractors who can now finance Harvard educations for their children).

What would California be without it’s cushy tax payer funded packages to developers and special interests?

[1AngryTaxPayer]

Originally Posted by CaliRestoration

I'm sure California tax payers are happy that billions were spent to tear up prime agricultural land between Bakersfield and Madera.

Sure it was worth all the costs (to contractors and sub-contractors who can now finance Harvard educations for their children).

Interesting how easy it was to do this for a train to nowhere but everyone thinks we can't do it to keep illegal aliens out from the South?

[jm1982]

From article today

—-
Governor Gavin Newsom wants to build 3.5 million homes across California over the next seven years. But there’s one glaring problem: the state doesn’t have enough land zoned for it.
UCLA said the state would have to double or triple the land zoned for housing to meet the goal. That means Newsom will have to push local governments to create more buildable land by upzoning residential parcels and rezoning non-residential parcels. He said last month he plans to withhold state tax dollars if they don’t meet housing goals.

https://therealdeal.com/la/2019/02/1...housing-goals/

[CaliRestoration]

Originally Posted by 1AngryTaxPayer

Interesting how easy it was to do this for a train to nowhere but everyone thinks we can't do it to keep illegal aliens out from the South?

One party rule needs a constant stream of new voters.

[jm1982]

Originally Posted by 1AngryTaxPayer

Interesting how easy it was to do this for a train to nowhere but everyone thinks we can't do it to keep illegal aliens out from the South?

Yeah true . It’s just they don’t want a wall , they don’t want to keep illegal aliens out