Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-31-2018, 09:19 PM
 
Location: Silicon Valley
18,813 posts, read 32,512,273 times
Reputation: 38576

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by expatCA View Post
Please try to avoid insulting anyone.


You have made many statements above and none apply directly to the one issue we discussed in the post I was responding to and that is health care. The State has done a terrible job managing the roads with the billions already allocated. What on earth makes you think they will do any better now, when not all of it goes for road repairs. Like with schools when new money went to them they took some of the old money that was supposed to go to schools away and spent it elsewhere. Learn from reality not what you may want.
Interesting. This proposition is about dialysis patients supposedly, but is really about these private companies profiting to an ungodly degree. Yet, now you're talking about it having to do with generic health care in the state.

Then, you bring in road repairs.

And, wait, now it's about schools...

But, I shouldn't insult you.

However, you are insulting anyone with a brain, in my opinion, with these supposed arguments regarding a proposition for subsidizing these private dialysis clinics, which have zero to do with basic healthcare or roads or schools.

Do you really think this argument, that's like using scatter shot, is going to work for you?

If so, I disagree.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-01-2018, 11:57 AM
 
18,172 posts, read 16,403,105 times
Reputation: 9328
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoMoreSnowForMe View Post
Interesting. This proposition is about dialysis patients supposedly, but is really about these private companies profiting to an ungodly degree. Yet, now you're talking about it having to do with generic health care in the state.

Then, you bring in road repairs.

And, wait, now it's about schools...

But, I shouldn't insult you.

However, you are insulting anyone with a brain, in my opinion, with these supposed arguments regarding a proposition for subsidizing these private dialysis clinics, which have zero to do with basic healthcare or roads or schools.

Do you really think this argument, that's like using scatter shot, is going to work for you?

If so, I disagree.
Hi, Sorry I was thinking it was another thread.


The dialysis question is one I have no opinion on as I see problems with a yes or no.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-01-2018, 06:35 PM
 
Location: Silicon Valley
18,813 posts, read 32,512,273 times
Reputation: 38576
Quote:
Originally Posted by expatCA View Post
Hi, Sorry I was thinking it was another thread.


The dialysis question is one I have no opinion on as I see problems with a yes or no.
Haha, happens to the best of us. :-)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-01-2018, 08:01 PM
 
Location: So Ca
26,735 posts, read 26,820,948 times
Reputation: 24795
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbunniii View Post
This has to be one of the more random ballot initiatives I've seen in years. Why specifically dialysis?
It's a labor dispute. Voters shouldn't be the ones settling it. Nor should we be limiting the revenue of a private enterprise. Vote no.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2018, 11:44 PM
 
Location: Madison, WI
1,044 posts, read 2,768,789 times
Reputation: 984
Quote:
Originally Posted by CA4Now View Post
It's a labor dispute. Voters shouldn't be the ones settling it. Nor should we be limiting the revenue of a private enterprise. Vote no.
"No" is my default position on most ballot initiatives. This one was no exception.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
Similar Threads
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:06 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top